RG3 > Tom Brady
#1
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:51 PM
"Maybe I'll die dumb....and leave behind a beautiful corpse known for my hand and my balls like Cy Young" - Royce da 5'9
#3
Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:54 PM
He's special, but he needs to learn to slide or he's not going to have a long career.
goodell will make a rule in 2013 that you can't hit him without RG3s permission first
"Maybe I'll die dumb....and leave behind a beautiful corpse known for my hand and my balls like Cy Young" - Royce da 5'9
#7
Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:51 AM
He's pretty amazing.
Is this QB class going to be 1983 like good? Luck, RG III, Wilson, Tannenhill vs. Elway, Kelly, Marino, O'Brien.
Probably not...but still.
If Luck and RG3 end up in the "best ever" discussion then sure. It'll first have to pass the 2004 class before it can approach 1983.
It's certainly promising.
Edited by Jetsfan80, 04 December 2012 - 08:51 AM.
sheesh, I'm a doosh.
#10
Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:37 AM
OF COURSE the two hall of fame rookie QB's in the same year happen at a time when the Jets are still delusional about the QB they have and have no chance at them.
even if the Jets wanted Rg3 they weren't getting up to 2 to get him. the redskins mortgaged their future in that trade, it was a good deal but never was a real option for this team .
My posts have to get worse, so they can get better.
#12
Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:54 AM
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
#19
Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:15 PM
Vick was never and has never been as good a thrower of the football that RG3 is.
POWERADE COMMERCIALS SAY DIFFERENTLY PAL.
(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.
#20
Posted 04 December 2012 - 05:14 PM
so what are you saying that the Redskins traded 3 first round picks, the Jets should have traded 4 or 5?
Yes. Whatever it takes. Throw in Revis.
Haha! Hindsight is an awesome thing.
If Tannenbaum proposed trading four or five first round picks and Revis to move up to #2 in the draft to take the second QB prospect all over again... A running QB, no less... A guy the same height as Mark Sanchez, deemed here to be too short to play QB in the NFL... Damn, I just can't imagine what that backlash would've been like. Petty epic, I'd guess.
wish you were dead
you bawl like the baby
in Eraserhead
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

















