SMC Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 You had a bunch of guys who probably haven't had sex in a decade, like Hesshole, Jf80 and BG, using words like heinous and disgusting to describe her. My point is that she's attractive, she's not Kate Upton, but she's interesting and quirky and would def bang.. Bangable was never the criteria and never will be the criteria because even fugly chicks get banged. That's genetically implanted in men in order to perpetuate the species. And you had intimated in the other thread that Baggie was hot, hence the poll. "Attractiveness" wasn't the issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Bangable was never the criteria and never will be the criteria because even fugly chicks get banged. That's genetically implanted in men in order to perpetuate the species. And you had intimated in the other thread that Baggie was hot, hence the poll. "Attractiveness" wasn't the issue. attractive = not ugly for sure but also not necessarily hot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Yes, but you can see her individual ribs in that photo before. Not hot. Yes. Much rather see fat curls. Skinny girls are gross. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 attractive = not ugly for sure but also not necessarily hot Many years ago before I started wasting employer's time with all you guys, I used to play an online game with friends where we would have a roster of female and male celebrities (there were both female and male players). We had 3 categories: (1) Pretty, (2) Attractive, and (3) Hot. Player A would say a celebrity's name and Players B, C, etc. had to guess whether Player A thought the celebrity was Pretty, Attractive, Hot. Then it would be Player B's turn. The player with the most correct guesses wins. The way we distinguished the 3 categories were as follows: 1) A pretty celebrity was a goodlooking celebrity, be it cute, pretty, beautiful, gorgeous or whatever that you would most likely make romantic love. Try to romance the celebrity and be okay with that. 2) An attractive celebrity might even be ugly, but she has a certain allure to her that would make you want to **** the sh*t out of her. 3) A hot celebrity was a combination of both pretty and attractive. In other words, they're beautiful and have that allure where you want to **** their brains out. Those definitions still work for me. So, I can see where you say she's attractive. I can see that, but she may very well still be ugly. Ugly chicks get love too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 See that's the thing. JF80 is a twit and is trying to change the argument... You had a bunch of guys who probably haven't had sex in a decade, like Hesshole, Jf80 and BG, using words like heinous and disgusting to describe her. My point is that she's attractive, she's not Kate Upton, but she's interesting and quirky and would def bang.. I'm pretty sure Kate Upton would be really, really boring in bed. No fundamentals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 I'm pretty sure Kate Upton would be really, really boring in bed. No fundamentals. You would pop three nuts, have a mild stroke and lose function on the left side of your body before she was even totally undressed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 You would pop three nuts, have a mild stroke and lose function on the left side of your body before she was even totally undressed. Not true. I have tremendous penile control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Not true. I have tremendous penile control. Well yeah when your by yourself. This would be different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 Well yeah when your by yourself. This would be different. She's too hot and has always been too hot. Women only get better in bed in an attempt to compensate for vast and incorrectable insecurities. Her only insecurities are 1. aging and 2. Fear of getting impregnated by Drake at some point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted July 19, 2012 Share Posted July 19, 2012 in this post porn age, "hot" is a very high level to attain she just aint there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 in this post porn age, "hot" is a very high level to attain she just aint there I guess the definition changes with the person. I don't dig the porn queen type. Skanks dont do it for me either. Bimbos can be hot, but only if they're genuine bimbos. Girls who act like bibos for attention are not hot. All that being said, there is one hot porn psuedo-bimbo that breaks the above rules. Katie Morgan. Cute and bubbly and crazy sexy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeC36 Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I guess the definition changes with the person. I don't dig the porn queen type. Skanks dont do it for me either. Bimbos can be hot, but only if they're genuine bimbos. Girls who act like bibos for attention are not hot. All that being said, there is one hot porn psuedo-bimbo that breaks the above rules. Katie Morgan. Cute and bubbly and crazy sexy. love katie morgan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I feel like if I were in bed with Maggie Gyllenhaal, then I'd think I was in bed with Jake Gyllenhaal. And that is EXACTLY WHY I'D TOTALLY DO HER. Just saw your avatar sig. Zero Dark Thirty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Just saw your avatar sig. Zero Dark Thirty. "If fortune is a bitch with venom and laser t!ts maybe sin'll make for sugar flavored flesh." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 "If fortune is a bitch with venom and laser t!ts maybe sin'll make for sugar flavored flesh." I have been a bastard to the people who actively attempted to deliver me from peril That dude throws out some of the most complex lyrics I have ever heard. That one in particular made me lulz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I have been a bastard to the people who actively attempted to deliver me from peril That dude throws out some of the most complex lyrics I have ever heard. That one in particular made me lulz. It's his best since Labor Days, no doubt. I was a huge fan of None Shall Pass too, esoteric narratives about pirates make RJF's mind happy. Guy's the Frank Zappa of hip hop. That one particular line had to be a shout out to Bazooka Tooth, which was basically a giant middle finger to label execs that wanted to turn him into a pop artist. He's playing out here next Friday and I can't wait, it'll be my 4th time seeing him live and he always puts on a solid act. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 It's his best since Labor Days, no doubt. I was a huge fan of None Shall Pass too, esoteric narratives about pirates make RJF's mind happy. Guy's the Frank Zappa of hip hop. That one particular line had to be a shout out to Bazooka Tooth, which was basically a giant middle finger to label execs that wanted to turn him into a pop artist. He's playing out here next Friday and I can't wait, it'll be my 4th time seeing him live and he always puts on a solid act. That's a great comparison, Frank Zappa of hip hop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 That's a great comparison, Frank Zappa of hip hop. Do yourself a favor and pull up Hail Mary Mallon on Spotify when you get some time. One of the better underground albums of the year in '11. It's always great hearing him in a collaborative context, he lays off and has a little more fun not having to assume production responsibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 That's a great comparison, Frank Zappa of hip hop. I'm sure Zappa would love it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 I'm sure Zappa would love it.. Probably. I always thought of Zappa as one of the earliest influences on the genre. Songs like Dumb All Over are as close to pre Sugarhill as you're going to find. Even a song like Trouble Every Day, for a guy like Aesop, his work is directly descendent of that stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Probably. I always thought of Zappa as one of the earliest influences on the genre. Songs like Dumb All Over are as close to pre Sugarhill as you're going to find. Even a song like Trouble Every Day, for a guy like Aesop, his work is directly descendent of that stuff. Yah, to be honest the comment was only half snarky... Zappa was very serious about music and probably would've minimized hip hop as non serious, but he generally respected all artistic endeavors and of course was highly anti censorship.. I'm sure he was an influence and to be perfectly honesty I am pretty much ignorant as to what people mean when they say hop hop anymore anyway... As a sometimes muscian, there's a visceral reaction I have to seeing hip hop and a giant like zappa mentioned in same breath. but as these types of knee jerk reactions generally are, it's not well informed or thought out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Yah, to be honest the comment was only half snarky... Zappa was very serious about music and probably would've minimized hip hop as non serious, but he generally respected all artistic endeavors and of course was highly anti censorship.. I'm sure he was an influence and to be perfectly honesty I am pretty much ignorant as to what people mean when they say hop hop anymore anyway... As a sometimes muscian, there's a visceral reaction I have to seeing hip hop and a giant like zappa mentioned in same breath. but as these types of knee jerk reactions generally are, it's not well informed or thought out. You're thinking Soulja Boy. Don't. Aesop Rock is way more comparable to someone like Battles than the cliches that mainstream hip hop sees these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Yah, to be honest the comment was only half snarky... Zappa was very serious about music and probably would've minimized hip hop as non serious, but he generally respected all artistic endeavors and of course was highly anti censorship.. I'm sure he was an influence and to be perfectly honesty I am pretty much ignorant as to what people mean when they say hop hop anymore anyway... As a sometimes muscian, there's a visceral reaction I have to seeing hip hop and a giant like zappa mentioned in same breath. but as these types of knee jerk reactions generally are, it's not well informed or thought out. You can't paint hip-hop with a broad brush stroke like that. If I say "Rock" I could include Nickleback in the same sentence as Zappa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 You can't paint hip-hop with a broad brush stroke like that. If I say "Rock" I could include Nickleback in the same sentence as Zappa. Well like I said, I really don't know. I've already admitted my ignorance of the topic and backed off the position. It was a knee jerk reaction... I'd react the same way if someone compared Nickleback to Zappa lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Well like I said, I really don't know. I've already admitted my ignorance of the topic and backed off the position. It was a knee jerk reaction... I'd react the same way if someone compared Nickleback to Zappa lol LOOK AT THIS PHOTOGRAPH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 You're thinking Soulja Boy. Don't. Aesop Rock is way more comparable to someone like Battles than the cliches that mainstream hip hop sees these days. so what's the deal, is this 1 guy playing instruments, or 1 guy on a synth over multiple tracks? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 so what's the deal, is this 1 guy playing instruments, or 1 guy on a synth over multiple tracks? Sometimes both, most of the time it's the latter. This is the first album he's done entirely on his own, it's still usually mostly him on his LP's but he's historically done guest spots as well. It's really more music for a satisfied mind than anything joyous, because it takes a good 4-5 listens to figure out what the hell he's talking about on every track. Hence the Zappa comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Picture her with your cock down her throat, it helps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted July 20, 2012 Share Posted July 20, 2012 Picture her with your cock down her throat, it helps. Nope, nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted July 21, 2012 Share Posted July 21, 2012 Picture her with your cock down her throat, it helps. That just made me want my cock back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 Nope, nothing. That just made me want my cock back. Queers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
war ensemble Posted July 22, 2012 Share Posted July 22, 2012 By the way, the forum software agrees that she's hot. So clearly she is. Boom, roasted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vudu Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 She's horrible. Her brother is way prettier than she is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted July 24, 2012 Share Posted July 24, 2012 She's horrible. Her brother is way prettier than she is. Well I think that officially settles that well beyond a point of any debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyHector Posted September 27, 2012 Share Posted September 27, 2012 Just saw her on the Lower East Side and I only figured out it was her because there was a (presumed) paparazzo taking pictures of her as she was crossing the street. Verdict? Not hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.