Jetfan13 Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Would it be possible for us to make a run at Jamaal Charles? Reid has always been a pass first coach, he has wasted running backs for years. Charles may want out, what r your thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsJETStime Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Did Andy Reid give up LeSean McCoy??? NO Jamal Charles is one of the reasons Reid would choose KC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 KC just got one hell of a head coach. The Jets aren't getting Jamaal Charles b/c Reid likes to pass a lot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted January 3, 2013 Share Posted January 3, 2013 Reid uses rb as extension of passing game (westbrook, mccoy). Charles is good catching ball out of backfield. Good fit actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Charles will thrive in Reid's offense, that doesn't require the RB to be a bruising heavy-touch athlete. In what universe do we have the ammunition to make such a trade anyway... completely unrealistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Andy Reid only took the job there because he thought he was applying at the KFC Chefs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted January 4, 2013 Author Share Posted January 4, 2013 Charles will thrive in Reid's offense, that doesn't require the RB to be a bruising heavy-touch athlete. In what universe do we have the ammunition to make such a trade anyway... completely unrealistic. Did I mention a trade? It was just a hypothetical, hence the words " would it be possible". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Dexter McCluster. Big time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Did I mention a trade? It was just a hypothetical, hence the words " would it be possible". Well, as far as I know he isn't a FA this off-season, so trade is the only logical alternative. Of course I was assuming kidnapping and magic were off the table as options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 . Of course I was assuming kidnapping and magic were off the table as options. LMAO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted January 4, 2013 Author Share Posted January 4, 2013 Well, as far as I know he isn't a FA this off-season, so trade is the only logical alternative. Of course I was assuming kidnapping and magic were off the table as options. Then a simple no would suffice, Einstein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Maybe we could package Shonn Greene and Vlad Ducasse for Jamaal Charles and Tamba Hali. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Then a simple no would suffice, Einstein. If you wanted to acquire Charles via free agency, then you should have Google "jamaal charles" to see if he was a free agent. Instead of implying Reid wouldn't need a 1500 yard rusher (despite makning studs out of both Westbrook and McCoy in Philly) and want to get rid of him, which implies trading. Einstein. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetfan13 Posted January 4, 2013 Author Share Posted January 4, 2013 If you wanted to acquire Charles via free agency, then you should have Google "jamaal charles" to see if he was a free agent. Instead of implying Reid wouldn't need a 1500 yard rusher (despite makning studs out of both Westbrook and McCoy in Philly) and want to get rid of him, which implies trading. Einstein. u r the only one implying anything. Read my post, I asked "WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 u r the only one implying anything. Read my post, I asked "WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE". I read it again. Still dumb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 If you wanted to acquire Charles via free agency, then you should have Google "jamaal charles" to see if he was a free agent. Instead of implying Reid wouldn't need a 1500 yard rusher (despite makning studs out of both Westbrook and McCoy in Philly) and want to get rid of him, which implies trading. Einstein. Andy Reid could always cut him outright, 1500 yard rushers who can catch out of the backfield are interchangeable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 u r the only one implying anything. Read my post, I asked "WOULD IT BE POSSIBLE". I read it again. Still dumb. Andy Reid could always cut him outright, 1500 yard rushers who can catch out of the backfield are interchangeable LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Well, as far as I know he isn't a FA this off-season, so trade is the only logical alternative. Of course I was assuming kidnapping and magic were off the table as options. could be your best post evah!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted January 4, 2013 Share Posted January 4, 2013 Great thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.