#27TheDominator Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 The Jets gave them problems. The Jets held the Pats to 17 pts in regulation. That would be their lowest of the season. They held them to their lowest yardage outing of the year too, including overtime. Yes, but they couldn't deal with the speed of Seattle's defense! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Russel Wilson has Braylon Edwards. I feel like the Sanchez Debate is essentially The Chewbacca Defense for his supporters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Has anyone mentioned that the Pats defense yields an average QBR against of 99.2? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GimmeShelter Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 May have been by design. Davis is fast. He is inexperienced, but I don't think they are afraid to have him cover a back. I also don't think they can afford to sit in one coverage. Mixing it up is what keeps the Pats guessing. When Davis was stuck on Welker is when I was pissed because Davis was obviously calling for help, but didn't get it and it seemed from his reaction that it wasn't intended in the scheme. They used Bell on the TEs a bunch and he and Landry did a fairly good job. I don't see how you take the team having to be perfect to win from this game. There were about 30 miscues made by different players without ANY one of which we would have won. Hill catches that easy pass? Done deal. They don't give up the kick return - overzealous Davis, McIntyre unable to close the gap, Folk sh*tting the bed and letting McCorty get outside? We win. Cromartie catches that INT in his hands? No PI. Greene doesn't fumble/Slauson doesn't get mauled? There were a ton of plays that cost them this game. Sanchez was a factor in plenty, but FAR from all of them. Spot on as usual. Won't sit well with the resident agenda guys but a very fair observation of how the game actually went down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizard King Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Steve Young said Sanchez is either overloaded with info which is doubtful in this offense, or he is immature and does not understand how to play QB. Sanchez sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Has anyone mentioned that the Pats defense yields an average QBR against of 99.2? YOU SHUT UP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Striving for mediocrity. The more Sanchez on par or better, the farther he can distance himself from the 4 weeks of bogies. It's like a 16 hole course. Sanchez birdied holes 1 and 6, bogied holes 2 through 4, and parred hole 7. Problem is, this was a hole where at best he saved par after an awful tee shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ignatius del Sol Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 And I'm hardly the ringleader. Glad we got that cleared up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Problem is, this was a hole where at best he saved par after an awful tee shot. Dude, that sh*t was Jean van de Velde played out on a football field. When all was said and done he put himself right in a position to win, then he rolled his pants up and headed into the ****ing water on the 18th hole on the last day. Kid is such a dope and you simply can't cure stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Dude, that sh*t was Jean van de Velde played out on a football field. When all was said and done he put himself right in a position to win, then he rolled his pants up and headed into the ****ing water on the 18th hole on the last day. Kid is such a dope and you simply can't cure stupid. Sanchez is a special kind of stupid. Hes a very immature 25 yr old so thats a bad combo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Steve Young said Sanchez is either overloaded with info which is doubtful in this offense, or he is immature and does not understand how to play QB. Sanchez sucks. strong townie vibe here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 YOU SHUT UP. I'm still blaming Chad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Pats tried thier best to fumble the game away, but Sanchex had the last laugh Look at who's luring the innocent into their dark lair...must resist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Has anyone mentioned that the Pats defense yields an average QBR against of 99.2? Yeah, Sanchez was below that at 90. He did, however, lead the Jets to more points (26) than the Seahawks (24) and Cardinals (20) did in their victories. Brady also turned the ball over in those games which didnt happen in Jets game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HessStation Posted October 22, 2012 Share Posted October 22, 2012 Yeah, Sanchez was below that at 90. He did, however, lead the Jets to more points (26) than the Seahawks (24) and Cardinals (20) did in their victories. Brady also turned the ball over in those games which didnt happen in Jets game. Don't forget 3 points where on the kickoff fumble....so 23. Kolb and a rookie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Don't forget 3 points where on the kickoff fumble....so 23. Kolb and a rookie. Dude, the rookie benefitted from 2 Brady INTs and Kolb from 1 Brady INT. Brady didnt throw a pick against the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RutgersJetFan Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Brady didnt throw a pick against the Jets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JFtoLong Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Dude, the rookie benefitted from 2 Brady INTs and Kolb from 1 Brady INT. Brady didnt throw a pick against the Jets. He tried a few times, but we don't catch on defense as well as the Pats and other teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Dude, the rookie benefitted from 2 Brady INTs and Kolb from 1 Brady INT. Brady didnt throw a pick against the Jets. lawl hey guess what. Neither wilson or kolb threw interceptions those games either guess they benefited from that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 lawl hey guess what. Neither wilson or kolb threw interceptions those games either guess they benefited from that EDIT: Correct on INTs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Wrong, Kolb threw an INT and led the offense to 6 less points than the Jets but still won. are you sure i was just on espn i coulda sworn it said no INT. and a rookie 3 touchdowns no interceptions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 are you sure i was just on espn i coulda sworn it said no INT. and a rookie 3 touchdowns no interceptions? Correct, misread and fixed my post after doublechecking. Wilson threw 3 TDs, but led them to 24 points, stil less than Sanchez did despite having bad field position the entire game until the last possession. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Correct, misread and fixed my post after doublechecking. Wilson threw 3 TDs, but led them to 24 points, stil less than Sanchez did despite having bad field position the entire game until the last possession. sanchez contributed to that bad field position lol. You can say brady didnt have an INT but throwing an INT hurts just as much if not more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 sanchez contributed to that bad field position lol. You can say brady didnt have an INT but throwing an INT hurts just as much if not more No, 9/17 on 3rd down defense and Kerley faircatching within the 5 killed them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 No, 9/17 on 3rd down defense and Kerley faircatching within the 5 killed them. ..... you say your not a sanchez lover but im gonna state you are lol. Its like this yes those were bad idk why kerley didnt let some those go. But that doesnt absolve sanchez of all blame with his woeful 3 and out drives Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 ..... you say your not a sanchez lover but im gonna state you are lol. Its like this yes those were bad idk why kerley didnt let some those go. But that doesnt absolve sanchez of all blame with his woeful 3 and out drives Call me whatever. Ive been called worse, LOL. But I like the outcast so thats why I defend him a bit. As to the 3 & outs, there was only 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knix Tix Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Sanchez probably played his best "offensive" game for the Jets. About 300 passing yards. Sounds good. Great b/c we were forced to throw it more, due to our injured running back corps. Blah, blah, blah... I never felt there was a QB conspiracy. I guess I still don't right now. But the fact remains...Sanchez scares the hell out of me. He's in the 4th year of his career and HE'S STILL MAKING ROOKIE QB101 MISTAKES!!! [Again] Sanchez probably played his best "offensive" game for the Jets to date. He was a beast and he was the goat in the same fukken game. That offends me. You can't have that from your QB in year 4-5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Call me whatever. Ive been called worse, LOL. But I like the outcast so thats why I defend him a bit. As to the 3 & outs, there was only 3. lol the misfits. But you know what i mean not just 3 and out but the complete inability to move the ball consistently. 4 and outs or whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 lol the misfits. But you know what i mean not just 3 and out but the complete inability to move the ball consistently. 4 and outs or whatever Yeah, Sanchez is a misfit toy, LOL. Jets had more plays and more yardage than the Pats. Sanchez sucks and he is a moron which has led to his turnovers, but he did move the offense enough to get a 3pt lead with 1:30 left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetsjetsjetss Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Yeah, Sanchez is a misfit toy, LOL. Jets had more plays and more yardage than the Pats. Sanchez sucks and he is a moron which has led to his turnovers, but he did move the offense enough to get a 3pt lead with 1:30 left. not bad. But he didnt lead us to a win with a 3 point deficit and all the time in the world. When it counts not only didnt score a touchdown for the win but he did the worst possible thing a turnover and we lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Yeah, Sanchez is a misfit toy, LOL. Jets had more plays and more yardage than the Pats. Sanchez sucks and he is a moron which has led to his turnovers, but he did move the offense enough to get a 3pt lead with 1:30 left. If you're going to bottom line it, he also fumbled the game away with a stupid decision to not just take the sack, he also threw a pick inside the 10, and he also put the ball into greenes shoulder and bought us a safety. You are sounding like a penningtologist Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T0mShane Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Correct, misread and fixed my post after doublechecking. Wilson threw 3 TDs, but led them to 24 points, stil less than Sanchez did despite having bad field position the entire game until the last possession. DISCOUNT DOUBLECHECK!!!!! RAH-JAHHHHHHHHHZZZZZ!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Call me whatever. Ive been called worse, LOL. But I like the outcast so thats why I defend him a bit. As to the 3 & outs, there was only 3. Wait a second, is that what it is? Too many people agree with the opinion of the Jets QB sucking this time around? Don't get me wrong, I still like him better than our old enemy, but let's be honest here, he's ran all out of excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 If you're going to bottom line it, he also fumbled the game away with a stupid decision to not just take the sack, he also threw a pick inside the 10, and he also put the ball into greenes shoulder and bought us a safety. You are sounding like a penningtologist Nah, Sanchez sucks, but even considering his stupidity he was still good enough to get a lead for Rex's D to blow in last 1:30. BTW, its not Penningtology because Chad would never have gotten the team the lead or brought them back from 10 points down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted October 23, 2012 Share Posted October 23, 2012 Wait a second, is that what it is? Too many people agree with the opinion of the Jets QB sucking this time around? Don't get me wrong, I still like him better than our old enemy, but let's be honest here, he's ran all out of excuses. Sanchez is a three legged dog getting kicked by everyone. So while he sucks I like to defend where he doesnt suck as much. Call it suck relativity. Bottom line, though, the Jets best bet is that Sanchez gets better the rest of the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.