ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Chris Henry, good pick, but I would've taken Michael Bush at that pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNJet Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 what do we have left? we better get more than 3 fkn picks this draft that sux. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 The New York 'Ginas are OTC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Chris Henry, good pick, but I would've taken Michael Bush at that pick. A running back? are you daffy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 what do we have left? we better get more than 3 fkn picks this draft that sux. I agree, but don't forget, you have to add t. jones to our draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 A running back? are you daffy? Tenessee needed a RB drastically at that pick, I just would've taken Michael Bush instead of Chris Henry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1stand2nd Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Man! Couldn't we have waited our turn and gotten Zach DeOssie, Buster Davis or Anthony Waters if we had to have an ILB? Is Harris that good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Revis, Harris, Thomas Jones, 6th, 7th. Not bad, imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Man! Couldn't we have waited our turn and gotten Zach DeOssie, Buster Davis or Anthony Waters if we had to have an ILB? Is Harris that good? good point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Tenessee needed a RB drastically at that pick, I just would've taken Michael Bush instead of Chris Henry. I'm sorry I thought you were talking about out pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Man! Couldn't we have waited our turn and gotten Zach DeOssie, Buster Davis or Anthony Waters if we had to have an ILB? Is Harris that good? apparently he is, he was a projected late first rounder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Man! Couldn't we have waited our turn and gotten Zach DeOssie, Buster Davis or Anthony Waters if we had to have an ILB? Is Harris that good? Yes Harris is that good. He should have been a mid-late first rounder and can start immedietly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 The Giants have a guy named Steve Smith and Santana Moss's little brother at receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Speez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 apparently he is, he was a projected late first rounder. yeah there was alot of big talk about him leading up to the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I took Revis and Harris in the JN mock. Only I took them for the Bengals! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I think Barton is gone... we now have 3 potential starting ILB on the roster... So does New England most years. I think keeping all three is important, i realize they won't all get the playing time, but having depth at the inside means we won't get run over come the 4th quarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Revis, Harris, Thomas Jones, 6th, 7th. Not bad, imo. I agree. CB was a weak spot, we addressed that in this draft. You need a ton of LB's in the 3-4, and we got one that could be VERY good in the system(something NE has been known for doing the past several years). We traded to get TJ, when it was obvious our running game was one of the weakest in the NFL, and the front office seemed to believe in some of their pickups for the D-line. An o-lineman would be nice, as would a slot reciever, but they arent dire needs by any means. I love this draft/offseason so far, very productive if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I took Revis and Harris in the JN mock. Only I took them for the Bengals! So what you're saying is that we just got 2 of the top ten on the FBI's most wanted list Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Man! Couldn't we have waited our turn and gotten Zach DeOssie, Buster Davis or Anthony Waters if we had to have an ILB? Is Harris that good? deOssie will be there much later. i hope we get him too, he's the real deal...IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Speez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 uhmmmmm pardon my ignorance but...what does pwnz mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I took Revis and Harris in the JN mock. Only I took them for the Bengals! Must have been the spirit of you picking for the Jets the year before eh? haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 At this point, I'd have to say we are SET on the defensive side of the ball. My biggest concern at this point is on the offensive line. Are we relying on the June 1st cuts? Anthony Clement certainly CANNOT be our starting RT in week 1. And we still need a run-blocking G. We're pretty dependent on trading Barton and McCareins if we want to fill these needs in the draft. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 uhmmmmm pardon my ignorance but...what does pwnz mean? that the user is younger than 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 uhmmmmm pardon my ignorance but...what does pwnz mean? i don't know either, and was hoping to never know so it would never bother me...thanks for ruining my day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 that the user is younger than 12 POTW nom...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 At this point, I'd have to say we are SET on the defensive side of the ball. My biggest concern at this point is on the offensive line. Are we relying on the June 1st cuts? Anthony Clement certainly CANNOT be our starting RT in week 1. And we still need a run-blocking G. We're pretty dependent on trading Barton and McCareins if we want to fill these needs in the draft. what o linemen from the 7th would you have to start before him. Unless we trade a player that is it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 At this point, I'd have to say we are SET on the defensive side of the ball. My biggest concern at this point is on the offensive line. Are we relying on the June 1st cuts? Anthony Clement certainly CANNOT be our starting RT in week 1. And we still need a run-blocking G. We're pretty dependent on trading Barton and McCareins if we want to fill these needs in the draft. Why not? He's not good, but he can do the job as he did last year. i was hoping for Blalock to step into that slot, but i think he'll remain servicable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Why not? He's not good, but he can do the job as he did last year. i was hoping for Blalock to step into that slot, but i think he'll remain servicable. Clement is HORRIBLE. We need a new RT... Leonard goes to a team i don't hate!!!! Awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 what o linemen from the 7th would you have to start before him. Unless we trade a player that is it. Obviously, we have no picks to shore up the OL right now. Eric Barton has to be a goner, but unless a deal happens soon we will have a lot of difficulty finding a decent one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 At this point, I'd have to say we are SET on the defensive side of the ball. My biggest concern at this point is on the offensive line. Are we relying on the June 1st cuts? Anthony Clement certainly CANNOT be our starting RT in week 1. And we still need a run-blocking G. We're pretty dependent on trading Barton and McCareins if we want to fill these needs in the draft. The staff has shown they are willing to do what it takes to move up and get who/what they want in the draft....Im fairly confident that if they see a good opportunity, they'll take advantage of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Clement is HORRIBLE. We need a new RT... Leonard goes to a team i don't hate!!!! Awesome. Yeah but bad news is the took him as a FB and already have Steven Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Marc Bulger, Steven Jackson, and Brian Leonard in the backfield for St. Louis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Something i think we're forgetting too, is that you can pick up a good quality o-lineman in the later rounds. Keep in mind we dont need super elite guys(although ofcourse, that would be nice), we'd just like to get some upgrades. Shouldn't be all that hard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Marc Bulger, Steven Jackson, and Brian Leonard in the backfield for St. Louis.Yeah but he'll catch alot of ball for that offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Something i think we're forgetting too, is that you can pick up a good quality o-lineman in the later rounds. Keep in mind we dont need super elite guys(although ofcourse, that would be nice), we'd just like to get some upgrades. Shouldn't be all that hard. I agree whole-heartedly. We can find a capable G to compete with Moore/Kendall. But not in the 6th round. It's essential that we try to get a 3rd-4th round pick by trading player(s) we don't need (Barton, McCareins, Kendall, Barrett, etc) to teams that do. Also, I don't know if it is as easy to find good RT's in the later rounds. OT is a bit of a different beast than OG; you don't find all that many gems in day 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.