I think Mark Sanchez/Sparano deserves another season
#1
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:02 PM
WR:
1.Jeremy Kerley
2.Chaz Schillens
3.Mardy Gilyard
TE:
1.Jeff Cumberland
2.Konrad Reuland
These guys are scrap heap players who have been thrusted into the starting lineup--no wonder we have a bottom 4 passing offense in the NFL.
After today we have a top 10 defense and top 10 rushing offense. If Sanchez could've protected the the ball better, and we got league average special teams play, I think it could have been a decent season.
#2
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:05 PM
Lets look at his main targets today
WR:
1.Jeremy Kerley
2.Chaz Schillens
3.Mardy Gilyard
TE:
1.Jeff Cumberland
2.Konrad Reuland
These guys are scrap heap players who have been thrusted into the starting lineup--no wonder we have a bottom 4 passing offense in the NFL.
After today we have a top 10 defense and top 10 rushing offense. If Sanchez could've protected the the ball better, and we got league average special teams play, I think it could have been a decent season.
why cant u add QB to that list tho. Yes i know the wrs and Tes arnt the best of the best but i dont think the QB is either lol
#3
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:09 PM
why cant u add QB to that list tho. Yes i know the wrs and Tes arnt the best of the best but i dont think the QB is either lol
He's not great, but did you watch the game today? The guys around him cant play. I remember one drive when he went 0/3 with passes to Gilyard, Hilliard and Reuland. Tom Brady would look ordinary playing with that cast of cast-offs.
#6
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:29 PM
He's not great, but did you watch the game today? The guys around him cant play. I remember one drive when he went 0/3 with passes to Gilyard, Hilliard and Reuland. Tom Brady would look ordinary playing with that cast of cast-offs.
yea i watched the game. And hes below average in almost everything he does. And is one of the worst at holding onto the ball. There are a bunch of teams with worse talent and they still are better. Good Qb's elevate those around him
#7
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:30 PM
yea i watched the game. And hes below average in almost everything he does. And is one of the worst at holding onto the ball. There are a bunch of teams with worse talent and they still are better. Good Qb's elevate those around him
Please name one team with worse offensive talent than what the Jets had out there in the receiving positions. Please.
#10
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:32 PM
yea i watched the game. And hes below average in almost everything he does. And is one of the worst at holding onto the ball. There are a bunch of teams with worse talent and they still are better. Good Qb's elevate those around him
Sanchez is as bad as it gets in terms of outright starters in the league. But our skill position players are probably the worst collection of talent in the league. You could argue Arizona, maybe.
#12
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:35 PM
redskins? without garcon
Moss & Morris would both start for the Jets.
The team with maybe less is Miami
Edited by Matt39, 09 December 2012 - 07:35 PM.
#15
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:36 PM
moss is a holmes and morris isnt a WR?
how about browns then?
Richardson and the rookie they have from Baylor would both start for the Jets.
Speaking of which, what happened with Hill today. Not that it matters considering he's an awful player.
#18
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:39 PM
moss is a holmes and morris isnt a WR?
how about browns then? rams? yea i was gonna say miami too
Browns - Watson, Gordon and Little all better than what the Jets had out there.
Rams - I'd take Danny Amendola and Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens over the WRs that were out there today.
#19
Posted 09 December 2012 - 07:41 PM
Browns - Watson, Gordon and Little all better than what the Jets had out there.
Rams - I'd take Danny Amendola and Brandon Gibson and Chris Givens over the WRs that were out there today.
you can make a case for rams cause amendola is gooooood. But browns not a chance. Heck even miami has a pretty bad WR core.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














