Jump to content

Yanks happy to see Stewart break up Schills no no


Matt39

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply
That's class at it's finest. Now some might say the Red Sox would do the same thing, but if they don't throw at .270 hitter why would they bother paying attention to below .500 teams?

Look who's ****y. We'll see whos talking crap when the games matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say that a lot when you are wrong.

You said that Schillings numbers have been going down.

Is ERA a number?

Thought so.

ERA is a number but apparently you can't read those numbers because his ERA went up from April to May.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ERA is a number but apparently you can't read those numbers because his ERA went up from April to May.

And it is down for June? :rolleyes:

He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005.

If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it is down for June? :rolleyes:

He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005.

If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material.

I'm not gonna made a judgment on his one good start, one bad start june. Great job BTW in using meaningless W-L record to say he's not done. ALL his important peripherals have gotten worse each of the last 3 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And it is down for June? :rolleyes:

He is 21-9 since the Yankee Nation declared his career over in 2005.

If your only argument of his demise is his ERA went from 3.27 in April to 4.03 in May, you need new material.

From April to May? That's a hell of a sample size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not gonna made a judgment on his one good start, one bad start june. Great job BTW in using meaningless W-L record to say he's not done. ALL his important peripherals have gotten worse each of the last 3 years.

Hmmm, so his ERA is lower so far in 2007 than in 2006, yet EVERYTHING is in decline.

You just don't know when to admit you made a mistake.

That would take a man to do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, so his ERA is lower so far in 2007 than in 2006, yet EVERYTHING is in decline.

You just don't know when to admit you made a mistake.

That would take a man to do.

It's WAY too early to compare his 2007 ERA to his 2006 ERA. But why would that prevent you from misusing it to try to make one of your missinformed points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's WAY too early to compare his 2007 ERA to his 2006 ERA. But why would that prevent you from misusing it to try to make one of your missinformed points.

So, it is too early to use a 2007 ERA, yet it is ok to use ERA's from month to month.

Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, it is too early to use a 2007 ERA, yet it is ok to use ERA's from month to month.

Unbelievable. Simply unbelievable.

You're comparing an ERA from a year to an ERA from 2+ months. (Typical crap from you) I'm comparing month to month and year to year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So one can assume that his EREA has declined from July 2006, August 2006, Septemebr 2006, April 2007< to May 2007.

Right Mike?

No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year.

The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year.

The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95.

OK, no, as I thought.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good. Invent that i said something and then prove THAT wrong. Your tactics haven't changed.

Yes, Mike.

People invent debates just to make you look stupid

People are stalking you.

People don't acknowledge that you are the smartest baseball person on this site.

People don't congratulate you on MadMike predictions.

Yes, everyone on this site is trying to make you look stupid.

Keep believing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No but the overall trend is that he gets worse not better. His ERA ballooned in June July and August, went down in September but that was only 2 starts then it went up from april to may this year.

The point is that his important peripherals are getting worse every year (IE his trend is downward,) not a shock for a 40 year old pitcher who's fastball is now 90 instead of 95.

Keep telling yourself that and you might eventually get it right.

Is it that hard to admit you are wrong? Seriously?

Schilling is a productive pitcher. Spin some obscure statistic to try and prove a point if you want. You look ridiculous.

You harping on his 'decline' is amusing. His ERA going from 3.27 for April to 4.03 for May is not that big a deal.

He is on pace for about 15-20 wins which is about 15 wins more then you thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep telling yourself that and you might eventually get it right.

Is it that hard to admit you are wrong? Seriously?

Schilling is a productive pitcher. Spin some obscure statistic to try and prove a point if you want. You look ridiculous.

You harping on his 'decline' is amusing. His ERA going from 3.27 for April to 4.03 for May is not that big a deal.

He is on pace for about 15-20 wins which is about 15 wins more then you thought.

I know better than to make predictions based on wins. Apparently you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know better than to make predictions based on wins. Apparently you don't.

Why?

Looking at Schilling's body of work last year, and the Sox as a team is not that hard to figure out what he should do if he pitches well.

Maybe that is why wins is a meaningless stat to you. Not exactly a math major now are we?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...