GM Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Who are you to judge how good a team is. We're on a roll, 4 game win streak. What kind of streak are the Jets on, a 1 game streak. Buffalo is gonna play tough, they'll most likely beat you. Christmas is a loss for the Jets, write that down. And the week 17 upset, Oakland over N.Y. 33-13 Did you just judge how good the Jets are? stop contradicting yourself.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Still nothing from GARB after his idiotic comment on Coles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Still nothing from GARB after his idiotic comment on Coles? Garb is a woman idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Me & Garb are women idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Tx, if you're going to be talking about the history of teams, you really have to start including the entire history of the franchises. You only seem to want to count the SB wins of the Pats and discount all of their miserable seasons. They've been around a lot longer than the last 5 or 6 years. True. Up until the 2001 season, the Patriots were a bad team, but they were not utterly pathetic like the Jets. The Jets had one shining momenet and have been non-existent the other 46 years. While up until 2001, they had similar records, the Patriots had shown the ability to get to the Superbowl/AFL Championship game. Granted, it was to be another teams pawn in route to their championship, but the organization as a whole showed they can get to the championship game. It was only a matter of when, not if. The Jets are different. You would want to think they are a "when" team but reality is 'if' they can even reach the championship. Short of one season breaking exactly right, they would be an oh-fer their entire history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 You are delusional. How is this not pathetic? 1975 3 11 0 5th 1974 7 7 0 3rd 1973 5 9 0 3rd 1972 3 11 0 5th 1971 6 8 0 3rd 1970 2 12 0 5th 1969 4 10 0 3rd 1968 4 10 0 4th 1967 3 10 1 5th 1966 8 4 2 2nd 1965 4 8 2 5th 1982 5 4 0 7th 1981 2 14 0 5th 1993 5 11 0 4th 1992 2 14 0 5th 1991 6 10 0 4th 1990 1 15 0 5th 1989 5 11 0 4th 338 wins 345 loses Don't act like people expectrd the Pats to be in the mix of things all the time before 2001..More than half of New England could give 2 sh!ts about the Pats before than. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 You are delusional. How is this not pathetic? 1975 3 11 0 5th 1974 7 7 0 3rd 1973 5 9 0 3rd 1972 3 11 0 5th 1971 6 8 0 3rd 1970 2 12 0 5th 1969 4 10 0 3rd 1968 4 10 0 4th 1967 3 10 1 5th 1966 8 4 2 2nd 1965 4 8 2 5th 1982 5 4 0 7th 1981 2 14 0 5th 1993 5 11 0 4th 1992 2 14 0 5th 1991 6 10 0 4th 1990 1 15 0 5th 1989 5 11 0 4th 338 wins 345 loses Don't act like people expectrd the Pats to be in the mix of things all the time before 2001..More than half of New England could give 2 sh!ts about the Pats before than. GreenMachine, Nice cherry-picking the season's you want to use to try and make your point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 GreenMachine, Nice cherry-picking the season's you want to use to try and make your point. I would hardly call a 12 year span "cherry picking";) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PatsFanTX Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 I would hardly call a 12 year span "cherry picking";) BTW Greenie, did you know the Pats have won more playoff games in the last 4 years than the Jets have won in their entire 47-year existance? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 BTW Greenie, did you know the Pats have won more playoff games in the last 4 years than the Jets have won in their entire 47-year existance? So we should only judge the Pats over the last 4 years, but the Jets for 46 years? Thanks for prooving all Pats fans are bandwagon fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 So we should only judge the Pats over the last 4 years, but the Jets for 46 years? How good were the Steelers before winning a Superbowl? They were perrennial doormats. They had never won a playoff game. The Jets' pathetic history would have been a step-up for them. Even to this day, after all that great history they are around 20 games over .500. I ask the same question of the Niners? Until Walsh and Montana arrived, they had only two playoff wins in 30+ years. The Patriots are not the Cowboys or Niners by any stretch. However, they have not been as bad as the Jets either. They cracked .500 this year for the first time in 40 years. The bottonline is this: Patriots > Jets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 How good were the Steelers before winning a Superbowl? They were perrennial doormats. They had never won a playoff game. The Jets' pathetic history would have been a step-up for them. Even to this day, after all that great history they are around 20 games over .500. I ask the same question of the Niners? Until Walsh and Montana arrived, they had only two playoff wins in 30+ years. The Patriots are not the Cowboys or Niners by any stretch. However, they have not been as bad as the Jets either. They cracked .500 this year for the first time in 40 years. The bottonline is this: Patriots > Jets Whatever helps you sleep at night... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 Whatever helps you sleep at night... Please explain any facet of the miserable Jets existence, outside of futility, the Jets are greater then the Patriots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackout Posted December 2, 2006 Share Posted December 2, 2006 i dont really care about the patriots history back on to the subject, anyone notice how Cotchery is #10 in the AFC in recieving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 i dont really care about the patriots history back on to the subject, anyone notice how Cotchery is #10 in the AFC in recieving? Due top Chad no doubt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetophile Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Due top Chad no doubt. Freudian Slip. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Jet Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Hey Kansas, here's a stat for you.... 48-45-1 Amazing ain't it? That such a pathetic team can hold a winning record over a not as pathetic team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Hey Kansas, here's a stat for you.... 48-45-1 Amazing ain't it? That such a pathetic team can hold a winning record over a not as pathetic team? POTW NoM... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Hey Kansas, here's a stat for you.... 48-45-1 Amazing ain't it? That such a pathetic team can hold a winning record over a not as pathetic team? Touche LJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biggs Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Please explain any facet of the miserable Jets existence, outside of futility, the Jets are greater then the Patriots. Here's a dose of reality for you. If Sonny Werblin hadn't signed Namath you would be a NY Giant fan right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Hey Kansas, here's a stat for you.... 48-45-1 Amazing ain't it? That such a pathetic team can hold a winning record over a not as pathetic team? I like LJ. She stops by at night. Checks in. Slaps a few people around and then signs off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I like LJ. She stops by at night. Checks in. Slaps a few people around and then signs off. Thst was not a slap. It was an outright beatdown. Biggs What? Oh another Joe saved the AFL. The TV contract the AFL signed that allowed the Jets to sign Joe to the richest contract is what saved the AFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AFJF Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Thst was not a slap. It was an outright beatdown. Biggs What? Oh another Joe saved the AFL. The TV contract the AFL signed that allowed the Jets to sign Joe to the richest contract is what saved the AFL. Joe was a big reason why that contract was signed in the first place. After drafting Snell and moving to Shea the season before, the Jets were outdrawing some NFL teams. With a guy with Namaths potential and persona, things were only going to get better for the AFL. The AFL couldn't be ignored anymore and it was Namath who showed the rest of the country that a team from the AFL could hang with a team from the NFL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Joe was a big reason why that contract was signed in the first place. After drafting Snell and moving to Shea the season before, the Jets were outdrawing some NFL teams. With a guy with Namaths potential and persona, things were only going to get better for the AFL. The AFL couldn't be ignored anymore and it was Namath who showed the rest of the country that a team from the AFL could hang with a team from the NFL. No, it was not. The TV contract was signed January 29th, 1964. Joe was signed January 2nd, 1965. I agree with your last part, but Joe did not help them secure it. He was just an added benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GM Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 No, it was not. The TV contract was signed January 29th, 2004. Joe was signed January 2nd, 2005. I agree with your last part, but Joe did not help them secure it. He was just an added benefit. Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garb Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Still nothing from GARB after his idiotic comment on Coles? Someone call me? I stand by my statement. To me, Coles = Branch, almost. A good receiver who's fanbase makes him out to be Gawd. There are several receivers I'd rather have than those two - none of which are on the Pats (and by far). The state of the Pats Wide outs is so mediocre or less, I pine for Deion Branch. If I could click my witch shoes and make him magically appear on the field turf today, I would. I would. There's no place like Gillette. There's no place like Gillette. Ooops - that was Dorothy.....my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Huh? Opps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 Someone call me? I stand by my statement. To me, Coles = Branch, almost. A good receiver who's fanbase makes him out to be Gawd. There are several receivers I'd rather have than those two - none of which are on the Pats (and by far). The state of the Pats Wide outs is so mediocre or less, I pine for Deion Branch. If I could click my witch shoes and make him magically appear on the field turf today, I would. I would. There's no place like Gillette. There's no place like Gillette. Ooops - that was Dorothy.....my bad. Reche has not been bad lately. He actually might be a capable replacmeent for Branch. I wonder if Gabriel is out of the doghouse? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.02d5a086ca7ed80fc66faf3bb6f878c7.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.