L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 I don't know how to add a link so piss off lol ,but I just seen it on the Nfl network . Imo he is better than Tim Dwight Discuss?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 I don't know how to add a link so piss off lol ,but I just seen it on the Nfl network . Imo he is better than Tim Dwight Discuss?? Would be a nice 3rd receiver for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 We need a deep tall threat. Stokley is not the answer for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DefenseWinsChampionships Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 He is no Wayne Chrebet, sorry but I dont want him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 It's not that he is Wayne but he would not do anything in our offense. We need a real deep threat and we don't have that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Stokely would be a great addition to this team. He's a very good possession receiver and the deep threat receiver that we could use is negated by Penny's arm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Stokely would be a great addition to this team. He's a very good possession receiver and the deep threat receiver that we could use is negated by Penny's arm. Deep threat reciver ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Deep threat reciver ? :opps: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Stokley would be a nice addition but if Dwight wasn't released by now he may be sticking around for another season. He was our best option at PR and he was good in the slot when healthy. Also, Brad Smith is the supposeded future slot man receiver so why bring yet another one in? Makes no sense to me but I wouldn't complain too much if we brought him in, if we release Dwight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Stokley would be a nice addition but if Dwight wasn't released by now he may be sticking around for another season. He was our best option at PR and he was good in the slot when healthy. Also, Brad Smith is the supposeded future slot man receiver so why bring yet another one in? Makes no sense to me but I wouldn't complain too much if we brought him in, if we release Dwight. Only thing is, he would probably cost a lot more money than Dwight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Deep threat reciver ? You may have misread what I meant. Stokely is not a deep threat receiver. However, we do not necessarily need one because Penny's lack of arm strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Only thing is, he would probably cost a lot more money than Dwight. With about $28 million in cap space, I don't think money is going to be that big of an issue for a receiver whose coming off an injury plagued season and is nothing more than a slot man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Deep threat? We are never going to have a deep threat as long as Pennington is the QB. We could have Bullet Bob Hayes and Cliff Branch lined up in the slot and they'd both be possession receivers. I wouldn't mind taking a look at Stokley, assuming the price was right. He'd be better than McCareins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 You may have misread what I meant. Stokely is not a deep threat receiver. However, we do not necessarily need one because Penny's lack of arm strength. Your right, but again I think we need a DEEP THREAT. We don't have to throw him the ball everytime but its just another defender away from the ball and then maybe we can go short. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Guy is also pretty injury prone, its a nice idea but we can spend our money better elsewhere.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MTJ06 Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Deep threat? We are never going to have a deep threat as long as Pennington is the QB. We could have Bullet Bob Hayes and Cliff Branch lined up in the slot and they'd both be possession receivers. I wouldn't mind taking a look at Stokley, assuming the price was right. He'd be better than McCareins. Troll, What if the Jets were in shotgun formation with those guys and as soon as Penny got the snap he ran forward and throw it as far as he could, I think he might be able to hit them for a 20 yard gain and then maybe they could use their speed to take it to the house. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/players/4755/career;_ylt=AjsyBPXUKKNnTH3EXS98zFL.uLYF Stokley only played 3 full seasons in his 8 in the pros.... only over 1000 yds once... and turns 31 in training camp..... and is coming back from a ruptured achilles.... No thanks.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 Didn't the Colts just give him a pretty big contract right after the 2004 season? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted March 2, 2007 Share Posted March 2, 2007 Didn't the Colts just give him a pretty big contract right after the 2004 season? http://www.fanball.com/football/playerProfile.cfm/pid.1650/Brandon/Stokley/ Contract Details Stokley signed a two-year deal with the Colts in the spring of 2003. His contract was restructured in February 2004 by lowering his '04 base pay to $535,000 and giving him a signing bonus of $970,600. Stokley and the Colts agreed in principle to a five-year, $17 million contract extension in December 2004, according to the Indianapolis Star, and Stokley signed the deal in January 2005. The contract includes a $5 million signing bonus that will be paid in two installments. He is due a $2.1 million base salary to go with a $500,000 roster bonus in March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.