#27TheDominator Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Was it a total abysmal performance? No. However, an asterik needs to be applied to it due to the game circumstances. I'll agree with the asterisk. That's why I do not give him a "300 yard passing" rating for the game. I give him decent. I'm going to bed now. You guys can bash me and Chad all you want. Night, see ya tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Stupid Post of the week nomination. Wow that was creative, jerk off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 Wow that was creative, jerk off. As was your lame post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 To take it even further all of the Pats losses except one (KC in 2005) were in games they were outrushed during the last two years which still posted an impressive 100 yards rushing. PFKBITCH, grow up you still a look like a little nerd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 after 4 years i would say it's safe to say we know what pennington can do. it remains to be seen what clemens is capable of and it would be a wasted season to finsish out of the playoffs and have no idea about clemens ability heading into next year. it could be 2 games, 4 games, or 8 games i really don't care but i want to see clemens get his shot. you hit absolutely on the money man. and even if penny was doing great and we were winning we have to see what clemens can do. as a second rounder pick you have to put him in sooner ar later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 you hit absolutely on the money man. and even if penny was doing great and we were winning we have to see what clemens can do. as a second rounder pick you have to put him in sooner ar later I agree with that as well. Plus getting Clemens the experience could only help his developement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 If it is indeed true that Pennington could be pulled if he performs badly against NE, then you can bank on Ramsey starting against Chicago. Pennington hasn't even a decent game in New England since 2002. September 17, 2006: 22 for 37; 306 yards; 2 tds and 1 int. You and Tex can yell fluke all you want, but that's still a decent game. Read my post again. I said IN New England. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pragmatic Bus Posted November 4, 2006 Share Posted November 4, 2006 I agree with that as well. Plus getting Clemens the experience could only help his developement. and also if it turns out he is better than penny we are in bussiness, and if he is just as good as penny we can still trade him and get some value Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bman Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 why would you trade a QB as good as penny? You need a quality back up who will be the future QB.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 why would you trade a QB as good as penny? You need a quality back up who will be the future QB.. Because being as good as Penny means you are mediocre, and you should aspire to be more than that. I'm not happy with the chance at sneaking into the playoffs every year as the final playoff team, and winning 1 game by upset before bowing out. One day, I'd like to be a Super Bowl team. Even Vinny gave us a better chance at that, and he's not even really that great. The guy wasn't a very good decision maker, but he was still a better option than Chad, which is really funny if you consider how many people claim arm strength doesn't matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 To take it even further all of the Pats losses except one (KC in 2005) were in games they were outrushed during the last two years which still posted an impressive 100 yards rushing. PFKBITCH, grow up you still a look like a little nerd Calm down Francis. You are stating obvious. Here is another one. If your team turns over the ball more, they will probably lose. Plus, when they give up more points, they will always lose. I would have never thought of that. A QB with a running game is going to have more success. Wow. If your point is the only thing separating Chad and Tom is a running game and run D, you are sadly mistaken. If Chad was on the Patriots at the beginning of 2005 when the Patriots D sucked and Dillon was ineffective, we would have been 0-8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Calm down Francis. You are stating obvious. Here is another one. If your team turns over the ball more, they will probably lose. Plus, when they give up more points, they will always lose. I would have never thought of that. A QB with a running game is going to have more success. Wow. If your point is the only thing separating Chad and Tom is a running game and run D, you are sadly mistaken. If Chad was on the Patriots at the beginning of 2005 when the Patriots D sucked and Dillon was ineffective, we would have been 0-8. Point is great QB's win even without running games or run defense. Therefor Tom Brady is just another run of the mil QB like Trent Dilfer that needs defense and a running game to win. PS - to the Jets nation staff. This tool is the reason I'm done posting here. Later. PFKBITCH - Go throw yourself on a grenade you little nerd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 lighten up Francis!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 5, 2006 Author Share Posted November 5, 2006 Point is great QB's win even without running games or run defense. Therefor Tom Brady is just another run of the mil QB like Trent Dilfer that needs defense and a running game to win. PS - to the Jets nation staff. This tool is the reason I'm done posting here. Later. PFKBITCH - Go throw yourself on a grenade you little nerd. Nice to see Jet fans have thick skin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Nice to see Jet fans have thick skin. It's not about having thick skin. It's about the fact that this moron has no idea what he is talking about. "Corey Dillon would never have rushed for the yardage he did without Brady" hahahahaha. Right because he never rushed for big yardage with guys like David Klingler at QB. He is a dumbass, and between his posts and yours it is just not worth posting here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted November 5, 2006 Author Share Posted November 5, 2006 He is a dumbass, and between his posts and yours it is just not worth posting here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Big Green Douche Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Hey tx, isnt there a colts message board you should be trolling on right about now? Seriously, do you leave the house? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raffyD Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Brady is gay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 It's not about having thick skin. It's about the fact that this moron has no idea what he is talking about. "Corey Dillon would never have rushed for the yardage he did without Brady" hahahahaha. Right because he never rushed for big yardage with guys like David Klingler at QB. He is a dumbass, and between his posts and yours it is just not worth posting here. True dat.....diverse opinions are cool but blatant bs is just that....bs. Speaking of thick skin....what pathetic chump called himself unbannable, received a 24 hr timeout and is currently on a pout strike? Yep, tell us all about thick skin TX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 hahahahahahahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted November 5, 2006 Share Posted November 5, 2006 Read my post again. I said IN New England. Now that's funny. I went through my whole tirade and you were just making a Chad's injury prone joke. He missed the '03 and '05 games and in '04 was fairly crappy 180 something no tds and no ints in a 13-7 loss. If your point is the only thing separating Chad and Tom is a running game and run D, you are sadly mistaken. If Chad was on the Patriots at the beginning of 2005 when the Patriots D sucked and Dillon was ineffective, we would have been 0-8. How can you say that? He's 4-4 with the '06 NY Jets. Something tells me our D and running game might suck a little more than the Pats coming off a super bowl season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr nyjet Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Other than delusional, unrealistic blind faith, what leads you to that conclusion? In 6 games against the Pats, PennyBoy is 1-5 with the following cumulative stats: 113/189, 59.7%, 1,273 yards, 6 TD's and 8 INT's and a whopping 72.9 QB rating. So again, what leads you to think PennyBoy will have a good game on the 12th? herm's leftover kool-aid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
serphnx Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Haha to be fair, PF really is annoying. But I guess that is what the ignore feature is for. I get the feeling he is a little dork too, just from the way he posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Point is great QB's win even without running games or run defense. Therefor Tom Brady is just another run of the mil QB like Trent Dilfer that needs defense and a running game to win. PS - to the Jets nation staff. This tool is the reason I'm done posting here. Later. PFKBITCH - Go throw yourself on a grenade you little nerd. RSherry -- Well I will be honest. After all of our conversations I would have expected a little more than having to read this a few days later in a thread. And I do agree PF can be annoying. Taking an internet debate and turning it into a joke about someone dying in Iraq, well that it a bit much. Had I seen this earlier, I would have locked it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.