Jetsfan80 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9893855/brian-holloway-house Playing to the left of Hall of Fame guard John Hannah, Holloway helped establish a New England running game that peaked in the 1985 season when the Patriots made it to the Super Bowl to play the Chicago Bears, a game Holloway claims New England lost, at least in part, because the team's passing offense had been installed by Michael Jackson.1 1. Before you get too carried away with mental images of Michael Jackson playing Ten Yard Fight in the owner's box and signaling passing plays down to Tony Eason via Bubbles, consider the following: The Sullivan family, the owners of the Patriots of the time, cut a bad deal and lost a fortune on the Jackson's Victory Tour, which precipitated the sale of the team. Holloway believes the Sullivan family had been forced to put the team up as collateral to Jackson, who took over as owner right before the Super Bowl. During Super Bowl week, Holloway claims that the coaches came to the players and told them that they were going to play right into the Bears' strength and throw the ball the entire game. If you check the game's play-by-play, the Patriots did pass the ball on six of their first seven plays, resulting in zero completions, two sacks, and a lost fumble. Holloway claims that nobody in the locker room understood the move and suspicions kicked up immediately after the game. Later, Holloway says that he was approached by storied Boston sportswriter Will McDonough, who reported that Michael Jackson had wagered a lot of money on the game and had requested the passing attack as a way to ensure that his Patriots wouldn't cover the spread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 So apparently people do stretch the truth for personal gain eh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 All I have is LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 The prevailing thought was, the 1985 Bears 46 Defense could be best moved on with a short, efficient passing game. I remember when the Jets were preparing for the Bears in week 12 (or so), there were pundits that the Jets would be the first team to beat the Bears, because of Kenny OBrien and the pass game (seriously). Of course, the Jets got mauled Who beat the Bears? The Dolphins of course with a quick strike passing game with Marino. To say that passing against the Bears was a bad strategy, is absolutely false. Now, to have Tony Eason pulling the trigger is a whole other thing. But you had to pass to try and beat the Beras. There was no other way. Most ridiculous article I ever read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 The prevailing thought was, the 1985 Bears 46 Defense could be best moved on with a short, efficient passing game. I remember when the Jets were preparing for the Bears in week 12 (or so), there were pundits that the Jets would be the first team to beat the Bears, because of Kenny OBrien and the pass game (seriously). Of course, the Jets got mauled Who beat the Bears? The Dolphins of course with a quick strike passing game with Marino. To say that passing against the Bears was a bad strategy, is absolutely false. Now, to have Tony Eason pulling the trigger is a whole other thing. But you had to pass to try and beat the Beras. There was no other way. Most ridiculous article I ever read. If you look at the box scores from the Pats first three playoff games that year they were heavily run oriented. Wildcard Game at Jets 39 rushes for 99 yards, 12 for 16 passing for 179 AFC Divisonal vs Raiders 49 rushes for 156 yards 8 for 15 passing for 125 yards AFC Championshp vs Miami 59 rushes for 255 yards 10 of 12 passing for 71 yards Then you get to the Super Bowl vs Bears 11 rushes for 7 yards 17 for 36 passing for 177 yards. Now the Pats got way behinds early in that game so I would think that the gameplan was pretty much out the windows by midway through the second qtr but it does look like the Pats got completely away from what got them there in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 that bears team was a juggernaut. it had tecmo bowl walter payton in his prime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kleckineau Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 The prevailing thought was, the 1985 Bears 46 Defense could be best moved on with a short, efficient passing game. I remember when the Jets were preparing for the Bears in week 12 (or so), there were pundits that the Jets would be the first team to beat the Bears, because of Kenny OBrien and the pass game (seriously). Of course, the Jets got mauled Who beat the Bears? The Dolphins of course with a quick strike passing game with Marino. To say that passing against the Bears was a bad strategy, is absolutely false. Now, to have Tony Eason pulling the trigger is a whole other thing. But you had to pass to try and beat the Beras. There was no other way. Most ridiculous article I ever read. 19-6 final score. Mauled? Hardly. Jets were one of a very few teams that actually belonged on the field with that Bears team. Klecko did not play and I think they had like 4 sacks anyway and were in the game till very late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 If you look at the box scores from the Pats first three playoff games that year they were heavily run oriented. Wildcard Game at Jets 39 rushes for 99 yards, 12 for 16 passing for 179 AFC Divisonal vs Raiders 49 rushes for 156 yards 8 for 15 passing for 125 yards AFC Championshp vs Miami 59 rushes for 255 yards 10 of 12 passing for 71 yards Then you get to the Super Bowl vs Bears 11 rushes for 7 yards 17 for 36 passing for 177 yards. Now the Pats got way behinds early in that game so I would think that the gameplan was pretty much out the windows by midway through the second qtr but it does look like the Pats got completely away from what got them there in the first place. You were not going to beat the Bears running the ball. That was conventional wisdom. That the Pats came out throwing was not outrageous in terms of game planning Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 19-6 final score. Mauled? Hardly. Jets were one of a very few teams that actually belonged on the field with that Bears team. Klecko did not play and I think they had like 4 sacks anyway and were in the game till very late. My memory is hazy-those were college years. It sure felt like they got mauled. As I look up stats, the Jets had only 159 yards total offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 jets fans can't complain, bubba smith still thinks morrall threw SB III and namath was investigated for hanging out with bookies and then throwin 6 picks but who cares, I was a college freshman and because of the safety before the half I won 3 out of 4 boxes in the pool (2 boxes hit !) and had food money for a month, lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 The 46 d is designed to stop the run. Modern day passing has made the d obsolete in the nfl. Article makes no sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 the rules have made it so that there will never be a defense as dominant as the '85 bears ever again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Honestly, I find it unfathomable that could happen in the NFL. One thing we know about this is league is that integrity, honor, class, and totally not fixed/scripted games are a staple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo83 Posted November 16, 2013 Share Posted November 16, 2013 Mover evidence of NE being a cheating organization. Cheating to lose in this case but still........................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.