RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM 3 hours ago, mfmartin said: Getting paid fully for half the work. He didn't get an extension or the 3/75mil he was originally looking for. He lost. 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Just now, Rhg1084 said: I mean Clemons is pretty terrible he didn’t secure the edge cost us the win last week against Allen. Reddick is a big upgrade Reddick is not good against the run. This is a pretty well known fact. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethead Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Good news. He makes the team stronger. I hope he sticks around. Go Jets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanadaSteve Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:22 PM 21 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: So , if I have an hourly job that I am scheduled for forty hours a week, and I only work 20 hours, but get paid for my scheduled 40 hours, who wins? THE LABOUR UNIONS! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted Sunday at 03:23 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:23 PM Woody interferes, Jets cave in Nothing to see here, business a usual. Just why is Joe Douglas getting a pay check again? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:24 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:24 PM 22 minutes ago, Scott Dierking said: So , if I have an hourly job that I am scheduled for forty hours a week, and I only work 20 hours, but get paid for my scheduled 40 hours, who wins? Not the guy who wanted an ironclad 3 year contract for 75 million. I'll tell you that. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:28 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:28 PM 2 minutes ago, Beerfish said: Woody interferes, Jets cave in Nothing to see here, business a usual. Just why is Joe Douglas getting a pay check again? You are just making sh*t up. Reddick did not get the long term contract he desperately wanted. He's playing on a 1 year deal and reporting on Monday. Then they will continue to talk. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted Sunday at 03:28 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:28 PM 3 minutes ago, RevisIsland610 said: Not the guy who wanted an ironclad 3 year contract for 75 million. I'll tell you that. Stay tuned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:29 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:29 PM 4 minutes ago, RevisIsland610 said: Not the guy who wanted an ironclad 3 year contract for 75 million. I'll tell you that. They both lost. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slimjasi Posted Sunday at 03:29 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:29 PM 5 minutes ago, Beerfish said: Woody interferes, Jets cave in Nothing to see here, business a usual. Just why is Joe Douglas getting a pay check again? How, precisely, did the jets “cave” it seems pretty clear that Reddick caved, but I look forward to your detailed response 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:30 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:30 PM Just now, Green Ghost said: Stay tuned. And he will be in camp if/when an agreement is reached on a longer deal. Just like the Jets said months ago. He also won't get anywhere near 3/75 mil. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:31 PM 1 minute ago, jgb said: They both lost. How did the Jets lose? They were always willing to sweeten the deal this year without extending until he first reported. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:32 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:32 PM 3 minutes ago, Green Ghost said: Stay tuned. Stay tuned until when? Monday when he reports without the long term deal he wanted? You're grasping at straws. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:32 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:32 PM Just now, RevisIsland610 said: How did the Jets lose? They were always willing to sweeten the deal this year without extending until he first reported. They didn't have him for 7 weeks, in which we suffered 3 one-score losses. They lost due to opportunity cost. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plen T Posted Sunday at 03:34 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:34 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:35 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:35 PM 4 minutes ago, jgb said: They both lost. The Jets were always willing to give him more money for this year. They weren't willing to give him a multi-year deal. Jets didn't. Reddick is here playing for the same same money *if* he meets a bunch of incentives. He didn't just lose, he got raped. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plen T Posted Sunday at 03:36 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:36 PM I thought you couldn’t waive fines? Lol these reporters don’t know sh*t Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:36 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:36 PM Just now, bicketybam said: The Jets were always willing to give him more money for this year. They weren't willing to give him a multi-year deal. Jets didn't. Reddick is here playing for the same same money *if* he meets a bunch of incentives. He didn't just lose, he got raped. Reddick likely lost "worse" but it sure would've been nice to have him (or someone else) for the first 7 weeks. JD should've had an agreement in writing as a condition of the trade, or pursued another target (or kept JFM). 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM 1 minute ago, jgb said: They didn't have him for 7 weeks, in which we suffered 3 one-score losses. They lost due to opportunity cost. I'm talking about the very public negotiations. His previous agency dumped him because he was delusional and then the new guy, after seeking a trade and finding no interest, persuaded him that reporting would be in his best interest. Reddick handled this poorly. He lost. It's very questionable if having him on the field would have prevented any of the 3 losses. I guess we will never know. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:38 PM Just now, jgb said: Reddick likely lost "worse" but it sure would've been nice to have him (or someone else) for the first 7 weeks. JD should've had an agreement in writing as a condition of the trade, or pursued another target (or kept JFM). You're moving in the right direction. Lose the word "likely" and you're a lot closer to the reality of the situation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:40 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:40 PM 3 minutes ago, RevisIsland610 said: I'm talking about the very public negotiations. His previous agency dumped him because he was delusional and then the new guy, after seeking a trade and finding no interest, persuaded him that reporting would be in his best interest. Reddick handled this poorly. He lost. It's very questionable if having him on the field would have prevented any of the 3 losses. I guess we will never know. Of course it's questionable (what in sports is not?) but keep in mind, pursuing him also carried the additional opportunity cost of not perusing someone else or keeping JFM. Reddick is an idiot but JD didn't cross the T's and dot the I's in the initial trade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:41 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:41 PM 2 minutes ago, bicketybam said: You're moving in the right direction. Lose the word "likely" and you're a lot closer to the reality of the situation. So the win here is that an individual player lost more than the team. Ok, enjoy that victory lap, I suppose. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM The Jets could have just increased Reddick's base salary to cover the fines. The Jets said, "uh, uh, uh" while waving their finger in his face. Instead they are going to make him hit incentives to ensure he just doesn't mail it in. Fantastic job by Jets management. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:43 PM 1 minute ago, jgb said: Of course it's questionable but keep in mind, pursuing him also carried the additional opportunity cost of not perusing someone else or keeping JFM. Reddick is an idiot but JD didn't cross the T's and dot the I's in the initial trade. This is all true but people who think that Reddick somehow comes out of this looking good are as delusional as he is. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:44 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:44 PM Just now, RevisIsland610 said: This is all true but people who think that Reddick somehow comes out of this looking good are as delusional as he is. Oh, Reddick comes out looking like a freaking moron. Jets just also suffered collateral damage. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:46 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:46 PM 2 minutes ago, jgb said: So the win here is that an individual player lost more than the team. Ok, enjoy that victory lap, I suppose. Jets were always willing to give him more money for this year. But instead of him getting guaranteed more money to cover his fines, he now has to hit certain incentives. The Jets losing the game changing services of Haasan Reddick for 7 games is better than overpaying him on a 3 year contract. Win Jets, ass rape Reddick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets723 Posted Sunday at 03:46 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:46 PM 23 minutes ago, Jethead said: Good news. He makes the team stronger. I hope he sticks around. Go Jets. Well it depends what shape he is in. It depends if we win tonight Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM 3 minutes ago, bicketybam said: Jets were always willing to give him more money for this year. But instead of him getting guaranteed more money to cover his fines, he now has to hit certain incentives. The Jets losing the game changing services of Haasan Reddick for 7 games is better than overpaying him on a 3 year contract. Win Jets, ass rape Reddick. If only there was some legal mechanism to memorialize two parties' mutual obligations to each other ahead of time. And if only JD knew about such a thing when entering the trade with the Eagles. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:49 PM 2 minutes ago, Jets723 said: Well it depends what shape he is in. It depends if we win tonight Didn't you see those Twitter vids he posted? He's in beast mode! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Ghost Posted Sunday at 03:50 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:50 PM 11 minutes ago, RevisIsland610 said: This is all true but people who think that Reddick somehow comes out of this looking good are as delusional as he is. I’ve never seen one person post Reddick “looked good” at any point since this began. I certainly haven’t seen it today. What I have seen plenty of is “JD should’ve done his due dilegence” plenty of “let him rot” or “Reddick will eventually get his deal here or somewhere else” stuff the past 4-5 months. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted Sunday at 03:52 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:52 PM 42 minutes ago, Fantasy Island said: Reddick getting paid same amount for 9 games as 17. Reddick won 1 minute ago, Green Ghost said: I’ve never seen one person say Reddick “looked good” at any point since back when this began. I certainly haven’t seen it today. What I have seen plenty of is “JD should’ve done his due dilegence” plenty of “let him rot” or “Reddick will eventually get his deal here or somewhere else” stuff the past 4-5 months. Reading is fundamental 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted Sunday at 03:58 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:58 PM 3 hours ago, mfmartin said: 65% of the pay for half the work 3 hours ago, Larz said: Math not your thing ? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RevisIsland610 Posted Sunday at 03:59 PM Share Posted Sunday at 03:59 PM 1 minute ago, Green Ghost said: I’ve never seen one person say Reddick “looked good” at any point since back when this began. I certainly haven’t seen it today. What I have seen plenty of is “JD should’ve done his due dilegence” plenty of “let him rot” or “Reddick will eventually get his deal here or somewhere else” stuff the past 4-5 months. Oh please. Some people said he would flat out win this thing. He did not. Reporting on his 1 year deal, and then they will talk. The only people around here who are trying to save face are the geniuses who said he would never report without a new contract or that he would never play a down for the Jets and would get traded. Sound familiar? 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted Sunday at 04:02 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:02 PM All I know after all this BS is that if he doesn’t play like Lawrence Taylor and start wrecking games then it’s another Woody FUBAR 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM Share Posted Sunday at 04:03 PM 2 hours ago, OilfieldJet said: This. Saleh deserved to get fired, but a mid season termination is going to drive us to another complete re-do. Anything Woody does is without any commercial, operational, financial or football sense or thought. He doesn’t own those qualities. “Thinking is overrated” cemented that. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.