SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Well? You giving up #10 for this guy or what Jetnation? Would him and G Wilson be too similar? Not that that would be a bad thing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post extmenace Posted February 19 Popular Post Share Posted February 19 15 minutes ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: Well? You giving up #10 for this guy or what Jetnation? Would him and G Wilson be too similar? Not that that would be a bad thing. Not pick 10, but trading down, and giving up a pick in the 15-20 range for him while picking up a second wouldn’t be a terrible move if we had a good free agency period. Maybe even multiple trade downs and giving up a pick in the mid 20’s. Pipe dream though and not very likely. 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IntoTheGreen Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 23 minutes ago, extmenace said: Not pick 10, but trading down, and giving up a pick in the 15-20 range for him while picking up a second wouldn’t be a terrible move if we had a good free agency period. Maybe even multiple trade downs and giving up a pick in the mid 20’s. Pipe dream though and not very likely. This situation will be dealt with prior to the draft. In my opinion it'll be very unlikely for a franchise and draft day trade. If Jets want him more likely swap their 10 for their late first instead of trading down and then trading it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gibby Posted February 19 Popular Post Share Posted February 19 Yeah. Sure Aiyuk will be thrilled.🤣 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 I'd love to have Aiyuk but the WR market in free agency will probably be pretty good. I'd rather just pay one of the top guys (Evans, Ridley) and try to use the high pick in the draft to land LT. The FA tackle market blows. 2 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SackExchangeNYJ Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Using the first rounder in a trade for another WR1 is neglecting the OL to strengthen a solidified top of the WR depth chart. I'd rather bring in someone who won't cost as much capital but can be a very good #2, while utilizing that first rounder and cap space on OL. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extmenace Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 10 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said: I'd love to have Aiyuk but the WR market in free agency will probably be pretty good. I'd rather just pay one of the top guys (Evans, Ridley) and try to use the high pick in the draft to land LT. The FA tackle market blows. This team likely won’t be able to sign the top free agents. Only real shot at getting a top tier WR will be via trade. Signing here is too risky when there are multiple options on the table. We’re one of the worst landing spots. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 10 minutes ago, Barry McCockinner said: I'd love to have Aiyuk but the WR market in free agency will probably be pretty good. I'd rather just pay one of the top guys (Evans, Ridley) and try to use the high pick in the draft to land LT. The FA tackle market blows. What, you’re not sold on Bakhtiari and Becton being our starting tackles??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extmenace Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 33 minutes ago, IntoTheGreen said: This situation will be dealt with prior to the draft. In my opinion it'll be very unlikely for a franchise and draft day trade. If Jets want him more likely swap their 10 for their late first instead of trading down and then trading it. Bad optics for the 49ers, don’t think that would go over well to trade a talent like that and still only have 1 first round pick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 9 minutes ago, extmenace said: This team likely won’t be able to sign the top free agents. Only real shot at getting a top tier WR will be via trade. Signing here is too risky when there are multiple options on the table. We’re one of the worst landing spots. Aaron Rodgers is our QB and we have a top 5 defense. If WR's want to win and/or produce we're a good landing spot. 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
extmenace Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 minute ago, Barry McCockinner said: Aaron Rodgers is our QB and we have a top 5 defense. If WR's want to win and/or produce we're a good landing spot. Rodgers hasn’t had a 300 yard game since 2021. Coming off serious injury and is 40 years old. Coaching staff and front office 1 bad season away from being blown up. Not a well respected OC coaching the offense. WRers have been complaining for years now. Throw in some of the worst tax rates in the league and this is a good landing spot? WRers want stats above all else…I literally can’t think of any positives out side of the name Aaron Rodgers. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 brandon who? a first round talent? ok sf gives us him and the 31 pick we give up 10. we use the 31 on tyler guyton. not bad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 17 minutes ago, extmenace said: Rodgers hasn’t had a 300 yard game since 2021. Coming off serious injury and is 40 years old. Coaching staff and front office 1 bad season away from being blown up. Not a well respected OC coaching the offense. WRers have been complaining for years now. Throw in some of the worst tax rates in the league and this is a good landing spot? WRers want stats above all else…I literally can’t think of any positives out side of the name Aaron Rodgers. The WR's have been complaining because Zach Wilson was their QB. What does that have to do w/playing w/Rodgers? NFL WR's will have a much different perspective about playing w/Aaron Rodgers than jaded Jets fans. Rodgers is an architect of the offense Hackett ran with him in back to back MVP seasons while throwing to Davante Adams who put up huge numbers in the process and earned a monster contract. I'll give you the CS and FO being lame duck is a negative. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oatmeal Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Bump and where tf is the thread about these goofys leaking to Connor Huges that they are interested in Sam Howell?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Aiyuk right now: 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 6 minutes ago, oatmeal said: Bump and where tf is the thread about these goofys leaking to Connor Huges that they are interested in Sam Howell?? You lost bruh? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SomebodytoAnybody47 Posted February 19 Author Share Posted February 19 2 minutes ago, Jet_Engine1 said: Aiyuk right now: Yeah but like, with a crap ton of money. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Yes I approve. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 To acquire Aiyuk smartly we would need to sign and trade. he ain’t signing. Let’s see what the Jets pay for a 1 year rental. we now know Woody makes all the calls on these trades. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerfish Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 More unrealistic hopes and wishes. Just like the Davante Adams fable. SF controls his situation, they are in win now mode they have spent a few years developing the player. He is going no where. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Barry McCockinner said: Aaron Rodgers is our QB and we have a top 5 defense. If WR's want to win and/or produce we're a good landing spot. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 hours ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: Well? You giving up #10 for this guy or what Jetnation? Would him and G Wilson be too similar? Not that that would be a bad thing. Trade down to the end of the 1st with the 49ers (pick swap). See if that works. Should still be several good OT options at #31. If necessary maybe use a late pick or a 2025 mid-rounder to move up a few spots into the late 20's if an OT that you absolutely want is there. This would be the ideal type scenario for me, but it still doesn't negate the fact of needing an OT and a WR in free agency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetstream23 Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 1 hour ago, Barry McCockinner said: Aaron Rodgers is our QB and we have a top 5 defense. If WR's want to win and/or produce we're a good crash landing spot. fixed. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larz Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 The jets are 4 million under the cap. these things are not happening Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry McCockinner Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 15 minutes ago, Larz said: The jets are 4 million under the cap. these things are not happening soon to be $60 million Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 We're going to need all the draft capital possible to trade up for a QB next year. No way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 hours ago, SomebodytoAnybody47 said: What, you’re not sold on Bakhtiari and Becton being our starting tackles??? Most likely what we're going to end up with. Becton at RT on the cheap and Bakhtiari at LT on the cheap + rookie OT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FidelioJet Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 16 minutes ago, Adoni Beast said: Most likely what we're going to end up with. Becton at RT on the cheap and Bakhtiari at LT on the cheap + rookie OT. Yup. And when Becton and Bakhtiari are both injured - and the Rookie isn't ready. Rodgers then gets hurt because he's 41 and playing behind a makeshift OL... And all we'll be hearing is how great JD is - he just got unlucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 10 minutes ago, FidelioJet said: Yup. And when Becton and Bakhtiari are both injured - and the Rookie isn't ready. Rodgers then gets hurt because he's 41 and playing behind a makeshift OL... And all we'll all be hearing how great JD - he just got unlucky. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 23 minutes ago, Adoni Beast said: Most likely what we're going to end up with. Becton at RT on the cheap and Bakhtiari at LT on the cheap + rookie OT. This would be great with Carter Warren T4 and Mitchell T5. Not really great, but as good as we can hope for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 36 minutes ago, varjet said: This would be great with Carter Warren T4 and Mitchell T5. Not really great, but as good as we can hope for. Given his lack of athleticism and lateral movement I think we should beef up Mitchell and keep 'ol boy at Guard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetsfaninNorthHollywood Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 2 hours ago, Jet_Engine1 said: Aiyuk right now: 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adoni Beast Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Absolutely cannot see us trading a 1st for him. I can see the Bills, Jaguars, or Ravens making a play here though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
varjet Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 7 minutes ago, Adoni Beast said: Absolutely cannot see us trading a 1st for him. I can see the Bills, Jaguars, or Ravens making a play here though. Those are the types of teams that trade for Aiyuk. They have a low 1st round pick. They can hope he agrees to a longer deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lith Posted February 19 Share Posted February 19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.