jgb Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Texans, Lions, 49ers head NFL's most problematic QB situations The NFL is more exciting and competitive than ever. Yet, when you delve into a Sunday slate of games these days -- and take a closer look at the prime-time bouts -- one thing stands out pretty quickly: It feels like more teams have quarterback issues than ever before. And there are some epic catastrophes, some abject failures at the quarterback position 2015. Thus, our crack staff at NFL.com asked me to list the nine biggest quarterback disasters in the league as we speak. For the sake of fairness, we took the rookies out of the mix. (You're welcome, Tampa!) I didn't include the Pittsburgh Steelers here because Ben Roethlisberger will be back soon. And while Mike Vick doesn't know the playbook and appears dangerously close to retirement, Pittsburgh did lose Bruce Gradkowski to injury in the third game of the preseason. There was an initial backup plan in place. And Ben is a future Hall of Famer and current top-five quarterback by any measuring stick. So, factoring in play, plan, contracts, current results and a glimpse into the crystal ball, here are the nine worst quarterback situations in the NFL today (with current team records listed parenthetically, as this figure is paramount when discussing the game's most important position): 1) Houston Texans (1-4) Ryan Mallett ... Brian Hoyer ... Matt Schaub ... David Carr ... It's all beginning to blend together. Bill O'Brien is one of the best coaches in the league. He turned Houston around last year and received my vote for Coach of the Year. Having said that, O'Brien's flip-flopping at QB has doomed Houston. Truthfully, entering this season with Mallett and Hoyer as the team's top two options at QB doomed Houston. Brian Hoyer is a career backup. If O'Brien was going to have Hoyer, his opening-day starter, on as short a leash as he did, he should've just started Mallett and hoped the inexperienced -- but naturally gifted -- signal caller gained confidence and raised his overall level of play. Mallett is the football equivalent of Nuke LaLoosh, the fictional character from "Bull Durham." Remember what Crash Davis said about the million-dollar arm and five-cent head? This is the worst quarterback situation in the NFL -- and it's not even close. And to think, Houston could've plucked up Derek Carr to start Round 2 of the 2014 NFL Draft. Instead, the Texans took an offensive guard who's toiling away on the bench. If only the Carr surname didn't immediately evoke nightmares in Houston ... O'Brien has reinstalled Hoyer as the starter. It doesn't matter. The team is 1-4. And as we speak, the 2016 starting quarterback isn't anywhere near Houston, Texas. 2) Detroit Lions (0-5) On Sunday, Matthew Stafford got benched for Dan Orlovsky. This is not a drill, people. Matthew Stafford got benched for Dan Orlovsky, the quarterback who became the poster child of Detroit's 0-16 season back in 2008 when he inexplicably ran out the back of the end zone for a safety. And the move was a no-brainer. Welcome to hell, Lions fans. Stafford's play has been horrific this season. He threw three more picks against Arizona -- giving him a league-high total of eight -- and Jim Caldwell had seen enough. Three offseasons ago, Stafford signed a $53 million extension that keeps him in Detroit through 2017. Our Albert Breer reported that the deal included $41.5 million guaranteed. On average, Stafford is getting Tony Romo money. Yet, Stafford has never shown the proficiency for the position routinely displayed by his Cowboys counterpart. Stafford has an absolute cannon for an arm ... but rarely makes good decisions and has serious issues protecting the football. While there are deep problems in Motown -- which begin with certain members of the coaching staff -- quarterback is certainly one of them. 3) San Francisco 49ers (1-4) Remember when the great Ron Jaworski looked into the camera back in August of 2013 and declared, "Colin Kaepernick could be one of the greatest quarterbacks ever"? Remember when Kap played in a Super Bowl and looked fantastic? Remember Jim Harbaugh? (Good weekend, Jed York? Did you catch the Michigan score? Sorry, I digress ...) Yes, Kaepernick played better in the fourth quarter during Sunday's loss to the New York Giants, but by and large, the 27-year-old has significantly regressed over the past couple seasons. It's clear in the statistical realm (Kap currently owns the lowest passer rating of his career at 76.8) and it's clear in the eyeball test (how many uncontested throws has he one-hopped this season?). Now, original reports on Kaepernick's 2014 extension had the quarterback pocketing $61 million in guarantees -- but, as we found out in the days after the deal, the 49ers committed far less real money to the raw young quarterback. Kaepernick has a $2 million roster bonus in each year of the contract -- which runs through 2020, but allows the team to really operate on a year-to-year basis. How will the Niners proceed with the position going forward? It'll be interesting to see. One thing we do know is there is no real alternative to Kap on the current roster. Blaine Gabbert? He might be the worst backup in the NFL. 4) Washington Redskins (2-3) They still have to cut ties with Robert Griffin III at some point. I like a lot of what Kirk Cousins has to offer -- the game-losing pick-six on Sunday wasn't entirely on him, as the receiver fell down -- but his ups and downs are just too extreme for an NFL starter. And Colt McCoy isn't the answer. Washington has proven to be more competitive than most people anticipated this season, but the franchise still doesn't have a long-term plan at quarterback, which prevents the 'Skins from being taken seriously. 5) Kansas City Chiefs (1-4) I'm an unabashed Alex Smith fan. I've spent a lot of ink in recent years lauding the Chiefs QB for making clutch throws and simply winning football games. Unfortunately, 2015 has been a grotesque disappointment. And if Jamaal Charles is indeed done for the season, Smith can't carry the day. Smith got a four-year, $68 million deal (with $45 million in guarantees) just prior to the beginning of last season. Factoring everything in, the pact put Smith in position to make an average of $15.1 million annually through 2018. For a guy with legit limitations in his game (see: downfield passing), this kinda dough just doesn't add up. 6) Dallas Cowboys (2-3) Tony Romo is a star. I've argued in this space that he's a top-tier quarterback for quite some time. I've always found it offensive how hard many folks are on No. 9. And I found it unfathomable that some analysts thought Dallas wouldn't drastically drop-off sans Romo and Dez Bryant. The problem with Brandon Weeden is that he isn't any good. Dallas cracks this list because of the Cowboys' poor preparation. Romo's been an injury problem for a while, with his body breaking down on him in recent years. So why has Dallas continually neglected the backup quarterback position? Weeden is in the Gabbert class of reserve QBs. That is not a compliment. CBS' Tracy Wolfson asked Jason Garrett a great question at the halftime on Sunday, asking if we'd see Matt Cassel after the break. Garrett gave the wrong answer -- NO! -- and stuck with Weeden, who finished the game with some highly underwhelming numbers, including an average of 4.8 yards per attempt. Weeden's play is bad. Banking on him was worse. It's time for the Cowboys to at least try out Cassel, who is a pro's pro. Neglecting the backup QB position could end up costing Dallas a spot in the playoffs. 7) Philadelphia Eagles (2-3) Early on Sunday, there were cries for Mark Sanchez. And that's not good for anyone. Sam Bradford threw two end-zone interceptions in the first 16 minutes of the game, giving him a third multi-pick game in five weeks with Philly. To his credit, Bradford settled down and guided the Eagles to a needed win over the Saints. I still think Philly is going to win the underwhelming NFC East. But Bradford, who certainly hasn't lived up to the hype generated in August, and Chip Kelly aren't out of the woods quite yet. 8) St. Louis Rams (2-3) Nick Foles was giving away the football like Oprah gives away cars. And that's not good. Foles has been quite erratic for the 2-3 Rams. There have been pulsating moments against the Seahawks and Cardinals, but too many moments of futility. All in all, we're currently looking at career lows in completion percentage (57.4) and passer rating (77.6). Just not good enough. 9) Chicago Bears (2-3) OK, in fairness, Jay Cutler has been really clutch over the past two weeks, helping guide Chicago to tight wins over Oakland and Kansas City. When healthy, he's been good this year. But when you factor in Cutler's gargantuan contract -- a seven-year deal worth a total of $126 million (with $54 million guaranteed) that was consummated in January of 2014 -- the bloom immediately vacates the rose. And when Jimmy Clausen's your No. 2 ... yeah, the backup plan isn't too inspiring. A few more QB concerns » I don't entirely blame Ryan Tannehill for the Dolphins debacle this season, but the young QB who signed a massive deal in May has to get going. » Can we talk about Peyton Manning's struggles? Drew Brees'? » Andrew Luck has been injured and stunningly awful this year. Matt Hasselbeck's logged two key wins in reserve, though. And Luck will get right. » Lastly, I'm still waiting for Ryan Fitzpatrick to look like Ryan Fitzpatrick, but it hasn't happened yet. Follow Adam Schein on Twitter @AdamSchein. http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000555560/article/texans-lions-49ers-head-nfls-most-problematic-qb-situations Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Probably because our 3 QB's have a combined cap number of $5.2M. We aren't tied down by any of them, and one of them (Petty) is 24 and likely has this full year to sit and learn. Meanwhile, about half of those teams on the list are paying one average or sh*tty QB about 3 times as much as our 3 QB's combined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Dolphins should be high on this list. The Texans tank, they draft a qb. The phins are stuck with Tannehil for the next 2-3 years minimum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Dolphins should be high on this list. The Texans tank, they draft a qb. The phins are stuck with Tannehil for the next 2-3 years minimum. Yep, Dolphins essentially were an "honorable mention" on this list. Certainly that has to be a worse situation than the Rams. Foles (26) is actually younger than Tannehill (27) and makes significantly less. The Rams can safely cut Foles after 2016 if they so choose, with just $1M in dead money. Foles could also opt out of the 3rd year on his deal after 2016, leaving the Rams with no dead money. If Miami tried to cut Tannehill after 2016 they'd be dealing with $18.5M in dead money. So unless anyone thinks Tannehill at 27 years old is going to improve dramatically....that's a huge bust of a contract. Unsurprising when Mike Tannenbaum is involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet9 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 He refers to the respective backups a lot. Well, if you watch 15 minutes of Red Zone on Sundays you will see there are only about 12-15 STARTERS who are worth a damn, never mind the backups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 When you factor in finances with performance, this should be the list of worst QB situations. Feel free to put them in whatever order you choose: 1. Detroit: Stafford has a $17.7M cap number this year and $22M in 2016 and '17. Can't safely cut him until after June 1, 2016 unless they restructure/trade. 2. Kansas City: Alex Smith has a $15.6M cap number this year, $17.8M in 2016 and $16.9M in 2017. Can't safely cut him until after June 1, 2017 unless they restructure/trade. 3. Miami: Tannehill has a $4.8M cap number this year but $11.6M in 2016 and $20.3M in 2017. Can't safely cut him until after June 1, 2017 unless they restructure/trade. 4. Baltimore: Flacco has a $14.6M cap hit this year, $28.6M in 2016, $31.2M in 2017, and $24.8M in 2018. If they cut him after June 1, 2017 they'll have $10.6M in dead money and $20.6M in cap savings. After June 1, 2018 they can safely cut him unless they restructure/trade. 5. Chicago: Cutler has a $16.5M cap number this year, $17M in 2016, and $16M in '17. Can't safely cut him until after June 1, 2017 unless they restructure/trade. 6. San Francisco: Kaep has a $15.3M cap hit this year, $16.8M in 2016. Can't safely cut him until after June 1, 2016 unless they restructure/trade. Houston, Washington, Philly, STL and the Jets are all teams that have bad QB's, no doubt. But there's a difference between having bad QB play for a year or having bad QB play and being stuck with it for multiple years. The Redskins will cut RG3 after this season and Cousins is a UFA they can let go if they'd like. Houston can move on from Hoyer/Mallett quite easily. Bradford is a UFA after this season in Philly, as is Fitzpatrick for the Jets (Geno can be safely cut/traded as well if the Jets so choose). All of those situations are preferable to the ones listed above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 This should get the DBF (deep ball faction) to melt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetster Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 This just goes to show you how lucky Bob Kraft & BB have it with Brady! Guy always gives a discount & they continue to win the division, it's becoming redundantly ridiculous! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonmajet Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 This just goes to show you how lucky Bob Kraft & BB have it with Brady! Guy always gives a discount & they continue to win the division, it's becoming redundantly ridiculous! Pats are always so damn lucky. In the beginning of the season, this looked like a sure fire loss with Brady on suspension; but when the game is played, not only is Brady there, but Dallas' best to offensive players (Romo and Dez) are out. You can't get any luckier than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rex-n-effect Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 The Dallas analysis doesn't make sense. If you're criticizing them for lack of preparation then why would it make sense to send in a backup that just got on the team and has barely any exposure to the playbook to play an entire half of a game that wasn't completely lost by the half? You wouldn't unless you thought inability to be prepared is better than a lack of preparation. Also, Dallas has tried to plug the hole at backup QB several times but apparently nobody wants to work with Romo and/or team management. They had Orton in there for a while, which wasn't a terrible backup option. He just didn't want to remain part of the organization. Or pro football, apparently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe W. Namath Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 Our qb situation is pretty good for not having a franchise guy on the roster. We have a solid vetern who is getting our playmakers the ball and keeping the turnovers down. We also have a young gun on the bench and will take a qb with one of our 1st few picks in next years draft. things are looking up for the Jets! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 worst starter + best backup = QB gold muthafukkas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted October 12, 2015 Share Posted October 12, 2015 I seen this on NFL's website and thought of posting it as well, then I figured I'd be somehow cursing our QB's. If things go wrong you will be remembered JGB! lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ohio State NY Jets fan Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 Great read, some funny stuff there, "welcome to hell Detroit", how's that team up North, Mr York, and how bad do you have to be to earn "worst backup in the league" Sanchez showed us that no QB is better then a big contract QB with "potential" Hence the draft a QB till you find the franchise QB strategy, but those same teams would have been killed if any of those QB's were lost to FA, some other team would have paid them, and a different slanderous article written... And the Ravens got a ring for the Flacco contract - I think all of us would trade a few years of cap hell for a ring Happy the Jets are not on that list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted October 13, 2015 Share Posted October 13, 2015 The worst QB situation in the NFL belongs to the team some Jets fans spent the offseason asking "If Fitz doens't suck, why did the Texans give him up for nothing"...as if an NFL team has never made a bad personnel decision, and O'Brien is suddenly Bill Walsh. Fitz had a winning record with the Texans last season and they dumped him in favor of Mallett/Hoyer...I'm sure they're thrilled with that decision today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted October 13, 2015 Author Share Posted October 13, 2015 Pats are always so damn lucky. In the beginning of the season, this looked like a sure fire loss with Brady on suspension; but when the game is played, not only is Brady there, but Dallas' best to offensive players (Romo and Dez) are out. You can't get any luckier than that And Le'veon Bell and Martavius Bryant suspended for Pitt. Why every player doesn't sue is beyond me. You always get a better deal by at least threatening to sue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted October 13, 2015 Author Share Posted October 13, 2015 The worst QB situation in the NFL belongs to the team some Jets fans spent the offseason asking "If Fitz doens't suck, why did the Texans give him up for nothing"...as if an NFL team has never made a bad personnel decision, and O'Brien is suddenly Bill Walsh. Fitz had a winning record with the Texans last season and they dumped him in favor of Mallett/Hoyer...I'm sure they're thrilled with that decision today. Jets got Marshall for a 5th (and a 7th round swap). Fitz will end up costing Jets a 6th due to playing time. Yet Fitz must suck because we paid a 6th but Marshall isn't damaged goods because he cost a 5th lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.