budda12ax7 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Are the Jets willing to eat the salary?? OR, will San-Cheese become the 2nd stringer?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnleyJet Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 No ones taking on that contract. He will be cut June 1st. (Lower cap hit). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Not unless you have a Delorean and if you had a car that could take us back in time I would rather go further back and abort Tanny or just kick his first abacus out of his hand cause he clearly couldn't work it right anyway. He couldn't grasp what was going on with the beads he pushed to the left that had to be counted later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 No ones taking on that contract. He will be cut June 1st. (Lower cap hit). If the Jets are willing to eat the entire contract by cutting him, they should be willing to eat the majority of it to try to get something back in a trade for him. That would be my thinking, anyway. They could do that by converting most of his idiotically guaranteed salary into a bonus, or maybe in the parameters of the trade if Sanchez didn't feel like helping them move him (but I think he'd be happy to be traded at this point). And they can cut him at any time and designate him a June 1 cut for cap purposes, they don't have to wait for the date. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 San-Cheese? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I say cut him and eat the contract if we cant find a conditional trade partner. Sux losing money but u gotta let the losers go sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsJETStime Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 If the Jets are willing to eat the entire contract by cutting him, they should be willing to eat the majority of it to try to get something back in a trade for him. That would be my thinking, anyway. They could do that by converting most of his idiotically guaranteed salary into a bonus, or maybe in the parameters of the trade if Sanchez didn't feel like helping them move him (but I think he'd be happy to be traded at this point). And they can cut him at any time and designate him a June 1 cut for cap purposes, they don't have to wait for the date. This is true however I believe the cap hit for trading Sanchez would make it more feasible to just cut him. I'm not sure about this but I have seen a post that stated that the cap hit for trading Sanchez us greater than the hit for cutting him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsJETStime Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I just checked and I was wrong according to Bloomberg "New York would face a $17.1 million salary cap hit if it cut Sanchez, who has made 50 turnovers in the last two seasons. A trade of Sanchez would still count $8.9 million toward the Jets’ salary cap next season, and the team probably also would have to pay a sizable portion of the $8.25 million he’s guaranteed in 2013, said Andrew Brandt, a former NFL executive and now an ESPN business analyst." Therefore trading him would make more sense but the problem is who would wanna take up even half of that contract Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j4jets Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Are the Jets willing to eat the salary?? OR, will San-Cheese become the 2nd stringer?? I'm glad you asked the question. It was the only question that had not been discussed here yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Tanny should be fired from his next 2 jobs, for this contract ext alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I refuse to give up any future draft picks to trade Sanchez Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Tanny should be fired from his next 2 jobs, for this contract ext alone. Or at least work for free at H&R block the next 3 tax season wearing an orange jump suit. Community service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Tanny should be fired from his next 2 jobs, for this contract ext alone. What do you mean? I was told it was a smart contract last year because there was no chance of Sanchez not being the QB for the next 2 years anyway. Plus Tannenbaum needed the extra cap space to put together our superbowl contending 2012 team. Whatever. The giant hole it's dug us into allowed us to to a total makeover instead of doing a slow peel off of the band-aid over the course of 3 seasons (during which time we win nothing but theoretically are somewhat more competitive at least in 2013). Forced us to go with a rookie as the next QB instead of risking a larger contract on hopes that someone like Carson Palmer could come in here (for Sanchez money) and magically turn his career around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 The Jets should offer him to the entire NFL for an unconditional 2014 draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbanmadmike1 Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 What do you mean? I was told it was a smart contract last year because there was no chance of Sanchez not being the QB for the next 2 years anyway. Plus Tannenbaum needed the extra cap space to put together our superbowl contending 2012 team. Whatever. The giant hole it's dug us into allowed us to to a total makeover instead of doing a slow peel off of the band-aid over the course of 3 seasons (during which time we win nothing but theoretically are somewhat more competitive at least in 2013). Forced us to go with a rookie as the next QB instead of risking a larger contract on hopes that someone like Carson Palmer could come in here (for Sanchez money) and magically turn his career around. I prefer taking the year the see what a rookie has to bringing in some mediocre vet like Carson Palmer who might win a few more games but won't be the long term solution. The same pretty much goes for all the QB's who changed teams this offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 I prefer taking the year the see what a rookie has to bringing in some mediocre vet like Carson Palmer who might win a few more games but won't be the long term solution. The same pretty much goes for all the QB's who changed teams this offseason. Agree, but who knows, maybe Tannenbaum isn't even fired if not for the mess that the Sanchez extension put us in. If we weren't trapped into Sanchez's his extension we'd have had enough cap space to get a bit more expensive veteran QB than David Garrard. And if Tannenbaum was given one more year I bet he goes that route in hopes of saving his own skin. I'm just saying that, like in other areas of life, sometimes you need to hit rock bottom first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Or at least work for free at H&R block the next 3 tax season wearing an orange jump suit. Community service. Signholder with an ipod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Signholder with an ipod Dude I saw him try and catch a punt before. he does not have the skill set to be a sign dancer. Those guys are gifted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 What do you mean? I was told it was a smart contract last year because there was no chance of Sanchez not being the QB for the next 2 years anyway. Plus Tannenbaum needed the extra cap space to put together our superbowl contending 2012 team. Whatever. The giant hole it's dug us into allowed us to to a total makeover instead of doing a slow peel off of the band-aid over the course of 3 seasons (during which time we win nothing but theoretically are somewhat more competitive at least in 2013). Forced us to go with a rookie as the next QB instead of risking a larger contract on hopes that someone like Carson Palmer could come in here (for Sanchez money) and magically turn his career around. You are 100% right. I often find myself appreciating my bitch of an ex girlfriend and her bipolar ways...which caused me to frequint strip clubs and bless me with my happliy ever after...lol....KIDDING! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Dude I saw him try and catch a punt before. he does not have the skill set to be a sign dancer. Those guys are gifted. Oh god...ye of little faith! Dont you know a circus clown act when you see one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Oh god...ye of little faith! Dont you know a circus clown act when you see one! Negative Jet fans rubbing off on me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted April 28, 2013 Share Posted April 28, 2013 Negative Jet fans rubbing off on me. Filthy wizards! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.