Green DNA Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Which proves my point. what's that knuckle head Moss doin hangin around with trash like that anyway? If the shoe fits.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 The only thing that I can think of in his defense is that the bitch acted up and he slapped her around. Perfectly understandable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 I've got no particular love for Moss (let alone the Patriots), but this more than smells like garbage. Too much shakedown-esque stuff going on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Reading the papers this morning - this woman and her lawyer - a recent grad (two years ago) from a 2nd tier law school- U of Miami - sound like they are trying to shake Moss down big time. Now, if Moss is the guilty party here - I say suspend his butt......but let's see: 1)no criminal complaint 2) she's unemployed 3) she's had two eviction notices 4) Moss - through his attorney - offered to pay for med expenses (sprained finger sustained during some ....um....."playful" foreplay) and whatever associated expenses through Randy's homeowners. She (and attorney) say "no." They shake 'em down saying they want 6 figures. Moss' lawyers say maybe we should avoid the headache - offer her 100K. She and the attorney say "no, we want at least 500k" Moss' lawyers essentially tell him to buck off. Part of me feels bad for her. She's been sleeping with this man - who knows how often - for 11 years. Meanwhile - he has a "steady" girlfriend (since high school) whom he has four children with and whom he supports completely. Now, you 'gotta think that she allowed herself to be used. Can't help her already crappy self-esteem any. Now she's just mad - and wants a payoff. That's my take on it, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Reading the papers this morning - this woman and her lawyer - a recent grad (two years ago) from a 2nd tier law school- U of Miami - sound like they are trying to shake Moss down big time. Now, if Moss is the guilty party here - I say suspend his butt......but let's see: 1)no criminal complaint 2) she's unemployed 3) she's had two eviction notices 4) Moss - through his attorney - offered to pay for med expenses (sprained finger sustained during some ....um....."playful" foreplay) and whatever associated expenses through Randy's homeowners. She (and attorney) say "no." They shake 'em down saying they want 6 figures. Moss' lawyers say maybe we should avoid the headache - offer her 100K. She and the attorney say "no, we want at least 500k" Moss' lawyers essentially tell him to buck off. Yes, thank you mother Teresa. I was sitting here on pins and needles just wondering which side of the fence you would fall on this issue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Reading the papers this morning - this woman and her lawyer - a recent grad (two years ago) from a 2nd tier law school- U of Miami - sound like they are trying to shake Moss down big time. Now, if Moss is the guilty party here - I say suspend his butt......but let's see: 1)no criminal complaint 2) she's unemployed 3) she's had two eviction notices 4) Moss - through his attorney - offered to pay for med expenses (sprained finger sustained during some ....um....."playful" foreplay) and whatever associated expenses through Randy's homeowners. She (and attorney) say "no." They shake 'em down saying they want 6 figures. Moss' lawyers say maybe we should avoid the headache - offer her 100K. She and the attorney say "no, we want at least 500k" Moss' lawyers essentially tell him to buck off. Part of me feels bad for her. She's been sleeping with this man - who knows how often - for 11 years. Meanwhile - he has a "steady" girlfriend (since high school) whom he has four children with and whom he supports completely. Now, you 'gotta think that she allowed herself to be used. Can't help her already crappy self-esteem any. Now she's just mad - and wants a payoff. That's my take on it, anyway. i'm sure kraft will buy her off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 i'm sure kraft will buy her off. Nope. Randy's attorney's are raging a counter war. Have the authorities in FLA and WV involved as well as the FBI....something about shake-downs and unethical behavior by the Complaintant's attorney. This 2 year Law dude may be in way over his head. If he did indeed conjur this crap up for a big payday - I hope they disbar him. Lawyers can be such azzh*les, Assmop. Really. I see it every day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Nope. Randy's attorney's are raging a counter war. Have the authorities in FLA and WV involved as well as the FBI....something about shake-downs and unethical behavior by the Complaintant's attorney. This 2 year Law dude may be in way over his head. If he did indeed conjur this crap up for a big payday - I hope they disbar him. Lawyers can be such azzh*les, Assmop. Really. I see it every day. there is a chance she is in the right..just sayin he is a turd and always will be one, maybe innocent this time ...who knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 there is a chance she is in the right..just sayin he is a turd and always will be one, maybe innocent this time ...who knows Even if she was right and he did injury her on purpose. The atty engaged in illegal behavior. The atty is going down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Should have just straight up paid her off with cash... homie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 there is a chance she is in the right..just sayin he is a turd and always will be one, maybe innocent this time ...who knows Absolutely, she could be the real victim here - but my gut tells me no. Randy's no saint - I mean, why would a man that has been with the same woman since high school have four children with her and not marry her? He's an assh*le. And, seriously, does he maintain his "freedom" so he can screw around with this one? Some men are beyond selfish and have this really screwed-up sense of entitlement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted January 18, 2008 Author Share Posted January 18, 2008 Should have just straight up paid her off with cash... homie She wanted six figures, so probably around $100,000 and he wouldn't pay it. Yeah Randy, like $100,000 is a lot of money to you. Thats like if I bought my friend a Cheeseburger when he forgot his wallet in the car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 She wanted six figures, so probably around $100,000 and he wouldn't pay it. Yeah Randy, like $100,000 is a lot of money to you. Thats like if I bought my friend a Cheeseburger when he forgot his wallet in the car. some people are cheap........ I laugh it this cause a Pizza delivery guy refused TO's tip of 2 dollars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 She wanted six figures, so probably around $100,000 and he wouldn't pay it. Yeah Randy, like $100,000 is a lot of money to you. Thats like if I bought my friend a Cheeseburger when he forgot his wallet in the car. Either that or maybe he really didn't do it and paying her off would have been like admitting that he really did do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Either that or maybe he really didn't do it and paying her off would have been like admitting that he really did do it. If you are going to bang a goumah then he should take care of his goumah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 moss has put people in hospitals before in fights this is not beneath him and LOL at anyone who defends him at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 She wanted six figures, so probably around $100,000 and he wouldn't pay it. Yeah Randy, like $100,000 is a lot of money to you. Thats like if I bought my friend a Cheeseburger when he forgot his wallet in the car. Reports state she was offered 100k but her lawyer turned it down saying it would cost at least 500k to save Randy from embarassment. If this dopey attorney is guilty of lying and shaking down a man with means - I hope this doofus faces the same humilation and consequences that Nifong did. You can't purposely screw people over (even if they deserve it) and think that you will somehow get away scott-free. That is true Karma, folks. Blackout - you may want to read the actual report before you say anything. She didn't go to the ER until a few days later at her lawyers behest - x-rays were negative - she "sprained" a finger during "horseplay" (read: foreplay). Growing up in Boston, I've seen my fair share of athletes out and about. Most seem cool - but there's some that are dogs - plain and simple. That said, I've seen some women (especially at bar called Daisy Buchanan's) practically throw themselves at athletes. I never quite understood why. I mean what's the grand prize here? Getting to tell your grandchildren that you had sex with an athlete? I mean do you think it would be cool to tell the little ones that Grandma was used? It's silly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 Reports state she was offered 100k but her lawyer turned it down saying it would cost at least 500k to save Randy from embarassment. If this dopey attorney is guilty of lying and shaking down a man with means - I hope this doofus faces the same humilation and consequences that Nifong did. You can't purposely screw people over (even if they deserve it) and think that you will somehow get away scott-free. That is true Karma, folks. i hope moss gets the chair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 She wanted six figures, so probably around $100,000 and he wouldn't pay it. Yeah Randy, like $100,000 is a lot of money to you. Thats like if I bought my friend a Cheeseburger when he forgot his wallet in the car. A first she demanded 6 figures, when Moss's agent asked if he meant $100,000 the demand went up to $500,000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alk Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 This is a supposed email from Moss' agent. My communications with Mr. McGill began last Wednesday. He told me that Randy had intentionally hurt his client Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 [quote name='Blackout Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted January 18, 2008 Share Posted January 18, 2008 It's not fair. It is just not fair ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 I think mumbles and Kraft deflected the heat from the players. management was kicked in the nuts, not the players. this is direct heat on a dumb player, it could have chilling after effects (I hope). Who had to answer the same questions over and over? Players. Now, a player having problems with a woman? Yeah, that never happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Who had to answer the same questions over and over? Players. Now, a player having problems with a woman? Yeah, that never happens. About spygate? I don't think so. all the questions were focused on mumbles, not the players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whaler53 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 So, this was supposedly consensual horseplay...So my question is...How the hell did they get the horse to consent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 About spygate? I don't think so. all the questions were focused on mumbles, not the players. Yes, but who answered the questions on what happened? "What did you know?" "Do you know the camerman?" "Have you seen at the games before?" "Does this tarnish youre legacy?" "Did you hear what Player X said about it?" "How do you feel about losing the draft pick?" Yes, it was about Belichick. However, his players took the brunt of the storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Yes, but who answered the questions on what happened? "What did you know?" "Do you know the camerman?" "Have you seen at the games before?" "Does this tarnish youre legacy?" "Did you hear what Player X said about it?" "How do you feel about losing the draft pick?" Yes, it was about Belichick. However, his players took the brunt of the storm. If it's questions about Belichick it won't be that much of a distraction to a player. it would be the same as if the press asked '' what's mumbles game plan''. the answer would be a simple ''I don't know'', or ''I can't comment on that''. very simple, cut and dry. The Moss situation is a distraction for one of your best players, a dumb player at that. if you think he can stay as focused as mumbles could with all of that **** going on you're crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 If it's questions about Belichick it won't be that much of a distraction to a player. it would be the same as if the press asked '' what's mumbles game plan''. the answer would be a simple ''I don't know'', or ''I can't comment on that''. very simple, cut and dry. The Moss situation is a distraction for one of your best players, a dumb player at that. if you think he can stay as focused as mumbles could with all of that **** going on you're crazy. You are missing the big picture. "Tom, Hines Ward said he thought it was funny you guys played so well in 2001 and 2004. You seemed to be a play ahead of the Steelers in both games. Does this tarnish your legacy?" Yes, it was about Belichick, but the players had their hard work questioned. You do not think that was a tad distracting? Year(s) of your hard work and effort questioned? I agree Moss is distracted. However, that is one player. I doubt it is having the residual effect you hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 So, this was supposedly consensual horseplay...So my question is...How the hell did they get the horse to consent? You can get a horse (Colt) to consent to almost anything for enough money, including licking cookies on national TV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 randy, you have been accused of assault what do you have to say "why would i do that man were 17-0!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thai Jet Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Yes, thank you mother Teresa. I was sitting here on pins and needles just wondering which side of the fence you would fall on this issue. Well? Were you disappointed or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo83 Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 Absolutely, she could be the real victim here - but my gut tells me no. Randy's no saint - I mean, why would a man that has been with the same woman since high school have four children with her and not marry her? He's an assh*le. And, seriously, does he maintain his "freedom" so he can screw around with this one? Some men are beyond selfish and have this really screwed-up sense of entitlement. Just like some women are nothing but gold diggers, beyond selfish, and feel like they are entitled just because they are pretty. Your point is??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 She seems like a real winner, she doesn't know where Randy Moss works, and she got here own birthday wrong (unless she is 99 years old). 2008 - 1972 = 99? Huh? Only in Boston Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 She seems like a real winner, she doesn't know where Randy Moss works, and she got here own birthday wrong (unless she is 99 years old). 2008 - 1972 = 99? Huh? Only in Boston You mean FLA, right? This chick lives in Ft. Lauderdale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.