green_blood Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 i see the division title as being realistic. what pickups have been great for the pats? look for the pats to STRUGGLE TO .500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 The pats will not struggle for .500 ... I hate them and wish they would lose all their games for the next 247 years. It just isn't realistic to expect them to have a losing record. The pats will be 9-7 next year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 I don't believe that any teams "took us lightly" or that we won't be able to "sneak up" on anybody. We weren't the most talented team this past year and we won't be the most talented team next year. The are three reasons we still won: 1. Lack of major injuries-we were pretty healthy all year. 2. Good coaching can keep other teams off balance-another reason why we try to get versatile players. You guys may not understand this possibility because it's been 5-6 years since we had a coach that understood the second hand on a clock. 3. Dumb luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 None really... MAYBE Payton... but its not so much how well he does it but how much the defense fears he might still have the ball and Harrison will get a lob for a td... I tihnk he's the best at it in the league. Peyton's looks kinda mechanical to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNJet Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 only 5 games.Jets 11-5 in 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 I tihnk he's the best at it in the league. Peyton's looks kinda mechanical to me. I agree that Pennington's look more natural, but since Peyton's actual hand-off looks just as mechanical it's equally effective. It's like a change-up or pick-off move in baseball. What is important is that the motion looks the same as on a fastball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gang_green03 Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 I agree that Pennington's look more natural, but since Peyton's actual hand-off looks just as mechanical it's equally effective. It's like a change-up or pick-off move in baseball. What is important is that the motion looks the same as on a fastball. Lol, you're right I forgot he looks like a robot when he actually does hand off anyway. I guess I have to put them about equal when you look at it that way. My personal preference would go to Pennington simply because, like you said, he looks more natural. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arsis Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 even if, it's the only thing chad does better than peyton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 One of the primary reasons why people believe we will take a step back next season (besides the QB controversy) is our schedule. I just don't buy it. Here are the teams we will play next season: NFC EAST (Giants, Redskins, Eagles, Cowboys): All 4 of these teams are a MESS. The only one I fear is Philly, if they have a healthy McNabb. We can go 3-1 against these clowns. AFC NORTH (Bengals, Ravens, Steelers, Browns): Steelers have a new coach. Browns still suck. The Bengals game depends on how many players they have in prison. Baltimore was impressive last season, but they are doing what they usually do in the offseason: spending money on FA's they dont need and letting go of the ones that do. I see us going 3-1 or 2-2 against the AFC North. other AFC opponents (Chiefs, Titans): I'll bet against a Herm-led team anyday. And as for the Titans, its very possible Vince Young has a Sophomore slump. But to be fair, let's give that one an L and say we go 1-1 here. AFC EAST (Pats, Bills, Phins): The Dolphins are a mess. The Bills are poorly coached. And we know we can play toe-to-toe with the Pats. I'll say we end up 4-2 in division play. Adding it all up, that puts us at 10-6 or 11-5. Feel free to disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetlag Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 The New York Jets will not lose a single game in 2007-2008. I'll bet your life on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 Adding it all up, that puts us at 10-6 or 11-5. Feel free to disagree. I would do just that - cept I have already been chastised in this thread for negativity by the Bhagwan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Troll Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 i see the division title as being realistic. what pickups have been great for the pats? look for the pats to STRUGGLE TO .500. Could you possibly be a bigger homer? The Pats have improved themselves DRASTICALLY, something our beloved Jets have NOT done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 One of the primary reasons why people believe we will take a step back next season (besides the QB controversy) is our schedule. I just don't buy it. Here are the teams we will play next season: NFC EAST (Giants, Redskins, Eagles, Cowboys): All 4 of these teams are a MESS. The only one I fear is Philly, if they have a healthy McNabb. We can go 3-1 against these clowns. AFC NORTH (Bengals, Ravens, Steelers, Browns): Steelers have a new coach. Browns still suck. The Bengals game depends on how many players they have in prison. Baltimore was impressive last season, but they are doing what they usually do in the offseason: spending money on FA's they dont need and letting go of the ones that do. I see us going 3-1 or 2-2 against the AFC North. other AFC opponents (Chiefs, Titans): I'll bet against a Herm-led team anyday. And as for the Titans, its very possible Vince Young has a Sophomore slump. But to be fair, let's give that one an L and say we go 1-1 here. AFC EAST (Pats, Bills, Phins): The Dolphins are a mess. The Bills are poorly coached. And we know we can play toe-to-toe with the Pats. I'll say we end up 4-2 in division play. Adding it all up, that puts us at 10-6 or 11-5. Feel free to disagree. Still too early to tell but here is something to think about. How many times have the Jets beaten the Steelers, Eagles and Redskins ? They are three teams that have absolutely owned the Jets anytime they have played them. Just a little something to think about after the draft when you and everyone else start forecasting the Jets 07 record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 Still too early to tell but here is something to think about. How many times have the Jets beaten the Steelers, Eagles and Redskins ? They are three teams that have absolutely owned the Jets anytime they have played them. Just a little something to think about after the draft when you and everyone else start forecasting the Jets 07 record. I just think its time to throw out history and focus on the present. We've never had a front office/coaching staff combination nearly as strong as we currently do. So why should we fear any team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj meadowlands Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 I agree with JF80. Where are the bells and sirens?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DHJF Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 The New York Jets will not lose a single game in 2007-2008. I'll bet your life on it. Ditto Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn306 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 I just think its time to throw out history and focus on the present. We've never had a front office/coaching staff combination nearly as strong as we currently do. So why should we fear any team? I hope you are right. I love the way this team is turning around. I don't know if they are the Parcells, BB level like they were in 98-99 but they are getting there. I think it is going to be very interesting to see who the draft and how Mangini handles the Chad situation if the Jets start off slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterNorth09 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 16-0? Probably won't happen. 11-5? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 I hope you are right. I love the way this team is turning around. I don't know if they are the Parcells, BB level like they were in 98-99 but they are getting there. I think it is going to be very interesting to see who the draft and how Mangini handles the Chad situation if the Jets start off slow. Mangini just seems to have that "it" factor. He's the PERFECT kind of coach who knows that he can piss off his players enough to get them to run through walls for him. Then, when the dust has cleared, they realize that going through Hell for their coach was all worth it in the end, because they end up with the W's. As for Tannenbaum, he's a financial genius and seems to work well with Mangini to get the RIGHT kind of players, not necesarilly the MOST TALENTED ones. As long as these 2 men stay together, we will win a championship sooner rather than later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joebabyny Posted March 26, 2007 Share Posted March 26, 2007 Thomas Jones is here. Mangini and Schott in year 2. Anthony Clement was resigned. These things all point to the perfect season if you ask me. In theory the Jets could lose. I just don't see how. SuperBowl or bust in 07, G!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gainzo Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Mangini just seems to have that "it" factor. He's the PERFECT kind of coach who knows that he can piss off his players enough to get them to run through walls for him. Then, when the dust has cleared, they realize that going through Hell for their coach was all worth it in the end, because they end up with the W's. As for Tannenbaum, he's a financial genius and seems to work well with Mangini to get the RIGHT kind of players, not necesarilly the MOST TALENTED ones. As long as these 2 men stay together, we will win a championship sooner rather than later. I agree. You blokes are in good hands with Mangini and Tannenbaum. The AFCE should be a lot of fun from here on out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PFSIKH Posted March 27, 2007 Share Posted March 27, 2007 Mangini just seems to have that "it" factor. He's the PERFECT kind of coach who knows that he can piss off his players enough to get them to run through walls for him. Then, when the dust has cleared, they realize that going through Hell for their coach was all worth it in the end, because they end up with the W's. As for Tannenbaum, he's a financial genius and seems to work well with Mangini to get the RIGHT kind of players, not necesarilly the MOST TALENTED ones. As long as these 2 men stay together, we will win a championship sooner rather than later. This year will be a good judge of Mangini's coaching ability. The NFL has a history of coaches who came tooke over after an inept coach and saw immediate results. The Jets had little expectations last year. This year is different. If Mangini can keep the team focused and continue to improve, you have a good coach. The Jets might improve, but will not see any improvement in the W/L record. Despite the dismissal of the schedule as being easy, there are alot more teams that can do damage than were on last year's schedule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GodWearsAGrayHoodie Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 So close, you got the right conf and division, just need to head a hundred miles or so northeast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
afosomf Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 So close, you got the right conf and division, just need to head a hundred miles or so northeast. OK TX, begone b4 i have a house drop down on your head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.