Scott Dierking Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Just now, T0mShane said: Ah. Yes. My belief is that Hackenberg lacks the talent to be the starter for the New York Jets. Not sure I needed Hughes or Mehta to help me with that argument(?) What I witness: -Beat writers agree with Shane agenda: Shane hugs them like a a Literature major to Chaucer. -Beat writers report against Shane agenda: Shane clamors about media bias and self serving future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 17 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: What I witness: -Beat writers agree with Shane agenda: Shane hugs them like a a Literature major to Chaucer. -Beat writers report against Shane agenda: Shane clamors about media bias and self serving future. A Chaucer reference on JN?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 16 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: What I witness: -Beat writers agree with Shane agenda: Shane hugs them like a a Literature major to Chaucer. -Beat writers report against Shane agenda: Shane clamors about media bias and self serving future. Chaucer is terrible. And what you just described are the fundamentals of conversation. "Con," in Latin, meaning "against." You agree with some points, disagree with others. Like, you and @Jet Nut were very excited three days ago, but you're not as excited now. It's the ebb and flow, baby. The good and the bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 52 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: What I witness: -Beat writers agree with Shane agenda: Shane hugs them like a a Literature major to Chaucer. -Beat writers report against Shane agenda: Shane clamors about media bias and self serving future. This seems like the more appropriate Geoffrey for JN: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 32 minutes ago, T0mShane said: Chaucer is terrible. And what you just described are the fundamentals of conversation. "Con," in Latin, meaning "against." You agree with some points, disagree with others. Like, you and @Jet Nut were very excited three days ago, but you're not as excited now. It's the ebb and flow, baby. The good and the bad. Ugh, find a report that should change my mind? You're rooting for a guy who doesn't have a chance in hell of starting, I'm not. Didn't read a single report all spring and summer giving Petty the nod for a single practice by anyone. 3 days ago they weren't practicing, nothing to get excited over, have no idea what team you root for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 17 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: This seems like the more appropriate Geoffrey for JN: No. The most appropriate would be JOFFREY..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 All the QB's SUCK cant we all get along..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 2 hours ago, T0mShane said: Chaucer is terrible. And what you just described are the fundamentals of conversation. "Con," in Latin, meaning "against." You agree with some points, disagree with others. Like, you and @Jet Nut were very excited three days ago, but you're not as excited now. It's the ebb and flow, baby. The good and the bad. Wow so you agree with people who agree with you and disagree with people who disagree with you? lol bias much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 I'm not trying to throw myself into the schlong measuring contest of the day but there is no ******* way that Tom has read Canterbury Tales. Absolute zero chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 9 hours ago, RutgersJetFan said: I'm not trying to throw myself into the schlong measuring contest of the day but there is no ******* way that Tom has read Canterbury Tales. Absolute zero chance. Were you here for his prose to GGG at the beginning of this site? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage69 Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 12 hours ago, T0mShane said: Chaucer is terrible. And what you just described are the fundamentals of conversation. "Con," in Latin, meaning "against." You agree with some points, disagree with others. Like, you and @Jet Nut were very excited three days ago, but you're not as excited now. It's the ebb and flow, baby. The good and the bad. True but in Spanish it means with.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 Just now, Savage69 said: True but in Spanish it means with.. Oh I know. It's featured in Despacito many times. That Bieber has some pipes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 10 hours ago, dbatesman said: Wow so you agree with people who agree with you and disagree with people who disagree with you? lol bias much It's my fatal flaw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 10 hours ago, dbatesman said: Wow so you agree with people who agree with you and disagree with people who disagree with you? lol bias much Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tfine Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 I hate how the Jets beat writers treat camp like it's beneath them to cover it, like they're being inconvenienced by fans to report on it. The Jets beat is the only group I've ever seen who does this. In Buffalo, the media treats the camps like they're major events and they break stories, write really smart pieces on them, and do enthusiastic, compelling radio spots on them. Same with the Giants guys. But the back-benchers who cover the Jets act like they're in summer school for failing algebra or some sh*t. Remember when Connor Hughes wrote that item about Hack hitting reporters at practice and every other writer was like, "whoa, hey, stay in your lane, kid?" It's because they all have a bunch of pre-written articles they can submit ten minutes after practice ends, then head off to Buffalo Wild Wings to get hammered on the company credit card. This is the best post you've ever had. So true. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 5, 2017 Share Posted August 5, 2017 15 minutes ago, tfine said: This is the best post you've ever had. So true. Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app I've had easily 429 posts significantly better than that one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.