ZachEY Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 Are you reading this Vicious? I was just trying to be more general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 Are you reading this Vicious? Nah, yo. I'm the guardian angel. Don't vote for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 Nah, yo. I'm the guardian angel. Don't vote for me. Peter Petrelli > Guardian Angel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharrow Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 If I ever get a chance to make up a fake role reveal, I'm going with Indian Superman. Nobody better steal my idea either. 0_4C7TDyVfs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shutout Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 If I ever get a chance to make up a fake role reveal, I'm going with Indian Superman. Nobody better steal my idea either. 0_4C7TDyVfs Great job, now everyone's gonna know were a team. I know you didn't want any early reveals EY, but I seemingly don't have a choice now...I'm Mexican Batman Jcki43OxYm8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted March 29, 2009 Share Posted March 29, 2009 Peter Petrelli > Guardian Angel Hey don't hate on me taking you on a ride Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 +1 - I've actually been toying with a "bad guys are really the good guys" setup but couldn't figure it out (because I was too damn stupid to think "mafia", apparently) OK, 18 players - that means we should expect 4-5 mafia (I'd guess 4, including a godfather, to balance out the game). Oh, and I'm here (but I've got passover shopping/cooking to do this weekend, plus we're taking the kids to Ringling Bros. tomorrow, so don't expect to see me much until Monday, when (being at work) I'll be able to spend hours goofing off). Oh, and vote: Bleedin. He's won two straight games as scum without any pressure on him until end game. So, just in case I lose to him again, I'm putting this vote out so I can say "I told you so" later I knew those wins would catch up with me sooner or later. Although you've got nothing to worry about, as long as you ain't some sort of snitch, a win for me means a win for you. But I guess I can't expect to be able to get away as long as I did last game without a single vote until the second to last day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 I've played quite a few games, and I've never heard of that one either. All that having been said, I agree with your assessment of the game for the most part. I think it's fairly obvious we have a "Doctor" who is, in this game, known as a lawyer. We'd have to guess there is an 'investigator' of sorts. The number in this game itself makes things changing as we have a great deal of players to keep track of. Hopefully, after the first full cycle we can gather a stronger outline of what this game looks like. AND FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, AND ALL THAT IS HOLY, IF YOU ARE THE 'LAWYER' OR INVESTIGATOR, TRY TO AVOID REVEALING YOUR ROLES. What, you mean revealing when you're 6 votes away from being lynched isn't a good play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doggin94it Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 OK, less spam, more voting. Day 1 sucks, but we need to start developing info if we want any chance to win this game. So lets start pressuring someone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 OK, less spam, more voting. Day 1 sucks, but we need to start developing info if we want any chance to win this game. So lets start pressuring someone Vote: Doggin Strictly on the fact that I feel pressured to vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AVM Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: JiF, SMC, and JMJ I don't trust anyone with 3 letter ID's lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: JiF, SMC, and JMJ I don't trust anyone with 3 letter ID's lol Why I aughta... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Peter Petrelli > Guardian Angel It was a desperate attempt. I **** the bed on the coolest role ever. I suck and ih8u. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Things Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 It was a desperate attempt. I **** the bed on the coolest role ever. I suck and ih8u. So...what you're saying is that you both suck IJ and hate IJ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Crusher Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 vote: bleedin So he won't be here to kick my ass again later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norway'sWaddlingMarmaloof Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Has everyone checked in yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: Vicious, for not revealing his role yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Early inactives: The Crusher 2 Bleedin' Green 2 JMJ 2 Jets Things 2 It's very early, but yeah.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Add Dan X 1 I didn't even realize he was playing at first. As the currently least active he gets my... FOS: Dan X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Good morning friends and arch enemies. Seems like BG is out to an early lead in votes. I don't like voting for a guy just because he's good... but I understand the sentiment, at least on the 1st day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bleedin Green Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 vote: bleedin So he won't be here to kick my ass again later. Don't be hatin'. Although I must say, after two back-to-back wins you think you guys would want to keep an asset like me alive. There's no reason to be afraid. Trust me. In all seriousness though, my personal inclination is to be more wary of those guys too easily manipulated. Having been on the other side the past two games, I found one of the biggest assets for scum is townies who you can get on your side and take along for a ride. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMJ Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Don't be hatin'. Although I must say, after two back-to-back wins you think you guys would want to keep an asset like me alive. There's no reason to be afraid. Trust me. In all seriousness though, my personal inclination is to be more wary of those guys too easily manipulated. Having been on the other side the past two games, I found one of the biggest assets for scum is townies who you can get on your side and take along for a ride. We should lynch you for this alone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Don't be hatin'. Although I must say, after two back-to-back wins you think you guys would want to keep an asset like me alive. There's no reason to be afraid. Trust me. In all seriousness though, my personal inclination is to be more wary of those guys too easily manipulated. Having been on the other side the past two games, I found one of the biggest assets for scum is townies who you can get on your side and take along for a ride. Not-so-subtle claim of innocence, Bleedin' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: Vicious, for not revealing his role yet. FOS: Myself, because 1 person is talking ish and it's making me sensitive. Maybe I should vote for myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Don't be hatin'. Although I must say, after two back-to-back wins you think you guys would want to keep an asset like me alive. There's no reason to be afraid. Trust me. In all seriousness though, my personal inclination is to be more wary of those guys too easily manipulated. Having been on the other side the past two games, I found one of the biggest assets for scum is townies who you can get on your side and take along for a ride. So you think we should vote off JVOR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Well, I was thinking the game balance thing and the fact that a side killer makes the game more interesting. I'd watch out for two distinct MO's when bodies start showing up in the morning - a la game #1. And also this... Which could be general paranoia, or foreshadowing. Not sure how sold I am on you right now, slats. Your explanation here sounds a little weak to be honest. 1st off, there was no mention of a serial killer. And the idea that 'making the game more interesting' is a reason to assume there is something that's not a standard piece of the game, doesn't sound to great to me. Then, quoting CTM, well, that which you bolded, seems like the very people we're looking for... the 'Rats' or 'undercover cops'... There's still no mention in there of any rogue players. Seems like obvious backtracking. As it's your first game, I'm not ready to pressure you on this, but if there proves to be multiple deaths tonight, you may have some answering to do for what you "thought" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 So you think we should vote off JVOR? That's another interesting strategy. Fairly hurtful... but interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMC Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: Myself, because 1 person is talking ish and it's making me sensitive. Maybe I should vote for myself. Oh no, not mafia-cide again! Anyway, great new Jet pick of the kid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CTM Posted March 30, 2009 Author Share Posted March 30, 2009 Vote Count Bleedin' (2) Doggin, Crusher Doggin (1) JIF With 18 alive it takes 10 to whack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicious89x Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Oh no, not mafia-cide again! Anyway, great new Jet pick of the kid! Haha, thanks man. We got his 1 year old pics just done, I demanded he be wearing jets paraphernalia Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 Not sure how sold I am on you right now, slats. Your explanation here sounds a little weak to be honest. 1st off, there was no mention of a serial killer. And the idea that 'making the game more interesting' is a reason to assume there is something that's not a standard piece of the game, doesn't sound to great to me. Then, quoting CTM, well, that which you bolded, seems like the very people we're looking for... the 'Rats' or 'undercover cops'... There's still no mention in there of any rogue players. Seems like obvious backtracking. As it's your first game, I'm not ready to pressure you on this, but if there proves to be multiple deaths tonight, you may have some answering to do for what you "thought" I actually picked up on that as well. I was going to ask if he had played before because he was dissecting possibilities of roles and game set ups. My first game I was just lost and voting people that were playing strange. I dont think I tried to figure out the landscape of the game at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets Things Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 I actually picked up on that as well. I was going to ask if he had played before because he was dissecting possibilities of roles and game set ups. My first game I was just lost and voting people that were playing strange. I dont think I tried to figure out the landscape of the game at all. It's also possible that slats did a little mafia game structure research before the game started and, being his first game, wanted to show a little know-how. A bit suspicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shutout Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 FOS: Myself, because 1 person is talking ish and it's making me sensitive. Maybe I should vote for myself. Yeah but look at the silver lining. That 1 person may be making you sensitive enough that you feel the need to reveal or vote yourself, but at least you won't have to do so in the 3rd person Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Jet Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 LOL at the voting for BG. I'll always be very suspicious of him as I will with CTM, Doggin, EY etc. That being said I wont vote him for the sake of it. There's nothing to do here but grasp at straws and I HATE voting for people without something to really go by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZachEY Posted March 30, 2009 Share Posted March 30, 2009 LOL at the voting for BG. I'll always be very suspicious of him as I will with CTM, Doggin, EY etc. That being said I wont vote him for the sake of it. There's nothing to do here but grasp at straws and I HATE voting for people without something to really go by. I don't know if I should be honored, or upset to be on your list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.