ylekram Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Passing on Revis, OK.. I get it. But there were so many good options out there! I can't imagine a stronger corner market coming around anytime soon. Milliner Island.. love it. But yeah, why throw at Dee when you can just lob it over Patterson. Thats probably how everyone saw it. but,but,but they weren't a good fit.didnt you hear? all the good free agents that idzik passed on either were not a good fit or overpaid. best to keep that $$ in woodys pocket Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LionelRichie Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This team is going to have a very good D. Given that, all the offense needs to do is take care of the ball, put a few drives together, and find a way to come up with 20 pts. as much as I hate to say it, I think Vick is the answer at QB. Geno is never going to be elite. Once you accept that, the right decision is to play the QB that gives the team the best chance to win. Even at 34, Vick can move the chains. Between dink and dunk and his scrambling ability a Vick led Jets team has 10 or 11 wins in it. as much as I hate Ron Mexico as a human being, he gives the team the best chance to win. last - i am going to cut Patterson some slack. he's a little banged up and 2 weeks into camp his legs are probably a little shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F.Chowds Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 TJ Barnes was ballin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This team is going to have a very good D. Given that, all the offense needs to do is take care of the ball, put a few drives together, and find a way to come up with 20 pts. as much as I hate to say it, I think Vick is the answer at QB. Geno is never going to be elite. Once you accept that, the right decision is to play the QB that gives the team the best chance to win. Even at 34, Vick can move the chains. Between dink and dunk and his scrambling ability a Vick led Jets team has 10 or 11 wins in it. as much as I hate Ron Mexico as a human being, he gives the team the best chance to win. last - i am going to cut Patterson some slack. he's a little banged up and 2 weeks into camp his legs are probably a little shot. Yeah I don't think Patterson even practiced today because he's pretty banged up but still, falling on your ass on a curl route by the reciever on 3rd and long it's hard for me to not get on him. But you're probably right,cut him some slack and let's see how he progresses from here on out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlife33 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 TJ Barnes was ballin Both he and IK Enemkpali showed some great play. Our depth at dline is very impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This team is going to have a very good D. Given that, all the offense needs to do is take care of the ball, put a few drives together, and find a way to come up with 20 pts. as much as I hate to say it, I think Vick is the answer at QB. Geno is never going to be elite. Once you accept that, the right decision is to play the QB that gives the team the best chance to win. Even at 34, Vick can move the chains. Between dink and dunk and his scrambling ability a Vick led Jets team has 10 or 11 wins in it. as much as I hate Ron Mexico as a human being, he gives the team the best chance to win. last - i am going to cut Patterson some slack. he's a little banged up and 2 weeks into camp his legs are probably a little shot. Thats the thing with Patterson..he is always banged up. He might be the greatest corner to ever live, but no one will know cause he is always hurt. In short, hurt Patterson = sucking patterson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbanmadmike1 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 25 of them. And all the teams that have one went deep into the playoffs because they do have one. Julian Edelman, Golden Tate, Steve Smith, Dwayne Bowe, Marques Colston... These true #1s are among the best WRs in football. They all drew (and beat) consistent double-teams last year, and that's why their respective teams won so many games. You want to compare the talent level on the Siants, Chiefs, Patriots or Seahawks offense to that of the Jets offense? Sure you can win without a true No 1 WR.... As long as you have a top 5 RB in the NFL or a future hall of fame QB. What a bad comparison that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbanmadmike1 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 TY Hilton will make anyone look slow. He gut burned by backups too. Not just Hilton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sperm Edwards Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 You want to compare the talent level on the Siants, Chiefs, Patriots or Seahawks offense to that of the Jets offense? Sure you can win without a true No 1 WR.... As long as you have a top 5 RB in the NFL or a future hall of fame QB. What a bad comparison that is. Neither Cam Newton nor DeAngelo Williams had HOF or top-5 caliber seasons. Plus I hear that Russell Wilson is nothing but a game manager rather than a great future HOF type. And I was only looking at this past season. But since you don't really watch much football, Brady won SBs before he was even elite present level (at that time), never mind HOF (elite all-time) level. And spare me the OR a top 5 RB nonsense as though any one of these things is all that's required. What a silly thing to claim. A top 5 RB on his own isn't getting a team to the playoffs - let alone a SB - except in fantasy football. If that was the case the Vikings would have 5 rings already. The Chiefs had neither an elite QB nor a "true #1" WR. Charles is great but only a fool thinks he's the whole team (or the whole offense), even though he's by far the best player on that offense. They picked up a QB who played adequately plus the defense gave up a TD less per game than the year before, and that's the reason they won double-digit games. Not just because of Charles. They had him the year before - and he was awesome the year before - and they won 2 games all season long. A "true #1 WR" - in the fantasy football sense as you mean it - is certainly nice, but it isn't remotely required to make the playoffs or even win a superbowl. Having a few good options is plenty, even if none of them are elite "true #1 WR" types. Christ, there are teams like Chicago with TWO "true #1 WR" types and they won the same number of games as the Jets who didn't even have one full season of a "true #2" WR (as you'd call one). Ditto Atlanta, and their season was over after the first month. Same with the Giants. Cleveland had a record-setting "true #1 WR" and a beast of a TE and they won half as many games as we did (including getting beat up by our weak 2013 Jets team). And this is just from this past single season alone. It's as though you do not watch football outside of video games and make-believe fantasy leagues. And you still owe me a list of all the #3 RBs in the NFL who do so many things better than Powell. C'mon. Just give me a cool dozen or two to start, which should be easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 That is it dbatesman, walk towards us. Walk away from that light, it is Tom with a flashlight. You don't want to know what happens when you get to him. Walk towards us. You should bring back the private debate format just one time. T0mShane against one poster chosen by the people, and only those two can post in that thread (Like the BZ VS TX Debate) and have a poll attached to it. Can you do that with this software? Oh crap here I am consulting iwith you about deas on the site again. it must be old timers day or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 You should bring back the private debate format just one time. T0mShane against one poster chosen by the people, and only those two can post in that thread (Like the BZ VS TX Debate) and have a poll attached to it. Can you do that with this software? Oh crap here I am consulting iwith you about deas on the site again. it must be old timers day or something. We could try, but I don't think anyone actually wants to talk to T0m. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 You should bring back the private debate format just one time. T0mShane against one poster chosen by the people, and only those two can post in that thread (Like the BZ VS TX Debate) and have a poll attached to it. Can you do that with this software? Oh crap here I am consulting iwith you about deas on the site again. it must be old timers day or something. This would be the essence of that "debate": Me-- So, here's the record... Sperm/slats-- listing of largely irrelevant statistics in an attempt to prove that the Jets could, in no way, have won a single game more than they did. Me-- Yeah, so here's the record... Sperm/slats-- Even less relevant statistic comparing Mark Sanchez to Akili Smith. Me-- :lays head on desk, falls asleep, dreams of a time when explaining the exhaustive failings of a Jets coach is no longer the primary topic surrounding the Jets. Sperm/slats-- Attempted slap at Parcells Me-- :waking up, sipping coffee and popping two DayQuil: Sperm/slats-- Attempt to diminish every Super Bowl winning coach ever, then loosely ties Rex's copious failings to the proposed failings of those coaches. Me-- :opens tab for RedTube; clicks <Categories>; clicks <Milf>; clicks <Filter> <Highest Rated> Sperm/slats-- Attempt to suggest that quarterbacks are products of divinity and not design Me-- Orders sweet and sour chicken combo from that Chinese place down the street. Sperm/slats-- Another Parcells salvo Me-- So, here's the record again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This would be the essence of that "debate": Me-- So, here's the record... Sperm/slats-- listing of largely irrelevant statistics in an attempt to prove that the Jets could, in no way, have won a single game more than they did. Me-- Yeah, so here's the record... Sperm/slats-- Even less relevant statistic comparing Mark Sanchez to Akili Smith. Me-- :lays head on desk, falls asleep, dreams of a time when explaining the exhaustive failings of a Jets coach is no longer the primary topic surrounding the Jets. Sperm/slats-- Attempted slap at Parcells Me-- :waking up, sipping coffee and popping two DayQuil: Sperm/slats-- Attempt to diminish every Super Bowl winning coach ever, then loosely ties Rex's copious failings to the proposed failings of those coaches. Me-- :opens tab for RedTube; clicks <Categories>; clicks <Milf>; clicks <Filter> <Highest Rated> Sperm/slats-- Attempt to suggest that quarterbacks are products of divinity and not design Me-- Orders sweet and sour chicken combo from that Chinese place down the street. Sperm/slats-- Another Parcells salvo Me-- So, here's the record again... This is accurate in that it's loaded with inaccuracies. Particularly the milf channel. Everyone knows you're a shemale kinda guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 He gut burned by backups too. Not just Hilton. Shut up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 We could try, but I don't think anyone actually wants to talk to T0m. So who is the most hated poster on the site? Since of course you're in the know. Me, T0mshane or Bugg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This would be the essence of that "debate": Me-- So, here's the record... Sperm/slats-- listing of largely irrelevant statistics in an attempt to prove that the Jets could, in no way, have won a single game more than they did. Me-- Yeah, so here's the record... Sperm/slats-- Even less relevant statistic comparing Mark Sanchez to Akili Smith. Me-- :lays head on desk, falls asleep, dreams of a time when explaining the exhaustive failings of a Jets coach is no longer the primary topic surrounding the Jets. Sperm/slats-- Attempted slap at Parcells Me-- :waking up, sipping coffee and popping two DayQuil: Sperm/slats-- Attempt to diminish every Super Bowl winning coach ever, then loosely ties Rex's copious failings to the proposed failings of those coaches. Me-- :opens tab for RedTube; clicks <Categories>; clicks <Milf>; clicks <Filter> <Highest Rated> Sperm/slats-- Attempt to suggest that quarterbacks are products of divinity and not design Me-- Orders sweet and sour chicken combo from that Chinese place down the street. Sperm/slats-- Another Parcells salvo Me-- So, here's the record again... Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 So who is the most hated poster on the site? Since of course you're in the know. Me, T0mshane or Bugg? It's gotten this bad lately: you're not even in the running. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 It's gotten this bad lately: you're not even in the running. Wow I better step up my game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This is accurate in that it's loaded with inaccuracies. Particularly the milf channel. Everyone knows you're a shemale kinda guy. Milf4Lyfe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ylekram Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 So who is the most hated poster on the site? Since of course you're in the know. Me, T0mshane or Bugg? don't know who is the most hated,but tom is by far the funniest and most entertaining Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Whatever's required to get to the Super Bowl, the Jets don't have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt39 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Also, there are about 10 teams in the league with as good if not better defensive lines than the Jets. I know that's usually our fall back option for gassing Rex and company, but take a look around the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RSJ Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 The next time Woody hires a GM or Coach with a proven winning record on any level, will be the first. You get what you pay for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 don't know who is the most hated,but tom is by far the funniest and most entertaining <333 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Also, there are about 10 teams in the league with as good if not better defensive lines than the Jets. I know that's usually our fall back option for gassing Rex and company, but take a look around the league. Houston, St Louis, Buffalo... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbanmadmike1 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Neither Cam Newton nor DeAngelo Williams had HOF or top-5 caliber seasons. Plus I hear that Russell Wilson is nothing but a game manager rather than a great future HOF type. And I was only looking at this past season. But since you don't really watch much football, Brady won SBs before he was even elite present level (at that time), never mind HOF (elite all-time) level. And spare me the OR a top 5 RB nonsense as though any one of these things is all that's required. What a silly thing to claim. A top 5 RB on his own isn't getting a team to the playoffs - let alone a SB - except in fantasy football. If that was the case the Vikings would have 5 rings already. The Chiefs had neither an elite QB nor a "true #1" WR. Charles is great but only a fool thinks he's the whole team (or the whole offense), even though he's by far the best player on that offense. They picked up a QB who played adequately plus the defense gave up a TD less per game than the year before, and that's the reason they won double-digit games. Not just because of Charles. They had him the year before - and he was awesome the year before - and they won 2 games all season long. A "true #1 WR" - in the fantasy football sense as you mean it - is certainly nice, but it isn't remotely required to make the playoffs or even win a superbowl. Having a few good options is plenty, even if none of them are elite "true #1 WR" types. Christ, there are teams like Chicago with TWO "true #1 WR" types and they won the same number of games as the Jets who didn't even have one full season of a "true #2" WR (as you'd call one). Ditto Atlanta, and their season was over after the first month. Same with the Giants. Cleveland had a record-setting "true #1 WR" and a beast of a TE and they won half as many games as we did (including getting beat up by our weak 2013 Jets team). And this is just from this past single season alone. It's as though you do not watch football outside of video games and make-believe fantasy leagues. And you still owe me a list of all the #3 RBs in the NFL who do so many things better than Powell. C'mon. Just give me a cool dozen or two to start, which should be easy. Are you, with a straight face going to tell me that the Jets have comparable offensive talent levels with teams like the saints, Seahawks or chiefs? If you really believe that you're more deluded than Idzik is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thor99 Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Last week was so nice around here. What changed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Last week was so nice around here. What changed? Traffic picked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 10, 2014 Author Share Posted August 10, 2014 You should bring back the private debate format just one time. T0mShane against one poster chosen by the people, and only those two can post in that thread (Like the BZ VS TX Debate) and have a poll attached to it. Can you do that with this software? Oh crap here I am consulting iwith you about deas on the site again. it must be old timers day or something. LOL - I don't think we have that ability anymore. That is a feature I would like to bring back though, I will look into it. That was a lot of fun back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 10, 2014 Author Share Posted August 10, 2014 Traffic picked up. Are you still worried about our sagging ratings? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted August 10, 2014 Author Share Posted August 10, 2014 It's gotten this bad lately: you're not even in the running. Please don't give BP motivation to try harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 This "true #1" talk is about as annoying as it gets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 10, 2014 Share Posted August 10, 2014 Please don't give BP motivation to try harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Are you still worried about our sagging ratings? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BP Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.