dolphann4life Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 There is an even better chance that you are a douche. I'm a douche because i think Baltimore, New England and Miami can beat the Jets? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolphann4life Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 No way they blow 2 home games, and NO WAY they lose 3 straight to the Fins... be happy you got 2 somehow. You have already lost 3 straight to the fins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I'm a douche because i think Baltimore, New England and Miami can beat the Jets? But you don't think there's any way we win those games and go 3-0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I'm a douche because i think Baltimore, New England and Miami can beat the Jets? No, and sorry Max does not have enough bandwidth for me to list the reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 You have already lost 3 straight to the fins. Ecurb must have missed the parade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolphann4life Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 But you don't think there's any way we win those games and go 3-0? Of course you have a shot to go 3-0. You guys have a boatload of talent on both sides of the ball. I just think your achilles heal is Sanchez. Ravens have a great front 7, their secondary is banged up and weak but i don't think you guys are gonna be able to exploit it with sanchez. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Of course you have a shot to go 3-0. You guys have a boatload of talent on both sides of the ball. I just think your achilles heal is Sanchez. Ravens have a great front 7, their secondary is banged up and weak but i don't think you guys are gonna be able to exploit it with sanchez. Sadly, I agree. I can't see us winning all 3. Taking 2 of 3 would be a solid accomplishment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 that's the spirit bob, rex would be proud of you ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Of course you have a shot to go 3-0. You guys have a boatload of talent on both sides of the ball. I just think your achilles heal is Sanchez. Ravens have a great front 7, their secondary is banged up and weak but i don't think you guys are gonna be able to exploit it with sanchez. Right. I think the first 3 games are going to be tough because we are matched pretty evenly with all 3. Ultimately I believe we'll lose against the Ravens because of the turnover differential. The only way we beat up on the Ravens is with quick timing throws, WCO style. Sanchez won't be able to do it because if his first read is covered he panics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 You guys should lose to Baltimore and then the following week to the Pats. There is actually a excellent chance the jets start off the year 0-3. Why exactly "should" that happen? Both games could easily go either way. Could the Jets start 0-2? Sure. 0-3? Nah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 You have already lost 3 straight to the fins. Fine, just furthers my point. 4 straight? Yeah, ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolphann4life Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Sadly, I agree. I can't see us winning all 3. Taking 2 of 3 would be a solid accomplishment. 2 out of 3 would be a great start especially if you knock off us and the pats start of 2-0 in the division. As a fin fan i've ceased all sh*t talking and i'm gearing up for the worst this year lol. @Buffalo, @Minny, Jets, Pats, @Green Bay, Pitt, @Cincy, @Baltimore. This could be a Cam Cameron type year with a horrid 0-8 start lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I wish we had Holmes for this one. Too bad getting 2 games knocked off for serial raping does not equal 4 games back for smoking pot, in the commoner's good behavior program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 2 out of 3 would be a great start especially if you knock off us and the pats start of 2-0 in the division. As a fin fan i've ceased all sh*t talking and i'm gearing up for the worst this year lol. @Buffalo, @Minny, Jets, Pats, @Green Bay, Pitt, @Cincy, @Baltimore. This could be a Cam Cameron type year with a horrid 0-8 start lol Yep. I really only see you coming out of the first half of the season 2-6, with 3-5 being your ceiling. That's just a brutal start to the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Too bad getting 2 games knocked off for serial raping does not equal 4 games back for smoking pot, in the commoner's good behavior program. When was Rothlisberger convicted of any rapes? I musta missed that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 When was Rothlisberger convicted of any rapes? I musta missed that. He did not need to get convicted to get a 6 game suspension now did he? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 He did not need to get convicted to get a 6 game suspension now did he? he's just a troll. any good man with women in his life that he loves would be so horrified by what injuries were reported and the nature and location of the injuries, he wouldn't be spewing non-sense like this unless he's just a loser innerweb troll craving attention Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 When was Rothlisberger convicted of any rapes? I musta missed that. Wow. They finally let you out of the lounge, after all these years. Good. I've always lobbied for your release back into the mains, which probably didn't help, so, sorry about that I trust you're looking forward to the Jets upcoming dismal season as much as i am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 he's just a troll. any good man with women in his life that he loves would be so horrified by what injuries were reported and the nature and location of the injuries, he wouldn't be spewing non-sense like this unless he's just a loser innerweb troll craving attention Spot on! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Yep. I really only see you coming out of the first half of the season 2-6, with 3-5 being your ceiling. That's just a brutal start to the season. I agree. 3-5 if they beat the Jets or Pats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Wow. They finally let you out of the lounge, after all these years. Good. I've always lobbied for your release back into the mains, which probably didn't help, so, sorry about that I trust you're looking forward to the Jets upcoming dismal season as much as i am. Isn't that cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Isn't that cute. What, you watched 30 for 30 last night and decided you needed some Iron Mike in your life? Cool. You listening to some 2pac too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraVerde Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Mevi$ is out of shape and out of practice. He's gonna get torched. Just keepin' it real. I agree ban his a$$ for a week. We dont need this pessimistic bs before the seasn even starts...Geez Bob grow some balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 What, you watched 30 for 30 last night and decided you needed some Iron Mike in your life? Cool. You listening to some 2pac too? No I missed it, was it good? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Jet Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 We are going to beat the Ravens, Bob! We are Superbowl bound!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatriotReign37 Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Mevi$ is out of shape and out of practice. He's gonna get torched. Just keepin' it real. Bob, you are dead on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionelRichie Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 Hmmm, I think we should take this opportunity to play Devil's Advocate and make the argument(s) for why the Ravens WILL beat us: 1) Even with Baltimore's banged up secondary, Sanchez is going to make plenty of mistakes and turn the ball over. 2) Latching on to the earlier point, The Ravens DL is going to push Slauson and Woody around all day. 3) If "The Terminator"/T-Rich and our other backs don't pick up the blitz effectively it'll be a long day. The Ravens front 7 as a whole is scary. 3) As Bob mentioned, it will take at least 1-2 weeks for Revis to get into game shape. 4) Flacco is ready to develop into a star QB, and this will be an opportunity to show what he can do against the # 1 D. With lots of weapons in the arsenal, he'll take advantage. 5) Ray Rice is going to run circles around our front 7, which simply lacks the speed to dominate. SOJ I don't even know why they are going to bother showing up at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 He did not need to get convicted to get a 6 game suspension now did he? That's my point. Rothlisberger was suspended under the vague "conduct unbecoming of a NFL player" rule that Goodell has the latitude to implement any suspension he feels like, which he can reduce as well. Fail a pot-smoking drug test and you are gone for 4 games. That's the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bob Posted September 8, 2010 Author Share Posted September 8, 2010 I agree ban his a$$ for a week. We dont need this pessimistic bs before the seasn even starts...Geez Bob grow some balls. If I lacked balls, I'd jump on the bandwagon with the rest of you. The Jets will win plenty of games this year. The opener is not one of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 That's my point. Rothlisberger was suspended under the vague "conduct unbecoming of a NFL player" rule that Goodell has the latitude to implement any suspension he feels like, which he can reduce as well. Fail a pot-smoking drug test and you are gone for 4 games. That's the difference. He was suspended under the vague "conduct unbecoming of a NFL player" because he's an accused serial rapist. Too bad the commissioner thinks that's the type of scum that deserves a break. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 He was suspended under the vague "conduct unbecoming of a NFL player" because he's an accused serial rapist. So when does "accused" mean guilty? If the DA had any real evidence, Rothlisberger would have been arrested and the case would have went to trial. The DA dropped the case due to lack of evidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 So when does "accused" mean guilty? If the DA had any real evidence, Rothlisberger would have been arrested and the case would have went to trial. The DA dropped the case due to lack of evidence. We are talking about the suspension here, we already established he did not have to be convicted to get a 6 game suspension. He got a 6 game suspension because of what he was "accused" of. Let me know when you catch up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I love how if you don't agree with the resident Hitler Youth around here you're automatically a hater. Get real, this team is nowhere close to being ready for primetime. Anyone who thinks the Jets are just going to coast on into Dallas for SB win with little effort is fooling themselves. Jets win more games then they loaebthis year, easily. But Week 1 will be a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Gun Of Bavaria Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 I love how if you don't agree with the resident Hitler Youth around here you're automatically a hater. Get real, this team is nowhere close to being ready for primetime. Anyone who thinks the Jets are just going to coast on into Dallas for a SB win with little effort is fooling themselves. Jets win more games then they loaebthis year, easily. But Week 1 will be a loss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted September 8, 2010 Share Posted September 8, 2010 So when does "accused" mean guilty? If the DA had any real evidence, Rothlisberger would have been arrested and the case would have went to trial. The DA dropped the case due to lack of evidence. The DA dropped the case because when the accuser was asked to describe her attacker, she cited Roethlisberger's height and weight exactly as they appear on his NFL.com profile. In short, the DA rightly decided she would have been destroyed on the witness stand. Doesn't mean that Ben didn't do it (sure sounds like he did it), but having an alleged victim whose intellect doesn't stand a chance in cross-examination is probably just cause to turn tail. Big Ben just needs to keep assaulting nitwits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.