Maynard13 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 hour ago, bicketybam said: Mooney got $13 mil a year. Boyd will want at least that. Wow Absurd. He’s a one trick pony. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 hour ago, Augustiniak said: Jets seem to be doing the right things so far in FA. Biggest question i have is, if they don’t get a legit wr in FA, and then the top 3 wrs go in the draft before them, would they still go OT at 10 and then hope to address wr in round 3 or would they pivot to bowers or a trade back? Bowers then Leggett or Persall then Malik Washington. That’s a lot of ummphh and speed and shake n bake. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jethead Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Interesting decision. I'd be afraid of CJ Uzoma redux. We can do better. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 28 minutes ago, section314 said: Hearing anything about Mike Williams interest from the genius ensemble in Florham Park? Nothing to report there yet. I've heard Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and MVS. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, Mogglez said: Nothing to report there yet. I've heard Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and MVS. I fear the jets will fix the OL in FA enough and then the top 3 wrs are gone and the jets take bowers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, Augustiniak said: I fear the jets will fix the OL in FA enough and then the top 3 wrs are gone and the jets take bowers. It wouldn’t surprise me either. I do think a WR will be available. If not, a trade down would probably be on the table as well. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, Mogglez said: Nothing to report there yet. I've heard Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and MVS. Definitely not a modern day Charlie's Angels. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 2 minutes ago, Mogglez said: It wouldn’t surprise me either. I do think a WR will be available. If not, a trade down would probably be on the table as well. Main scenario either rome or Nabers is there at 10, is if mccarthy goes top 9. But even if 4 qbs go top 9, you could still have top 3 wrs in there as well as alt. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post extmenace Posted March 14 Popular Post Share Posted March 14 1 hour ago, Augustiniak said: Jets seem to be doing the right things so far in FA. Biggest question i have is, if they don’t get a legit wr in FA, and then the top 3 wrs go in the draft before them, would they still go OT at 10 and then hope to address wr in round 3 or would they pivot to bowers or a trade back? If there was ever a time to trade down, this is the year. The way FA is unfolding, the jets are gaining more and more flexibility. The 10 pick is an easy pick to deal for, it’ll only cost a team in the 14-18 range a second rounder. The team would be in excellent shape to make such a move if they can land a Tyler Boyd / Curtis Samuel type. Then get bakharati on a team friendly deal. Then the trade down could afford us to go and get the tackle in rd 1 and the WR in rd 2. All of a sudden you have depth everywhere and you can let your best players win their jobs. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: Main scenario either rome or Nabers is there at 10, is if mccarthy goes top 9. But even if 4 qbs go top 9, you could still have top 3 wrs in there as well as alt. I could see that and then, yeah, you’d have to figure the pick would be Bowers. The team loves him from what I know. 6 minutes ago, section314 said: Definitely not a modern day Charlie's Angels. Eh - I wouldn’t hate it. In fact, I’d probably prefer to shore up the line with FA and address the WR in the draft. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker89 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 This would be ... boring... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker89 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 27 minutes ago, Maynard13 said: Bowers then Leggett or Persall then Malik Washington. That’s a lot of ummphh and speed and shake n bake. Legette is booty... took until his 5th year to breakout and his best year for anyone who was not a ****ing super senior was 167 yards... he is an athlete before a wr and i hate his face because people keep pretending this 23 year old *** prospect is something special. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I could see that and then, yeah, you’d have to figure the pick would be Bowers. The team loves him from what I know. Eh - I wouldn’t hate it. In fact, I’d probably prefer to shore up the line with FA and address the WR in the draft. I’m warming to the idea of bowers, though idk if this coaching staff would truly use him correctly. Rodgers would probably enjoy having him there to throw quick strikes and have him run for yac. And a weapon is a weapon, and the jets probably aren’t getting a legit #2 wr in FA. I guess his pro day will be interesting. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 8 minutes ago, Lurker89 said: Legette is booty... took until his 5th year to breakout and his best year for anyone who was not a ****ing super senior was 167 yards... he is an athlete before a wr and i hate his face because people keep pretending this 23 year old *** prospect is something special. He reminds me of another gamecock wr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTJetsFan Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 5 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: I’m warming to the idea of bowers, though idk if this coaching staff would truly use him correctly. Rodgers would probably enjoy having him there to throw quick strikes and have him run for yac. And a weapon is a weapon, and the jets probably aren’t getting a legit #2 wr in FA. I guess his pro day will be interesting. Apparently didn't participate in pro day https://sports.yahoo.com/report-brock-bowers-amarius-mims-132837040.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sammybighead Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 26 minutes ago, Mogglez said: It wouldn’t surprise me either. I do think a WR will be available. If not, a trade down would probably be on the table as well. I don't get this thinking. They should draft a tackle regardless. Who is protecting Rodgersnext year when smith/bhaktiari gets hurt and Moses is not resigned? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeNamathsFurCoat Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 26 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: Main scenario either rome or Nabers is there at 10, is if mccarthy goes top 9. But even if 4 qbs go top 9, you could still have top 3 wrs in there as well as alt. They should sign Tyron Smith to give themselves maximum flexibility at #10 to draft an OT (Moses' contract expires after this season, Smith's injury concerns), WR, or trade back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, Sammybighead said: I don't get this thinking. They should draft a tackle regardless. Who is protecting Rodgersnext year when smith/bhaktiari gets hurt and Moses is not resigned? They should, if only after a trade back. But increasingly, i can see the jets gm sitting there saying we need more weapons and we’re not going to get them in FA, we (currently) have no 2nd round pick, and may not be able to trade back. If we can’t, we’re going offensive weapon at 10. If it’s rome, great. If it’s bowers, great. But we’re getting a weapon to make this offense look functional so i don’t lose my job. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mogglez Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 7 minutes ago, Sammybighead said: I don't get this thinking. They should draft a tackle regardless. Who is protecting Rodgersnext year when smith/bhaktiari gets hurt and Moses is not resigned? I’m not saying avoid the position entirely but I’m not of the opinion that we should overpay anyone left on the WR market and leave a rookie protecting our QBs blindside. It’s just how I view the remaining FA market. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 9 minutes ago, Augustiniak said: They should, if only after a trade back. But increasingly, i can see the jets gm sitting there saying we need more weapons and we’re not going to get them in FA, we (currently) have no 2nd round pick, and may not be able to trade back. If we can’t, we’re going offensive weapon at 10. If it’s rome, great. If it’s bowers, great. But we’re getting a weapon to make this offense look functional so i don’t lose my job. I could see the trade down scenario if Fuaga and Dallas Turner are on the board. Will be interesting if Fuaga is seen as strictly a RT and the team that everyone has taking him just signed a RT(us.) Turner is best edge and a team that needs a PR may want him bad enough to move up. If one of the top 3 wr's on board, it's a moot point. We take him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrebetfan80 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 6 minutes ago, Mogglez said: I’m not saying avoid the position entirely but I’m not of the opinion that we should overpay anyone left on the WR market and leave a rookie protecting our QBs blindside. It’s just how I view the remaining FA market. I agree. But also I think that going into the draft with options is also best for the team. I think there is a world where we sign Smith/Bahktiari (hopefully both) and then say ok we can either take a WR at 10 and hope to find a good tackle prospect in rd 3, OR we can trade down, take a wr or tackle and then address whichever we did not at that spot in rd 2. I just like options. I dont want to feel the need to commit to one thing or another going into a draft that has depth at our positions of need. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrebetfan80 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 3 minutes ago, section314 said: I could see the trade down scenario if Fuaga and Dallas Turner are on the board. Will be interesting if Fuaga is seen as strictly a RT and the team that everyone has taking him just signed a RT(us.) Turner is best edge and a team that needs a PR may want him bad enough to move up. If one of the top 3 wr's on board, it's a moot point. We take him. id be hard pressed to see a scenario where at least 1 of the WR's is not on the board by 10. MHJ is almost a lock to go top 5, but after that its really anyones guess. I think we will be looking at atleast 1 of them when sitting there at 10. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Chrebetfan80 said: id be hard pressed to see a scenario where at least 1 of the WR's is not on the board by 10. MHJ is almost a lock to go top 5, but after that its really anyones guess. I think we will be looking at atleast 1 of them when sitting there at 10. I don’t think it’s so far fetched that Harrison, nabers and rome are all gone in the top 9. At least 2 wrs will be gone. Big question is what the giants do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheAustrian Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 if tyler boyd is our big fa aquisition as weapon we need to adress wr or bowers in the draft 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, TheAustrian said: if tyler boyd is our big fa aquisition as weapon we need to adress wr or bowers in the draft If they sign one more OL now, you’d have to assume the big focus is on adding a weapon in round 1. And likely that’s bowers or rome, both of which will be on most team’s top 10 boards. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
section314 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 56 minutes ago, Mogglez said: Nothing to report there yet. I've heard Tyron Smith, David Bakhtiari, and MVS. The Packers got rid of Rodgers, Cobb, Lazard, MVS and played the whole damn season without Bakhtiari , won a playoff game and should have been in the NFC championship game. Anbody else the the pattern here ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrebetfan80 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 minute ago, Augustiniak said: I don’t think it’s so far fetched that Harrison, nabers and rome are all gone in the top 9. At least 2 wrs will be gone. Big question is what the giants do. to me the biggest threats are the cardinals who are definitely taking MHJ unless they trade out Giants next since they absolutely need one, then I believe the bears are the only other threat to take a wr. Conceivable but I do think unless someone trades up ahead of the giants for mccarthy, then thats where they go, and I am starting to believe the bears want to look defensively in that spot at 9. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lurker89 Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 43 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said: He reminds me of another gamecock wr Bryan Edwards.....😂 jk Edwards was way more productive than Legette in college. So... you're telling me... he's Deebo .... helmet scouting is fun... Deebos college production sucked because he was injured his junior year. Deebos 4 years in college 2076 yards Legette first 4 years in school 423 yards Add in Legettes stellar super senior year woth 1255 yards and he still with 5 years does not come close to Deebos 4 year college production. Add to that old prospect.... it's not a good profile... its a profile to avoid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Just now, Lurker89 said: Bryan Edwards.....😂 jk So... he's Deebo .... helmet scouting is fun... Deebos college production sucked because he was injured his junior year. Deebos 4 years in college 2076 yards Legette first 4 years in school 423 yards Add in Legettes stellar super senior year woth 1255 yards and he still with 5 years does not come close to Deebos 4 year college production. Add to that old prospect.... it's not a good peofile... its a profile to avoid. I never looked at the stats of either. Just the way he plays reminds me of Deebo is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paradis Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 Love Boyd, but sounds like competition is steep. With no Diontae in PIT, hard to see him passing going to his home town 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King P Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 10 minutes ago, Chrebetfan80 said: id be hard pressed to see a scenario where at least 1 of the WR's is not on the board by 10. MHJ is almost a lock to go top 5, but after that its really anyones guess. I think we will be looking at atleast 1 of them when sitting there at 10. MHJ and Nabers will definitely be off the board by 10. Odunze is 50/50. But I could see him being taken as well. If all 3 are off the board, I'd trade down a couple spots and be in position to nab Brian Thomas Jr Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustiniak Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 12 minutes ago, Chrebetfan80 said: to me the biggest threats are the cardinals who are definitely taking MHJ unless they trade out Giants next since they absolutely need one, then I believe the bears are the only other threat to take a wr. Conceivable but I do think unless someone trades up ahead of the giants for mccarthy, then thats where they go, and I am starting to believe the bears want to look defensively in that spot at 9. already assuming cards take harrison. but if the giants go OL or qb that means it could shake out that nobody else goes wr until chicago at 9 maybe. but if the cards go harrison and then the giants go nabors, then rome could easily go by 9. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extmenace Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 1 hour ago, Maynard13 said: Wow Absurd. He’s a one trick pony. Can’t remember the specifics but I saw something that showed that Mooney got the least amount of accurate passes thrown his way over a certain amount of time. Not sure if it was just last year or for his career, but if that’s the case, Atlanta may believe he’d be more productive with a guy like cousins throwing him the ball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Untouchable Posted March 14 Share Posted March 14 22 minutes ago, TheAustrian said: if tyler boyd is our big fa aquisition as weapon we need to adress wr or bowers in the draft I think that’s the plan Go get Smith or Bakhtiari and a dude like Boyd, then get a legit playmaker at the top of the draft. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.