Jump to content

Tyreek bein tyreek


rangerous

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Joe W. Namath said:

Tyreke wasnt fooled.  He has a bunch of baby mammas.  You guys are unreal thinking he is a victim here.

When you get a woman pregnant and you make x amount of dollars, you are going to pay the amount you owe.

These woman arent getting any more then what the law states based on his income.

Tyreek must own his own actions and he should be on the hook for whatever the court decides.  But let’s be clear, the amount of money he’ll pay is somewhat arbitrary.  The key terms are lifestyle he/ she are accustomed to. It applies to babies as well.  The point being it’s not set at x dollars per week.  If there are set values then they are most likely starting points.  The amount can get much higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rangerous said:

Tyreek must own his own actions and he should be on the hook for whatever the court decides.  But let’s be clear, the amount of money he’ll pay is somewhat arbitrary.  The key terms are lifestyle he/ she are accustomed to. It applies to babies as well.  The point being it’s not set at x dollars per week.  If there are set values then they are most likely starting points.  The amount can get much higher.

Agreed.  None of these women will get a penny more than what they are legally entitled to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/15/2023 at 8:57 AM, Darnold's Forehead said:

Typical gold digger behavior.  They get pregnant for financial gain, claim that Hill’s voluntary 2.5k a month is not enough to raise a child - they need 10k.  120k a year to raise a kid LMAO.

So as it turns out, posting photos of yourself with a famous athlete on social media is not a job.  Put your kid in a daycare, get a job and get off Medicaid you f*cking bum.

It was their choice to conceive a child. Now they complain about more money because Hill makes $30mil a year.

Absolute bottom feeders.

$2.5K per month is nowhere near enough given what he is paid.  Has nothing to do with whether you can raise a kid a $2.5K per.  
And did she force him to have sex with her, unprotected sex?  
Yeah, it’s all on her, 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jet Nut said:

$2.5K per month is nowhere near enough given what he is paid.  Has nothing to do with whether you can raise a kid a $2.5K per.  
And did she force him to have sex with her, unprotected sex?  
Yeah, it’s all on her, 

So you think it’s ok for a woman with a net worth of $0 to purposely get pregnant with a rich guy and have him pay for the kid while taking zero self accountability for it.

Society’s tolerance of leeches and similar pathetic behavior is why it’s so screwed up today.

  • Upvote 1
  • Sympathy 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Darnold's Forehead said:

So you think it’s ok for a woman with a net worth of $0 to purposely get pregnant with a rich guy and have him pay for the kid while taking zero self accountability for it.

Society’s tolerance of leeches and similar pathetic behavior is why it’s so screwed up today.

She purposely got pregnant?  Great uninformed assumption there buddy.

A better assumption would be since he has multiple baby mammas, hes purposely trying to spread his seed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RutgersJetFan said:

Boomers and bros ruminating about how much money children cost in 2023 is almost as entertaining as listening to you schmucks proselytize about how much you think housing costs.

I have no idea what a kid cost in 2023 and it feels like one of my life’s greatest achievements 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Crusher said:

I have no idea what a kid cost in 2023 and it feels like one of my life’s greatest achievements 

Its not about what a kid costs when it comes to child support.  Its about a % of your income.

So people who are saying, “A child doesnt cost x amount of dollars” are not understanding what child support is.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its not about what a kid costs when it comes to child support.  Its about a % of your income.
So people who are saying, “A child doesnt cost x amount of dollars” are not understanding what child support is.
 
The number you are searching for is about 18% up to (in some states) 60% of your disposal income.

My only disagreement is the deserves part...mostly because I firmly believe people should pay their own way and not leech off the worl of others. This situation or any other.

Sent from the FOREVER AND EVER Suicide Watch desk.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Darnold's Forehead said:

So you think it’s ok for a woman with a net worth of $0 to purposely get pregnant with a rich guy and have him pay for the kid while taking zero self accountability for it.

Society’s tolerance of leeches and similar pathetic behavior is why it’s so screwed up today.

What do you know about this woman?  Nothing.  But yet you have decided she got pregnant on purpose.  Why should either one have to take self accountability, wait only her.  When he could have not had unprotected sex.  The way to be most accountable.  
Stop blaming society, blame #10, he had the ability say no and not leave children behind that he will have to part of raising while the women you blame will be 100% responsible for raising them.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you know about this woman?  Nothing.  But yet you have decided she got pregnant on purpose.  Why should either one have to take self accountability, wait only her.  When he could have not had unprotected sex.  The way to be most accountable.  
Stop blaming society, blame #10, he had the ability say no and not leave children behind that he will have to part of raising while the women you blame will be 100% responsible for raising them.  
Why do you assume that the women will be 100% responsible for raising them? That is definitely not always the case.

Sent from the FOREVER AND EVER Suicide Watch desk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hill shouldn’t have an issue giving the women $120k a year if they are his kids. He makes more than enough. His teeth would put those kids through college.

He should want his kids to live in a nice neighborhood, go to a good school, get mma lessons (or some type of discipline sport), be driven around in a safe vehicle, have good food, etc. $120k a year in most American cities/suburbs isn’t a ton of money. Me and my wife make more than that and still have to budget to give our daughter a better upbringing. 

He should also want to be part of their lives. I would be fighting for custody of them. 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...