T0mShane Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 That's what I said, in Brooklynese. A-o. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted September 10, 2014 Author Share Posted September 10, 2014 I said that DRC was a flake and that the Giants will regret that contract as soon as next year. Those of us who didn't like him or didn't have a problem with not giving him what he wanted, we're in the minority Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 What are you, his big brother? And no, that's not it at all. You're ******* wrong. Let him call me out what is it your ******* job? Unless you're infatuated with the GM's dick, which compelled you to say something, you should have shut the **** up and kept out of it, you ******* washer woman. "quite deservedly so" ******* Hallway monitor. lol POTW NOM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villain The Foe Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 I said that DRC was a flake and that the Giants will regret that contract as soon as next year. Then you, like myself are not part of that group. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 What are you, his big brother? And no, that's not it at all. You're ******* wrong. Let him call me out what is it your ******* job? Unless you're infatuated with the GM's dick, which compelled you to say something, you should have shut the **** up and kept out of it, you ******* washer woman. "quite deservedly so" ******* Hallway monitor. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Oh, and if you're anything above like 14 years old, you should probably seek out professional help. I'm dead serious too, this isn't just some random forum insult. A properly functioning adult human mind cannot possibly believe that there is even the slightest bit of validity to your completely hypocritical crazy rants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 On a sidenote, keep out of this you ******* washer woman is my new go-to insult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I see nothing changes. Another year and the same ole same ole out of good ole BG. You used that on me, and about 10 others in the last 2 years. If everyone in the room is now dumber over and over doesnt that make you the dumb one? Food for thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I see nothing changes. Another year and the same ole same ole out of good ole BG. You used that on me, and about 10 others in the last 2 years. If everyone in the room is now dumber over and over doesnt that make you the dumb one? Food for thought. Hey, welcome back. I've missed you. Although I believe at this point I'm required to go so on some sort of crazy, yet supposedly completely justified, rant based around you supposedly not being allowed to post a response to anything that wasn't directed at you, and how that must make you Gastineau Lives' washer woman boyfriend, or something like that. I don't know, I'll let Gastineau fill us in on what the proper procedure is there though. I'd just as soon let you give me a hard time about it (as I freely admit I've abused the use of that video), but that's apparently not allowed around here anymore. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 If everyone in the room is now dumber over and over doesnt that make you the dumb one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Section 333 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Hey, welcome back. I've missed you. Although I believe at this point I'm required to go so on some sort of crazy, yet supposedly completely justified, rant based around you supposedly not being allowed to post a response to anything that wasn't directed at you, and how that must make you Gastineau Lives' washer woman boyfriend, or something like that. I don't know, I'll let Gastineau fill us in on what the proper procedure is there though. I'd just as soon let you give me a hard time about it (as I freely admit I've abused the use of that video), but that's apparently not allowed around here anymore. Sorry. High road. Nice. The new you. I missed you as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 High road. Nice. The new you. I missed you as well. You might be giving me a little too much credit with "high road", but its certainly not the lowest either... so I appreciate the sentiment. lol And yeah, what the hell, I'm sure we'll still argue plenty as the season goes on, but what are these boards for anyway? Agreeing with everyone eventually gets boring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Schroy Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Thanks for proving my point. His post wasn't directed at you, but it didn't stop you, now did it? If you don't want anyone else responding to your little tantrums then perhaps stick to PMs and keep your homoerotic infatuation with the GMs dick to yourself. Either that or accept the fact that when you try to call someone out for something you're just as guilty of, you're bound to get the same, and quite deservedly so. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Oh, and if you're anything above like 14 years old, you should probably seek out professional help. I'm dead serious too, this isn't just some random forum insult. A properly functioning adult human mind cannot possibly believe that there is even the slightest bit of validity to your completely hypocritical crazy rants. Ah, you're such a little bitch everyone in this room now has a pussy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Ah, you're such a little bitch everyone in this room now has a pussy. Well at least that should make it easier for you to go **** yourself then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 You smug ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Still pretty dumb. You took a tabloid article and used it as proof that your ball washing of the GM was right. That was my point. What was yours? Go ask your boyfriend if you need help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 You know, I used to get annoyed when people used to abuse you on this board. Turns out they were right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gastineau Lives Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Well at least that should make it easier for you to go **** yourself then. Or for you to do scissor sisters, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Let's keep things in perspective. I was very happy about our game week 1 but it was still just 1 game. What happens if our secondary doesn't play as well this week and Rodgers burns us badly. And what if the Giants win week 2 as well? We'll clearly have a different perspective then. Keep in mind that, in our preseason predictions, I'm pretty sure I said the Jets would win 10 games (so it's not like I wasn't optimistic about this team going into the season). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsFanInDenver Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 You know, I used to get annoyed when people used to abuse you on this board. Turns out they were right. Oh........that hurt........almost developed an eating disorder just now. But now i am fine. GFY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 StiIf you have any doubt, ask yourself this: If the two teams were stocks, which one would you buy? Still probably the Giants.... Giants: Large Cap Growth stock: sustainable growth over the long term, solid CEO with strong leadership team, utilizes profits to re-invest back into the company and has paid huge dividends in recent years to shareholders. Jets: Small Cap stock: no track record of sustainable growth, disengaged CEO with constantly changing leadership team, would rather sit on large amounts of cash rather than re-investing back into the company and hasn't paid dividends to shareholders in the last 46 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Prop em up to break em down. F the Post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Giants: Large Cap Growth stock: sustainable growth over the long term, solid CEO with strong leadership team, utilizes profits to re-invest back into the company and has paid huge dividends in recent years to shareholders. Jets: Small Cap stock: no track record of sustainable growth, disengaged CEO with constantly changing leadership team, would rather sit on large amounts of cash rather than re-investing back into the company and hasn't paid dividends to shareholders in the last 46 years. Of course, the same argument (no track record of sustainable growth) could've been used against the Pats back in 2002. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Giants: Large Cap Growth stock: sustainable growth over the long term, solid CEO with strong leadership team, utilizes profits to re-invest back into the company and has paid huge dividends in recent years to shareholders. Jets: Small Cap stock: no track record of sustainable growth, disengaged CEO with constantly changing leadership team, would rather sit on large amounts of cash rather than re-investing back into the company and hasn't paid dividends to shareholders in the last 46 years. Please elaborate when you say, "rather than re-investing back into the company"...is this other than on the field? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Please elaborate when you say, "rather than re-investing back into the company"...is this other than on the field? Isn't Idzik sitting on $21MM? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Isn't Idzik sitting on $21MM? So one season, meanwhile the Jets were notorious for spending big on FA's good and bad every year before that? What are you trying to pull some Jedi mind trick? Youve got to do better than that my winless friend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 So one season, meanwhile the Jets were notorious for spending big on FA's good and bad every year before that? What are you trying to pull some Jedi mind trick? Youve got to do better than that my winless friend. So when the Jets finish the season 9-7 or 8-8 and miss the playoffs by one game, you'll still be happy because Idzik is sitting on $21MM? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TnT Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 So when the Jets finish the season 9-7 or 8-8 and miss the playoffs by one game, you'll still be happy because Idzik is sitting on $21MM? I'll be happy that we will have a def answer whether Geno is the long term answer, money to resign our most important pieces, replace what needs to be replaced, and we didnt throw a sh#t ton of money at a corner or wr that wasnt going to increase our win total. If we are in the same position going into camp next year with the same amount of space...then I'll be concerned. We arent in a mandatory "win now" mode like the Pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted September 11, 2014 Author Share Posted September 11, 2014 Of course, the same argument (no track record of sustainable growth) could've been used against the Pats back in 2002. Actually worse, Jets at least have one SB win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 So when the Jets finish the season 9-7 or 8-8 and miss the playoffs by one game, you'll still be happy because Idzik is sitting on $21MM? You are aware that the NFL has changed it's salary cap rules, and that now money unspent in one season gets carried over into future years, right? I'm assuming you're being purposely obtuse, but I suppose it's possible that you're just ignorant. From the Salary Cap/NFL page on Wiki: The new collective bargaining agreement formulated in 2011 had an initial salary cap of $120 million. While the previous CBA had a salary floor, the new CBA did not have one until 2013. Starting with that season, each team is required to spend a minimum of 88.8% of the cap in cash on player compensation,[9] and 90% in future years. However, the floor is based on total cash spent over each of two four-year periods, the first running from 2013–2016 and the second from 2017–2020. A team can be under the floor in one or more seasons in a cycle without violating the CBA, as long as its total spending during the four-year period reaches the required percentage of the cap.[9] So basically, you add up the four salary cap maximums over the four years, and a team is required to spend @ 90% of that figure over that four year period - and has those four years to spend it. So, the $21M the Jets didn't spend this year will be available to them to spend in 2015-2016. As cheap a bastard as John Idzik strives to be, he still has to get to that 90% number over the four year term. And if he's not the spendthrift many of us think he is, he'll actually be in position to splurge next year. If the Jets do manage to win 8 or 9 games with a young team that's under the cap by $21M (while carrying another $12M or so in dead money), imagine what great shape they'll be in next year with an extra $33M to spend over next year's cap! I would've liked to see the Jets sign Vontae Davis for about $10M of that money this year, but I understand the logic of saving it. Especially if they were looking at potentially getting into the FA QB market next season. If they discover they're set at QB, they're gonna have a ton of resources to build a team around him next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 Dumb. Yes. Yes it was. Acknowledging that is the first step to doing better, so we're proud of you. Let us know if we can offer you any further support on this journey of self-improvement Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 You might be giving me a little too much credit with "high road", but its certainly not the lowest either... so I appreciate the sentiment. lol And yeah, what the hell, I'm sure we'll still argue plenty as the season goes on, but what are these boards for anyway? Agreeing with everyone eventually gets boring. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 11, 2014 Share Posted September 11, 2014 I agree Well I disagree with your agreement... so there! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.