ylekram Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 lets face it,the jets dont have a starting qb on the roster.do the jets put all their eggs in one basket next year,like they did with sanchez? or do they draft one every year till one sticks? thoughts? other possibilities.draft one in the second ,third,or later Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I think they draft one in the third or fourth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 i say the Jets should draft a USC quarterback....those never fail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I think they take a guy later to compete but nothing in the first 3 picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted April 25, 2013 Author Share Posted April 25, 2013 i am convinced the jets take a qb no later than their 2nd round,not really for it or against it.just think thats what they will do Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 i am convinced the jets take a qb no later than their 2nd round,not really for it or against it.just think thats what they will do Maybe. But only if they are able to move back and acquire more picks. I could see it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I think they take a guy later to compete but nothing in the first 3 picks So they duplicate the same schlock they already have on the roster? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So they duplicate the same schlock they already have on the roster? No matter which QB they take in any round, it's the same schlock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Jets are going to trade for Brandon Weeden after the Browns pick Geno Smith. I say they give them a 3rd for him. You heard it here first..... oh.... by the way I am sourceless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 No matter which QB they take in any round, it's the same schlock. When you don't have a viable NFL QB on your roster you have two options, go another year without a viable NFL QB or try to acquire the best guy available and hope to develop your own stud. It makes zero sense to have the most important position on the field, the position that more than any other determines who wins and loses and purposely choose a guy that you know is only the fifth or sixth best guy available to you. You take a guy with upside and draft another one next year if you get the chance. Heck, take the best QB you can every year until you have an elite QB. There are three kinds of teams in the league...those with elite QB's who have a chance to win it all; those with high end developmental guys who have hope of moving to the first group; those with jack squat. It is no fun to be in group three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Sounds like a good plan but the trouble is, if you draft a guy who you don't really believe in but who was the best available and he shows anything at all, there will pressure to let him continue his development another year or two. Then after that, you discover that the guy quits improving and you've shot 3 years on a guy you never believed in in the first place. If you take a guy to be the leader of your team, developing him will take time, more often than not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sirlancemehlot Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Tyler Bray. Big arm. 4th rounder. Easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Tyler Bray. Big arm. 4th rounder. Easy. if we were a good team with a qb bray could sit behind yes we suck so no. We need a guy who is gonna come in and immediettly be the leader Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 if we were a good team with a qb bray could sit behind yes we suck so no. We need a guy who is gonna come in and immediettly be the leader If the Jets don't think that guy can be THE GUY, then taking a QB too high is a wasted pick. I'm not against them taking a QB at the end of the first/early second, but they really need to have a lot of confidence in him to pass on any number of surer thing prospects there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Don't do it! I don't want Rex anywhere near our future QB, draft him next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehands Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Sounds like a good plan but the trouble is, if you draft a guy who you don't really believe in but who was the best available and he shows anything at all, there will pressure to let him continue his development another year or two. Then after that, you discover that the guy quits improving and you've shot 3 years on a guy you never believed in in the first place. If you take a guy to be the leader of your team, developing him will take time, more often than not. So, take another guy next year. Teams carry multiple QB's. In today's market with salary slotting, you can take 2 or 3 first round pick QB's for similar money to what you used to pay a guy. Grab a guy each year and let them battle it out. When you don't have a QB, you have to make every effort to go get one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 No!!!! Every qb in this draft is terrible, save for maybe Barkley. Hope for Bridgewater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GandWFan Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So, take another guy next year. Teams carry multiple QB's. In today's market with salary slotting, you can take 2 or 3 first round pick QB's for similar money to what you used to pay a guy. Grab a guy each year and let them battle it out. When you don't have a QB, you have to make every effort to go get one. This is the key. You don't have to pay a first round QB 50 million anymore. Take one with every 1st round pick until you find your guy. Let them all compete. The cream will rise to the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GandWFan Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 No!!!! Every qb in this draft is terrible, save for maybe Barkley. Hope for Bridgewater. So play for the number 1 draft pick next year? Bad strategy. Win one game by accident and you are out. Only one team in 32 will get Bridgewater. We are bad, but not bad enough for the number 1 pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 When they do....I hope it's Manuel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 So play for the number 1 draft pick next year? Bad strategy. Win one game by accident and you are out. Only one team in 32 will get Bridgewater. We are bad, but not bad enough for the number 1 pick. Unless they want to trade back for future 1's. They could get two more along with their #5 overall next year. That could/should be enough to move up for Bridgewater. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GandWFan Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Unless they want to trade back for future 1's. They could get two more along with their #5 overall next year. That could/should be enough to move up for Bridgewater. In order to move up, the number one team has to want to move down. A team picking #1, by definition, has no QB. Why would they possibly trade down and give up a franchize QB... for any amount of picks. Not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 If the Jets don't think that guy can be THE GUY, then taking a QB too high is a wasted pick. I'm not against them taking a QB at the end of the first/early second, but they really need to have a lot of confidence in him to pass on any number of surer thing prospects there. oh bray is probably gonna be a 4th rounder i think. heck mccshay was saying hes the best qb in the draft but he still wouldnt draft him because he doesnt have the consistency or work ethic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Unless they want to trade back for future 1's. They could get two more along with their #5 overall next year. That could/should be enough to move up for Bridgewater. If Idzik’s strategy is to put everything on hold until they get a franchise QB, that’s the way to go. LOL Jets fans would go insane. Trade both 9-13 for for future picks. Come into next season with 3 first rounders, one of them top 5, and 4 second rounders. Trade up for Bridgewater, (if he has an excellent season), and Clowney. If Bridgewater doesn’t look like a guaranteed franchise QB, do it again for next season. In your next 2-3 years you will have a franchise QB . 90% of Jets fans will have killed themselves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 In order to move up, the number one team has to want to move down. A team picking #1, by definition, has no QB. Why would they possibly trade down and give up a franchize QB... for any amount of picks. Not happening. Chill broseph I'm just making up hypotheticals for fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GandWFan Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Chill broseph I'm just making up hypotheticals for fun. Broseph? Is that the new "cool kids" term? Let me write that down. Btw, I am chill. I just hear this ridiculousness far too often. Stockpiling first round picksmay get you a good player next year, but only #1 or #2 is going to get you Bridgewater. Unless you are epically bad, just go for the best QB we can this year. No reason to wait. With mediocre QB play and our defense, we will likely be picking middle of the pack next year anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Broseph? Is that the new "cool kids" term? Let me write that down. Btw, I am chill. I just hear this ridiculousness far too often. Stockpiling first round picksmay get you a good player next year, but only #1 or #2 is going to get you Bridgewater. Unless you are epically bad, just go for the best QB we can this year. No reason to wait. With mediocre QB play and our defense, we will likely be picking middle of the pack next year anyway. I'd prefer to wait on the QB, but a lot talk around them going after one in the 2nd round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.