madmike1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 You talking about The Texas Con Man? I was never for bringing Clemens here. I'm not gonna defend that move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 He sucks. One game against a crappy NL lineup doesn't change that. Right. So the games like Texas, Anaheim, Toronto, Minnesota they don't all count either. And last I checked any lineup featuring Todd Helton, Matt Holliday, Brad Hawpe etc isn't all that crappy. Come on Mike, you're usually better than this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Right. So the games like Texas, Anaheim, Toronto, Minnesota they don't all count either. And last I checked any lineup featuring Todd Helton, Matt Holliday, Brad Hawpe etc isn't all that crappy. Come on Mike, you're usually better than this. When his ERA was in the 1's I told you it would settle somwhere in the high 4's didn't I? And it will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 When his ERA was in the 1's I told you it would settle somwhere in the high 4's didn't I? And it will. Which is pretty solid for a #4 starter. I don't know what your point is. You say he sucks, but his ERA is right about average for a 4th starter, so therfore not only is he doing his job but exceeding expectations. I know you Yankees fans don't know much about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbn007 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Which is pretty solid for a #4 starter. I don't know what your point is. You say he sucks, but his ERA is right about average for a 4th starter, so therfore not only is he doing his job but exceeding expectations. I know you Yankees fans don't know much about that. Don't lump all Yankee fans together. There are major differences of opinions among us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Which is pretty solid for a #4 starter. I don't know what your point is. You say he sucks, but his ERA is right about average for a 4th starter, so therfore not only is he doing his job but exceeding expectations. I know you Yankees fans don't know much about that. The problem with players playing much better than their career numbers show at 40 is that you know it won't last. Boston has a lot of players doing that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 The problem with players playing much better than their career numbers show at 40 is that you know it won't last. Boston has a lot of players doing that. I know it won't last why? Because you told me? There is no reason to believe that the Red Sox players playing well right now cannot keep it up. I guess since Manny is 35 we should be concerned about his play right now too, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 I know it won't last why? Because you told me? There is no reason to believe that the Red Sox players playing well right now cannot keep it up. I guess since Manny is 35 we should be concerned about his play right now too, right? Because players don't drastically improve at that age. Manny could decline and still be a great player. It's an awful comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted June 13, 2007 Author Share Posted June 13, 2007 I know it won't last why? Because you told me? There is no reason to believe that the Red Sox players playing well right now cannot keep it up. I guess since Manny is 35 we should be concerned about his play right now too, right? Because they haven't kept it up in the past decade... thats a pretty easy guess to figure they wont keep it up again this year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 Because they haven't kept it up in the past decade... thats a pretty easy guess to figure they wont keep it up again this year... Who hasn't kept it up? I think you're talking wholistically while we're talking indiviually. And Madmike.. players don't improve at that age yet they are. So you really don't have a sound argument here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 13, 2007 Share Posted June 13, 2007 And Madmike.. players don't improve at that age yet they are. So you really don't have a sound argument here. Temporary better performances is not the same thing as permanent improvement. Players play to their career norms the VAST majority of the time. And older players don't improve at anywhere near the level wakefield had earlier in the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 If ARod wins his 2nd MVP(in 3 seasons) as a Yank it will be interesting if the FO caves to the demands Boras will make. I say the Yanks have to pay him.....he's that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Temporary better performances is not the same thing as permanent improvement. Players play to their career norms the VAST majority of the time. And older players don't improve at anywhere near the level wakefield had earlier in the year. I don't think Wakefield is a good example as he's a knuckleballer. He can have a terrible year and then a great year. Knuckleballers don't really have "career norms." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 I don't think Wakefield is a good example as he's a knuckleballer. He can have a terrible year and then a great year. Knuckleballers don't really have "career norms." Only a dumbass who doesn't take into account adjusted ERA+30 and zone range factor would think that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Only a dumbass who doesn't take into account adjusted ERA+30 and zone range factor would think that. Thats right. I forgot to add BFP, IBB and the other stats that don't mean squat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MasonJet Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 Thats right. I forgot to add BFP, IBB and the other stats that don't mean squat! Of all the things that don't matter those are the most important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 I don't think Wakefield is a good example as he's a knuckleballer. He can have a terrible year and then a great year. Knuckleballers don't really have "career norms." I think his deviations IN SEASON will probably be wider than normal pitchers but at the end of the season he'll pitch to his career norms just like anyone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 The Yankees will not catch the Red Sox because they do not have Randy Johnson and because Bobby Abreu's OPS is insufficient for the chase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 If ARod wins his 2nd MVP(in 3 seasons) as a Yank it will be interesting if the FO caves to the demands Boras will make. I say the Yanks have to pay him.....he's that good. He has finally mastered the NY spotlight, it seems. But it will be October results that count. Again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted June 14, 2007 Share Posted June 14, 2007 He has finally mastered the NY spotlight, it seems. But it will be October results that count. Again. Arod has been on fire this season. No doubt about that. I agree with you mate. Arod needs to get it done in September and, more importantly, October. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Temporary better performances is not the same thing as permanent improvement. Players play to their career norms the VAST majority of the time. And older players don't improve at anywhere near the level wakefield had earlier in the year. Yeah, but as Gain said, knuckleballers are different cats altogether. If Schil goes out there, I have a reasonable expectation of what I am going to get. I have watched Wake for 13 years and I have no idea what he will do from start to start. Where as Schill starts probably fall into a normal distribution (68% within 1 standard deviation). Wake is not like this. He is probably brilliant and atrocious more across the board then a normal distribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Hey PFSIKH, how's Joshie Josh doing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Hey PFSIKH, how's Joshie Josh doing? Not a good outing by Beckett at all. Seems like the Yanks and Sox have traded mojo from the beginning of the season. That got ugly quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anskyruben Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Is there a possibilty both teams are showing their TRUE colors ? This may be better than 78. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Hey PFSIKH, how's Joshie Josh doing? At 9-1 and considering madmike had him flat lined last year, pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Sawx pitching needs to be perfect in order for them to make a run at a ring. I just dont think their lineup is good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Sawx pitching needs to be perfect in order for them to make a run at a ring. I just dont think their lineup is good enough. Any line-up with Manny and Ortiz is good enough. They just have to wake up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Any line-up with Manny and Ortiz is good enough. They just have to wake up. Maybe. But if they go into slumps there's really no one else that can pick them up imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Maybe. But if they go into slumps there's really no one else that can pick them up imo. The same was true when Abreu, Cano and ARod were struggling at the start of May. I see no distinct advantage to the Bombers lineup compared to the Sox. Both have basically the same stats and that is only in large part due to ARod having a great year and Posada playing over his head. http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/stats/teamsort/regularseason/yearly/AL/HIT/BASIC?&_1:col_1=10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barton Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 The same was true when Abreu, Cano and ARod were struggling at the start of May. I see no distinct advantage to the Bombers lineup compared to the Sox. Both have basically the same stats and that is only in large part due to ARod having a great year and Posada playing over his head. http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/stats/teamsort/regularseason/yearly/AL/HIT/BASIC?&_1:col_1=10 And Lowell isnt playing over his head? Crisp and Lugo flat out suck. There's the difference between the 2 lineups. The Yankees have only 1 flat out sucky hitter, Cairo/Mientkiwicz. And unlike the sox, the Yankees can improve at 1st base with a trade. The sox are stuck with Lugo at SS for at least this season. BTW, a 21 run difference in just 64 games is....ALOT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madmike1 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 The same was true when Abreu, Cano and ARod were struggling at the start of May. I see no distinct advantage to the Bombers lineup compared to the Sox. Both have basically the same stats and that is only in large part due to ARod having a great year and Posada playing over his head. http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/stats/teamsort/regularseason/yearly/AL/HIT/BASIC?&_1:col_1=10 Boston has 3-4 good hitters. The yankees have 6. there is a BIG difference between the lineups. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Yanks have a better lineup than Boston. Like Barton said, a few of those guys flat out are horrible. Coco Crisp is a borderline mjaor league player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbn007 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Yeah, but as Gain said, knuckleballers are different cats altogether. If Schil goes out there, I have a reasonable expectation of what I am going to get. I have watched Wake for 13 years and I have no idea what he will do from start to start. Where as Schill starts probably fall into a normal distribution (68% within 1 standard deviation). Wake is not like this. He is probably brilliant and atrocious more across the board then a normal distribution. Wakefield has said that he himself has no idea from pitch-to-pitch of what will happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyCarl40 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 Boston has 3-4 good hitters. The yankees have 6. there is a BIG difference between the lineups. That's fine. I'll take the Sox pitching over the Yankees. That includes bullpen, closer, and rotation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted June 15, 2007 Share Posted June 15, 2007 That's fine. I'll take the Sox pitching over the Yankees. That includes bullpen, closer, and rotation. Thats fine too. I honestly think the rotations are pretty even. Boston most definitely has the advantage in the pen. Mo and Papelbon are even though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.