neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 It gives us a hof veteran who is obviously still performing at a high level. 2/25....should do it. then we could draft a receiver number 1 and go defense with the rest. ratliff/clemens/ainge can learn under him and if it doesn't look like they are going to cut the mustard, we draft a qb next year or acquire a young guy to learn the ropes for a year under warner. this also appeases the win-now crowd as warner has the ability to take a team to the promised land. if one of our young guys is looking good then we can grab ourselves a rb next year and be set for a while. plus warner is all class and an easy guy to root for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 I love Kurt Warner but NO. The Cards #3 and #4 wideouts are better than our #1 and #2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETSorDIE Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 It gives us a hof veteran who is obviously still performing at a high level. 2/25....should do it. then we could draft a receiver number 1 and go defense with the rest. ratliff/clemens/ainge can learn under him and if it doesn't look like they are going to cut the mustard, we draft a qb next year or acquire a young guy to learn the ropes for a year under warner. this also appeases the win-now crowd as warner has the ability to take a team to the promised land. if one of our young guys is looking good then we can grab ourselves a rb next year and be set for a while. plus warner is all class and an easy guy to root for. dump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 I love Kurt Warner but NO. The Cards #3 and #4 wideouts are better than our #1 and #2. this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 dump oh ok.....here's the better idea right? let's go into the seaosn with 3 likely career back-ups and let them fight it out for who will suck least when the games start? another miserable jets season....i can't wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 oh ok.....here's the better idea right? let's go into the seaosn with 3 likely career back-ups and let them fight it out for who will suck least when the games start? another miserable jets season....i can't wait. It's not that, Kurt Warner won't play half as good as he played last year. Don't forget who Warner was throwing too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 I love Kurt Warner but NO. The Cards #3 and #4 wideouts are better than our #1 and #2. btw...under this scenario we acquire a #1 receiver. and, btw our running game is head and shoulders above the cards. warner did all that with teams knowing he was throwing. our o-line will give him the time and getting a #1 receiver here will give warner all the weapons we need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 btw...under this scenario we acquire a #1 receiver. and, btw our running game is head and shoulders above the cards. warner did all that with teams knowing he was throwing. our o-line will give him the time and getting a #1 receiver here will give warner all the weapons we need. I don't know but Coles and Cotchery are not teams defenseive players fear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 It's not that, Kurt Warner won't play half as good as he played last year. Don't forget who Warner was throwing too. we could get warner and a guy like antonio bryant and with our running game and leon....warner would be just fine. actually he'd be great. and our defense should be much improved......there's no way in hell i want to see this team go into the season with ratliff/clemens/ainge battling it out for the qb position. it pretty much guarantees the jets finishing last in the afc east with no viable qb option for the next year either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 we saw Kurt Warner in NY once and it wasn't pretty Warner for the record has said he wants to finish his career in AZ... and i think that's probably best for everyone... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 I don't know but Coles and Cotchery are not teams defenseive players fear. alright great.....so if you don't think warner could do it with these guys wtf chance do the guys we have now got? slim to none is the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatcatxl Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 If arizona started me at qb I'd be able to throw for at least 10 tds during the year, just because I would know the general area Larry Fitz is in. If the Jets started me at qb I'd throw for 2. Both against the Pats because Cotch would come up with an amazing play. Thats a true story btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 we could get warner and a guy like antonio bryant and with our running game and leon....warner would be just fine. actually he'd be great. and our defense should be much improved......there's no way in hell i want to see this team go into the season with ratliff/clemens/ainge battling it out for the qb position. it pretty much guarantees the jets finishing last in the afc east with no viable qb option for the next year either. I agree with you man, Erik Ainge? Seriously? Haha I feel you but I rather draft a QB like Sanchez and a wideout. On the otherside, I rather just get a good CB and maybe a Bart Scott. We'll pay Warner an absolute ton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 alright great.....so if you don't think warner could do it with these guys wtf chance do the guys we have now got? slim to none is the answer. I just made a thread about aquiring Plax. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 we saw Kurt Warner in NY once and it wasn't pretty Warner for the record has said he wants to finish his career in AZ... and i think that's probably best for everyone... ok.....but money changes everything. you could make him the offer at least. we saw clemens in ny briefly too......not pretty. our other 2 choices aren't looking too great either. but i forgot, people are lining up for ratliff's c*ckmeat sandwich cause he made few completions to a wide open receiver in preseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 btw...under this scenario we acquire a #1 receiver. and, btw our running game is head and shoulders above the cards. warner did all that with teams knowing he was throwing. our o-line will give him the time and getting a #1 receiver here will give warner all the weapons we need. The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 But not with the Chad part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 This is not a bad idea. Warner is still a great passer. I would not be excited about bringing in any other available vet (Garcia, etc). The problem is, I can't see him not returning to the Cardinals. Maybe we can get GOD to put in a good word for the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. antonio bryant is a #1 type and would come cheaper. btw, until we know the jets exact cap number you don't know how much they'll have to spend. chad guarantees that your team will not get to a superbowl ever. only perfect circumstances and an insanely dominany defense will get penny to the big dance......best thing favre did was get chad and fat boy out of ny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. Nah. With the defense that we should have with Ryan, I'd rather Chad stay with the Phins and resume the Jets winning streak against them. Nothing like have two guaranteed wins in your division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Montreal Jet Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. The difference between Favre and Chad. Even when Favre sucked, I always thought we had a chance. Even when Chad was great, I always thought we would lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The difference between Favre and Chad. Even when Favre sucked, I always thought we had a chance. Even when Chad was great, I always thought we would lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 The difference between Favre and Chad. Even when Favre sucked, I always thought we had a chance. Even when Chad was great, I always thought we would lose. the fins fans will learn this soon enough. God i hope this doen't turn into another chad thread. the fu*king guy is like that damn cat .......always coming the freak back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 the fins fans will learn this soon enough. God i hope this doen't turn into another chad thread. the fu*king guy is like that damn cat .......always coming the freak back. That is funny. And true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 There's only 2 options for Warner: (1) re-sign with Cards or (2) retire. He's not signing anywhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Make him an offer he can't refuse? Who are we? The Corleones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 No more old QB's dammit. We never win with them. Think young and mobile. Lest we forget, regardless of the Superbowl appearance, Warner is a turnover machine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Make him an offer he can't refuse? Who are we? The Corleones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraVerde Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 man where was this poster this year???? O__o Didnt we already try this lets get a HOF veteran experiment this past season??? HAVE YOU LEARNED NOTHING????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 no such deal exists, he's not gonna learn a new offense, and the only way he'll do it is if his teammates are still around. hell his decision still leans heavy on Boldin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The Jets don't have the cap space to pull this off. Warner would cost a fortune for 1 year, and to bring in a #1 reciever (Boldin being the only viable option) would cost too much money, not to mention losing draft picks. To get Boldin you'll have to give up a 1st and maybe even your 2nd, leaving the Jets with no picks in the first 3 rounds. They can't do that. The Jets should've stuck with Chad, they'd be in better shape right now. How the H would you know about our cap space ? Trolls Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 The difference between Favre and Chad. Even when Favre sucked, I always thought we had a chance. Even when Chad was great, I always thought we would lose. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 No more old QB's dammit. We never win with them. Think young and mobile. Lest we forget, regardless of the Superbowl appearance, Warner is a turnover machine. young and mobile is great. know where we can get a good young, mobile quarterback? it's easy to say...hey let's get a young mobile quarterback. they don't grow on trees. so tell me where we can get one? or are you in line for the c*ckmeat sandwich also? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted February 12, 2009 Author Share Posted February 12, 2009 no such deal exists, he's not gonna learn a new offense, and the only way he'll do it is if his teammates are still around. hell his decision still leans heavy on Boldin you might be right, but i think it's at least worth a try. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.