neckdemon Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 19 hours ago, Augustiniak said: Jets seem to be doing the right things so far in FA. Biggest question i have is, if they don’t get a legit wr in FA, and then the top 3 wrs go in the draft before them, would they still go OT at 10 and then hope to address wr in round 3 or would they pivot to bowers or a trade back? In that case they'd probably be staring at fashanu and bowers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 I think we neee to create a situation where we’re ok at OT and WR going into the draft. Ho sign Bak for LT and get a big name WR. We’d still need another WR and Moses and Bak are older so the rookie could be next man up at OT (especially with how Bak gets injured). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 The pro now is I can’t see KC signing Boyd now after just signing Brown. So seems maybe down to us or PIT. Where he played college and not sure might even be from. But he doesn’t have a SB ring and very well might be chasing one. And quite frankly us with a healthy AR are closer to that than Pitt with Wilson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 31 minutes ago, Bobby816 said: I think we neee to create a situation where we’re ok at OT and WR going into the draft. Ho sign Bak for LT and get a big name WR. We’d still need another WR and Moses and Bak are older so the rookie could be next man up at OT (especially with how Bak gets injured). You can't sign Bahkatari and say you are set at LT. I am having a hard time seeing any scenario where we can be set at both LT and WR2 heading into the draft. I'd love if we could do it because our options in the first round would be numerous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 9 minutes ago, bicketybam said: You can't sign Bahkatari and say you are set at LT. I am having a hard time seeing any scenario where we can be set at both LT and WR2 heading into the draft. I'd love if we could do it because our options in the first round would be numerous. I guess I just have a decent amount of optimism in what I saw from Warren last year with in essence no offseason training. Where if we signed Bak and he starts that if or when he got injured I’d be ok with starting Warren. Or even drafting OT to battle with Bak 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Bobby816 said: The pro now is I can’t see KC signing Boyd now after just signing Brown. So seems maybe down to us or PIT. Where he played college and not sure might even be from. But he doesn’t have a SB ring and very well might be chasing one. And quite frankly us with a healthy AR are closer to that than Pitt with Wilson Lol Rodgers gonna be running for VP on a failed ticket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 9 minutes ago, neckdemon said: Lol Rodgers gonna be running for VP on a failed ticket. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 1 hour ago, Bobby816 said: I think we neee to create a situation where we’re ok at OT and WR going into the draft. Ho sign Bak for LT and get a big name WR. We’d still need another WR and Moses and Bak are older so the rookie could be next man up at OT (especially with how Bak gets injured). The problem with doing that is that you let Saleh convince Douglas to draft another edge rusher at 10. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 15 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: The problem with doing that is that you let Saleh convince Douglas to draft another edge rusher at 10. We need to replace Bryce Huff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker89 Posted March 15 Share Posted March 15 On 3/14/2024 at 11:06 AM, Lurker89 said: This would be ... boring... Okay... I'll take boring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Joejet Posted March 16 Popular Post Share Posted March 16 How about we dump the politics and stay with the Tyler Boyd thread!! 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, Long Island Leprechaun said: And he's not going to appeal to Democrats. He's a MAGA guy. Meanwhile you got GOP dark money funding Kennedy to take votes from Biden. Rodgers makes no sense in that scenario. I really wasn't trying to be political. Its just common sense there's no chance in hell anyone but the 2 main guys will win Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 14 hours ago, bicketybam said: You can't sign Bahkatari and say you are set at LT. I am having a hard time seeing any scenario where we can be set at both LT and WR2 heading into the draft. I'd love if we could do it because our options in the first round would be numerous. Tyron Smith and Mike Williams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Van Jefferson signed with Steelers. That might take them out of the Boyd sweepstakes. We need a big slot, he’s perfect for us if we’re going WR in the first. #Brian Thomas Jr. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
83Kelly2Allen18 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 21 hours ago, neckdemon said: In that case they'd probably be staring at fashanu and bowers. Pick ten has to start immediately Right now it's Nabers, Odunze, Bowers, Thomas in any particular order. You are probably signing Bakhitari as swing tackle. Assuming Lazard and Davis stay G. Wilson/ A. Lazard or ( draft pick day 3) Odunze*/ C. Davis /. Brownlee M. Williams/. X. Gibson Corey Davis would allow Williams to ease his transition and give yourself a great 4 wr set with Great versatility for a super bowl run after Thanksgiving Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plen T Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Good #3 but with Pitt he’s a 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C Mart Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 Just now, Plen T said: Good #3 but with Pitt he’s a 2 So who is the Jets #2 that makes him a #3? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bonkertons Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 On 3/15/2024 at 10:13 AM, TuscanyTile2 said: We need to replace Bryce Huff I think that would be Clowney if we pick him up. If not, we could probably take a kid in the 3rd or 4th to fill that spot. Obviously not replace his production but the hope is that McDonald does, or at least replaces "most" of it. 4 minutes ago, Plen T said: Good #3 but with Pitt he’s a 2 I think the only way he's not a #2 for us is if we draft Odunze or BTJ. If we draft Bowers, Boyd would absolutely be our #2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plen T Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 1 hour ago, C Mart said: So who is the Jets #2 that makes him a #3? I think they sign Mike Will or draft WR although Mikey another hospital bill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bicketybam Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 16 hours ago, Long Island Leprechaun said: And he's not going to appeal to Democrats. He's a MAGA guy. Meanwhile you got GOP dark money funding Kennedy to take votes from Biden. Rodgers makes no sense in that scenario. Rodgers is not a MAGA guy, lol 😅 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 On 3/14/2024 at 10:22 AM, Bobby816 said: We’ll have to significantly overpay to get him with those being the other 2 options for him. It might depend on who RFK Jr's VP is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby816 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 19 minutes ago, TuscanyTile2 said: It might depend on who RFK Jr's VP is. Quite getting overblown 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted March 16 Share Posted March 16 7 minutes ago, Bobby816 said: Quite getting overblown Agreed. It was a joke anyway. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.