Lupz27 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Only the Jets screw things up just bad enough to not be bad enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kelticwizard Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 So now we're complaining that the Jets had the nerve to win a game? It's Christmas-let yourself be optimistic. It will all work out in the end. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 8 hours ago, Lupz27 said: Only the Jets screw things up just bad enough to not be bad enough. In what way? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adb280z Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 If they had lost where would they be picking? There'd be 4 teams tied at 3-12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 And honestly, there is no player worth tanking for this season. So Lupz has got the wrong idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toua77 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 24 minutes ago, adb280z said: If they had lost where would they be picking? There'd be 4 teams tied at 3-12. They'd be at #3 if I'm seeing this correctly http://www.tankathon.com/nfl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 28 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said: And honestly, there is no player worth tanking for this season. So Lupz has got the wrong idea. This I agree with. I am not in a knot over this year. If there was a franchise looking qb kicking around it would be another matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 If Peyton was going to be there, it would mean something. He's not, and it means nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Just now, flgreen said: If Peyton was going to be there, it would mean something. He's not, and it means nothing. Peyton is available you know, just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 6 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: Peyton is available you know, just saying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Obrien2Toon Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 When we trade away a 2nd or 3rd to move up 2 spots, we'll see if you guys feel the same way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Just now, Obrien2Toon said: When we trade away a 2nd or 3rd to move up 2 spots, we'll see if you guys feel the same way If the player turns out to be great, nobody will care. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said: If the player turns out to be great, nobody will care. Has that happened in recent years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smaxor5 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Trubisky is that good. Watch the tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southtown24th Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Need a Top of the first round QB, whether that guy turns out to be Browning Nagle or Tom Brady, I don't care. Go QB high and often Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 6 minutes ago, southtown24th said: Need a Top of the first round QB, whether that guy turns out to be Browning Nagle or Tom Brady, I don't care. Go QB high and often Agree our most glaring need right now is a decent QB we need to draft the best available QB when its our turn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 15 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: Has that happened in recent years? Well the last time Macc traded up for somebody was Brandon Shell, who, when he has played, had played okay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 There is a good chance that the player we want falls to us anyway there is also a chance the player we want is taken before us and ends up being a bust. I'm losing no sleep over that win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 It looks like we are pretty locked in at #6. Given that the Chargers had a stronger "strength of schedule" than we have, even if we somehow defeat the Bills we still are at 6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, JetsFanatic said: It looks like we are pretty locked in at #6. Given that the Chargers had a stronger "strength of schedule" than we have, even if we somehow defeat the Bills we still are at 6. Would you draft DeShaun Watson if he's there at 6 which I think he will be, I would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanatic Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 1 minute ago, joewilly12 said: Would you draft DeShaun Watson if he's there at 6 which I think he will be, I would. A couple of things to consider, between now and the draft players stock are going to rise and fall. I also believe Mac truly believes in Hackenberg as our QB or he would not have drafted him in the 2nd round. If that is the case, than the Jets should draft in order to give Hackenberg the best chance to succeed. Hopefully a dominant O-lineman or a playmaker ala Shady McCoy. Another x-factor is what, if any, football management/coaching changes Woody makes at the conclusion of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 1 minute ago, JetsFanatic said: A couple of things to consider, between now and the draft players stock are going to rise and fall. I also believe Mac truly believes in Hackenberg as our QB or he would not have drafted him in the 2nd round. If that is the case, than the Jets should draft in order to give Hackenberg the best chance to succeed. Hopefully a dominant O-lineman or a playmaker ala Shady McCoy. Another x-factor is what, if any, football management/coaching changes Woody makes at the conclusion of the season. We could have a new GM and head coach by the draft then the unknown unproven unseen Hackenberg could be odd man out if the new regime drafts Watson or another QB. Until the team finds a decent QB nothing else matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonmajet Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 If we win, people piss; if we loose people piss. Is it me, or are there just too many fans that will never be happy with anything except a SB? Or, would they say, too little too late it has been too long. Some people are never happy. As for 'blowing it', there isn't a QB worth tanking over. And, if there was, drafting 3 wouldn't help anyway. The next Payton would be drafted at #1. Then some team would draft a long shot at #2 in order to make up for not getting #1. 3 or 6 wouldn't get that QB. So, maybe that will make some fans feel better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 10 minutes ago, bostonmajet said: If we win, people piss; if we loose people piss. Is it me, or are there just too many fans that will never be happy with anything except a SB? Or, would they say, too little too late it has been too long. Some people are never happy. As for 'blowing it', there isn't a QB worth tanking over. And, if there was, drafting 3 wouldn't help anyway. The next Payton would be drafted at #1. Then some team would draft a long shot at #2 in order to make up for not getting #1. 3 or 6 wouldn't get that QB. So, maybe that will make some fans feel better. Isn't the ultimate goal in the NFL to win the Super Bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King P Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 51 minutes ago, JetsFanatic said: A couple of things to consider, between now and the draft players stock are going to rise and fall. I also believe Mac truly believes in Hackenberg as our QB or he would not have drafted him in the 2nd round. If that is the case, than the Jets should draft in order to give Hackenberg the best chance to succeed. Hopefully a dominant O-lineman or a playmaker ala Shady McCoy. Another x-factor is what, if any, football management/coaching changes Woody makes at the conclusion of the season. I disagree with your statement about Hackenberg. If Macc truly believed Hackenberg was our solution at QB, he would have drafted him in the 1st. He was willing to trade up to #1 to get Goff, that shows true belief. If you believe a QB has the potential to be a franchise guy, you take him in the 1st. Anything past that is basically a value pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonmajet Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 4 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: Isn't the ultimate goal in the NFL to win the Super Bowl. NO, really? It appears that the ultimate goal is to piss and whine about everything. My point wasn't that it wouldn't be great to win the SB, it was that until the Jets win a SB many fans will piss and moan about every outcome and half will argue that the good things are bad things. My other point is that even if the Jets were to win the SB, these fans would find something to be unhappy about. Hey, it is a fan's right to be unhappy and whine, or course. But the only thing that seems to be worse than watching the Jets on TV, is reading some of these posts. I will, however, wish all fans a happy holiday and a Happy New Year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 1 minute ago, bostonmajet said: NO, really? It appears that the ultimate goal is to piss and whine about everything. My point wasn't that it wouldn't be great to win the SB, it was that until the Jets win a SB many fans will piss and moan about every outcome and half will argue that the good things are bad things. My other point is that even if the Jets were to win the SB, these fans would find something to be unhappy about. Hey, it is a fan's right to be unhappy and whine, or course. But the only thing that seems to be worse than watching the Jets on TV, is reading some of these posts. I will, however, wish all fans a happy holiday and a Happy New Year. We are a bad organization its nothing to be pissed about no one is whining we are discussing the team on the Jets message board with other fans we are all entitled to our opinions. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonmajet Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: We are a bad organization its nothing to be pissed about no one is whining we are discussing the team on the Jets message board with other fans we are all entitled to our opinions. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Sorry, but the main purpose of this op is to complain that the Jets had the audacity and stupidity to win a game, and that now the future is permanently ruined. You have a right to your opinion, and I have a right to call it pissy, whining, and sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Jet Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 4 hours ago, flgreen said: If Peyton was going to be there, it would mean something. He's not, and it means nothing. We had our shot at Peyton and blew that also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 Only reason we didn't lose that game was Powell played brilliantly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 4 hours ago, Anthony Jet said: We had our shot at Peyton and blew that also Yeah but we got Farrior instead Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rangers9 Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 That comeback was one of the bright spots of the season. A lot better feeling as a Jets fan than what we saw on Saturday. Getting our ass kicked by the Cheaters and watching their mediocre fan base root for a shut out against us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anthony Jet Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 7 minutes ago, drdetroit said: Yeah but we got Farrior instead What a consolation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drdetroit Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 2 minutes ago, Anthony Jet said: What a consolation Parcells was openly telling the NY media why he didn't want Peyton Manning. It was because we already had Neil O'Donnel and the roster had so many holes he needed to trade down to get more picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.