Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Cleveland just traded up again. I wonder what they have up their sleeves with this pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Yeah but he'll catch alot of ball for that offense. I can see the Rams going WR in round 3, like Chansi Stuckey, etc. Isaac Bruce is ancient, and Torry Holt is solid albeit he is aging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Cleveland just traded up again. I wonder what they have up their sleeves with this pick. Eric Wright. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I agree whole-heartedly. We can find a capable G to compete with Moore/Kendall. But not in the 6th round. It's essential that we try to get a 3rd-4th round pick by trading player(s) we don't need (Barton, McCareins, Kendall, Barrett, etc) to teams that do. Also, I don't know if it is as easy to find good RT's in the later rounds. OT is a bit of a different beast than OG; you don't find all that many gems in day 2. Someone is going to want Barrett, for some stupid reason, im sure. I don't really know why, i just really feel like he gets dealt. Kendall probably stays, and Barton too. With the 3-4 scheme, you need so many LB's to interchange that i just dont see the coaching staff letting an above average guy like Barton go. Of course i could be wrong, i usually am lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 We can wait until June 1st cuts for a guard. The only "problems" we have is DT and a burner WR. If you look at the big picture, we went w/ quality over quantity at need spots. Tangini has really sured up some question marks this offseason. I love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Someone is going to want Barrett, for some stupid reason, im sure. I don't really know why, i just really feel like he gets dealt. Kendall probably stays, and Barton too. With the 3-4 scheme, you need so many LB's to interchange that i just dont see the coaching staff letting an above average guy like Barton go. Of course i could be wrong, i usually am lol. Barton gets paid an awful lot just to be an "interchangable part". He's a better fit for a team that runs the 4-3, and he'll find a home there, eventually. It's just a matter of WHEN, and HOW MUCH we get for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I can see the Rams going WR in round 3, like Chansi Stuckey, etc. Isaac Bruce is ancient, and Torry Holt is solid albeit he is aging. Holt is a lot more than solid, he's one of the best in the league...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Holt is a lot more than solid, he's one of the best in the league...lol Don't mind him, he's clueless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 We can wait until June 1st cuts for a guard. The only "problems" we have is DT and a burner WR. If you look at the big picture, we went w/ quality over quantity at need spots. Tangini has really sured up some question marks this offseason. I love it. I feel we don't need a NT, D-Rob has come up strong to finish of the year, and we don't need a burner WR because we lack the QB to throw the deep ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 We can wait until June 1st cuts for a guard. The only "problems" we have is DT and a burner WR. If you look at the big picture, we went w/ quality over quantity at need spots. Tangini has really sured up some question marks this offseason. I love it. OL is a MUCH bigger concern than not having a "burner" at WR. The obsession people have with us upgrading the WR corps is incredible. Until we get a big-armed QB, having WR's with 4.3 speed is completely unnecesarry. How soon we forget what happened to Santana Moss here. Our OL was not "fixed" by Ferguson and Mangold; it is still a work in progress. Kendall can't push anyone around anymore at the age of 35. Moore is average. Clement cannot be anything more than a backup if we want the offense to succeed. What would a burner at WR do without a big-armed QB and a solid offensive line to give the QB time? NOTHING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman88 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I feel we don't need a NT, D-Rob has come up strong to finish of the year, and we don't need a burner WR because we lack the QB to throw the deep ball. Wow I actually agree with everything you said in this post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Speez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 We can wait until June 1st cuts for a guard. The only "problems" we have is DT and a burner WR. If you look at the big picture, we went w/ quality over quantity at need spots. Tangini has really sured up some question marks this offseason. I love it. Cotchery will suffice as a burner for now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I feel we don't need a NT, D-Rob has come up strong to finish of the year, and we don't need a burner WR because we lack the QB to throw the deep ball. That's why I put quotations around problems. I really don't see them as huge problems but they would be our weaknesses. BTW I don't think we need a WR that much only because I like the set of guys we already have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BornJetsFan1983 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I wonder when the mikeyCare ins trade will come in, I think the jets are going make some more moves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Barton gets paid an awful lot just to be an "interchangable part". He's a better fit for a team that runs the 4-3, and he'll find a home there, eventually. It's just a matter of WHEN, and HOW MUCH we get for him. I dont think i said it clearly, my apologies. What i meant was using him, along with the rest of our LB's the same way NE uses theirs. Keeping your defense fresh into the 4th quarter would be very nice, something that our D didn't really have in the playoffs last year against NE. Thats why i want him. I do agree he's better for a 4-3, but he's pretty dag on good in our 3-4 as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 We can wait until June 1st cuts for a guard. The only "problems" we have is DT and a burner WR. If you look at the big picture, we went w/ quality over quantity at need spots. Tangini has really sured up some question marks this offseason. OL is a MUCH bigger concern than not having a "burner" at WR. The obsession people have with us upgrading the WR corps is incredible. Until we get a big-armed QB, having WR's with 4.3 speed is completely unnecesarry. How soon we forget what happened to Santana Moss here. Our OL was not "fixed" by Ferguson and Mangold; it is still a work in progress. Kendall can't push anyone around anymore at the age of 35. Moore is average. Clement cannot be anything more than a backup if we want the offense to succeed. What would a burner at WR do without a big-armed QB and a solid offensive line to give the QB time? NOTHING. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Cheifs pick Mcbride/DE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 The rams got 2 top of the line players and people in cariiker and leonard... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Seattle reaches for CB Josh Wilson.. or whatever his name was. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Someone please update me, I just came from Philly and I am confused. Just tell me everything that happened please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Someone please update me, I just came from Philly and I am confused. Just tell me everything that happened please In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Someone please update me, I just came from Philly and I am confused. Just tell me everything that happened please The jets traded up twice in the 1st and 2nd rounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShadowJet35 Posted April 29, 2007 Author Share Posted April 29, 2007 Someone please update me, I just came from Philly and I am confused. Just tell me everything that happened please The Jets reached for a mediocre CB and took a good ILB from Michigan... The Browns are Pwning the draft.. I'm to lazy to think about anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 The jets traded up twice in the 1st and 2nd rounds. So when is our next pick ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 So when is our next pick ? umm, 7th rd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 So when is our next pick ? We have a 6th and 7th round pick Check out ESPN.com they have a cool draft tracker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 So when is our next pick ? late tomorrow heh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I never even heard of this LB we took. BLALOCKKKKKKKKKKKK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I never even heard of this LB we took. BLALOCKKKKKKKKKKKK He was projected to be a 1st-rounder by some and people though New England might take him in the 1st. http://www.nfldraftcountdown.com/scoutingreports/ilb/davidharris.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 I never even heard of this LB we took. BLALOCKKKKKKKKKKKK He's good. Perfect 3-4 ILB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Sucks that we only got a 6th and a 7th left. Lets trade some bums pleaseeeee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Sucks that we only got a 6th and a 7th left. Lets trade some bums pleaseeeee. Yes, lets trade schegal please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Speez Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Yes, lets trade schegal please. for what a Boars Head Ham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 Yes, lets trade schegal please. J-Mac & Barton too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachTsurfing Posted April 29, 2007 Share Posted April 29, 2007 J-Mac & Barton too I like barton and I really think that jmac is going to have a good year. I know he underperformed for what we gave up, but he is going to come out with a chip on his shoulder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.