SayNoToDMC Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 I would not want to give up half the active roster.. we are not fine with the running backs... how could you watch last year and think we are?? thomas jones is not a home run threat and never will be...leon wahington is a scat back at best... DMC is both of them combined.. Do you really think that Run "Until a defender touches me" DMC would have done any better behind the O-line we fielded last year, combined with our **** QB play? The issue wasn't the running backs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 I'm sorry but I don't know what an idsot is. Just kidding, but that was very bad timing for a spelling mistake. LOL Do you really think that Run "Until a defender touches me" DMC would have done any better behind the O-line we fielded last year, combined with our **** QB play? The issue wasn't the running backs. DMC IS A HOME RUN THREAT.. LIKE THEY SAID ON THE NFL NETWORK..MENDENHALL AND STEWART WIL BE GOOD... BUT DMC CAN WIN GAMES... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 DMC IS A HOME RUN THREAT.. LIKE THEY SAID ON THE NFL NETWORK..MENDENHALL AND STEWART WIL BE GOOD... BUT DMC CAN WIN GAMES... That doesn't even come close to answering what I asked......... I'm not sure whether or not you're a retarded person, or just a posting program with canned responses to hype DMC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 DMC IS A HOME RUN THREAT.. LIKE THEY SAID ON THE NFL NETWORK..MENDENHALL AND STEWART WIL BE GOOD... BUT DMC CAN WIN GAMES... I know. I was making fun of your retarded statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 he wins games..hes a homerun threat... thoms jones is old... washington is nothing... and chatman..wont even be there in a year or so.. look theres no reason to argue this anymore..we will all see what happens draft day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 he wins games..hes a homerun threat... thoms jones is old... washington is nothing... and chatman..wont even be there in a year or so.. Dumbest. Post. Ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 he wins games..hes a homerun threat... thoms jones is old... washington is nothing... and chatman..wont even be there in a year or so.. look theres no reason to argue this anymore..we will all see what happens draft day... So you won't make anymore DMC threads or turn every unrelated thread on the board into a DMC debate? Fantastic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 There is no f'ing way I want the Jets to draft McFadden, ESPECIALLY if it costs us our best 34 Defensive End. Screw that. Who would the Jets play at DE then? Dewayne Robertson? Are you joking me? I know some knuckleheads think he can play there, but, he can't. This has got to be a freakin' joke. Hopefully the Jets pull their heads out of their arses and do not give up Coleman. They have nobody to replace him with. Starting a 43 DT bust whose counting $11 million on the cap this season at 34 DE is a mistake if that is their reasoning behind this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 There is no f'ing way I want the Jets to draft McFadden, ESPECIALLY if it costs us our best 34 Defensive End. Screw that. Who would the Jets play at DE then? Dewayne Robertson? Are you joking me? I know some knuckleheads think he can play there, but, he can't. This has got to be a freakin' joke. Hopefully the Jets pull their heads out of their arses and do not give up Coleman. They have nobody to replace him with. Starting a 43 DT bust whose counting $11 million on the cap this season at 34 DE is a mistake if that is their reasoning behind this. Couldn't agree more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 Your dealing with a bunch of id$ots half the time..there are a few on here that are knowlegable and know what there talking about..the other nes just say stupid sh*t if they dont like a player... I just wish they showed there ages so then I know exactly who I was responding too.. 25 Most of us have said why we don't like him. I don't want to go in on it again. I know it is hard to believe but some of us don't see DMC as the next anything, regardless of his yards from the QB position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 According to "Favorite_Toon" everyone here is an uneducated idiot / moron unless they agree with him in terms of the Jets "MUST" draft Darren McFadden because he is the second coming of Jesus Christ, and actually has 1.5% of Christs' blood running through his veins. This is coming from the poster (FT) who can think of nothing but insulting other posters with you're "unknowledgeable" or an "idiot" everytime another poster doesn't agree with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 This just has to do with Favorite toons man crush on Mcfadden. And someone speculating at a trade. Tannenbaum isn't going to trade up for him. Bank on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 There is no f'ing way I want the Jets to draft McFadden, ESPECIALLY if it costs us our best 34 Defensive End. Screw that. Who would the Jets play at DE then? Dewayne Robertson? Are you joking me? I know some knuckleheads think he can play there, but, he can't. This has got to be a freakin' joke. Hopefully the Jets pull their heads out of their arses and do not give up Coleman. They have nobody to replace him with. Starting a 43 DT bust whose counting $11 million on the cap this season at 34 DE is a mistake if that is their reasoning behind this. Agreed. DRob @ 3-4 DE might be an interesting experiment if he were costing $1M or so against the cap, but at $8.5M it's not even worth thinking about. I don't think there is any other DE we are looking to scoop up if we move Coleman so we'd be right back in a hole on the DLine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeniorFlaJet Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 This rumor is just what happens this time of the year with all the top draft picks. I don't think its true for the following reasons: It didn't come from the Tanginni crew because you would have to stick toothpicks under their fingernails to get them to tell anything. These type of trades involving teams moving up or down for top picks doesn't happen until the night before the draft or that day. Why even consider it 5 weeks before the draft. More draft sites have Al Davis wanting DMC so why is he thinking of trading down if you are going just by rumors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4HCrew Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 There is no way in hell this scenario pans out... it just does not make sense on many fronts. Granted I can see Woody wanting a "star" like McFadden for his new stadium but that is too far down the line to warrant doing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobbyjet69 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 How many more threads on DMC is Favorite Loon gonna start. Hey mods, do you have a count on how many? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 This is to get someone to try to trade up with us, to prevent us from moving up ourselves. At least that's what I think. With Mangini's emphasis on character & brains, I think they're as interested in DMC as they are in bringing DRob back in 2008 (which they've also said they'd do), and in alluding to the QB job being an open competition while also saying they'll entertain offers for one of them. First time he's had to take notes? Yeah, I'm sure that made Mangini scream out "Get that kid on my team. Give up my only true 3-4 DE and what other player(s) I might have ended up with at #6 or by trading down." Anyway, like I said, that's what I think anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Favorite_Toon Posted March 22, 2008 Author Share Posted March 22, 2008 How many more threads on DMC is Favorite Loon gonna start. Hey mods, do you have a count on how many? ' This was news that I seen when I woke up this morning.. I report all news I see reguarding the NY jets.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docdhc Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 This is to get someone to try to trade up with us, to prevent us from moving up ourselves. At least that's what I think. With Mangini's emphasis on character & brains, I think they're as interested in DMC as they are in bringing DRob back in 2008 (which they've also said they'd do), and in alluding to the QB job being an open competition while also saying they'll entertain offers for one of them. First time he's had to take notes? Yeah, I'm sure that made Mangini scream out "Get that kid on my team. Give up my only true 3-4 DE and what other player(s) I might have ended up with at #6 or by trading down." Anyway, like I said, that's what I think anyway. Your assessment makes the most sense and I sure hope you are right. Dealing with that senile old goat would be bad enough, but to trade up in a draft that everyone wants to trade down in, and get a player you don't really need, would really rank as a bonehead move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 Your assessment makes the most sense and I sure hope you are right. Dealing with that senile old goat would be bad enough, but to trade up in a draft that everyone wants to trade down in, and get a player you don't really need, would really rank as a bonehead move. Well if no one thinks the Jets are interested in THEIR guy, they need only trade up to the slot below the Jets. Mangini did this in 2006 as well. I think they also wanted to trade down but that draft was WAY too deep for anyone to truly consider that ultra-costly move up into the top-4. So they settled on the one (thought-to-be) sure thing who had a true top-5 grade at a position of dire need. They intensely interviewed Jay Cutler for hours & apparently had come away plenty impressed on paper (and his arm was known to be as good as anyone's)...only to select someone else. So I think it's a ploy. Unfortunately, I think the other GM's realize it's a ploy. He does a little too much public acclaim of players he ends up passing on. Parcells used to do that. Problem is, if you never take a player that you publicly say you liked a lot, you're never believable in that regard either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaborJet Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 Well if no one thinks the Jets are interested in THEIR guy, they need only trade up to the slot below the Jets. Mangini did this in 2006 as well. I think they also wanted to trade down but that draft was WAY too deep for anyone to truly consider that ultra-costly move up into the top-4. So they settled on the one (thought-to-be) sure thing who had a true top-5 grade at a position of dire need. They intensely interviewed Jay Cutler for hours & apparently had come away plenty impressed on paper (and his arm was known to be as good as anyone's)...only to select someone else. So I think it's a ploy. Unfortunately, I think the other GM's realize it's a ploy. He does a little too much public acclaim of players he ends up passing on. Parcells used to do that. Problem is, if you never take a player that you publicly say you liked a lot, you're never believable in that regard either. Yeah, the draft is one big poker game. Everyone is full of sh**. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gsnts725 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 stupid trade i wouldnt even bother. why would u hurt the pass rush when you just improved it with Calvin Pace to get a potential bust in McFadden? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greensince69 Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 I would much rather trade down and get someone like Mendenhal who is a more physical runner, and will be a better pro for more years. You win by long grinding drives that eat clock. I also would rather save the extra money getting out of the top 6, sing a lesset first rounder, and get an extra pick ti help the secondary and WR slots. It is definatly not worth trading up and I think tangini is too smart to do it. I agree with Sperm that it is all a game at this point. Heck theey could even be doing it so the cowboys over spend to get the 3rd pick and they won have to draft Dmac and not have to hear the bad press of why they did not if he was available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaumerJet Posted March 22, 2008 Share Posted March 22, 2008 Jets contact the Raiders to trade up to get Mcfadden Wed.the 19th Lee "Hacksaw" Hamilton reported there was breaking news the the Jets have contacted the Raiders about trading up to Draft McFadden. The trade would allow the Raiders to still draft a top pick from the Jets 6th spot. Story Link http://www.xtrasports1360.com/pages/sportswatch.html Player stats http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/player...?playerId=3675 NFL stats 2007 player tackle leaders http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorysta...xperience=null UPDATE: Thursday 3/20 Lee reported the Raiders want to swap picks plus get D-lineman Kenyon Coleman. Kenyon led ALL defensive lineman in tackles last year!!! He can play DE and DT. He is 6 foot 5 inches and weighs 295. He can play the 4-3 and 3-4. It would give the Jets a superstar and franchise face in NY. The Raiders would get 2 potential starters by still being able to draft one of the top lineman on either side of the ball plus the player involved from the Jets. http://www.profootballtalk.com/2008/...ling-mcfadden/ The article above said the Jets would have to move to the Falcons 3rd spot to jump ahead of the Raiders, but sources say the Jets may be able to take the Raiders 4th spot instead with the Raiders going a different direction. The Falcons signed Michael Turner to a big contract and the only way they would draft Mcfadden is if the Cowboys renewed their interest in him. Then it might be a battle for who wants him most! Did anyone notice that this FOXSPORTS rumor came from a SAN DIEGO RADIO station? Or the fact that it's the only station in the Southland that still simulcasts RAIDERS football games? It's just a rumor & a bad one at that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 If this had any factuality, where is ESPN, FOX, CBS & NFL Network? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardJetsFan Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 If this had any factuality, where is ESPN, FOX, CBS & NFL Network? Thats what im saying' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 If this had any factuality, where is ESPN, FOX, CBS & NFL Network? If it was even possible it would have at least made SI's truth and rumors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DieHardJetsFan Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 If it was even possible it would have at least made SI's truth and rumors You know any of the "Truth and rumors" Going around in SI as of now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooliojets Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 if we draft mcfadden, i bet he play QB for us. We got no one but pennington and he looks to be on his way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 23, 2008 Share Posted March 23, 2008 We trade up and lose an ok defensive end, but keep all our other picks? Sign me the **** up for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.