JiF Posted November 12, 2009 Share Posted November 12, 2009 The Patriots can win with a bunch of Wes Welker's, they've proven that before. Has everyone forgotten the Wide Receiving Core of THE CHAMPION 2001, 2003 and 2004 New England teams? They don't need Randy Moss to succeed. They need Randy Moss to have one of the top 3 offenses in the NFL, yes, but they don't need him to have a very good, 6-10 ranking offense, and they don't need him to win Championships. They have the same number of championships with Welker as they do with Moss. The Pats are a different team. They are no longer the defensive beasts they once were. They are a finese team now and win by outscoring the other team and being able to scheme just enough to stop the oppossing offense. If the Pats didnt choke in the SB and they went 19-0, we wouldnt even be having his agrument. Keep in mind, the Pats have lost 3 games in the Moss/Brady era. So in essence you are judging this off one season, their first, which they lost 1 game. Also, saying the Pats can win with a bunch of Welker's once again, proves my point. You can take a ton of players and get Welker like production. The only difference between him and their past WR's is they didnt play with Randy Moss, so they werent as available as Welker is these days. And the discussion of their winning is not even the conversation. The conversation is about who is more valuable to their team, and its clearly Randy Moss. To say its Welker is just ridiculous. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.