SMC Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 snide little prick From your avy it sounds like an inside joke. Whats that about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Go die from pot overdose. much less likely then you causing a 5 car pile up when playing mafia at 70mph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 From your avy it sounds like an inside joke. Whats that about? CTM and Ape secretly bang each other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 From your avy it sounds like an inside joke. Whats that about? I pretend to be a racist, pac calls me archie bunker.. i rolled with it if your talking about the title, the ape, in his most astute post ever, called hess a snide little prick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 CTM and Ape secretly bang each other. in addition to being a snide little prick, you are disgusting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 in addition to being a snide little prick, you are disgusting I hope you drown in your own patchouli oil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 You're right...it was close...but its a drop. Watched it a few times. Just a great/lucky play by the DB. I don't think Evans even believed the ball ended up in his arms in the first place. Hell of a throw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 His foot is down a split second before he was stripped. He caught the pass have to maintain through which means after the foot is down you saw this with the lions last year what makes this different ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 23, 2012 Author Share Posted January 23, 2012 have to maintain through which means after the foot is down you saw this with the lions last year what makes this different ? nah you're right...i was unclear on the rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Not even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 have to maintain through which means after the foot is down you saw this with the lions last year what makes this different ? Actually he didnt fall to ground, it was very close and should have been reviewed, the call would never go against pats the nfl cash cow anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Not a catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 This thread rocks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Not a catch. Actually greg jennings had one very similar and it was called a TD, just have to break plane and have 2 feet down, very close Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 23, 2012 Author Share Posted January 23, 2012 Actually greg jennings had one very similar and it was called a TD, just have to break plane and have 2 feet down, very close First Giants game right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 First Giants game right? Yes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted January 23, 2012 Author Share Posted January 23, 2012 Yes yeah...at 1:45 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDNHCGZBOXA&feature=related Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Actually greg jennings had one very similar and it was called a TD, just have to break plane and have 2 feet down, very close Actually greg jennings had one very similar and it was called a TD, just have to break plane and have 2 feet down, very close Yeah, but Jennings got both feet down and THEN ball was knocked out. Here, ball was knocked out as Evans was putting down 2nd foot. Clearly not a catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 yeah...at 1:45 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDNHCGZBOXA&feature=related why the pats own NFL office, the oak fumble should have never been reviewed as pats had no timeouts and this play doesnt get a sniff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Yeah, but Jennings got both feet down and THEN ball was knocked out. Here, ball was knocked out as Evans was putting down 2nd foot. Clearly not a catch. It deserved an effen review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Yeah, but Jennings got both feet down and THEN ball was knocked out. Here, ball was knocked out as Evans was putting down 2nd foot. Clearly not a catch. also the ball hit evans in the numbers, i'm pretty sure both feet were on ground when he caught it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 It deserved an effen review it was reviewed Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Lee Evans caught Joe Flacco's pass in the end zone and dropped it with 22 seconds remaining and the Ravens down 23-20. There were a number of Ravens fans and scribes who wondered why it wasn't reviewed. Michael Signora, NFL vice president of football communications, offered the following explanation by way of Marc Sessler of NFL.com: "The ruling on the field of an incomplete pass was confirmed by the Instant Replay assistant, correctly, and as a result, there was no need to stop the game," Signora wrote. "... The receiver did not get his second foot down in the end zone with possession, and as a result, it was an incomplete pass." Case closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 also the ball hit evans in the numbers, i'm pretty sure both feet were on ground when he caught it No, both feet werent down. The video is posted in the first post of thread. See for yourself. It clearly wasnt a catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 No, both feet werent down. The video is posted in the first post of thread. See for yourself. It clearly wasnt a catch. U need to look again, when he first caught ball he was 6 inches over goaliine, ball came out 3 yds later or so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 No, both feet werent down. The video is posted in the first post of thread. See for yourself. It clearly wasnt a catch. stop it at 27 seconds and tell ne 1 foot wasnt down then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 it was reviewed Baltimore Ravens wide receiver Lee Evans caught Joe Flacco's pass in the end zone and dropped it with 22 seconds remaining and the Ravens down 23-20. There were a number of Ravens fans and scribes who wondered why it wasn't reviewed. Michael Signora, NFL vice president of football communications, offered the following explanation by way of Marc Sessler of NFL.com: "The ruling on the field of an incomplete pass was confirmed by the Instant Replay assistant, correctly, and as a result, there was no need to stop the game," Signora wrote. "... The receiver did not get his second foot down in the end zone with possession, and as a result, it was an incomplete pass." Case closed. the more i look at it the more it looks like a catch, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 U need to look again, when he first caught ball he was 6 inches over goaliine, ball came out 3 yds later or so stop it at 27 seconds and tell ne 1 foot wasnt down then the more i look at it the more it looks like a catch, Then I dont know what youre looking at. The ball is only in his grasp when his right foot hits ground and right as he is going to hit with his left foot the ball is knocked out. Thats exactly what the video shows. He doesnt have the ball the first time his left foot hits the end zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 the more i look at it the more it looks like a catch, Im not surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 not even close to a catch imo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 not even close to a catch imo But whyyyyyyyyy wasn't it revieweeeeeeed????????? Oh wait it was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 not even close to a catch imo Ball was in his grasp his 1 foot was 6 inches from goalline, ball came out about 4-5 yds later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Ball was in his grasp his 1 foot was 6 inches from goalline, ball came out about 4-5 yds later No, it wasnt. What are you looking at? The ball hits him when he is in the endzone. He puts the right foot down and the ball is knocked out when he puts down the left. The throw was completely to the endzone, not short of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 No, it wasnt. What are you looking at? The ball hits him when he is in the endzone. He puts the right foot down and the ball is knocked out when he puts down the left. The throw was completely to the endzone, not short of it. 6 inches over goalline ball is in possession and ball comes out 5 yds later, impossible not to have 2 feet down, doesnt need to make a football move in endzone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugg Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 6 inches over goalline ball is in possession and ball comes out 5 yds later, impossible not to have 2 feet down, doesnt need to make a football move in endzone , Uh, no. You have to maintain possession for at least a short time. Otherwise it would be a debacle on every incompletion in the end zone.He dropped the ball. If he didn't drop it the Pats probably wouldv'e lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Voice of Reason Posted January 23, 2012 Share Posted January 23, 2012 Was clearly not a catch. Lee Evans just choked like a little bitch on the biggest stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.