Jump to content

  •  

Photo
- - - - -

RG3 > Tom Brady


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Blackout

Blackout

    Circle Of Bosses

  • Members
  • 32,223 posts
  • Locationhome

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:51 PM

who agrees?
  • 0
"i'll rock forever....or at least until the Jets win the Superbowl" - Chino XL (1995)

#2 Skeet Ulrich

Skeet Ulrich

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 392 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:53 PM

He's special, but he needs to learn to slide or he's not going to have a long career.
  • 0

#3 Blackout

Blackout

    Circle Of Bosses

  • Members
  • 32,223 posts
  • Locationhome

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:54 PM

He's special, but he needs to learn to slide or he's not going to have a long career.


goodell will make a rule in 2013 that you can't hit him without RG3s permission first
  • 1
"i'll rock forever....or at least until the Jets win the Superbowl" - Chino XL (1995)

#4 jetsjetsjetss

jetsjetsjetss

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,616 posts

Posted 03 December 2012 - 11:57 PM

he is so accurate every time its insane
  • 0

#5 Integrity28

Integrity28

    I love it when Idzik's plan comes together.

  • Members
  • 32,350 posts
  • Locationwrong guy in the wrong place at the wrong time

Posted 04 December 2012 - 07:24 AM

he is so accurate every time its insane


This.

I can't believe where he puts the ball on some of these throws coming out of scrambles. Scary how good he's going to be.
  • 0

"Idz a process."

 

Posted Image


#6 JiF

JiF

    President of the Rex Ryan Fan Club

  • Members
  • 36,485 posts
  • LocationSomewhere between Heaven and Hell

Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:42 AM

He's pretty amazing.

Is this QB class going to be 1983 like good? Luck, RG III, Wilson, Tannenhill vs. Elway, Kelly, Marino, O'Brien.

Probably not...but still.

Edited by JiF, 04 December 2012 - 08:43 AM.

  • 0
Posted Image

#7 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 45,756 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:51 AM

He's pretty amazing.

Is this QB class going to be 1983 like good? Luck, RG III, Wilson, Tannenhill vs. Elway, Kelly, Marino, O'Brien.

Probably not...but still.


If Luck and RG3 end up in the "best ever" discussion then sure. It'll first have to pass the 2004 class before it can approach 1983.

It's certainly promising.

Edited by Jetsfan80, 04 December 2012 - 08:51 AM.

  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#8 THE ILK

THE ILK

    almost banned yo

  • Banned
  • 18,971 posts
  • LocationThe Hall of Doom

Posted 04 December 2012 - 08:54 AM

Black Dynamite -Black Dynamite

BD
  • 1

Posted Image


#9 unbanmadmike1

unbanmadmike1

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,884 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 09:39 AM

OF COURSE the two hall of fame rookie QB's in the same year happen at a time when the Jets are still delusional about the QB they have and have no chance at them.
  • 0
Tank for Teddy.

#10 bitonti

bitonti

    Draft Bathroom Attendant

  • Members
  • 14,723 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:37 AM

OF COURSE the two hall of fame rookie QB's in the same year happen at a time when the Jets are still delusional about the QB they have and have no chance at them.


even if the Jets wanted Rg3 they weren't getting up to 2 to get him. the redskins mortgaged their future in that trade, it was a good deal but never was a real option for this team .
  • 0

My posts have to get worse, so they can get better.


#11 unbanmadmike1

unbanmadmike1

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,884 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:48 AM

even if the Jets wanted Rg3 they weren't getting up to 2 to get him. the redskins mortgaged their future in that trade, it was a good deal but never was a real option for this team .

A franchise QB > everything they traded.
  • 0
Tank for Teddy.

#12 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Bring me Solo and the Wookie

  • Members
  • 15,807 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 10:54 AM

It'll be interesting to see how he progresses into his post-rookie years and the film builds up. Teams will eventually figure out how to keep him in the pocket or how to put him in spots on the field that he doesn't prefer to be in. Some QBs figure it out and some don't once that happens, but it's a transition that always has to be made eventually. For now though he's pretty damn entertaining to watch.
  • 0

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#13 bitonti

bitonti

    Draft Bathroom Attendant

  • Members
  • 14,723 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 11:05 AM

A franchise QB > everything they traded.


so what are you saying that the Redskins traded 3 first round picks, the Jets should have traded 4 or 5?
  • 0

My posts have to get worse, so they can get better.


#14 HDKostempski

HDKostempski

    Practice Squad Player

  • Members
  • 212 posts
  • LocationJamestown, NY

Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:24 PM

who agrees?


RGIII isn't going to last a decade with his playing style. Hell, he may NOT last the length of his rookie contract. Hasn't he already had 1 concussion this season already?
  • 0

#15 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 45,756 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:34 PM

so what are you saying that the Redskins traded 3 first round picks, the Jets should have traded 4 or 5?


Yes. Whatever it takes. Throw in Revis.
  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#16 whodeawhodat

whodeawhodat

    2nd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 1,414 posts
  • LocationI was up above it, now I'm down in it.

Posted 04 December 2012 - 02:56 PM

RG III > Mike Vick

/RG III gets hurt

RG III = Mike Vick
  • 0

#17 The Crusher

The Crusher

    DROY

  • Moderators
  • 28,952 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 03:57 PM

He's pretty amazing.

Is this QB class going to be 1983 like good? Luck, RG III, Wilson, Tannenhill vs. Elway, Kelly, Marino, O'Brien.

Probably not...but still.


I'm a Jet fan living in DC. Oh bother.
  • 0

#18 unbanmadmike1

unbanmadmike1

    3rd Year Veteran

  • Members
  • 2,884 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:04 PM

RG III > Mike Vick

/RG III gets hurt

RG III = Mike Vick

Vick was never and has never been as good a thrower of the football that RG3 is.
  • 1
Tank for Teddy.

#19 RutgersJetFan

RutgersJetFan

    Bring me Solo and the Wookie

  • Members
  • 15,807 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 04:15 PM

Vick was never and has never been as good a thrower of the football that RG3 is.


POWERADE COMMERCIALS SAY DIFFERENTLY PAL.
  • 0

(Chandler)'s a nice piece as long as he's the 7th most important player on your roster....I think they're going to be disappointed when they see he's just a pumped-up Drew Gooden.


#20 slats

slats

    9 5/8" hands

  • Moderators
  • 18,858 posts
  • LocationAcross the Universe

Posted 04 December 2012 - 05:14 PM


so what are you saying that the Redskins traded 3 first round picks, the Jets should have traded 4 or 5?


Yes. Whatever it takes. Throw in Revis.


Haha! Hindsight is an awesome thing.

If Tannenbaum proposed trading four or five first round picks and Revis to move up to #2 in the draft to take the second QB prospect all over again... A running QB, no less... A guy the same height as Mark Sanchez, deemed here to be too short to play QB in the NFL... Damn, I just can't imagine what that backlash would've been like. Petty epic, I'd guess.
  • 0
back in my room
wish you were dead
you bawl like the baby
in Eraserhead

#21 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 45,756 posts

Posted 04 December 2012 - 07:08 PM

Haha! Hindsight is an awesome thing.

If Tannenbaum proposed trading four or five first round picks and Revis to move up to #2 in the draft to take the second QB prospect all over again... A running QB, no less... A guy the same height as Mark Sanchez, deemed here to be too short to play QB in the NFL... Damn, I just can't imagine what that backlash would've been like. Petty epic, I'd guess.


Until he started winning. Despite trading away everything, having no weapons whatsoever (other than Alfred Morris and a few games out of Pierre Garcon), and a godawful defense, the Redskins are 6-6. Shannahan deserves a lot of credit, but RG3 has been simply amazing. His rookie season has topped even Cam Newton's.

The injury concerns are valid. His talent and production are not.

Edited by Jetsfan80, 04 December 2012 - 07:09 PM.

  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.


#22 Jet27

Jet27

    Alpha & Omega

  • Members
  • 2,982 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:08 AM

who agrees?


Your out of your mind.
  • 0

#23 ECURB

ECURB

    Throwback!

  • Members
  • 30,197 posts
  • LocationOn cloud 8.5

Posted 05 December 2012 - 07:59 AM

Until he started winning. Despite trading away everything, having no weapons whatsoever (other than Alfred Morris and a few games out of Pierre Garcon), and a godawful defense, the Redskins are 6-6. Shannahan deserves a lot of credit, but RG3 has been simply amazing. His rookie season has topped even Cam Newton's.

The injury concerns are valid. His talent and production are not.


Sanchez has no talent around him and the Jets are 5-7... So one extra win turns everything around for you? Sanchez won more in his rookie year.
  • 0

Posted Image


#24 Jetsfan80

Jetsfan80

    Hall Of Famer

  • Members
  • 45,756 posts

Posted 05 December 2012 - 08:36 AM

Sanchez has no talent around him and the Jets are 5-7...


The Jets, for all their shortcomings, still have a top 5 secondary and have gotten better against the run (we shut down Beanie Wells last week, for instance. He went off against the Rams). The defense has done quite well this year overall.

Washington's defense is an abomination. Nearly the league's worst in pass defense and below average against the run. They're 29th overall in YPG allowed (390.5). We're 10th (336.0) They'd be 9-3 or 8-4 if they had our defense.

Not to mention, our receivers are better than Washington's, and our pass protection is better as well. True statements.

Edited by Jetsfan80, 05 December 2012 - 08:40 AM.

  • 0

sheesh, I'm a doosh.





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users