Patriot Killa Posted December 19, 2017 Author Share Posted December 19, 2017 With the Browns second 1st rounders most likely being #4 or #3 when it’s all said and done..there a chance they trade? Really hope the Giants win just one more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King P Posted December 19, 2017 Share Posted December 19, 2017 1 hour ago, Patriot Killa said: With the Browns second 1st rounders most likely being #4 or #3 when it’s all said and done..there a chance they trade? Really hope the Giants win just one more Also better hope the Colts lose out. And they play Houston in Week 17, so that's not likely Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bealeb319 Posted December 20, 2017 Share Posted December 20, 2017 After clevland lost out on trubisky last season there is no way they don't take one of these two qbs. They say they like Kizer but he has won 0 games they can't not take darnold or Rosen and giants probably take the other.Sent from my [device_name] using http://JetNation.com mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 #8 so far. Rejoice! Two spots better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoustonJet Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 #8 so far. Rejoice! Two spots better.If SF wins today do we jump ahead of them? We’d have the same record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 How does Denver pick ahead of us when they win the head to head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dierking Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Warfish said: How does Denver pick ahead of us when they win the head to head? Based on SOS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 4 minutes ago, HoustonJet said: If SF wins today do we jump ahead of them? We’d have the same record. No because the 9ers SOS is lower than ours. They will probably drop where Denver is and Denver will move up..which is actually bad considering they need a QB. We need to hope they win their last game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRONX DUDE Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 On 12/17/2017 at 10:21 AM, Pcola said: At this point it doesn’t matter where we end up. Darnold and Rosen are out of reach. Mac doesn’t draft short QBs, o Mayfield was never an option. Losing out will have us picking 9th because Chicago beats Cleveland. We will be choosing between Arden Key and Denzel Ward after we resign McCown for “one more run.” MAC DOES DRAFT TINY LB'S Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRONX DUDE Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 14 minutes ago, HoustonJet said: If SF wins today do we jump ahead of them? We’d have the same record. YOU GOTTA HAND IT TO THE BROWNIES THEY SURE DO KNOW HOW TO TANK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pcola Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 11 minutes ago, BRONX DUDE said: MAC DOES DRAFT TINY LB'S ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 After that Bucs loss they pick 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philc1 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 On 12/17/2017 at 7:53 PM, Pac said: If we stay at 10 it might be better to go all in on Cousins. The bidding war for the Colts pick will be gross. Trade for Luck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Doesn’t matter, we aren’t getting 1 and 2. Who really cares if we are 6-10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Picking 6th through 10 I mean Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
adb280z Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, kevinc855 said: Picking 6th through 10 I mean It matters if you have a preference among Mayfield, Allen and Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 2 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Doesn’t matter, we aren’t getting 1 and 2. Who really cares if we are 6-10. We can trade up with Indy if they pick second so the further up we get, the easier it is to get to that spot. Duh Kevin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, adb280z said: It matters if you have a preference among Mayfield, Allen and Jackson. This too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 On 12/17/2017 at 8:09 PM, bla bla bla said: I could absolutely see Darnold - Browns Rosen - Giants Allen - Bills in a trade up Mayfield - Jets in a trade up with the Browns 2nd pick and we won't have to give up a 1st next year IMO because I don't think Elway would trade up for Mayfield but would take him if he is avaiable at their pick. I think we out bid the Cardinals in a trade up. This is the first plausible scenario that could actually happen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Just now, kevinc855 said: This is the first plausible scenario that could actually happen Giants aren’t a lock for 2.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FTL Jet Fan Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Don't count the Dolphins out of the QB market in round 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetspenguin Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: This is the first plausible scenario that could actually happen making my dikky hardy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoJoTownsell1 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 9 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Doesn’t matter, we aren’t getting 1 and 2. Who really cares if we are 6-10. If we want to trade to the 3rd pick, the difference between ending up with the 5th pick or the 10th pick is roughly 400 points on the trade chart which equates to throwing in an extra second round pick. You don't think that's a big deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, JoJoTownsell1 said: If we want to trade to the 3rd pick, the difference between ending up with the 5th pick or the 10th pick is roughly 400 points on the trade chart which equates to throwing in an extra second round pick. You don't think that's a big deal? There is no scenario where we get 5 you understand this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Just now, kevinc855 said: There is no scenario where we get 5 you understand this? 8 to 1 is better than 10. It doesn’t matter if we get to 5 don’t you understand that? He was using an example. As long as we keep moving up it makes the entire possibility easier to make happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetspenguin Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Hmmm.... we need a QB so.....this makes sense: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 5 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: 8 to 1 is better than 10. It doesn’t matter if we get to 5 don’t you understand that? He was using an example. As long as we keep moving up it makes the entire possibility easier to make happen. Where do you think we trade to? I’m assuming we are talking 3 correct?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, jetspenguin said: Hmmm.... we need a QB so.....this makes sense: It's only fine if we signed a QB via Free Agency (it's not really fine then either, but at least we'd have A QB). Every mock is going to predict we don't go QB......know why? Because it pisses off Jets Fans, and pissed off fans click more links and generate more web traffic. Edit: I may not be a Darnold/Rosen fan per se, but got to love the Browns if they walk away with Darnold/Rosen + Barkley. Talk about rebuilding your O in one cycle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetspenguin Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Warfish said: It's only fine if we signed a QB via Free Agency (it's not really fine then either, but at least we'd have A QB). Every mock is going to predict we don't go QB......know why? Because it pisses off Jets Fans, and pissed off fans click more links and generate more web traffic. I couldnt make up mind mind if I wanted to click the laughing or trophy emoji hahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 3 minutes ago, kevinc855 said: Where do you think we trade to? I’m assuming we are talking 3 correct?? Well if you actually read what I quote you on half the time, I have said over and over the Giants are NOT a lock for 2. Colts can clinch it and trade down to us giving us our QB. If we hold a pick like 6-8 rather than 10-12 that is major. It generates likely more interest from Indy and a cheaper cost..what don’t you get about this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 7 minutes ago, Patriot Killa said: Well if you actually read what I quote you on half the time, I have said over and over the Giants are NOT a lock for 2. Colts can clinch it and trade down to us giving us our QB. If we hold a pick like 6-8 rather than 10-12 that is major. It generates likely more interest from Indy and a cheaper cost..what don’t you get about this? Who is "our QB"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 4 minutes ago, Warfish said: Who is "our QB"? I find it hard for me to even dignify this with a response when you are obviously asking in a scarastic manner. If I’m talking about trading up to 2 Im obviously talking about either Rosen or Darnold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 Just now, Patriot Killa said: I find it hard for me to even dignify this with a response when you are obviously asking in a scarastic manner. If I’m talking about trading up to 2 Im obviously talking about either Rosen or Darnold. So which one is our QB? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patriot Killa Posted December 24, 2017 Author Share Posted December 24, 2017 Just now, Warfish said: So which one is our QB? Which ever one is left over from CLE. I believe they both are going to be FQBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted December 24, 2017 Share Posted December 24, 2017 1 minute ago, Patriot Killa said: Which ever one is left over from CLE. I believe they both are going to be FQBs. Then you're going to be sad when we fail to get either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.