RyanBe_Tweetin Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 The Jets obviously need some help at the safety position. Landry was a bit of a health concern in D.C. so I'm a little torn about him possibly coming to the Jets. What do you guys think? Btw is there any question this guy is on steroids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Read some Skins boards and they feel he needs surgery to get fully healthy. He refuses to have it. Weak in coverage, good in the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bLguerriero1 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 prolly hgh... but he obviously has very good genes on top of that... but for the right price he is an upgrade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Short answer. Yes and Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrellegivesmeaboner#24 Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 Landry would be great, but I can't make a clear determination without knowing about his medicals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 I say yes to both. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Vader Posted March 11, 2012 Share Posted March 11, 2012 he would replace smith as an in the box S - maybe he wld be a bit better. He is a major downgrade down the field in coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 HGH yes. Sign him no. We already have a hard hitting S that doesn't cover very good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LottsMissingFingerTip Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Short answer. Yes and Yes. ^this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Jets interested in LaRon Landry Posted by Michael David Smith on March 11, 2012, 7:05 PM EDT Getty Images LaRon Landry is likely to leave the Redskins in free agency after five years in Washington. The Jets may be his destination. The Jets have made a few contract moves to position themselves to be aggressive when free agency starts on Tuesday, and Rich Cimini of ESPNNewYork.com reports that they’re expected to show interest in Landry. Safety is a position that Jets coach Rex Ryan would like to upgrade on his defense, so Landry makes sense there. He also makes sense if the Jets are planning to enter their players in any bodybuilding competitions. Landry has always been a starter when healthy, but he hasn’t always been healthy. He has missed 15 games in the last two years with Achilles, groin and hamstring injuries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 HGH yes. Sign him no. We already have a hard hitting S that doesn't cover very good. Yeah the idea that Smith is comparable to Landry is pretty funny. I'll go yes on signing him if they think he's healthy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flgreen Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Tough one Guys another tough guy in the box who struggles in coverage. Not only that he is having difficulty staying on the field. Do the Jets commit to this guy when there are better players coming out in next years draft (maybe)? if he can stay on the field he's an upgrade. But how much. I'd take a shot at Lowery first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyanBe_Tweetin Posted March 12, 2012 Author Share Posted March 12, 2012 Read some Skins boards and they feel he needs surgery to get fully healthy. He refuses to have it. Weak in coverage, good in the box. If he refuses to get surgery and he'll never be 100 % healthy I dont think we should commit too much money. If he comes for a decent price I'm for it. I doubt hes any worse than Smith is in coverage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Yes but depends on the price. Argue what you will about him he'd be an upgrade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I say yes. While his cover skills might not be a huge upgrade over smith, he punishes people who come across the middle. His intimidation factor alone brings credibility to the position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SayNoToDMC Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Wait, is this that guy who isn't Eric Smith? If so I say get him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Yeah the idea that Smith is comparable to Landry is pretty funny. I'll go yes on signing him if they think he's healthy. I didn't say Smith was as good as Landry, I said we already have a S who can tackle but cant cover that good and that's all Landry is. Capt Dianabol can make it through a season without getting hurt. I'd rather keep Smith and not over pay for a guy that's going to spend 1/4 of the season on the sideline. Last year Smith got 700k Laundry got 3.75 mill. He's not worth that money, he can't cover the TEs we face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I didn't say Smith was as good as Landry, I said we already have a S who can tackle but cant cover that good and that's all Landry is. Capt Dianabol can make it through a season without getting hurt. I'd rather keep Smith and not over pay for a guy that's going to spend 1/4 of the season on the sideline. Last year Smith got 700k Laundry got 3.75 mill. He's not worth that money, he can't cover the TEs we face. What safety out there is blanketing TEs on a regular basis? Just out of curiosity...I have candidates...Either Seahawks starting safety for instance...but I don't watch enough to know...healthy Eric Berry maybe...Hell, lets expand it to LBs. Also, to clarify I didn't say you said Smith was as good as Landry. They don't compare because everything Smith does Landry does better...even the stuff they come up short in...Landry is better...significantly better. He's an impact talent mostly it's just him being healthy that I'm worried about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BroadwayJ667 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I say yes. While his cover skills might not be a huge upgrade over smith, he punishes people who come across the middle. His intimidation factor alone brings credibility to the position. Have you seen the NFL recently. That equates to a yellow flag. Sad face... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
New York Mick Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I just think it's stupid to pay a guy 4 mill a year to do pretty much the same thing Smith is doing now, granted he'd do it better but he's still not worth 3 mill plus a year especially considering he gets hurt. I'd rather draft a S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 I just think it's stupid to pay a guy 4 mill a year to do pretty much the same thing Smith is doing now, granted he'd do it better but he's still not worth 3 mill plus a year especially considering he gets hurt. I'd rather draft a S I'm pretty big on Barron, even at 16, but if it turns out they went Landry I wouldn't be too up in arms. They're making the cap space for a reason, might as well use it on talent where there's talent available. Would prefer they somehow fit in Mario Williams with the money, but that's probably never going to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Have you seen the NFL recently. That equates to a yellow flag. Sad face... No no no...if you put both arms up immediately after the hit, it communicates to the refs that you didn't mean it, or didn't do it... And they don't throw the flag. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1x148IuNKE You guys really forgot about how bad of a year Eric Smith had? I'll take a bag of wet paper towels over Smith and sometimes even dry ones. Eric Smith is ******* horrible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Scene: LaRon Landry playing the part of head-hunting (in the box) safety who punishes the crossing route, jarring the ball loose after contact. Mark Barron playing the part of the ball hawking enforcer, defending the deep half with his height, leaping, and length. For sh*ts & giggles he comes up in run support but that's unnecessary with our stout D-line and crazy-good linebackers. = best secondary in the league... And best run-D in the afc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PissdOffJetsFan Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1x148IuNKE You guys really forgot about how bad of a year Eric Smith had? I'll take a bag of wet paper towels over Smith and sometimes even dry ones. Eric Smith is ******* horrible. -_____________- just had to remind me of that. I like Smith for some reason but he needs to go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Scene: LaRon Landry playing the part of head-hunting (in the box) safety who punishes the crossing route, jarring the ball loose after contact. Mark Barron playing the part of the ball hawking enforcer, defending the deep half with his height, leaping, and length. For sh*ts & giggles he comes up in run support but that's unnecessary with our stout D-line and crazy-good linebackers. = best secondary in the league... And best run-D in the afc. Yea, but be prepared to hear about how useless safeties are if those were the moves. Barron is a FS btw....You'll hear he's not, but his numbers say otherwise. The fact that he hits like a safety I think makes people think that he's not a FS. Better player for Los Yets than Upshaw himself... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Ideally I would throw the farm at Williams, draft Barron, get a RT (sign Collins or Massie in the draft), and grab a couple of WR/RB/TE throughout. Simple enough if you get past the Williams part... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Yea, but be prepared to hear about how useless safeties are if those were the moves. Barron is a FS btw....You'll hear he's not, but his numbers say otherwise. The fact that he hits like a safety I think makes people think that he's not a FS. Better player for Los Yets than Upshaw himself... I don't understand. Landry is a SS, and Barron, in my projection (and by your own admission is a FS). He has the length to cover TEs which by definition is a SS, but in our scheme he would play center field by his lonesome, and rely on his ball skills to smack up the deep threats. Landry smacks em in the middle Barron smacks em deep It's a beautiful roster move IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Ideally I would throw the farm at Williams, draft Barron, get a RT (sign Collins or Massie in the draft), and grab a couple of WR/RB/TE throughout. Simple enough if you get past the Williams part... Kamerion Wimbley is more scheme diverse, and would get $6.5M of his 2012 salary paid for by the Raiders. He could even be spelled by Westermann who showed improvement/potential Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Kamerion Wimbley is more scheme diverse, and would get $6.5M of his 2012 salary paid for by the Raiders. He could even be spelled by Westermann who showed improvement/potential Meh. You're not wrong, but meh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SenorGato Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Oh yeah Carl Nicks... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smashmouth Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 when you have constant hammmy groin and achillies injuries that = injury prone. Our biggest need is a cover safety that can handle the middle of the field not another small LB to help stuff the run Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greenseed4 Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 when you have constant hammmy groin and achillies injuries that = injury prone. Our biggest need is a cover safety that can handle the middle of the field not another small LB to help stuff the run But he's such a good stuffer! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 No no no...if you put both arms up immediately after the hit, it communicates to the refs that you didn't mean it, or didn't do it... And they don't throw the flag. Ahhh yes. I always love seeing that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GREENBEAN Posted March 12, 2012 Share Posted March 12, 2012 Scene: LaRon Landry playing the part of head-hunting (in the box) safety who punishes the crossing route, jarring the ball loose after contact. Mark Barron playing the part of the ball hawking enforcer, defending the deep half with his height, leaping, and length. For sh*ts & giggles he comes up in run support but that's unnecessary with our stout D-line and crazy-good linebackers. = best secondary in the league... And best run-D in the afc. Add an effective pass rushing OLB and we have something there. I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.