Barry McCockinner Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 10:40 PM 24 minutes ago, LockeJET said: Either way once he gets traded I’m sure he’ll get a new contract It wouldn't shock me but I wouldn't consider it a given. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted Wednesday at 11:01 PM Share Posted Wednesday at 11:01 PM If JD does make a trade for him.. just a suggestion.. get it in writing that he will play on his current contract. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted Thursday at 01:10 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:10 AM 2 hours ago, jeremy2020 said: If JD does make a trade for him.. just a suggestion.. get it in writing that he will play on his current contract. Isn't the contract itself the "get it in writing" part? 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funaz Posted Thursday at 01:30 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:30 AM 1841321Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile app Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
funaz Posted Thursday at 01:31 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:31 AM [/url]1841321 Sent from my iPhone using JetNation.com mobile appNo idea why the jet nation app is adding all these emojis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaffneycatch81 Posted Thursday at 01:41 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:41 AM 30 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Isn't the contract itself the "get it in writing" part? Ya … that’s been my point with those saying the same thing about the Reddick deal — what was JD supposed to do, get him to sign his contract again? 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted Thursday at 01:49 AM Share Posted Thursday at 01:49 AM 12 hours ago, Warfish said: And I'm not investing another dollar in the JD/Saleh regime beyond this season now. This is the obvious argument against it. This is likely a failed regime and sinking future draft capital into some ill fated effort to save their jobs makes little sense. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeremy2020 Posted Thursday at 03:16 AM Share Posted Thursday at 03:16 AM 2 hours ago, TuscanyTile2 said: Isn't the contract itself the "get it in writing" part? based on past results.. No. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Thursday at 09:51 AM Share Posted Thursday at 09:51 AM Wouldn’t surprise me if Izzy is part of any deal 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted Thursday at 10:10 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:10 AM 15 minutes ago, jgb said: Wouldn’t surprise me if Izzy is part of any deal Maybe. He just doesn’t have really any value. So can’t see that being a part that closes the deal. I think we have to act rather quickly on this to not have the price drive up. Let’s just for example say that JJ gets injured against us Sunday. Now MIN could be in the mix for him. Bumping our price up. We need to have something finalized IMO today. Maybe 0 in the media. But to where deal is done. But not announced until Monday. Adams if traded to us today can’t play Sunday. And is already ruled out for LV this week. We aren’t eating a mill of his deal for him to not play for us this week. So they can’t have it official until after we play Sunday. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Thursday at 10:32 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:32 AM 20 minutes ago, Bobby816 said: Maybe. He just doesn’t have really any value. So can’t see that being a part that closes the deal. I think we have to act rather quickly on this to not have the price drive up. Let’s just for example say that JJ gets injured against us Sunday. Now MIN could be in the mix for him. Bumping our price up. We need to have something finalized IMO today. Maybe 0 in the media. But to where deal is done. But not announced until Monday. Adams if traded to us today can’t play Sunday. And is already ruled out for LV this week. We aren’t eating a mill of his deal for him to not play for us this week. So they can’t have it official until after we play Sunday. Totally agree he’d basically be a throw-in. Then also Jets won’t have to cut someone. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted Thursday at 10:52 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:52 AM 19 minutes ago, jgb said: Totally agree he’d basically be a throw-in. Then also Jets won’t have to cut someone. True. I think we’d go less at WR. Which would be odd maybe having to inactivate one of Corley or Gipson. Quite frankly I’m over Gipson. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Thursday at 10:53 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:53 AM 1 minute ago, Bobby816 said: True. I think we’d go less at WR. Which would be odd maybe having to inactivate one of Corley or Gipson. Quite frankly I’m over Gipson. Yeah Gipson ain’t it but we don’t need 4 RBs either and I think Raiders not happy with their RB room 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted Thursday at 10:57 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:57 AM 4 minutes ago, jgb said: Yeah Gipson ain’t it but we don’t need 4 RBs either and I think Raiders not happy with their RB room But @Raideraholicsaid White is an elite RB 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Thursday at 10:59 AM Share Posted Thursday at 10:59 AM 1 minute ago, Bobby816 said: But @Raideraholicsaid White is an elite RB I’d love to see his stock portfolio so I can short his biggest holdings 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted Thursday at 12:16 PM Share Posted Thursday at 12:16 PM 1 hour ago, Bobby816 said: But @Raideraholicsaid White is an elite RB @Lurker89 was quite high on him too! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Green Posted Thursday at 01:37 PM Share Posted Thursday at 01:37 PM 2 hours ago, Bobby816 said: But @Raideraholicsaid White is an elite RB Where the hell is he? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker89 Posted Thursday at 02:58 PM Share Posted Thursday at 02:58 PM 2 hours ago, Jetsfan80 said: @Lurker89 was quite high on him too! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whodeawhodat Posted Thursday at 08:01 PM Share Posted Thursday at 08:01 PM Sounds like we are the only game in town on this one. Hope we get him for a 4th 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted Thursday at 08:03 PM Share Posted Thursday at 08:03 PM 3 minutes ago, whodeawhodat said: Sounds like we are the only game in town on this one. Hope we get him for a 4th We were only game in town for Rodgers. Problem is JD and Saleh on short contracts. They’d go all in on Nelson Alghalor if he was available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claymation Posted Thursday at 09:37 PM Share Posted Thursday at 09:37 PM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 10/3/2024 at 6:57 AM, Bobby816 said: But @Raideraholicsaid White is an elite RB Yes White is elite runner in power blocking scheme what he was drafted to play in. The Raiders are running a zone blocking scheme where he struggles - doesn’t have the vision . Also the Raiders offense line due to injuries early really were having their troubles. Finally with the addition of 2rd pick lg Jackson Power Johnson ( who refs warned Ap has to stop being too physical) and third round draft choice Dj Glaze Rt . ( both made their first career start last week) The offense line had its best run game against Browns . Rg D Parham been playing at high level all year - out with Achilles soreness now. Hopefully we see Jordan Meredith than either Cody white hair or a Peat.( both been bad) white out this week . A Mathison looks a lot better running in this scheme . He always better as number 2 back than lead back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 10/3/2024 at 4:01 PM, whodeawhodat said: Sounds like we are the only game in town on this one. Hope we get him for a 4th Raiders just inactivate d Adams All year if that’s the case. Raiders are getting a second and something else or there won’t be any trade. They have 28 million under the cap they don’t have to do anything with him. Next year they have no control unless they want to pay him that ridiculous salary. Which they don’t. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raideraholic Posted 9 hours ago Share Posted 9 hours ago On 10/2/2024 at 7:01 PM, jeremy2020 said: If JD does make a trade for him.. just a suggestion.. get it in writing that he will play on his current contract. D Adams is not playing on his current contract( he has no guarantee money next two years) . Jets work out a trade with Raiders . The Raiders will let the Jets to negotiate with D Adams agent to see if they can come up with new contract . They can’t than the trade probably off. Jets trade for Adams they are given him a new contract for couple years .( not one year deal) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago 1 hour ago, Raideraholic said: D Adams is not playing on his current contract( he has no guarantee money next two years) . Jets work out a trade with Raiders . The Raiders will let the Jets to negotiate with D Adams agent to see if they can come up with new contract . They can’t than the trade probably off. Jets trade for Adams they are given him a new contract for couple years .( not one year deal) Serious question. Say the Jets lose out on Davante. Do you think there’s any chance we can give you guys two ones for Tre Tucker (4.37 40 time)? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hawk Posted 8 hours ago Share Posted 8 hours ago On 10/2/2024 at 9:51 AM, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: Very fair lol. I do think he'd make a big enough impact. But it's not gonna be some cure all, to where they start putting up 40 points a game. The run game woes are more of an issue imo. If they don't show 2 RB at least 10 times a game it's should be grounds for termination. Way to much talent and provides just enough defensive indecision to make it effective in many other facets. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNJETFAN Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago No more than a 4th. And the Raiders need to eat some of that salary. He’d also have to either restructure or be cut as he’s due way too much next season, and he’ll be 74. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted 12 minutes ago Share Posted 12 minutes ago 2 hours ago, TNJETFAN said: No more than a 4th. And the Raiders need to eat some of that salary. He’d also have to either restructure or be cut as he’s due way too much next season, and he’ll be 74. And trade would almost certainly involve a new deal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.