jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 My first thought on who should go to the pro bowl 1.D Harris 2.D Revis 3.T Richardson 4.N Mangold 5.C Jenkins 6.K Rhodes 7.C Pace (long shot but maybe) And VG for d rookie of the year 12 sacks Whats the rest of the nation think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 QB Chad Pennington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 make it a poll!!! btw Kerry's first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.S. Dylan Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Popularity contest and everyone hates us so I think none but maybe Leon washington and harris can make it, or rhodes if he plays big early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Kerry Rhodes has no chance. He has the great John Lynch blocking his way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Same as last year.....Linda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 My first thought on who should go to the pro bowl 1.D Harris 2.D Revis 3.T Richardson 4.N Mangold 5.C Jenkins 6.K Rhodes 7.C Pace (long shot but maybe) And VG for d rookie of the year 12 sacks Whats the rest of the nation think? The Pro Bowl means ****, Rhodes proved that the last 2 years. What you should all be concerned with is I'm drunk and board so I put 500 on the Tigers since the Yankees already played today. This is the only game I have on TV and I know very little about baseball. I can't wait for football season, it's the only sport I win at betting on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Same as last year.....Linda. Thanks for adding so much to this thread. You are a very valuable poster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bear Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 My first thought on who should go to the pro bowl 1.D Harris 2.D Revis 3.T Richardson 4.N Mangold 5.C Jenkins 6.K Rhodes 7.C Pace (long shot but maybe) And VG for d rookie of the year 12 sacks Whats the rest of the nation think? 1)rhodes =probowl lock 2)harris =tackling machine 3)leon ,or miller=return specialist 4)faneca 5)mangold=best center in AFC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 No chance in Hell we get seven Pro Bowlers. Rhodes can't even get in the past two years when he clearly should have went. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 No chance in Hell we get seven Pro Bowlers. Rhodes can't even get in the past two years when he clearly should have went. I know but these players I think will play at that level, and who knows stranger things have happened Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetkid94 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 If they all make it then I would say we finished 12-4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangreenman Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I think Rhodes, Faneca, Mangold, and Miller/Leon are the only players on the team that can reallistically make it. Harris would have a shot but nobody has heard of him. He was a 2nd rounder in last years draft and only started 7 or 8 games last season. He would have to put up unreal #s to get voted into the pro bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 If they all make it then I would say we finished 12-4. I agree thats the bulls*** about the pro bowl if your team wins you go if not you have no chance, for this to even come close we need to win atleast 11 or 12 games might be done who knows? I did forget Faneca, but with the roster we have these are the players that have the best shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicBizkit87 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Here is who I think has a great chance of making it this year: S Kerry Rhodes LG Alan Faneca LB David Harris C Nick Mangold Honestly for now, I think thats it, other players will have to prove a whole lot to really have a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Ben Graham has the best shot of making it to Hawaii. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.S. Dylan Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Really though and its been said already but probowls don't matter. Look at dallas. They had a ton of pro bowlers and lost in the playoffs. Giants had one and won it. I'd take the latter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 My first thought on who should go to the pro bowl 1.D Harris 2.D Revis 3.T Richardson 4.N Mangold 5.C Jenkins 6.K Rhodes 7.C Pace (long shot but maybe) And VG for d rookie of the year 12 sacks Whats the rest of the nation think? How does the fullback make it to the pro bowl and not the running back with him? If the FB had a probowl year that must mean that the running back was killing the entire year....ask adrian peterson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 How does the fullback make it to the pro bowl and not the running back with him? If the FB had a probowl year that must mean that the running back was killing the entire year....ask adrian peterson. More talented RB's in the AFC, and we have RB's that split time thats how Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 More talented RB's in the AFC, and we have RB's that split time thats how That makes no sense. That situation just wasnt thought of....thats how. There's so many situations that could lead to none of the guys that was mentioned NOT going to the probowl yet they're named as potentials. If a "Fullback" is mentioned as going to the probowl just on a forum site like this (Not what "RB's" are in the AFC) then our RB has to be mentioned because he's an instant probowl contender if the damn Fullback made it. And I doubt that with the amount of touches that Thomas Jones got last year that the issue would possibly be that we "split the time". That was a lame excuse. You can simply say that you didnt think of it. The truth would have been quite fine. ("Thats How")....You're a funny dude sun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Erik Ainge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 That makes no sense. That situation just wasnt thought of....thats how. There's so many situations that could lead to none of the guys that was mentioned NOT going to the probowl yet they're named as potentials. If a "Fullback" is mentioned as going to the probowl just on a forum site like this (Not what "RB's" are in the AFC) then our RB has to be mentioned because he's an instant probowl contender if the damn Fullback made it. And I doubt that with the amount of touches that Thomas Jones got last year that the issue would possibly be that we "split the time". That was a lame excuse. You can simply say that you didnt think of it. The truth would have been quite fine. ("Thats How")....You're a funny dude sun. Not true at all, the truth is TJ or LW are not good enough to make it to the pro bowl, just because a FB goes to the pro bowl doesn't mean the RB goes with him. Richie Anderson ring a bell piss head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 That makes no sense. That situation just wasnt thought of....thats how. There's so many situations that could lead to none of the guys that was mentioned NOT going to the probowl yet they're named as potentials. If a "Fullback" is mentioned as going to the probowl just on a forum site like this (Not what "RB's" are in the AFC) then our RB has to be mentioned because he's an instant probowl contender if the damn Fullback made it. And I doubt that with the amount of touches that Thomas Jones got last year that the issue would possibly be that we "split the time". That was a lame excuse. You can simply say that you didnt think of it. The truth would have been quite fine. ("Thats How")....You're a funny dude sun. Talk about being funny besides these stupid comments you just made, of course situations are true but the way you put it souds retarded so by reading this I will assume if a TE or a WR goes to the pro bowl the QB goes too? or the whole O line? Please dude your a tool stupid reply try better next time or THINK IT THROUGH!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Not true at all, the truth is TJ or LW are not good enough to make it to the pro bowl, just because a FB goes to the pro bowl doesn't mean the RB goes with him. Richie Anderson ring a bell piss head? I love to see when someone acts smarter than what they are. They tend to show how lost they really are. Yes I've heard of Richie Anderson. I also heard of Curtis Martin. I know that If someone would have said in the offseason that the next year Richie Anderson would go to the Pro Bowl and That Curtis Martin Would have averaged almost 5 Yards Per Carry on over 330 attempts with 10 TD's and over 1,500 yards rushing for the year and only 42 yards behind the rushing champ that year which was priest holmes I doubt that anyone would have said that Curtis Martin WASNT going to the damn probowl. Though he didnt make it doesnt mean that those arent probowl numbers. He got those numbers because of the type of year that his Fullback had as well. Typically, if a Fullback had a probowl year, the Running back is usually a contender for a probowl too....is that not true? and if that is true, then shouldnt Thomas Jones be up there as a probowler given that you're stating that we'll have a probowl FB? You're a just a fan stuck in Maine, im going to dismiss you because you dont think rational or make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 I love to see when someone acts smarter than what they are. They tend to show how lost they really are. Yes I've heard of Richie Anderson. I also heard of Curtis Martin. I know that If someone would have said in the offseason that the next year Richie Anderson would go to the Pro Bowl and That Curtis Martin Would have averaged almost 5 Yards Per Carry on over 330 attempts with 10 TD's and over 1,500 yards rushing for the year and only 42 yards behind the rushing champ that year which was priest holmes I doubt that anyone would have said that Curtis Martin WASNT going to the damn probowl. Though he didnt make it doesnt mean that those arent probowl numbers. He got those numbers because of the type of year that his Fullback had as well. Typically, if a Fullback had a probowl year, the Running back is usually a contender for a probowl too....is that not true? and if that is true, then shouldnt Thomas Jones be up there as a probowler given that you're stating that we'll have a probowl FB? You're a just a fan stuck in Maine, im going to dismiss you because you dont think rational or make sense. No you'll dismiss yourself because I just smoked your ass and you look like a fool, sucks being you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Talk about being funny besides these stupid comments you just made, of course situations are true but the way you put it souds retarded so by reading this I will assume if a TE or a WR goes to the pro bowl the QB goes too? or the whole O line? Please dude your a tool stupid reply try better next time or THINK IT THROUGH!!!! Okay, I see that you're still trying to think more than what you should. It DOESNT necessarily mean that a QB goes to a Probowl because he had a WR or a TE go to the Probowl, there's to many discrepancies for that. A QB can throw a 5 yard pass like Chad PenninGONE yet the WR could get 90 YAC for a TD. That had nothing to do with the f-ing QB you beavis. If You have a FB setting up key blocks for you and you're rushing for 1500 Plus yards then you cant take that feat away from the FB making the key blocks/openings OR the RB for hitting those holes and gaining yards you piss head. dude, dont even comment no more. you sound like an idiot trying to disprove an obvious rational point. How many fullbacks have made the probowl and their running back hasnt had a 1000 yard season???? can you answer that question since you're so f-ing intelligent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 No you'll dismiss yourself because I just smoked your ass and you look like a fool, sucks being you Prove that you smoked me. Answer the questions. You didnt smoke anyone. You dont make sense. ITS A FACT. CURTIS MARTIN THAT YEAR HAD PROBOWL NUMBERS DID HE NOT????? answer the questions or be dismissed. Keep your comments in Maine if you're not going to answer it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 Okay, I see that you're still trying to think more than what you should. It DOESNT necessarily mean that a QB goes to a Probowl because he had a WR or a TE go to the Probowl, there's to many discrepancies for that. A QB can throw a 5 yard pass like Chad PenninGONE yet the WR could get 90 YAC for a TD. That had nothing to do with the f-ing QB you beavis. If You have a FB setting up key blocks for you and you're rushing for 1500 Plus yards then you cant take that feat away from the FB making the key blocks/openings OR the RB for hitting those holes and gaining yards you piss head. dude, dont even comment no more. you sound like an idiot trying to disprove an obvious rational point. How many fullbacks have made the probowl and their running back hasnt had a 1000 yard season???? can you answer that question since you're so f-ing intelligent? Your the one who made a stupid reply to my post and now your trying to back out of it with this crap, won't work GAME OVER and you call yourself a jet fan Richie Anderson would love you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Your the one who made a stupid reply to my post and now your trying to back out of it with this crap, won't work GAME OVER and you call yourself a jet fan Richie Anderson would love you Dont play yourself. My point has been made. IF you have a probowl FB on your team then 9/10 you have a Probowl contending RB. You havent answered ANY OF MY LAST QUESTIONS. YOU SAY THAT IM TRYING TO BACK OUT YET IM ASKING YOU QUESTIONS AND YOU'RE NOT ANSWERING THEM. answer the questions. Im not going anywhere. You cant answer them because im right. Thats why you say im backing out. because a wise man once told me "dont argue with fools. because people from afar cant tell who is who". Tell me that with those numbers I stated on Curtis Martin werent probowl numbers. SH_T , if thomas jones puts up those numbers behind your alleged probowl fb this upcoming year would he "NOT" be a probowler? is that what you're saying? ANSWER MY QUESTIONS AND STOP ACTING LIKE AN ASS. WE ALREADY KNOW YOU ARE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 Prove that you smoked me. Answer the questions. You didnt smoke anyone. You dont make sense. ITS A FACT. CURTIS MARTIN THAT YEAR HAD PROBOWL NUMBERS DID HE NOT????? answer the questions or be dismissed. Keep your comments in Maine if you're not going to answer it then. Well of course those are pro bowl numbers DAH, I'm just going by what you said "if the FB is mentioned then the RB should be metioned. News flash Martin was mentioned but Anderson went to the pro bowl, opps you forgot about good ole Richie just think it through before you respond to this so you dont look more and more like a idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Your the one who made a stupid reply to my post and now your trying to back out of it with this crap, won't work GAME OVER and you call yourself a jet fan Richie Anderson would love you Answer my questions. you compared QB/WR/TE to this situation. Let me know what FB made the Probowl without a 1000 yard RB? Better yet, I'll make it even easier for your stupid ass. Name me a FB that made the Probowl that didnt have atleast a probowl contending RB? Answer my questions and I'll say I was wrong. Every FB that has ever went to the Probowl has had a a Running back that either went to the probowl or had probowl like numbers. Once again, you brought up richie anderson....with that said, are you saying that curtis martins numbers that year werent probowl worthy? Dont go pass my questions beavis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 Answer my questions. you compared QB/WR/TE to this situation. Let me know what FB made the Probowl without a 1000 yard RB? Better yet, I'll make it even easier for your stupid ass. Name me a FB that made the Probowl that didnt have atleast a probowl contending RB? Answer my questions and I'll say I was wrong. Every FB that has ever went to the Probowl has had a a Running back that either went to the probowl or had probowl like numbers. Once again, you brought up richie anderson....with that said, are you saying that curtis martins numbers that year werent probowl worthy? Dont go pass my questions beavis. Your the one that dug your hole i'm not helping you get out of it you said it not me, use more caution when posting cause you are really acting stupid about your own comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Well of course those are pro bowl numbers DAH, I'm just going by what you said "if the FB is mentioned then the RB should be metioned. News flash Martin was mentioned but Anderson went to the pro bowl, opps you forgot about good ole Richie just think it through before you respond to this so you dont look more and more like a idiot. Im looking more and more like an idiot huh??? yet you just agreed with me huh??? If they're probowl numbers then he should have been mentioned. IF a FB is going to the probowl the the Running back should be mentioned given that the positions go exactly hand in hand when FULLBACKS ARE BEING PRESENTED WITH A PROBOWL SELECTION. You can have a running back like barry sanders....that didnt have any help but got the job done. Or you can have a full back like what we have or a lorenzo Neal that does what he does for his running back to get numbers. either way if a fullback is going the to probowl is almost certain that the running back has probowl like numbers....which means he's being considered for the probowl.....RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!! JUST LIKE I SAID. IF YOU CONSIDER OUR FB YOU SHOULD CONSIDER OUR RB. BEAVIS. IM ANSWERING ALL YOUR QUESTIONS...HOW ABOUT ANSWERING MINE AND STOP DODGGING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Your the one that dug your hole i'm not helping you get out of it you said it not me, use more caution when posting cause you are really acting stupid about your own comments No, I dug YOUR hole. and you know by answering my questions that you'll be helping me cover you up in that hole. Im not ducking you homie. Im right here. let me say it again in case you think Im changing my story. IF YOU THINK THAT OUR FULLBACK IS GOING TO THE PROBOWL THEN YOU MUST CONSIDER OUR RB TOO. im not chaning anything. I dug your hole. just lay down and stop fighting. You havent proved me wrong yet. Its a rational point throughout the NFL. prove me wrong...answer my questions. I answers yours! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jet fan stuck in maine! Posted April 28, 2008 Author Share Posted April 28, 2008 Im looking more and more like an idiot huh??? yet you just agreed with me huh??? If they're probowl numbers then he should have been mentioned. IF a FB is going to the probowl the the Running back should be mentioned given that the positions go exactly hand in hand when FULLBACKS ARE BEING PRESENTED WITH A PROBOWL SELECTION. You can have a running back like barry sanders....that didnt have any help but got the job done. Or you can have a full back like what we have or a lorenzo Neal that does what he does for his running back to get numbers. either way if a fullback is going the to probowl is almost certain that the running back has probowl like numbers....which means he's being considered for the probowl.....RIGHT!!!!!!!!!!! JUST LIKE I SAID. IF YOU CONSIDER OUR FB YOU SHOULD CONSIDER OUR RB. BEAVIS. IM ANSWERING ALL YOUR QUESTIONS...HOW ABOUT ANSWERING MINE AND STOP DODGGING. Dude your answering your own questions and looking like a fool doing it have a party, I not helping you out you said now live with it "NO FB WITHOUT RB" not my fault. I'm right your wrong and I've proved my case with one of the Jet greats and you feel stupid, oh well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.