LandShark13 Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Do you? And was O'Brien a better QB than Marino because he did beat him...kind of like Henne did last year to Sanchez...just saying. That's a valid argument and damn you for even making me look this up. From 1985 to 1981 the years he was your starter he is exactly .500 Vs us. So neither of them beat the other. To answer your question though in the bigger scheme it wouldn't make much of a difference. This is going to be a hot topic for the remainder of these two's career. In the end though unless there is a clear cut winner I would expect this to remain a very heated point of conversation between us fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LandShark13 Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 Dan Marino has the same number of Super Bowl rings as Ken O'Brien, Chad Pennington, and Mark Sanchez. A lot of the fans here are pretty bright. Unfortunately though the rest seem to be one trick ponies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NIGHT STALKER Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 That's a valid argument and damn you for even making me look this up. From 1985 to 1981 the years he was your starter he is exactly .500 Vs us. So neither of them beat the other. To answer your question though in the bigger scheme it wouldn't make much of a difference. This is going to be a hot topic for the remainder of these two's career. In the end though unless there is a clear cut winner I would expect this to remain a very heated point of conversation between us fans. I didn't mean to imply that O'Brien beat Marino all the time...just that he "did" beat him. And my point was, at the end of the day (stat wise), Marino had the better career by far. But, both can hoist a few to never winning a SB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LandShark13 Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 I didn't mean to imply that O'Brien beat Marino all the time...just that he "did" beat him. And my point was, at the end of the day (stat wise), Marino had the better career by far. But, both can hoist a few to never winning a SB. Gotcha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 A lot of the fans here are pretty bright. Unfortunately though the rest seem to be one trick ponies. You should read my other 8,666 posts. They're all equally brilliant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted August 13, 2010 Author Share Posted August 13, 2010 You should read my other 8,666 posts. They're all equally brilliant. (cough) bull sh*t (cough). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Another thing to add and why at this moment I'll take the model over Henne and his black panther tattoo is the fact that outside of the Jets, Henne only beat 5 teams...Sanchez beat 10 different teams in the NFL last season. This post alone should swing those of you on the fence to Sanchez's side. If there's anyone more pessimistic about "the model" than JiF, I'd like to see him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gyno-Tony Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Does this mean the wild pussy gets spayed? ahahahahahahaha. yeaaah baby...yeaaaaaaahhhh! show that fish fruit who da boss is !!!!!! wild pussy aint doin jack against us baby!!!! we own the fish fags !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apache 51 Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Don't shoot the messenger, but I agree with the experts. http://espn.go.com/b...ne-over-sanchez Experts, we don't know what's going to happen. They both are capable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blurredorunfocused Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I`m from England and having not read all of this thread I can`t add much. But if I saw a dolphin swimming in the Bristol channel and I was fishing I would use quadruple treble barbed hooks on a single line with a 12kg leaded weight and as many rods as I could muster, and all would be cast in the direction of said dolphin and all it`s children and they would be thrown furiously towards the shoal. If I was fortunate to hook one in the fin and drag it to the shore, I would then punch it several times and then loosen the clutch and let it swim back out to sea thinking it was safe before reeling it back in and then abuse it some more. Those stinky fish will never be safe on these shores No mercy Kobra Kai, reel in and fry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 experts agree the jets are contenders and the phags are pretenders Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheSage Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 and Joe Montana couldn't throw a football through a paper bag but if my recollection is correct he was able to win a couple of games, so did a guy named Tarkenton who could run and hide but had to have a high arc on his throws to get it there. QB is more than arm strength. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LandShark13 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 and Joe Montana couldn't throw a football through a paper bag but if my recollection is correct he was able to win a couple of games, so did a guy named Tarkenton who could run and hide but had to have a high arc on his throws to get it there. QB is more than arm strength. Wasn't that the same argument a lot of Jets fans used with Pennington? It's a valid argument don't get me wrong or take it the wrong way I'm just curious. Bottom line is both these guys are still writing their own history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dbatesman Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 And was O'Brien a better QB than Marino because he did beat him Only if he did it twice in one season, which he did in 1991. So to answer your question: yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Wasn't that the same argument a lot of Jets fans used with Pennington? It's a valid argument don't get me wrong or take it the wrong way I'm just curious. Curious about what? If Sanchez has his arm surgically transformed into a vagina, then and only then can you bring Pennington into the argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Fascinating. The beauty of it is: we shall see. Any Michigan fan will tell you that Henne is bad in pressure situations and what we saw in December with Henne last year won't change that opinion. We saw Sanchez play well against superior opponents in the postseason. He raised his game in the end. Henne, on the other hand, wilted under the pressure of a playoff push. Will those trends continue? I have no idea. Miami Dolphins beat the Jags in Week 14 to go 7-6. They moved up to the No. 6 seed and controlled their own playoff destiny. At that point Henne had 9 TDs and 9 INTs. The Fins lost their last 3 games and failed to make the playoffs. Henne threw 3 TDs and 5 INTs in those last 3 games. In fact, in Henne's last 6 starts, the Fins went 2-4 and Henne had 6 TDs and 10 INTs. Henne was bad down the stretch when the Fins needed him most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lupz27 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Don't shoot the messenger, but I agree with the experts. http://espn.go.com/b...ne-over-sanchez Experts side with crashingjet being a douche over not being a douche, dont shoot the messenger, but I agree with the experts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JETS11269 Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Don't shoot the messenger, but I agree with the experts. /shoots messenger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifth Amendment Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Another thing to add and why at this moment I'll take the model over Henne and his black panther tattoo is the fact that outside of the Jets, Henne only beat 5 teams...Sanchez beat 10 different teams in the NFL last season. You cant be serious. Every game the Jets won was b/c of defense and/or running game. Sanchez didn't "win" a single game, and the few times he was asked to win a game, he failed. 2009 NYJ, #1 Running game, #1 Defense, #31 QB. Or did you forget? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifth Amendment Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 The past can be a comfortable place when you've enjoyed some luck. In this instance ... dumb luck. See you 9/26 ... bring your buttplug Yeah' he'll need it if Sanchez is in the vicinity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifth Amendment Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Dan Marino has the same number of Super Bowl rings as Ken O'Brien, Chad Pennington, and Mark Sanchez. Good point. Marino's a bum. They'll let anyone in the Hall of Fame these days... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifth Amendment Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Fascinating. The beauty of it is: we shall see. Any Michigan fan will tell you that Henne is bad in pressure situations and what we saw in December with Henne last year won't change that opinion. We saw Sanchez play well against superior opponents in the postseason. He raised his game in the end. Henne, on the other hand, wilted under the pressure of a playoff push. Will those trends continue? I have no idea. Miami Dolphins beat the Jags in Week 14 to go 7-6. They moved up to the No. 6 seed and controlled their own playoff destiny. At that point Henne had 9 TDs and 9 INTs. The Fins lost their last 3 games and failed to make the playoffs. Henne threw 3 TDs and 5 INTs in those last 3 games. In fact, in Henne's last 6 starts, the Fins went 2-4 and Henne had 6 TDs and 10 INTs. Henne was bad down the stretch when the Fins needed him most. I'm curious. Have you watched any of those games? Or did you make a quick visit to NFL.com for some debate ammo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 You cant be serious. Every game the Jets won was b/c of defense and/or running game. Sanchez didn't "win" a single game, and the few times he was asked to win a game, he failed. 2009 NYJ, #1 Running game, #1 Defense, #31 QB. Or did you forget? Trolling at 5am in the morning? Dumb post. Even you know this. But I'll play, so is his career record 11-8 or 0-0? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Fascinating. The beauty of it is: we shall see. Any Michigan fan will tell you that Henne is bad in pressure situations and what we saw in December with Henne last year won't change that opinion. We saw Sanchez play well against superior opponents in the postseason. He raised his game in the end. Henne, on the other hand, wilted under the pressure of a playoff push. Will those trends continue? I have no idea. Miami Dolphins beat the Jags in Week 14 to go 7-6. They moved up to the No. 6 seed and controlled their own playoff destiny. At that point Henne had 9 TDs and 9 INTs. The Fins lost their last 3 games and failed to make the playoffs. Henne threw 3 TDs and 5 INTs in those last 3 games. In fact, in Henne's last 6 starts, the Fins went 2-4 and Henne had 6 TDs and 10 INTs. Henne was bad down the stretch when the Fins needed him most. I love the revisionist history of the JN. They backed into the playoffs when their last two opponents tanked games. While Sanchise had a decent playoffs, he was greatly aided by the running game and Nate Kaeding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsMetsRangers Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I love the revisionist history of the JN. They backed into the playoffs when their last two opponents tanked games. While Sanchise had a decent playoffs, he was greatly aided by the running game and Nate Kaeding. I would say Sanchez was "slightly" better than decent.....He completed over 60% in the 3 playoff games with 4 TDS and 2 INT..... Had a 7.9 avg per attempt and over 13 yards per completion, keep in mind all 3 games were on the road....Sanchez stepped up big time in my view from the regular season, give the guy a little more credit than decent... We will never know if Henne would have performed as well in the playoffs since he and the Dolphins had destiny in their own hands and flopped.....As far as backing into the playoffs if the Dolphins did not crap the bed in the final weeks that would have been a moot point.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I love the revisionist history of the JN. They backed into the playoffs when their last two opponents tanked games. While Sanchise had a decent playoffs, he was greatly aided by the running game and Nate Kaeding. How is that backing in? We won those games right? We could only play who the other team puts out on the field. Not our fault teams rested players, and is in no way backing in. Backing in is when you lose and still get in! Your patsies got in and got stomped, revision that history! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I love the revisionist history of the JN. They backed into the playoffs when their last two opponents tanked games. While Sanchise had a decent playoffs, he was greatly aided by the running game and Nate Kaeding. Please...this sh*t just cracks me up. First off, we didnt back in, we won our way in...if you want to argue the Colts laid down for us, I'll agree...but dont act like we didnt prove we were the better team than the Bengals. The kid was a rookie, he played very well in the playoffs. This is fun...who's stats would you take in a playoff run 32-52 312 0 TD 1 INT 12-18 115 0 TD 0 INT 16-27 145 1 TD 0 INT or 12-15 182 1 TD 0 INT 12-23 100 1 TD 1 INT 17-30 257 2 TD 1 INT Hopefully you've figured out what I've done with this exercise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 I'm curious. Have you watched any of those games? Or did you make a quick visit to NFL.com for some debate ammo? I watched them. Thanks for playing, try again. I love the revisionist history of the JN. They backed into the playoffs when their last two opponents tanked games. While Sanchise had a decent playoffs, he was greatly aided by the running game and Nate Kaeding. You're completely revisionist. Claim the Colts tanked all you want, but the Bengals got smoked 2 weeks in a row, so I don't understand how you can claim they "tanked" that game. The Bengals weren't win that final game at the Meadowlands. And, as mentioned, you can't "back in" to the playoffs by winning games. Further, that's irrelevant to how Sanchez played in the playoffs with a 60% completion percentage, 92 QB rating, and 4/2 TD/INT. Those are the facts. To claim he had a "decent" playoff is asinine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 You're completely revisionist. Claim the Colts tanked all you want, but the Bengals got smoked 2 weeks in a row, so I don't understand how you can claim they "tanked" that game. The Bengals weren't win that final game at the Meadowlands. And, as mentioned, you can't "back in" to the playoffs by winning games. Further, that's irrelevant to how Sanchez played in the playoffs with a 60% completion percentage, 92 QB rating, and 4/2 TD/INT. Those are the facts. To claim he had a "decent" playoff is asinine. He did have a decent playoff run. The Jets beat a Bengals team that was hardly going all-out the last week. Sanchez did play a pretty good game against them. In the last two games, against much better competition, he had a 72 rating and was 54%. Again, for a rookie, he did a decent job, but hardly the second coming. JiF I would take the one that lead his team to a 3-0 record and two game winning drives. Brooklyn True. They beat what was put in front of them. And their second victory over the Bengals shows who was better. All I am saying, it is not like they met much resistance going in compared to other teams, but they won the games none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE ILK Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Brooklyn True. They beat what was put in front of them. And their second victory over the Bengals shows who was better. All I am saying, it is not like they met much resistance going in compared to other teams, but they won the games none the less. I can agree with that, but that's not backing in on any account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 phags fans have to very very very disappointed with Henne tonight I know it's PS I know it was raining, but that was pretty poor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattyandthejets Posted August 15, 2010 Share Posted August 15, 2010 Sanchez doesn't have the physical tools that Henne has??? Are we talking about the same people? And since when do people thing Sanchez has a noodle arm? He can sling it all over the field..... He can toss 60 yard passes with ease, so dont give us this nonsense that he doesnt have an arm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crashingjet Posted August 16, 2010 Author Share Posted August 16, 2010 /shoots messenger That's funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 And the fact of the matter is....if it wasnt even close...then why was Sanchez drafted 6th overall and Henne was a 2nd rounder? Why was Tom Brady drafted late in the 6th round and JaMarcus Russel the first overall? What round they were drafted in means nothing. Any analysis at this point must based on what each of them have done based on the games they have played in the NFL. It is too early to make any definitive declarations on either of them. Of what I have seen of both of them I think Henne is the better QB, both in terms of arm strength and decision making. The biggest reason why Sanchez was in the playoffs last year and Henne wasn't is sitting at home pouting because the Jets won't pay him as much as Oakland pays Aso. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klecko73isGod Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Why was Tom Brady drafted late in the 6th round and JaMarcus Russel the first overall? What round they were drafted in means nothing. Any analysis at this point must based on what each of them have done based on the games they have played in the NFL. It is too early to make any definitive declarations on either of them. Of what I have seen of both of them I think Henne is the better QB, both in terms of arm strength and decision making. The biggest reason why Sanchez was in the playoffs last year and Henne wasn't is sitting at home pouting because the Jets won't pay him as much as Oakland pays Aso. Except that when the season was on the line his decision making sucked and Sanchez's decision making was the best we've seen from him. Henne's never gonna be a bigtime QB as he continually wilts under pressure. Sanchez has already proven that he can step up his game when it matters most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.