Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 You know what I hate? The Jets fan who wants Clemens to start and knows that he won't start until Chad plays poorly enough, but doesnt want to deal with watching Chad play poorly enough/the Jets lose, for it to happen. Those of you out there who fit that description need to get off the fence and suck it up. Sundays game is meaningless for this franchise if Chad is the starter. And it would be a bad thing for the franchise if he went out, had a solid game and we squeaked out a victory. That is the last thing that we should want to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Hey Barton is this official? I don't see 4 asterisks on both side of the header. that must mean this is unofficial, which makes this thread null and void. It is now official. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 You know what I hate? The Jets fan who wants Clemens to start and knows that he won't start until Chad plays poorly enough, but doesnt want to deal with watching Chad play poorly enough/the Jets lose, for it to happen. Those of you out there who fit that description need to get off the fence and suck it up. Sundays game is meaningless for this franchise if Chad is the starter. And it would be a bad thing for the franchise if he went out, had a solid game and we squeaked out a victory. That is the last thing that we should want to happen. If Mangini is screwing this up as bad as you imply... our biggest issue is finding a new coach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 Hey Barton is this official? I don't see 4 asterisks on both side of the header. that must mean this is unofficial, which makes this thread null and void. That is weak, esp coming from somebody that wants Clemens to start. **rips off your chad pennington hater patch** Phony! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 That is weak, esp coming from somebody that wants Clemens to start. **rips off your chad pennington hater patch** Phony! It's official now, you bipolar Chad hater. I want Clemens to start, I just don't have the tireless energy that you have to do battle with that Chad loving ecurb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 It's official now, you bipolar Chad hater. I want Clemens to start, I just don't have the tireless energy that you have to do battle with that Chad loving ecurb. Put my thread back. You are killing the mood I set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Put my thread back. You are killing the mood I set. Are you asking me? or are you telling me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojodogs Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 You know what I hate? The Jets fan who wants Clemens to start and knows that he won't start until Chad plays poorly enough, but doesnt want to deal with watching Chad play poorly enough/the Jets lose, for it to happen. Those of you out there who fit that description need to get off the fence and suck it up. Sundays game is meaningless for this franchise if Chad is the starter. And it would be a bad thing for the franchise if he went out, had a solid game and we squeaked out a victory. That is the last thing that we should want to happen. If mangini starts chad this sunday chad will go out for the season. The guy is crazy brave and against this line he will get real hurt. I hope he does not start him the guy has a bad ankle and cant get out of the pocket in time to avoid a big hit. But knowing chad he's brave enough to pull a sneak and it will be career over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 You know what I hate? The Jets fan who wants Clemens to start and knows that he won't start until Chad plays poorly enough, but doesnt want to deal with watching Chad play poorly enough/the Jets lose, for it to happen. Those of you out there who fit that description need to get off the fence and suck it up. Sundays game is meaningless for this franchise if Chad is the starter. And it would be a bad thing for the franchise if he went out, had a solid game and we squeaked out a victory. That is the last thing that we should want to happen. Yeah of course, a win DEFINITELY is the last thing any jets fan should want. lolsc I don't know man, some people are just wired different. Me, I was always the extreme competitor, I wanted to win in every game i played in, no matter how meaningless it was if we were already in first place or last place or it was a scrimige against upper classmen, I just wanted to win, like diving-head-first-into-the-stands-or-wall-for-a-loose-ball type desire to win. I never thought of anything less. The same thing followed me as I went through my cancer treatment, and while I saw people much less sick then me die, I didn't give in for a second, then that just went on in my proffesional life, and even into things i took up later in life like yacht racing where in my second year i participated in one of the most presigous open water distance races there is with guys who waited 10-20 years or more to do. So no dude, I don't ever root to not win, not ever, because I am a winner in life, rooting to lose is for people who are fine with losing, and that ain't this guy and that ain't a lot of people here who grew up playing competitive sports or kick @ss on the field of life. You can justify losing to lead to player changes, or losing to get a better draft spot when we won't be in the playoffs anyway, but not me. And in NO WAY does that make me or anyone else who feels the same not a fan, it is actually quite the opposite. NOW WHOSE WITH ME HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraVerde Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 If mangini starts chad this sunday chad will go out for the season. The guy is crazy brave and against this line he will get real hurt. I hope he does not start him the guy has a bad ankle and cant get out of the pocket in time to avoid a big hit. But knowing chad he's brave enough to pull a sneak and it will be career over. Look, im as eager to see Kellen as the next guy but calling and predicting Chads demise is turning your back and the years his given to the Jets. Why cant we all be patient and let it play itself out. Kellen will play and Mangini is smart enough to know when to pull the switch. If not Chad wouldve started against Baltimore. Mangini is giving everyone a chance to redeem themselves. Plus they are not focused on Chad as the problem but it is becoming more and more apparent and Mangini is taking note of that. SUPPORT THIS TEAM AND ITS PLAYERS...except for Barrott and JCrap....they have GOT TO GO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Seriously guys, the absolute best thing that could happen to the Jets right now is for an axe murderer to show up at Chad Pennington's house. And Tuiasosopo's for good measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Seriously guys, the absolute best thing that could happen to the Jets right now is for an axe murderer to show up at Chad Pennington's house. And Tuiasosopo's for good measure. I don't agree with you, but i gotta admit it was funny, lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I don't agree with you, but i gotta admit it was funny, lol! You're right, that's not feasible. Pennington is a rhode scholar, after all, and would just talk the axe murderer out of killing him. Tuiasosopo wouldn't be so lucky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Seriously guys, the absolute best thing that could happen to the Jets right now is for an axe murderer to show up at Chad Pennington's house. And Tuiasosopo's for good measure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Are you asking me? or are you telling me? I would also like if it were seperated, but just because i want people to see my retort, lol. Of course i understand your desire to lump the same stuff posted ad nuasium into one disorganized pile, no worries either way jeffe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Put my thread back. You are killing the mood I set. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojodogs Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 Look, im as eager to see Kellen as the next guy but calling and predicting Chads demise is turning your back and the years his given to the Jets. Why cant we all be patient and let it play itself out. Kellen will play and Mangini is smart enough to know when to pull the switch. If not Chad wouldve started against Baltimore. Mangini is giving everyone a chance to redeem themselves. Plus they are not focused on Chad as the problem but it is becoming more and more apparent and Mangini is taking note of that. SUPPORT THIS TEAM AND ITS PLAYERS...except for Barrott and JCrap....they have GOT TO GO! I do support the team and its players. Which is why i dont want chad to go into a career suicide here. Chad would be a great qb on a team like the bears or ravens. They have a defense he could prosper with. I m sorry i should have said i hate chads performance this year not chad himself. But with this team he will never do what we need him to do which is THROW THE DAMN BALL AND MAKE THE D RESPECT YOU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 But with this team he will never do what we need him to do which is THROW THE DAMN BALL AND MAKE THE D RESPECT YOU Chad throws the ball all right. He just goes by the rules from the early 20th century when the FORWARD pass was illegal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I do support the team and its players. Which is why i dont want chad to go into a career suicide here. Chad would be a great qb on a team like the bears or ravens. They have a defense he could prosper with. I m sorry i should have said i hate chads performance this year not chad himself. But with this team he will never do what we need him to do which is THROW THE DAMN BALL AND MAKE THE D RESPECT YOU Walk with me here jojo for a sec, i have heard this from a few people here, that chad would do well on the bears, some people even said they get to the bowl with chad. These are generally the same people that want clemens in over him, like you. Now, if chad is not that good for us, but would be good for the bears or ravens because they have a great D which he would not interact with on the field as a QB who runs an offense, then WHY THE HELL WOULD HE NOT BE GOOD FOR US IF WE HAD A GOOD DEFENSE???? Is everyone here of the opinion that "hey, our D sucks, lets improve our offense through a qb change so we can be gun slingers and not care so much about the D? Well, that thinking led to Indy never getting it done in the post season, that is until they got a defense that showed up to play, and they had the biggest and greatest gunslinging offense in the league and one of the greatest in nfl history all those years they s%%t the bed in the playoffs. So I ask you and everyone again, if you think chad is great for the bears then why not just keep him and work on our defense, because nothing clemens does will help with that. If anything it will hurt because gun slinging quickly downfield will only mean more time for our Defense on the field, a unit that is already weak. AM I CRAZY OR DOES THIS ALL MAKE SENSE TO ANY OF YOU???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Walk with me here jojo for a sec, i have heard this from a few people here, that chad would do well on the bears, some people even said they get to the bowl with chad. These are generally the same people that want clemens in over him, like you. Now, if chad is not that good for us, but would be good for the bears or ravens because they have a great D which he would not interact with on the field as a QB who runs an offense, then WHY THE HELL WOULD HE NOT BE GOOD FOR US IF WE HAD A GOOD DEFENSE???? Is everyone here of the opinion that "hey, our D sucks, lets improve our offense through a qb change so we can be gun slingers and not care so much about the D? Well, that thinking led to Indy never getting it done in the post season, that is until they got a defense that showed up to play, and they had the biggest and greatest gunslinging offense in the league and one of the greatest in nfl history all those years they s%%t the bed in the playoffs. So I ask you and everyone again, if you think chad is great for the bears then why not just keep him and work on our defense, because nothing clemens does will help with that. If anything it will hurt because gun slinging quickly downfield will only mean more time for our Defense on the field, a unit that is already weak. AM I CRAZY OR DOES THIS ALL MAKE SENSE TO ANY OF YOU???? Nobody thinks Chad will be around by the time the JETS have a good D... thats why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzer Division Marduk Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Seriously guys, the absolute best thing that could happen to the Jets right now is for an axe murderer to show up at Chad Pennington's house. And Tuiasosopo's for good measure. I think Barton's looking for Tonya Harding's boyfriend's number as we speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojodogs Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Yeah of course, a win DEFINITELY is the last thing any jets fan should want. lolsc I don't know man, some people are just wired different. Me, I was always the extreme competitor, I wanted to win in every game i played in, no matter how meaningless it was if we were already in first place or last place or it was a scrimige against upper classmen, I just wanted to win, like diving-head-first-into-the-stands-or-wall-for-a-loose-ball type desire to win. I never thought of anything less. The same thing followed me as I went through my cancer treatment, and while I saw people much less sick then me die, I didn't give in for a second, then that just went on in my proffesional life, and even into things i took up later in life like yacht racing where in my second year i participated in one of the most presigous open water distance races there is with guys who waited 10-20 years or more to do. So no dude, I don't ever root to not win, not ever, because I am a winner in life, rooting to lose is for people who are fine with losing, and that ain't this guy and that ain't a lot of people here who grew up playing competitive sports or kick @ss on the field of life. You can justify losing to lead to player changes, or losing to get a better draft spot when we won't be in the playoffs anyway, but not me. And in NO WAY does that make me or anyone else who feels the same not a fan, it is actually quite the opposite. NOW WHOSE WITH ME HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA wow you have mojo. Actually i have to concur Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Walk with me here jojo for a sec, i have heard this from a few people here, that chad would do well on the bears, some people even said they get to the bowl with chad. These are generally the same people that want clemens in over him, like you. Now, if chad is not that good for us, but would be good for the bears or ravens because they have a great D which he would not interact with on the field as a QB who runs an offense, then WHY THE HELL WOULD HE NOT BE GOOD FOR US IF WE HAD A GOOD DEFENSE???? Is everyone here of the opinion that "hey, our D sucks, lets improve our offense through a qb change so we can be gun slingers and not care so much about the D? Well, that thinking led to Indy never getting it done in the post season, that is until they got a defense that showed up to play, and they had the biggest and greatest gunslinging offense in the league and one of the greatest in nfl history all those years they s%%t the bed in the playoffs. So I ask you and everyone again, if you think chad is great for the bears then why not just keep him and work on our defense, because nothing clemens does will help with that. If anything it will hurt because gun slinging quickly downfield will only mean more time for our Defense on the field, a unit that is already weak. AM I CRAZY OR DOES THIS ALL MAKE SENSE TO ANY OF YOU???? Great Post!!! If We had a great D we could be a SB team, we dont. I think we should blame Chad!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jojodogs Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 Great Post!!! If We had a great D we could be a SB team, we dont. I think we should blame Chad!!!!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.