Ghost Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Things are going to get interesting on Thursday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I would double Moss and put Revis on Welker wherever he goes and see if Revis can step up to the plate covering the slot receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Things are going to get interesting on Thursday. There is no way in the world that Law will match up with Welker on purpose. Welker will kill him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagicBizkit87 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Revis has been good against Randy Moss, and he even was good against him as a rookie, why would you want Revis put on Welker, when you already know he destroys Moss? Your best bet is probably putting two players on Welker. Maybe Law, and Lowery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Law is only going to play 10-15, maybe 20 snaps. He may go against Welker a couple of plays, but my money is when Welker is in the slot, there will be Lowery with Law on the outside on Gaffney. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 What a brilliant move by Mangini. BRILLIANT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brown42000 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I wouldn't be too excited about signing Ty Law. A corner who is likely very slow and hasn't played football at all this season don't expect a whole lot from him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Why would anyone purposely lineup Ty Law against Welker? It'd be hard to watch him try and stay with Welker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
will Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I'd take my chances with Stuckey on Welker before I'd use Law. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Don't forget if Law is in shape he is coming in with fresh legs and that always gives you an advantage at this point in the season. Still I would put Revis on Welker and Law on Moss with help over the top. Welker almost never goes deep and Revis can definitly handle those slant patterns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Don't forget if Law is in shape he is coming in with fresh legs and that always gives you an advantage at this point in the season. Still I would put Revis on Welker and Law on Moss with help over the top. Welker almost never goes deep and Revis can definitly handle those slant patterns. Who was on Welker in the first game? He had 7 receptions for 72 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Who was on Welker in the first game? He had 7 receptions for 72 yards. Lowery was. Revis was on Moss most of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 11, 2008 Author Share Posted November 11, 2008 It's like this, the Pats are going to throw opposite of Revis. We just HAVE to find away to stop the opposing receiver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 It's like this, the Pats are going to throw opposite of Revis. We just HAVE to find away to stop the opposing receiver. I agree and I trust in Mangini to figure it out because as much as all of us want to beat the Pats Thursday night, Mangini wants it even more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jared Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 why would you want Revis put on Welker, when you already know he destroys Moss? Out of curiosity, are you referring to Matt Cassel's first start, a ridiculously windy day in Foxborough where neither team could pass to save their lives, or the 183 yard game week 1 last season? Not much to go on to make a claim that one player "destroys" another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RoadFan Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Realistically, I can't see Law playing a whole lot. The guy hasn't played all year. He might, and I stress MIGHT, be used a little in nickel and dime packages. Ty Law always had a knack for being in the right spot at the right time. I imagine they will use him in a way that puts him in a position for an INT. This move puzzles me a little bit. Here's to hoping it works! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangreenman Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Who was on Welker in the first game? He had 7 receptions for 72 yards. This year? Lowery was the #2 starting CB for the first 6 games or so. It was clear he struggled against Welker in the slot and against the quick screen routes he was running. Law, at the very least, has a much better feel for the game and will be able to diagnose and react to those routes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rillo Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I don't like this matchup.....Welker will abuse him IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECURB Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I don't like this matchup.....Welker will abuse him IMO. Not a chance, they will put a safety on top and let Law beat the **** out of him on the line and dry hump him across the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Don't forget if Law is in shape he is coming in with fresh legs and that always gives you an advantage at this point in the season. Still I would put Revis on Welker and Law on Moss with help over the top. Welker almost never goes deep and Revis can definitly handle those slant patterns. Fresh legs? John Madden would have the same kind of fresh legs. In fact, anybody who hasn't played pro football the last nine weeks and has sat on the couch eating nachos would have the same fresh legs. If Mangini is thinking of using Law in any significant way, this could turn out to be one of the most embarrassing blunders by an NFL Head Coach in history. On national TV, no less. In the first NE game, the Pats scored 19 points, Welker caught 7 for 72 yards, no TDs, Moss caught 2 for 22 yards, no TDs and the Jets are now a much better defense and overall team than they were in week #2. What exactly is the problem that Mangini thinks he is trying to solve with such a very risky move? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 11, 2008 Author Share Posted November 11, 2008 Why don't we just bump him all game. Honestly, Randy Moss is a player I'm not scared off one bit, I know for a fact Revis will keep him under 50 yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
villain_the_foe Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 I would double Moss and put Revis on Welker wherever he goes and see if Revis can step up to the plate covering the slot receiver. Why? Revis has been shutting Moss down. Welker is the concern. We cant get into 3rd and 6 situations and having them get first downs from the slot position. That will render our run stopping useless. I would have the safety shadow Lowery and his receiver, Have Law on Welker and have the other safety playing free while keeping one LB playing under Welker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 How about having Gholston play face up on Welker on just one play and have him belt the little sh#t with one of those concrete forearms? Even if Gholston gets thrown out of the game, so what? It will be worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 LOL, that would be a ****ing disaster. law would need serious Help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 11, 2008 Author Share Posted November 11, 2008 F*** The Dolphins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Columbia Jet Fan Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Put Lowery on Gaffney, Revis on Moss...have Law jam Welker on the line and have Barrett play safety and support him... That is putting Revis on an island against Moss...I don't care who your cb is...1 on 1 v. Moss is scary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Fresh legs? John Madden would have the same kind of fresh legs. In fact, anybody who hasn't played pro football the last nine weeks and has sat on the couch eating nachos would have the same fresh legs. Once again I said ASSUMING HE STAYED IN SHAPE he will have fresh legs. If Mangini is thinking of using Law in any significant way, this could turn out to be one of the most embarrassing blunders by an NFL Head Coach in history. On national TV, no less. In the first NE game, the Pats scored 19 points, Welker caught 7 for 72 yards, no TDs, Moss caught 2 for 22 yards, no TDs and the Jets are now a much better defense and overall team than they were in week #2. What exactly is the problem that Mangini thinks he is trying to solve with such a very risky move? He is trying to get the team better. Right now there is no other decent option at the other CB spot opposite Revis. And yes a vet like LAw can come in and hit the ground running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted November 11, 2008 Author Share Posted November 11, 2008 Ahhh, just imagine if Mr.Brady was playing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangreenman Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Fresh legs? John Madden would have the same kind of fresh legs. In fact, anybody who hasn't played pro football the last nine weeks and has sat on the couch eating nachos would have the same fresh legs. If Mangini is thinking of using Law in any significant way, this could turn out to be one of the most embarrassing blunders by an NFL Head Coach in history. On national TV, no less. In the first NE game, the Pats scored 19 points, Welker caught 7 for 72 yards, no TDs, Moss caught 2 for 22 yards, no TDs and the Jets are now a much better defense and overall team than they were in week #2. What exactly is the problem that Mangini thinks he is trying to solve with such a very risky move? You have to remember that was also Cassell's 1st game he started since HS. He and that offense have undoubtedly improved since then as well. The key to this game is containing Welker, and yes, thats more key than containing Moss. Moss is a big play receiver. Cassell is not going for the the big play every play like Brady did/does. If he gets open downfield, he may score a long TD. However, if Welker can keep reeling in 5/6 yarders, they will drive down the field AND eat up clock. Jarvis-Green should be limited against our run D...So the key to this game really is Welker IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Once again I said ASSUMING HE STAYED IN SHAPE he will have fresh legs. He is trying to get the team better. Right now there is no other decent option at the other CB spot opposite Revis. And yes a vet like LAw can come in and hit the ground running. What are you guys smoking? Law was shot two years ago. He has been inactive. He just joined the team for a Thursday night game that he is under the impression he is going to have a significant role in. He will hit the ground running alright. As Welker glides into the endzone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjetsjetsjets Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Fresh legs? John Madden would have the same kind of fresh legs. In fact, anybody who hasn't played pro football the last nine weeks and has sat on the couch eating nachos would have the same fresh legs. If Mangini is thinking of using Law in any significant way, this could turn out to be one of the most embarrassing blunders by an NFL Head Coach in history. On national TV, no less. In the first NE game, the Pats scored 19 points, Welker caught 7 for 72 yards, no TDs, Moss caught 2 for 22 yards, no TDs and the Jets are now a much better defense and overall team than they were in week #2. What exactly is the problem that Mangini thinks he is trying to solve with such a very risky move? yeah, im sure with him talking to the jets since august or so, he has just been sitting on the couch eating nachos. plus, the problem with your theory is that ty law still has talent, john madden or some other fat ass sitting on a couch, does not. ill take him over miller who has done nothing all season. something is better than nothing, is it not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjetsjetsjets Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 What are you guys smoking? Law was shot two years ago. He has been inactive. He just joined the team for a Thursday night game that he is under the impression he is going to have a significant role in. He will hit the ground running alright. As Welker glides into the endzone. you honestly believe they are going to lock him up against welker? please, you can't even be that dumb. he is just another player, who takes the place of JUSTIN MILLER, who again, has not done a single thing this year. something, again, is better than nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 What are you guys smoking? Law was shot two years ago. He has been inactive. He just joined the team for a Thursday night game that he is under the impression he is going to have a significant role in. He will hit the ground running alright. As Welker glides into the endzone. He will have a significant role Thursday. And judging him based on playing the last 3 years with Herm is a big mistake. I'm not saying he is still in his prime - but those defenses were terrible and with an improved cast around him I'm betting he will make a big impact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted November 11, 2008 Share Posted November 11, 2008 Why? Revis has been shutting Moss down. Welker is the concern. We cant get into 3rd and 6 situations and having them get first downs from the slot position. That will render our run stopping useless. I would have the safety shadow Lowery and his receiver, Have Law on Welker and have the other safety playing free while keeping one LB playing under Welker Everybody has been shutting Moss down this year. I think he's either hurt or Cassell can't get him the ball deep. Welker is almost impossible to cover in the slot. he will kill us, why not try it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.