Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Who the hell wants to argue with me ? Kobe Bryant is the best basketball player of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Wilt Chamberlain > both of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjunc Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Kobe is NOT better than Jordan and Wilt was not better than both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Coming from a huge Kobe fan he is not better than Jordan and no-one else is either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Are you insane? It isn't even worth arguing with you because it isn't even an argument. Kobe can't carry Jordan's bags into his hotel room when he's on the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 There is no comparison. Jordan is the greatest of all time. Kobe is not even the greatest of his era. He is prolly 5-10 on that list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryK Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 If he's so important, why hasn't society given him a moniker? Wilt "The Stilt" "Magic" Johnson "Air" Jordan Heck, even Iverson is "AI". ....and then theres -- Kobe Bryant. Nothing more, nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 If he's so important, why hasn't society given him a moniker? Wilt "The Stilt" "Magic" Johnson "Air" Jordan Heck, even Iverson is "AI". ....and then theres -- Kobe Bryant. Nothing more, nothing less. Good observation. I propose "Kobe Teenager Rapin' Bryant." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 There is no comparison. Jordan is the greatest of all time. Kobe is not even the greatest of his era. He is prolly 5-10 on that list. Ohh that's complete bull****. By the time Kobe retires he'll be known as the best basketball player ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Ohh that's complete bull****. By the time Kobe retires he'll be known as the best basketball player ever. Kobe Bryant = Penny Hardaway (if he stayed healthy after Shaq left) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Good observation. I propose "Kobe Teenager Rapin' Bryant." Good one. I propose Kobe "I can't win without Shaq" Bryant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 How many rings has Kobe won without Shaq? Oh, yeah, I guess you forgot about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 Kobe Bryant = Penny Hardaway (if he stayed healthy after Shaq left) Are you ****ing kidding me ? It slowed him down but it didn't end his damn career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Are you ****ing kidding me ? It slowed him down but it didn't end his damn career. You can make the argument that Shaq was in Jordan's class - but not better. And to compare Kobe to MJ is laughable at best. It isn't even worth a discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 How many rings has Kobe won without Shaq? Oh, yeah, I guess you forgot about that. Do you understand how good of a player Shaq is ? Honestly. Shaq is known as the most dominant player of all time and he has yet to retire, he's also one of the best 50 players and he's yet retire. Shaq took all the teams he played for to the Finals except the Suns obviously. What I'm trying to say is when you have Shaq in his prime, your going to win some rings GUARANTEED. Don't look now, but Kobe will win at least 2 to 3 more rings in his career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 You can make the argument that Shaq was in Jordan's class - but not better. And to compare Kobe to MJ is laughable at best. It isn't even worth a discussion. It's really hard to compare a SG to a Center. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Don't look now, but Kobe will win at least 2 to 3 more rings in his career. When that happens start a thread. Until then there is no argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 It's really hard to compare a SG to a Center. How so? It is how you dominate the game - not what position you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 How so? It is how you dominate the game - not what position you are. Your telling me Jordan dominated the game more than Shaq ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Do you understand how good of a player Shaq is ? Honestly. Shaq is known as the most dominant player of all time and he has yet to retire, he's also one of the best 50 players and he's yet retire. Shaq took all the teams he played for to the Finals except the Suns obviously. What I'm trying to say is when you have Shaq in his prime, your going to win some rings GUARANTEED. Don't look now, but Kobe will win at least 2 to 3 more rings in his career. Thanks for proving my point, dumbass. Take out Shaq and Kobe has zero rings. So you basically just admitted that Shaq was the reason for all the rings, and now Kobe sucks at winning. I honestly have no idea where you were going with this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 Thanks for proving my point, dumbass. Take out Shaq and Kobe has zero rings. So you basically just admitted that Shaq was the reason for all the rings, and now Kobe sucks at winning. I honestly have no idea where you were going with this post. Why I'm trying to say DUMBASS is your going to win for sure. Shaq was a big reason but he wasn't the only reason. Kobe helped win those rings just like Shaq did. So don't give me that bull**** saying it was because of Shaq. Kobe is absolutely unstoppable one on one, he's playing the best basketball of his life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 How many rings has Kobe won without Shaq? Oh, yeah, I guess you forgot about that. True, but Kobes career is far from over and the Lakers are looking damn good this year despite losing Bynum and Gasol. Kobe should win MVP this season IMO. He's been injured himself and has held the Lakers together despite losing the best players around him. They could be a real force come the playoffs when they should be 100%. My point, don't bet against Kobe winning #4 sometime soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Why I'm trying to say DUMBASS is your going to win for sure. Shaq was a big reason but he wasn't the only reason. Kobe helped win those rings just like Shaq did. So don't give me that bull**** saying it was because of Shaq. Kobe is absolutely unstoppable one on one, he's playing the best basketball of his life. 75% of the shooting guards in the league would have won a ring with Shaq during those years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 True, but Kobes career is far from over and the Lakers are looking damn good this year despite losing Bynum and Gasol. Kobe should win MVP this season IMO. He's been injured himself and has held the Lakers together despite losing the best players around him. They could be a real force come the playoffs when they should be 100%. My point, don't bet against Kobe winning #4 sometime soon. They don't see that! They don't see that there might be a DYNASTY soon with the Lakers. Andrew Bynum has a chance of being the best center in the leauge in about two years. Gasol is still in his prime and the entire bench is talented and filled with youth. Not to mention we could put the ball in the basket, hmm wonder why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 75% of the shooting guards in the league would have won a ring with Shaq during those years. Your 100% wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 75% of the shooting guards in the league would have won a ring with Shaq during those years. A ring?? Maybe 3 rings?? doubtful Shaq or no Shaq, you can't take any credibilty away from Kobe for those Championships. Anyone who thinks he didn'y play well enough to earn them is ****ing crazy. It worked both ways, they helped each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 21, 2008 Author Share Posted March 21, 2008 A ring?? Maybe 3 rings?? doubtful Shaq or no Shaq, you can't take any credibilty away from Kobe for those Championships. Anyone who thinks he didn'y play well enough to earn them is ****ing crazy. It worked both ways, they helped each other. That's what I'm trying to say, I don't think there getting it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boozer76 Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Why I'm trying to say DUMBASS is your going to win for sure. Shaq was a big reason but he wasn't the only reason. Kobe helped win those rings just like Shaq did. So don't give me that bull**** saying it was because of Shaq. Kobe is absolutely unstoppable one on one, he's playing the best basketball of his life. If you wanted to win for sure, you'd have Jordan on your team. Jordan didn't need a Shaq to win. Kobe isn't a "if you want to win for sure" player, therefor he isn't the best player. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe24jets Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Who the hell wants to argue with me ? Kobe Bryant is the best basketball player of all time. fo sho thats muth fukin -realtalk- my man no lie kobe>jordan just accept it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe24jets Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 How many rings has Kobe won without Shaq? Oh, yeah, I guess you forgot about that.1 how many has shaq won wit kobe zero that chip in miami dont count tha refs bent ova fo dwade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kobe24jets Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 If you wanted to win for sure, you'd have Jordan on your team. Jordan didn't need a Shaq to win. Kobe isn't a "if you want to win for sure" player, therefor he isn't the best player. Period. jordan needed scottie and tha refs and jordan cant wint wit out scottie scottie>jordan just accept it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 21, 2008 Share Posted March 21, 2008 Before you geniuses crown the Lakers with another "dynasty" maybe you should wait until they win the west and before you declare Kobe the "greatest player ever" maybe you should wait until he's the best Laker ever. He might not even make the top five. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.