SouthernJet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 EAGLES GOT A FREEBIE As it turns out, the only touchdown scored by the Eagles in their Week Six win over the Jets should have been blown dead before the play even began. Bob Brookover of the Philadelphia Inquirer noted on Monday that the 75-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Donovan McNabb to receiver Kevin Curtis was the result of a play that began after the clock struck zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 EAGLES GOT A FREEBIE As it turns out, the only touchdown scored by the Eagles in their Week Six win over the Jets should have been blown dead before the play even began. Bob Brookover of the Philadelphia Inquirer noted on Monday that the 75-yard touchdown pass from quarterback Donovan McNabb to receiver Kevin Curtis was the result of a play that began after the clock struck zero. Both teams cut it very, very close a number of times, but that was the most blatant. Some officiating crews just seem to be quicker to call that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joiseyjet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 This wasn`t Chad under center do you think another 5 yards would have made a diff. to them scoreing a TD ,I highly doubt it ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Who cares? The D got beat... not other way to spin it... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 No excuse, it happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 PENNINGTON SUCKS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 people talk about what's wrong with the Jets and they want to boil it down to one simple thing like the QB or the OL my guess is what's wrong with the Jets, they aren't getting the breaks. granted, Eric Smith did a TERRIBLE job tackling on that play and granted an NFL offense usually has to put up more than 3 field goals to win a game but at the end of the day it was a bad break, in a season full of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 people talk about what's wrong with the Jets and they want to boil it down to one simple thing like the QB or the OL my guess is what's wrong with the Jets, they aren't getting the breaks. granted, Eric Smith did a TERRIBLE job tackling on that play and granted an NFL offense usually has to put up more than 3 field goals to win a game but at the end of the day it was a bad break, in a season full of them. You better get started on that draft you bastard. come on bitonti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 This wasn`t Chad under center do you think another 5 yards would have made a diff. to them scoreing a TD ,I highly doubt it ....... The point being, if that play is whistled, there is noo guarantee (actually it is highly improbable) that the same play gets called with tehe exact same result. Doesn't matter, the Jets stink, but as SJ said, I think all of us watching on TV noticed the clock had hit :00 and there was no snap. It wasn't even close. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joiseyjet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 The point being, if that play is whistled, there is noo guarantee (actually it is highly improbable) that the same play gets called with tehe exact same result. Doesn't matter, the Jets stink, but as SJ said, I think all of us watching on TV noticed the clock had hit :00 and there was no snap. It wasn't even close. It would have giving Moss another 5 yards to seperate himself from our wonderful defense ,Dyson would probably be laying on the field 5 yards from the scrimage line while Moss was dancing in the endzone.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GreenBeans Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 It would have giving Moss another 5 yards to seperate himself from our wonderful defense ,Dyson would probably be laying on the field 5 yards from the scrimage line while Moss was dancing in the endzone.. Moss? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joiseyjet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Moss? Sorry i`m so PO`d arguing with the Pats fans ,i`ve got Randy Moss on my brain ,no matter who the WR was Dyson or 1 of our fine cover guys would have ole`d the tackle... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slowmoe57 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Excuse my ignorance -- but can this play be challenged -- not that anyone in the booth noticed - only the fans watching on TV -- Someone has to be monitoring this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 I was going crazy at the stadium when they didnt call delay of game. Our players didnt say anything. Our coaches didnt say anything. And the official was staring straight at the clock... I dont think he wanted to throw his flag, he missed a few penalties during the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 PENNINGTON SUCKS Fair enough, but it doesnt really apply here. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Nothing new here it happens every year to the Jets , Chris baker in Cleveland ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaspegs Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 ya i was screaming and even more pissed at the time since they scored a td. w/e still should have made a tackle that middle school could have made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 The offensive team always gets another second after the clock is expired by the referees. Being at the game, it was pretty much bang-bang it seemed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Bit Special Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 The offensive team always gets another second after the clock is expired by the referees. Being at the game, it was pretty much bang-bang it seemed. my view was that it wasnt bang bang but the zero was up on the clock when snapped. i would love to see the replay. but, it doesnt matter. we still should have made the play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoFlaJets Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 The offensive team always gets another second after the clock is expired by the referees. Being at the game, it was pretty much bang-bang it seemed. the Jets got called on exactly the same deal later on Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn212 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 It wasn't even close..I'd say 2 secs maybe..The defense changes if the penalty is assessed. The Jets got jobbed on the call just like Baker call vs Cleveland.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kentucky Jet Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 people talk about what's wrong with the Jets and they want to boil it down to one simple thing like the QB or the OL my guess is what's wrong with the Jets, they aren't getting the breaks. granted, Eric Smith did a TERRIBLE job tackling on that play and granted an NFL offense usually has to put up more than 3 field goals to win a game but at the end of the day it was a bad break, in a season full of them. Bad break or a BAD play sent in by ERIC & SCHOTTY? When a guy like TJ is running well, why not run him until they stop him? Our stiffs serr staff stopped the run game pretty much in the second half. If we can not scoren 3 attempts, from the 8 yard line, where is the bad break? It was poor playcalling and a poor , whiffle ball , that floated and fell closer to the CB then WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 The Iggles TD happened on their first drive. There was plenty of time to get back in it. Unfortunately, the jets never led again, and i'm not going to blame that on a reffing call that happened in the first five minutes of the game. Bad break or a BAD play sent in by ERIC & SCHOTTY? When a guy like TJ is running well, why not run him until they stop him? Our stiffs serr staff stopped the run game pretty much in the second half. If we can not scoren 3 attempts, from the 8 yard line, where is the bad break? It was poor playcalling and a poor , whiffle ball , that floated and fell closer to the CB then WR. You are blinded by your hatred of pennington. The play call sucked- it was a 50/50 proposition, and they should have given it to TJ, but the throw was on the money and the CB made a great play knocking it away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kentucky Jet Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 The Iggles TD happened on their first drive. There was plenty of time to get back in it. Unfortunately, the jets never led again, and i'm not going to blame that on a reffing call that happened in the first five minutes of the game. You are blinded by your hatred of pennington. The play call sucked- it was a 50/50 proposition, and they should have given it to TJ, but the throw was on the money and the CB made a great play knocking it away. and you are sucked in by your love of a farce of a QB! Look at the play again and maybe you will open your eyes this time! The throw was not a great throw or on the money! The CB did make a nice play, I will admit. A bit more mustard and he could not have made the play! Try not to let your affection for CHAD cloud your usual fine judgement! And for what it is worth, HATE is a silly word to use in this instance. CHAD is a Jet and as such, I do not hate the man. I dislike him as QB of the Jets because I feel he hurts the team. There is a big difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetCane Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 You've been off-base for quite while with your animosity towards anyone who doesnt see things the same way as you. I just saw the play on jets Extra point, and the pass was fine. The DB made a great play- he had it all the way because the pattern was so predictable. The play call sucked, and no, i dont want Pennington to start, nor did i want him to start last week either. I have no more affection for pennington than any other jet player, so cool your Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kentucky Jet Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 You've been off-base for quite while with your animosity towards anyone who doesnt see things the same way as you. I just saw the play on jets Extra point, and the pass was fine. The DB made a great play- he had it all the way because the pattern was so predictable. The play call sucked, and no, i dont want Pennington to start, nor did i want him to start last week either. I have no more affection for pennington than any other jet player, so cool your Jets. I just saw the same play and beg to differ with you. People can have differing views I believe. Re animosity, I think you are off base and all wet! I do think that you are the guy with animosity or rather condescending problems! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 You've been off-base for quite while with your animosity towards anyone who doesnt see things the same way as you. I just saw the play on jets Extra point, and the pass was fine. The DB made a great play- he had it all the way because the pattern was so predictable. The play call sucked, and no, i dont want Pennington to start, nor did i want him to start last week either. I have no more affection for pennington than any other jet player, so cool your Jets. I found this very funny JC thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cmart28Coles87 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 I noticed it to. I was at the game and when the snap went off and they scored I was screaming "WTF WHERES THE FLAG REF HE DIDNT GET THAT SNAP OFF" I clearly saw on the playclock in the stadium at zero when the snap went off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mangenious420 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 I noticed it to. I was at the game and when the snap went off and they scored I was screaming "WTF WHERES THE FLAG REF HE DIDNT GET THAT SNAP OFF" I clearly saw on the playclock in the stadium at zero when the snap went off. Again like 124 said. They almost always give the QB an extra second, it's nothing new. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Rhodes25 Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 yea i noticed this a couple play dont you think the nfl should have someone upstairs as sort of a shot clock operator Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DACHUMS Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 It wasn't even close..I'd say 2 secs maybe..The defense changes if the penalty is assessed. The Jets got jobbed on the call just like Baker call vs Cleveland.. I THOUGHT THE SAME THING WHILE WATCHING IT, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.05f3dc52804d5fd84cf09ccfcd7bd10b.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.