Joe Jets fan Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Now that there is no shot at Glennon.. http://www.ganggreennation.com/2015/2/12/8023599/ryan-mallett-potential-jets yan Mallett has had an interesting career so far. A quarterback prospect many regarded highly, he fell into the third round of the 2011 NFL Draft when New England selected him. He did not start a game in his first three NFL seasons. While this might be unusual under normal circumstances for a quarterback selected so highly, there was a good reason in this case. The Patriots had Tom Brady. Faced with the likelihood Mallett would leave for no compensation via free agency to find a place where he could play more, the Patriots drafted Jimmy Garoppolo and traded Mallett to Houston. He ended up getting two starts when the Texans benched the struggling Ryan Fitzpatrick. Then he tore a pectoral and was lost for the year. It is quite rare such a highly selected quarterback makes it through his entire rookie contract without having a track record, but here Mallett is. Given his Texans connection, it is worth wondering whether Mike Maccagnan might bring in the former Arkansas Razorback and Michigan Wolverine. Mallett's 2014 season only consisted of two starts. He played a pretty good 20 for 30, 2 touchdown game in Cleveland and a bad 21 for 45 game against Cincinnati. This is the only extended playing time of his career. While the sample size is too small to make definitive statements, I did watch him and come away with a number of thoughts. His physical tools are top notch. He's 6'6" and owns a rocket for an arm. He can fit balls into very tight quarters. This is good because his accuracy looked inconsistent at spots. I think a lot of it has to do with his footwork. There were clear points where he didn't properly set his feet on throws. When you have a big arm, you can get away with less than pinpoint accuracy. This is true at least to a certain extent, and I think it was true for him in that Browns game. There were some things I really liked about Mallett. He was good at getting the ball out quickly. Pro Football Focus had him at 2.31 seconds from the snap to pass attempt. That's in Manning-Brady territory. Now let me provide you with some caveats here lest you think he has a Manning-Brady type release. Houston gave him a lot of quick and simple reads. Only 10.1% of his pass attempts were deep balls. That is a low rate. I do think he made good throws on time, though. <img alt=" " src="https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/e0jzXT-PBf8lWVmycvFu1OdZac4=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401116/mallett1.0.JPG"> He understands he's got a cushion here, and the ball is coming out as his receiver is making his break. There isn't going to be a chance for the corner to drive on the receiver and make a play. <img alt="mallett2" src="https://cdn2.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/HHziENyqGnwYKkf5uFXAmN0jfFA=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401134/mallett2.0.JPG"> Same thing here. The receiver is open, but it's only going to be for a short time until the corner reacts. It's up to the quarterback to mentally process how the route meshes with the coverage, and decisively get the ball to the receiver before this window closes. <img alt="mallett3" src="https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/q0R9CPqxrXNqv4Exb8od6BFeXeM=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401142/mallett3.0.JPG"> And once more here. This is the kind of thing that makes it very difficult for me to have optimism about Geno Smith's future. He doesn't make quick enough decisions and throw it quickly enough when he has receivers open like this. You can see here that the defenders are going to react eventually. You know how people frequently say, "Geno is late." That's frequently what they mean. Now I'd like to talk about a touchdown I think Mallett went a long way to creating. <img alt=" " src="https://cdn1.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/HB_O2OX_lzkd96zVVomW2JfHXTU=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401172/mallett4.0.JPG"> The Browns appear to be in a zone underneath to me, and Mallett uses his eyes to draw a linebacker out of his zone, clearing it for Garrett Graham. <img alt=" " src="https://cdn3.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/BpvJBOxhVn27LC2ZmdDTicf121o=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401180/mallett5.0.JPG"> <img alt=" " src="https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/sd0jhz0Yr61UZ5RS4YYTgqNw9ik=/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/3401188/mallett6.0.JPG"> If my interpretation is correct (maybe, maybe not), that's pretty advanced level stuff. It isn't all pretty, though. There were instances where Mallett's lack of game experience stuck out, and he was fooled. Take for example a standard zone blitz where he misses a defensive lineman dropping into coverage with near catastrophic results. The question is this. Would I go after Mallett if I was running the Jets? I think the answer is yes. Mallett has a lot of ability. He's shown some really good traits in his limited work. He has also trained under two really good offensive coaches, Bill O'Brien and Josh McDaniels. There isn't going to be a perfect candidate in free agency. The guys who are really good aren't allowed to hit free agency by their teams. Mallett is the rare free agent who has a legitimately high ceiling. I'd probably prefer to go with the higher ceiling than a known mediocrity like Sam Bradford or Brian Hoyer. I think for this reason that Mallett would be a good fit if the Jets brought in a rookie. Unless the rookie is ready to play on day one, the hope is to have a starting quarterback who can play effectively enough to stick for sixteen games. Mallett might provide more hope than the alternatives. Stick Geno Smith or even Hoyer or Bradford out there, and everybody knows what the team has. Management and coaches are liable to get impatient quickly knowing how little hope there is for this starter to succeed. An unwritten book like Mallett might get more patience. I can't imagine Mallett getting a prohibitive contract. Any deal would likely allow the Jets to escape in a year if it didn't work out. I'd consider this quarterback a target worth going after in that event. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallett's supposed to be an a$$hole but I have always been a big fan of the talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted February 12, 2015 Author Share Posted February 12, 2015 Sorry everyone, thought that when it was telling me I could not post the pictures it was not starting a new topic. So, Mallett, big, rocket arm, smart, and I bet would love to stick it to the pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Why is there no longer a shot at Glennon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I would prefer him over Glennon.. enough with the Glennon BS... PLEASE. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Why is there no longer a shot at Glennon? Hopefully because everyone has realized he sucks. Mallett sucks too. That said, he is more talented physically with a better pedigree as a player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted February 12, 2015 Author Share Posted February 12, 2015 Why is there no longer a shot at Glennon? Because TB has shown that they are keeping him. I don't see any way they cut McCown and trade Glennon. They had to keep one before drafting Winston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallet is hot garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Because TB has shown that they are keeping him. I don't see any way they cut McCown and trade Glennon. They had to keep one before drafting Winston. How have they "shown that they are keeping him?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet9 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 5-11 anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't know how much attention Maccagnan was paying to the pro personnel on the Texans while he was there, but I have to say I'd be pretty excited about this if he thought Mallet was worth bringing in. You can't teach 6'6" and a rocket arm. Back that move up with a QB in the second or third round and run with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 How have they "shown that they are keeping him?" It makes significantly more sense to keep him than trade, unless they're blown away with an offer. And I'd hope the Jets weren't interested in blowing them away. He's under contract, and they released the guy the head coach brought in last year to take over for him. You have to have a backup, and Glennon makes sense in the part-time starter role while they bring along the QB they prefer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet9 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't know how much attention Maccagnan was paying to the pro personnel on the Texans while he was there, but I have to say I'd be pretty excited about this if he thought Mallet was worth bringing in. You can't teach 6'6" and a rocket arm. Back that move up with a QB in the second or third round and run with it. Your name is slats so I'm going to assume that you're a Ranger fan. Nobody could stop saying that stuff when we drafted Hugh Jessiman. He was easily the worst pick in the 03 draft which was easily one of the best 1st rounds ever. My point is, the size stuff means nothing if you suck. And Mallett couldn't beat out Fitzpatrick, who I like but isn't that great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 It makes significantly more sense to keep him than trade, unless they're blown away with an offer. And I'd hope the Jets weren't interested in blowing them away. He's under contract, and they released the guy the head coach brought in last year to take over for him. You have to have a backup, and Glennon makes sense in the part-time starter role while they bring along the QB they prefer. If they take Winston with the number 1 overall pick he will be starting on opening day. Expect a decision to be made on Glennon within a few days of the opening of the trading period/free agency. They are going to want to move him prior to the draft to maximize his value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Your name is slats so I'm going to assume that you're a Ranger fan. Nobody could stop saying that stuff when we drafted Hugh Jessiman. He was easily the worst pick in the 03 draft which was easily one of the best 1st rounds ever. My point is, the size stuff means nothing if you suck. And Mallett couldn't beat out Fitzpatrick, who I like but isn't that great. I can't name a single hockey player. Also, like I said, if Maccagnan -who's presumably seen Mallet up close and has an eye for talent- thinks he's worth bringing in, I'll be excited to have him. If he chooses to pass, I'll be fine with that, too. I'm mostly excited about having a talent evaluator in the GM spot. If they take Winston with the number 1 overall pick he will be starting on opening day. Expect a decision to be made on Glennon within a few days of the opening of the trading period/free agency. They are going to want to move him prior to the draft to maximize his value. Maybe, maybe not on Winston. You need a backup either way. Before McCown was cut, I thought he made more sense for the role, but it would seem the Bucs feel otherwise. Barring a Villain-like offer, I'd be shocked if Glennon's not a Buc next season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't know how much attention Maccagnan was paying to the pro personnel on the Texans while he was there, but I have to say I'd be pretty excited about this if he thought Mallet was worth bringing in. You can't teach 6'6" and a rocket arm. Back that move up with a QB in the second or third round and run with it. Jamarcus Russell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Jamarcus Russell! I don't think we're talking about a $68M contract with $32M guaranteed for Mallet. He'll get a deal worthy of his two starts in four years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shockwave Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallet would be a great target. Young with upside, and most importantly CHEAP. He doesnt cost a draft pick, and unlike Geno if he sucks we can simply cut him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallet is hot garbage. He hasn't really had a chance to fail. Mallet won his first start and then was hurt in practice. He tried to play start #2 but had a torn pectoral muscle IIRC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I don't think we're talking about a $68M contract with $32M guaranteed for Mallet. He'll get a deal worthy of his two starts in four years. exactly. I would consider Mallett for a spot on the team. Mallet/Rookie/Genocide sounds decent for right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallett's supposed to be an a$$hole but I have always been a big fan of the talent. He was brought in as a transfer by one of the biggest a$$holes around, Bobby Petrino. Color me shocked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Sure why not who's next Mark Brunell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Sure why not who's next Mark BrunellNo, Kellen Clemens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 He hasn't really had a chance to fail. Mallet won his first start and then was hurt in practice. He tried to play start #2 but had a torn pectoral muscle IIRC Fine. Moderately medium heat garbage. Happy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallet is hot garbage. You overrate him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Jamarcus Russell! They can't teach him to stop eating and drinking grape drank. They taught him to be 6'6" with a rocket arm? Amazing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 You overrate him LOOK I CAN'T SATISFY EVERYONE WITH THESE TEMPERATURE METAPHORS OK GIVE ME A BREAK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsmanjb Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I'll take him as no. 2 or 3 QB: can't hurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Jets fan Posted February 12, 2015 Author Share Posted February 12, 2015 Sure why not who's next Mark Brunell Of course you don't want the Jets to bring in a young QB, that might well be the end of your boy Geno. Well got news for you, there will be a vet QB brought in and a draft pick I would bet. So thats all for Geno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 I'll take him as no. 2 or 3 QB: can't hurt He's worse than Matt simms Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 He can't be worst then Geno. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 He can't be worst then Geno-cide. fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 fixed. That would be a great nickname if you didn't suck so bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 That would be a great nickname if you didn't suck so bad. Why do I suck?): Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted February 12, 2015 Share Posted February 12, 2015 Mallett is a statue. Unless you are Peyton Manning, QBs must be able to move at least a little to escape the rush. Ryan Mallett is not PM. No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.