Maxman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Is there enought time for him to win the job? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 if miller & smith are healthy I kinda doubt it. not too concerned really, we got him for the long term Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 16, 2007 Author Share Posted August 16, 2007 if miller & smith are healthy I kinda doubt it. not too concerned really, we got him for the long term Vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Vote. Barking out orders first thing in the morning? I voted yes. I think he'll be the starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 He may partake in ST play, but I seriously doubt he'll be starting at CB...I voted no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Two to Three weeks to get ready for the Pats ? Not a chance. You will probably see him on KO and Punt returns and maybe some at Nickel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaborJet Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Not a starter, but he will see some playing time in week #1. I expect to see him some vs. the Giants in week 3 of preseason, and for at least a half, maybe even 3 quarters vs. the Eagles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 16, 2007 Author Share Posted August 16, 2007 I think he starts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I voted yes, but I think no... or kinda. Basically I think he will play the MOST in the game but might not be the stater. I think Mangini will give him a little nudge by NOT starting him but will put him in for most of the game. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 He will be the starter - he is a quick learner as Mangini stated in pre training camp workouts. Trial by fire but I am sure there will be arotation among the CB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Vote. good morning to you too can I get you a coffe ot perhaps a cup of stfu I voted no. however max has proven to be a formidable soothsayer so to speak as of late. I f revis does start, that'll speak volumes for what mangini & sutton think of this kid in summary: I hope i'm wrong Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SeniorFlaJet Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 The CW says that he shouldn't be able to start being he's missed so much time so I voted no. Now knowing Mangini, if he does start its because he came around very fast and Mangini felt hewas ready. i don't think hewill force him into it if he's not ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 NO He blew it with his holdout By wk5 maybe a different story I kind of feel this will be a lost year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green DNA Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 No way. He will not start until week 8, unless other teams are tearing the Jets secondary to shreds. He will play a lot, but he won't start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 16, 2007 Author Share Posted August 16, 2007 He went to mini camp. He has studied. He is in great shape. He probably will get slapped on the wrist and not "start" week one. But he will contribute a lot. This is not a wasted year for him. The holdout will not make or break his season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K2C Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Not if he posts here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 He went to mini camp. He has studied. He is in great shape. He probably will get slapped on the wrist and not "start" week one. But he will contribute a lot. This is not a wasted year for him. The holdout will not make or break his season. I agree with this 100%. I see good things from revis' contributions this year. depth alone is a huge contribution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMaynard Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I voted yes, but as the starting nickel-back. I believe he will then take replace Barrett by mid season on merit, or more probably, replace either Barrett or Dyson for the inevitable injury that one of them will suffer. Not that I want to jinx anybody, but let's be realistic about those two and their injury histories. Then Miller will move in as the nickel. By 2008, I expect the starters to be Revis and Miller. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
L.I.MikeBleedsGreen Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I vote yes Because our other db's are suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 if you look at the language of the contract RE: voidable years the FO doesn't expect him to start right away i say he's a dime back in year 1 a nickel in year 2 in year 3 he's a starter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 if you look at the language of the contract RE: voidable years the FO doesn't expect him to start right away i say he's a dime back in year 1 a nickel in year 2 in year 3 he's a starter That is a lot of money for the next two years for a non-starter. He starts by the end of the year. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gangreenman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 He will be the starter - he is a quick learner as Mangini stated in pre training camp workouts. Trial by fire but I am sure there will be arotation among the CB's. Guys, start or not, he'll play and he'll be part of the rotation. And there will be A LOT of rotations out there, especially given the depth we have at secondary and the fact that we're playing the Patsies and have to do everything we can to confuse BB and Brady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
124 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I personally do not believe that the Jets drafted him in the 1st round to play in Nickel and Dime packages and return punts, even in his first season. He has 3 weeks and 2 games to play in to prepare and since Miller is still out with his sore hammy and since he's a better corner than Barrett, Darrelle Revis will start opening day lining up against either Randy Moss or Donte Stallworth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drago Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I personally do not believe that the Jets drafted him in the 1st round to play in Nickel and Dime packages and return punts, even in his first season. He has 3 weeks and 2 games to play in to prepare and since Miller is still out with his sore hammy and since he's a better corner than Barrett, Darrelle Revis will start opening day lining up against either Randy Moss or Donte Stallworth. if he does start i hope he guards stallworth, barrett tends to do pretty well against the bigger faster WR's (see burress in 04). i don't even want revis retunring punts. keep leon back there, revis is overrated in that regard. that clip they keep showing of him wasn't that great. it was great blocking, but he didn't need to do much until the very end of the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
faba Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Three years to be a starter- that does not seem to be a wise first round decision if that actually happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 We just don't know, god forbid anyone getting injured and than that'll leave him Revis with a huge opportunity. In my opinion, yes, he's a shut down corner and I think he'll end up along side Dyson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 That is a lot of money for the next two years for a non-starter. He starts by the end of the year. BZ actually a lot of money is what Nate Clements got from SF what Revis got was very good money not "a-lot of money' at the end of the day he's a rookie, a junior coming out early, there are going to be growing pains Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BwanaZulia Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Nate Clements will start on day one. It is a lot of money for someone who you don't see starting for 3 years. BZ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I don't think he would've started if he was here for the first day of camp, but I do think he will be starting by mid-season. He's no three year project, and CB is a position rookies can play on instinct. The Jets traded up for this guy because of the severe need at CB the team has had since they gave away Aaron Glenn and Marcus Coleman in the Texans' expansion draft. He'll be on the field. He'll be on defense as early as the first series against the Pats. Only thing that gets him in the starting line-up sooner would be injuries to Barrett and Miller. I'm not a fan of either of those guys, but that wouldn't be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 It is a lot of money for someone who you don't see starting for 3 years. Vilma was DROY and he didn't even start until week 3 Drob started right away, and got ran over half the time B Thomas and Farrior didn't even get good until their 4th and 5th years respectively say it with me now playoff caliber teams don't look to the draft to solve their immediate problems bad teams do that, and they usually stay bad i don't know what kind of schedule the Jets have for Revis but to expect a junior coming out to start from day 1 is over aggressive by anyone's standard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick34125 Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 I would agree with those who say he'll play week 1, but won't start. Even if he learns fast I think Barrett will still be ahead of him. I'm not even sure we'll see him returning punts week 1. For now I'm comfortable with a healthy Barrett at CB and Leon returning punts, but feel better with the depth he brings to the DB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Vilma was DROY and he didn't even start until week 3 Drob started right away, and got ran over half the time B Thomas and Farrior didn't even get good until their 4th and 5th years respectively say it with me now playoff caliber teams don't look to the draft to solve their immediate problems bad teams do that, and they usually stay bad i don't know what kind of schedule the Jets have for Revis but to expect a junior coming out to start from day 1 is over aggressive by anyone's standard. say this with me...........d'rob is still gettin run over Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghost Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 say this with me...........drop is still getting run over You got to admit, he did a lot better in the second half last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetfan4hire Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 if you look at the language of the contract RE: voidable years the FO doesn't expect him to start right away i say he's a dime back in year 1 a nickel in year 2 in year 3 he's a starter wow, I expect quicker development than that from the 14th overall pick, and a guy the Jets felt strongly enough to move up for. I think a more likely case is that he goes into the early weeks as a nickel back, and wins the starting job opposite Dyson by mid season if not sooner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bitonti Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 look at the verbiage on the voided years Revis can void year 6 if he plays more than 35% of defensive snaps Revis can void year 5 if he plays more than 45% of defensive snaps granted these years can be bought back by the Jets at high prices but bottom line, money talks, the FO doesn't expect Revis to start, neither should we. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.