TNJet Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Cromartie is to blame for yesterday's loss. Dont get too philosiphical....Without his Muffed KR I honestly believe we win that game by atleast 3. That was the dagger...and cant leave out his 4 holding plays that kept giving their offense a second chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Cromartie is to blame for yesterday's loss. Dont get too philosiphical....Without his Muffed KR I honestly believe we win that game by atleast 3. That was the dagger...and cant leave out his 4 holding plays that kept giving their offense a second chance. But 2 of those holding calls were BS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 They lack a significant talent at safety and OLB. Aside from that, this team is fine. Oh and the QB isnt that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JerryK Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 *The initial post lists about 30 offensive losses and Shaun Ellis on D. How does losing Braylon and any number of offensive players give the Raiders 150 yards on the ground? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjets Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 Very good post. I agree with you on most issues. but wanted to touch on a few. Sanchez is not a top 5 QB and I don't think we need him to. for the most part I think he's been soild Ellis and Ihedigbo, not signing them, plain stupid and being cocky Greene doesn't have that "it" factor. Bilal Powell looks like a young strong hungry back. I say feed him. LT: just one last note. this is the guy they wanted to cut. Jets said take a pay cut and a lesser role or see you later. LT was cool with the pay cut and the lesser role. Guess what he has out preformed every player on the offense, the man is a soldier and has been rock soild for us. And when the season is over the Jets are gonna say **** you very much and thanks for comming. mark my words, it will come back and bite us in the a$$ just like the Woody thing and the Ellis thing is. it's always gonna be personal because we don't show loyalty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted September 26, 2011 Author Share Posted September 26, 2011 *The initial post lists about 30 offensive losses and Shaun Ellis on D. How does losing Braylon and any number of offensive players give the Raiders 150 yards on the ground? Our offense is a much bigger issue in general. The Raiders game was a fluke. We have a decent defense which is mainly intact from last year. Our offense can't run at all. We lose to the Cowboys if not for a blocked punt, remember. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 26, 2011 Share Posted September 26, 2011 And when the season is over the Jets are gonna say **** you very much and thanks for comming. mark my words, it will come back and bite us in the a$$ just like the Woody thing and the Ellis thing is. No, it won't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jbro22 Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 It took 3 seasons for Jets fans to stop complaining about Brad Smith wasting a roster spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JiFtheOracle Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Confused, Is this a joke thread. The "bad drafts" were like half jokes. The Jets are returning 10-11 starters on D and numerous back up contributors as well. The offensive line lost 1 players who was replaced by a player that was lights out last year when Woody missed due to injury. The WR's are a definite upgrade, especially considering Edwards and Cotchery arent even playing...and mostly because, Plaxico is better and Mason will be much better. Brad Smith? James Ihedigbo? Ben Harstock? Please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJoe12 Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Our offense is a much bigger issue in general. The Raiders game was a fluke. We have a decent defense which is mainly intact from last year. Our offense can't run at all. We lose to the Cowboys if not for a blocked punt, remember. We won a bunch of games we shouldn't have last year, Cleveland definitely comes to mind, but no one remembers how we got to 11-5, just that we won 11 games and lost in the AFCCG. Come the end of the year no one will care how we made the playoffs, so long as we made the playoffs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 the jets philosophy in building a team is to go after high impact, high cost stars and hope you can patch up the bottom of the roster with journeymen if turner doesn't get hurt, we're not having this discussion, but he did so it exposes the weakness to the philosophy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 It took 3 seasons for Jets fans to stop complaining about Brad Smith wasting a roster spot. No way the Bills beat the Pats without Brad Smith's 6 yards on two carries. You can't replace that kind of impact with just anyone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 No way the Bills beat the Pats without Brad Smith's 6 yards on two carries. You can't replace that kind of impact with just anyone. 6 yards, 100,000,000,000 intangibles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Mostro Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 6 yards, 100,000,000,000 intangibles. That is like a bazillion dollars per yard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Il Mostro Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 We do miss T-Rich's blocking, not that he would be the same guy this season as he has been in the past so what can you do. The "Terminator" hasn't shown jack. Another over hyped JAG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Plaxico is a better downfield blocker than Edwards. I'll sacrifice that for an actual target for the QB. Not saying that I have a problem with Plax, but it seems like Braylon grew some chemistry with Sanchez. The last thing you need for a QB with a suspect O'line, no running game and a sh*tty O.C. in Schotty is a WR that is better than your former target at blocking downfield. I doubt that would be considered an upgrade. It may be too early to call, but this has all the ingredients of one of those SOJ seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aten Posted September 27, 2011 Share Posted September 27, 2011 Of course the problem is personnel. Just like the problem is personnel for the Patriots, who are still trying to put a pass defense together after keeping the original band together for far too long and having to start from scratch. Just like the problem is personnel for the Colts, whose entire roster is built around a player whose career might be over. Just like the problem is personnel for Pittsburgh, which basically did a little of both in letting the defense get old and relying on Ben to be his own pass protection to the point where they wound up with a bunch of guys on the line who can't play. We ignored depth and banked on good fortune with injuries in putting together this talented but thin team and it damn near worked. Favre's injury and the decision to draft Sanchez blew our window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted October 3, 2011 Author Share Posted October 3, 2011 Of course the problem is personnel. Just like the problem is personnel for the Patriots, who are still trying to put a pass defense together after keeping the original band together for far too long and having to start from scratch. Just like the problem is personnel for the Colts, whose entire roster is built around a player whose career might be over. Just like the problem is personnel for Pittsburgh, which basically did a little of both in letting the defense get old and relying on Ben to be his own pass protection to the point where they wound up with a bunch of guys on the line who can't play. We ignored depth and banked on good fortune with injuries in putting together this talented but thin team and it damn near worked. Favre's injury and the decision to draft Sanchez blew our window. And this was the point. We did not sure-up the roster. Just swapped names for names and forgot that we actually need to play this game on the field. Very solid post, Aten. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 Of course the problem is personnel. Just like the problem is personnel for the Patriots, who are still trying to put a pass defense together after keeping the original band together for far too long and having to start from scratch. Just like the problem is personnel for the Colts, whose entire roster is built around a player whose career might be over. Just like the problem is personnel for Pittsburgh, which basically did a little of both in letting the defense get old and relying on Ben to be his own pass protection to the point where they wound up with a bunch of guys on the line who can't play. We ignored depth and banked on good fortune with injuries in putting together this talented but thin team and it damn near worked. Favre's injury and the decision to draft Sanchez blew our window. All of this is true except for one thing: Our window if far from closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 The problem is Greg McElroy's injured thumb. Shameless bump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.