Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Which player, when 100% is better? Not taking into account age or how prone they are to injury, who's the better player? I'm asking this because people are asking questions about Scotts production behind Ngata as opposed to playing behind Jenkins. As for me? I'd take Jenkins over him everyday. Was the most dominant player in the league for most of the 2008 season until he wore down. I doubt that will happen under Ryan who hopefully will take better care of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Which player, when 100% is better? Not taking into account age or how prone they are to injury, who's the better player? I'm asking this because people are asking questions about Scotts production behind Ngata as opposed to playing behind Jenkins. As for me? I'd take Jenkins over him everyday. Was the most dominant player in the league for most of the 2008 season until he wore down. I doubt that will happen under Ryan who hopefully will take better care of him. what is most 11 games??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjets Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Big man Kris.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 what is most 11 games??????? Yes, That is most of the season. You're aware that the season is 16 games right. Anything over 8 would be "most". I have to ask, do you think at all before you comment on this stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 You have to take in account their ages. Ngata is a lot younger and he is an emergiging talent. Ifn you want a guy that is going to get winded late int he season then take Jenkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Which player, when 100% is better? Not taking into account age or how prone they are to injury, who's the better player? I'm asking this because people are asking questions about Scotts production behind Ngata as opposed to playing behind Jenkins. As for me? I'd take Jenkins over him everyday. Was the most dominant player in the league for most of the 2008 season until he wore down. I doubt that will happen under Ryan who hopefully will take better care of him. If you completely ignore age and injuries? Then I'd probably give the nod to Jenkins by a little bit. Unfortunately though, those are very really factors and when taken into consideration you'd have to give it to Ngata. Either way, they're both fantastic players and we should be thankful to have player as talented as Jenkins. Especially at the price we paid for him. None of our LBs are going to have any problems related to Jenkins play, that's for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 this would be like having a poll on a pats board who is better wr Welker seriously or calvin johnson? Welker 350 votes CJ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 In reality I'd rather have Ngata but the way you posed the question ignoring injuries and age I voted Jenkins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 You have to take in account their ages. Ngata is a lot younger and he is an emergiging talent. Ifn you want a guy that is going to get winded late int he season then take Jenkins. I'm talking talent - This season. It's not about who's more valuable (I'd give that to Ngata) but who's simply better. For this season and for the here and now I can't see how you could go against Jenkins. He wore down for a reason last year. He was on the field too much for a 340lb man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 this would be like having a poll on a pats board who is better wr Welker seriously or calvin johnson? Welker 350 votes CJ 1 Not the same. I agree that I posed the question to favour Jenkins. BUT it's for the sake of proving a point so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Ngata is very good. Jenkins is probably a little better. If Jenkins is healthy, playing behind him instead of Ngata certainly will be no excuse for Scott if Scott's play is not at least as good as with the Ravens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Not the same. I agree that I posed the question to favour Jenkins. BUT it's for the sake of proving a point so. Are you on a debate team? You should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 Are you on a debate team? You should be. I don't like to lose arguements. That's all I'll say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PS17 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 I don't like to lose arguements. That's all I'll say. You are the best debater on this forum, you know how to prove your points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 You are the best debater on this forum, you know how to prove your points. yeah a real einstein...thinks orton is better than cutler a debate team winner lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 I don't like to lose arguements. That's all I'll say. You didn't lose this one, IJ. With your qualification on age and injuries, there is no doubt that playing behind Jenkins will be even better or at least as good for Scott than Ngata. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 yeah a real einstein...thinks orton is better than cutler a debate team winner lol Where did I ever say Orton is better than Cutler? Find where I said that! You really are clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Where did I ever say Orton is better than Cutler? Find where I said that! You really are clueless. when you say a 9-7 team with Cutler is going to have a worse season than a 8-8 team with Orton How do you explain that skippy...debate that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 I'm waiting.............................. tick tock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 when you say a 9-7 team with Cutler is going to have a worse season than a 8-8 team with Orton How do you explain that skippy...debate that Never said that either. Must be fun making stuff up. This is actually a quote from me from that "debate" "With that defense (Denvers defense) he'll not put up the wins Cutler will but I think he'll play better (Put up better #'s)" Yup, you clearly got me there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 I'm waiting.............................. tick tock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 brilliant "Kyle Orton has a better year than Jay Cutler. There I said it. " but he's not better ..u are a tool you have become an ecurb,,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Depends what you want. If you want someone to just play 34 Nose, Jenkins is your man. If you want someone whose more versatile and can play both 34 Nose and 34 End, Ngata's your man. I'd rather just have the straight up Nose, so I'll go with Jenkins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 brilliant "Kyle Orton has a better year than Jay Cutler. There I said it. " but he's not better ..u are a tool you have become an ecurb,,, Better year means better player? Oh my God, I really don't even begin to know where to start with absolutely retarded statement. Orton, in Denver is in a better situation for a QB, than Cutler. Not in terms of winning games but in terms of QB performance/#'s. NEVER did I state or imply that Orton was the better QB. Anyone who has an IQ over 12 would realise that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 you have become an ecurb,,, He is ecurb. We've known that for a long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Better year means better player? Oh my God, I really don't even begin to know where to start with absolutely retarded statement. Orton, in Denver is in a better situation for a QB, than Cutler. Not in terms of winning games but in terms of QB performance/#'s. NEVER did I state or imply that Orton was the better QB. Anyone who has an IQ over 12 would realise that. you phucking make no sense!!!!!!!!!! Shanahan is gone...a new tool is running show without Moss/Welker and has sh1t for a running game and a WR facing a lengthy suspension Right...keep on debating Bears just signed pace , have a stud RB, will prob sign Holt and another wideout in 2nd rd... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 you phucking make no sense!!!!!!!!!! Shanahan is gone...a new tool is running show without Moss/Welker and has sh1t for a running game and a WR facing a lengthy suspension Right...keep on debating Bears just signed pace , have a stud RB, will prob sign Holt and another wideout in 2nd rd... Yet I just proved you to be absolutely 100% wrong in your assumption that I made that statement. Cutler is a better QB, the Bears are a better team. BUT I believe Orton will have a better statistical season. I could be wrong, I'm not declaring it as fact it's just what I think will happen. Don't like it? Fair enough, don't crucify me for having an opinion that disagrees with your know it all attitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 He is ecurb. We've known that for a long time. Shhh, let's not tell the few who don't know that yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Yet I just proved you to be absolutely 100% wrong in your assumption that I made that statement. Cutler is a better QB, the Bears are a better team. BUT I believe Orton will have a better statistical season. I could be wrong, I'm not declaring it as fact it's just what I think will happen. Don't like it? Fair enough, don't crucify me for having an opinion that disagrees with your know it all attitude. better statistic season means what?????????? Nothing!!!!!!!!!!! You didn't i think Orton may have a better year you came out and said He will Go to Bed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 better statistic season means what?????????? Nothing!!!!!!!!!!! You didn't i think Orton may have a better year you came out and said He will Go to Bed I said it in a predictions thread. Jeez, I feel like I'm arguing with a child. I never said it meant anything, I'll take wins over stats any day of the week. But I still think Orton puts up better #'s in that system with those weapon as opposed to Cutler in the Chicago offense. Argue all you like I've made a prediction and you can't prove it wrong until the season plays out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Cutler is going to have a ****ty year in Chicago. Last time I checked Chicago wasn't a good team. They also had a ****ty line and worse receivers than Denver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 Cutler is going to have a ****ty year in Chicago. Last time I checked Chicago wasn't a good team. They also had a ****ty line and worse receivers than Denver. Yeah, but afo thinks since they've signed Pace (A guy who hasn't played well since the year of the ****ing snake) that they'll now be an elite offense. Oh and Tory Holt another has-been is going to be their saviour. To be serious, on offense all they have is Matt Forte, who's a VERy good RB. The Bears will still be a running team this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 Which player, when 100% is better? Not taking into account age or how prone they are to injury, who's the better player? I'm asking this because people are asking questions about Scotts production behind Ngata as opposed to playing behind Jenkins. As for me? I'd take Jenkins over him everyday. Was the most dominant player in the league for most of the 2008 season until he wore down. I doubt that will happen under Ryan who hopefully will take better care of him. Lol.. And Brett Favre was one of the best QB's in football until the Denver game when both him and Jenkins imploded. Lot of good it did us... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 I'd take Ngata, but Jenkins is a beast. Ngata's been a beast the past 3 years, while Jenkins beasted for 11 games last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 You'd get the same result if you asked on a Jets site, "Who was the better player: Kyle Clifton or Harry Carson?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.