Maxman Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 NYPost_Hubbuch The #Jets keep sabotaging any chance of trading Kellen Clemens. HBO cameras caught an 'X' (as in gone) by his name on Tannenbaum's board! I wanted to freeze that part but I didn't. I thought they would have made it so you couldn't have seen anything too revealing. This is interesting, anyone catch it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mandarinia Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I wanted to freeze that part but I didn't. I thought they would have made it so you couldn't have seen anything too revealing. This is interesting, anyone catch it? It's on my DVR i'll take a look and a pic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jbro22 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Are more screenshots of the depth chart available? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jbro22 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Are more screenshots of the depth chart available? Indeed, Props to Erick Mannasy of Jetstwit. http://jetstwit.com/2010/08/26/analysis-of-jets-hard-knocks-depth-chart/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 While it's very possible Clemens is a goner, I'm not sure the interpretation of this is completely correct, and with two games still left to go I really doubt final decisions have been made on most of these guys. Consider for a moment, that part of this is also looking at the card color and related info. Consider that Clemens has a yellow card with a red dot, which is assumed to have some sort of meaning towards his roster status. However, the same color and dot are present on Drew Coleman who just received a signing bonus and had his entire years salary guaranteed, so he's not going anywhere. Wayne Hunter, the Jets main backup at OT is the same, and I seriously doubt he's going anywhere, and is very likely to stay on the team as the backup OL with Turner and Vlad. I just can't imagine the Jets allowing any definitive plans they had to be allowed to show up on television, as it could only serve to hurt them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 It just hit me, seems like that the yellow card and/or red dot represent the Jets RFAs, considering the people who you can see on the board with those. I also never saw a pic that had an "X" next to Clemens name. Can anyone confirm that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Why would Jason Davis be on top of the fullback depth chart? That doesn't make sense.... if not Richardson, then it would HAVE to be Conner. Definitely one of those 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 It just hit me, seems like that the yellow card and/or red dot represent the Jets RFAs, considering the people who you can see on the board with those. I also never saw a pic that had an "X" next to Clemens name. Can anyone confirm that? In this pic: You can see the X next to Kellen's name, but you also see that there's only three QB's listed - O'Connell is no where to be found. Gone too is Jason Davis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireJet38 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 JetsTwit just saved a Patriots intern some time this morning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 How do you even know it's the depth chart? It might just be who is running with the 1s, 2s, etc that day or that practice. Richardson wasn't a RFA. Too old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 How do you even know it's the depth chart? It might just be who is running with the 1s, 2s, etc that day or that practice. Richardson wasn't a RFA. Too old. Yeah, I caught that after the fact. I'm guessing that's probably what the red dot indicates then as opposed to the card color. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 In this pic: You can see the X next to Kellen's name, but you also see that there's only three QB's listed - O'Connell is no where to be found. Gone too is Jason Davis. Oh ok, there it is, thanks. Although those points you make are interesting. Also this picture proves that the card colors have absolutely nothing to do with a players roster status, you can see what they all mean in the upper left hand corner, it's their contract status. Also considering that there's an "X" column on the far left, I'm wondering if those are the more definitive cuts while the other marked ones are possibilities they were looking at. I can't see the names on that list, but I'd be curious to see if that's where O'Connell and Davis ended up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonTime Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Im not saying that Clemens is our best option, but old man river hasnt shown jack sh*t from what Ive seen and/or read. Clemens is a veteran presence, knows the system, I do not see why its a lock that we are getting rid of him like that. Again, Brunell hasnt really shown anything. I just dont understand all this talk, does Clemens make alot of money..WTF.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 How do you even know it's the depth chart? It might just be who is running with the 1s, 2s, etc that day or that practice. Richardson wasn't a RFA. Too old. Well in the clip they were discussing who are locks to make the roster and the bubble players so I don't think it's outrageous to make the assumption they were setting up a hypothetical depth chart. I just went back and checked. Mike T says "let's see if we can cut to 53" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stoicsentry Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Well in the clip they were discussing who are locks to make the roster and the bubble players so I don't think it's outrageous to make the assumption they were setting up a hypothetical depth chart. I just went back and checked. Mike T says "let's see if we can cut to 53" If it's a depth chart, why is Jason Davis listed as #1??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 If it's a depth chart, why is Jason Davis listed as #1??????? There are two clips. The one I was talking about was the one where Mike T is at a white board where you can't see names, really. This is the one where the x by Kellen is visible. This is the one I was saying might be a hypothetical depth chart. There's another one where the camera just pans over a few names where there are no markings or "x's" to speak of. This one I don't think means a depth chart and it was old since Aaron Kia's name was listed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Well in the clip they were discussing who are locks to make the roster and the bubble players so I don't think it's outrageous to make the assumption they were setting up a hypothetical depth chart. I just went back and checked. Mike T says "let's see if we can cut to 53" Well, I would expect some artistic license. If they were going to give the full depth chart on television I'd be super pissed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Well, I would expect some artistic license. If they were going to give the full depth chart on television I'd be super pissed. I don't think they did. It's very difficult to make out the names. And yes, I expect artistic license to be there. It does suck though that you could make out the Xs next to names... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Looks like Hubbuch is full of sh*t, tbh. Chronologically, there were at least 4 QB on the board. Then it seems like they put an X by Clemens name and removed OConnell. To me that means they had a decision to make between those two, put an X by Clemens (meaning he's the one they kept) and removed OConnell. Seems like common sense to me, am I wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetscode1 Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 Well, I would expect some artistic license. If they were going to give the full depth chart on television I'd be super pissed. My thoughts at the time was that Mr. T suggestion was a little contrived...if they are smart enough to lobby to get on the show that have to realize some of the pitfalls... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 I think yellow with a red dot means "min. salary benefit". Drew Coleman has a yellow with a red dot and I don't think they are cutting him. edit: I think min. salary benefit means minimum benefit to the team for cutting the player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Banner Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Here's a thought, mebbe Drew Coleman accepted a $100K pay cut in exchange for upping the guarenteed money just to make himself harder to cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 A more interesting question .... was Revis on the board? Are they making plans based on the idea he will be back, or putting together the 53 with the expectation he won't be. Not that it would mean anything definitive on when the hold out ends, just some insight on Tanny's current expectations, by the folks who are actually in the know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 aaron kia is on the board it's old info or they are more retarded than we imagine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 aaron kia is on the board it's old info or they are more retarded than we imagine It probably is old. We know HBO holds material and cuts it in as they see fit based solely on the shake weights segment. Those weights showed up at camp on day one (as reported by the local beat), but didn't make Hard Knocks until the second episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 A more interesting question .... was Revis on the board? He was on the depth chart, but I'm pretty sure the position group breakdown didn't include him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.