Smizzy Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Go read the article.........a HR should have gotten the Yankees reaction not a nice opposite field hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 The yankee players don't hate boston. They hate Schilling. If that was Beckett or Matsuzaka or another boston pitcher they wouldn't have cared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 That's class at it's finest. Now some might say the Red Sox would do the same thing, but if they don't throw at .270 hitter why would they bother paying attention to below .500 teams? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Nobody like schilling, schilling's mother doesn't like schilling. His own mother cheered when Stewart got that hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 That's class at it's finest. Now some might say the Red Sox would do the same thing, but if they don't throw at .270 hitter why would they bother paying attention to below .500 teams? Look who's ****y. We'll see whos talking crap when the games matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Look who's ****y. We'll see whos talking crap when the games matter. Last time I checked they all counted equally. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Last time I checked they all counted equally. If I remember correctly Boston was in first place this time last year too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kidhuman Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Nobody like schilling, schilling's mother doesn't like schilling. His own mother cheered when Stewart got that hit. POTW NOM..... his mom is a Yankees Fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 So, if these numbers are in a steady decline, it must mean that his ERA must be worse than last year? Right? ERA is a number isn't it? We can only guess that Mike decided to walk away slowly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 We can only guess that Mike decided to walk away slowly I didn't walk away. I'm just not going to let myself get baited again by you or any of my other stalkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 I didn't walk away. I'm just not going to let myself get baited again by you or any of my other stalkers. You say that a lot when you are wrong. You said that Schillings numbers have been going down. Is ERA a number? Thought so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 You say that a lot when you are wrong. You said that Schillings numbers have been going down. Is ERA a number? Thought so. ERA is a number but apparently you can't read those numbers because his ERA went up from April to May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 ERA is a number but apparently you can't read those numbers because his ERA went up from April to May. And it is down for June? He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005. If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 And it is down for June? He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005. If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material. I'm not gonna made a judgment on his one good start, one bad start june. Great job BTW in using meaningless W-L record to say he's not done. ALL his important peripherals have gotten worse each of the last 3 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 And it is down for June? He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005. If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material. From April to May? That's a hell of a sample size. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 You say that a lot when you are wrong. Bingo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 I'm not gonna made a judgment on his one good start, one bad start june. Great job BTW in using meaningless W-L record to say he's not done. ALL his important peripherals have gotten worse each of the last 3 years. Hmmm, so his ERA is lower so far in 2007 than in 2006, yet EVERYTHING is in decline. You just don't know when to admit you made a mistake. That would take a man to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Hmmm, so his ERA is lower so far in 2007 than in 2006, yet EVERYTHING is in decline. You just don't know when to admit you made a mistake. That would take a man to do. It's WAY too early to compare his 2007 ERA to his 2006 ERA. But why would that prevent you from misusing it to try to make one of your missinformed points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 It's WAY too early to compare his 2007 ERA to his 2006 ERA. But why would that prevent you from misusing it to try to make one of your missinformed points. So, it is too early to use a 2007 ERA, yet it is ok to use ERA's from month to month. Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 So, it is too early to use a 2007 ERA, yet it is ok to use ERA's from month to month. Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. You're comparing an ERA from a year to an ERA from 2+ months. (Typical crap from you) I'm comparing month to month and year to year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 So, it is too early to use a 2007 ERA, yet it is ok to use ERA's from month to month. Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable. You compared April To MAY, yet I cant use a little over 2 months to use in comparison. Do you ebven think sometimes? Talk about misinformed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 You're comparing an ERA from a year to an ERA from 2+ months. (Typical crap from you) I'm comparing month to month and year to year. So one can assume that his EREA has declined from July 2006, August 2006, Septemebr 2006, April 2007< to May 2007. Right Mike? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 So one can assume that his EREA has declined from July 2006, August 2006, Septemebr 2006, April 2007< to May 2007. Right Mike? No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year. The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year. The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95. OK, no, as I thought. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 OK, no, as I thought. Thanks. Good. Invent that i said something and then prove THAT wrong. Your tactics haven't changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Good. Invent that i said something and then prove THAT wrong. Your tactics haven't changed. Yes, Mike. People invent debates just to make you look stupid People are stalking you. People don't acknowledge that you are the smartest baseball person on this site. People don't congratulate you on MadMike predictions. Yes, everyone on this site is trying to make you look stupid. Keep believing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Yes, everyone on this site is trying to make you look stupid. Not everyone. Just people like you who's only attempt at honesty is the word over your avatar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 Not everyone. Just people like you who's only attempt at honesty is the word over your avatar. Yeah, that is why even Yankee fans agreed with my debate in this thread. Right, it is just me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 This thread is gayer than Carson Kressler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 9, 2007 Share Posted June 9, 2007 This thread is gayer than Carson Kressler. I agree. Just look at the start of it. Then MadMike puts the cap on it with a backpedal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year. The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95. Keep telling yourself that and you might eventually get it right. Is it that hard to admit you are wrong? Seriously? Schilling is a productive pitcher. Spin some obscure statistic to try and prove a point if you want. You look ridiculous. You harping on his 'decline' is amusing. His ERA going from 3.27 for April to 4.03 for May is not that big a deal. He is on pace for about 15-20 wins which is about 15 wins more then you thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Keep telling yourself that and you might eventually get it right. Is it that hard to admit you are wrong? Seriously? Schilling is a productive pitcher. Spin some obscure statistic to try and prove a point if you want. You look ridiculous. You harping on his 'decline' is amusing. His ERA going from 3.27 for April to 4.03 for May is not that big a deal. He is on pace for about 15-20 wins which is about 15 wins more then you thought. I know better than to make predictions based on wins. Apparently you don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 I agree. Just look at the start of it. Then MadMike puts the cap on it with a backpedal. Scott, you have without a doubt contribute to this thread's unrelenting gayness. Kudos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 Scott, you have without a doubt contribute to this thread's unrelenting gayness. Kudos. You mean gay like when you had a temporary banning, you sending me PMs at JI, begging me to petition and ask Max to reconsider the banning? Gay like that? I don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 10, 2007 Share Posted June 10, 2007 I know better than to make predictions based on wins. Apparently you don't. Why? Looking at Schilling's body of work last year, and the Sox as a team is not that hard to figure out what he should do if he pitches well. Maybe that is why wins is a meaningless stat to you. Not exactly a math major now are we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.