KO91 Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Really don’t understand why this wasn’t considered more by the Jets. They could have declined Sam’s option and let him play out his rookie contract. 1) The Jets invest a TON in Darnold. 3 seasons, the #6 overall pick, and 3 early 2nd round picks. Wasn’t the opportunity to evaluate his play in a new system with better WR options worth more to the Jets than what they got for him? It’s not like they received franchise altering compensation for Sam Darnold. 2) A QB room of Darnold+Wilson is much better than Wilson + White. If Wilson wasn’t quite ready you had a very capable guy with upside of his own to hold the fort. 3) Could have had an open competition between two young QBs in camp. Iron sharpens iron. If Darnold beat out Wilson and held his job by playing well than it’s a good problem to have in the off-season. I understand it would have been an awkward spot for Sam to be in, but that’s part of the job description. Obviously it’s only 3 games, but we are watching Sam finally put it together for another team. Conversely Sam’s replacement is being thrown into the fire and is looking overwhelmed. 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Barry McCockinner Posted September 24, 2021 Popular Post Share Posted September 24, 2021 7 minutes ago, KO91 said: Really don’t understand why this wasn’t considered more by the Jets. They could have declined Sam’s option and let him play out his rookie contract. 1) The Jets invest a TON in Darnold. 3 seasons, the #6 overall pick, and 3 early 2nd round picks. Wasn’t the opportunity to evaluate his play in a new system with better WR options worth more to the Jets than what they got for him? It’s not like they received franchise altering compensation for Sam Darnold. 2) A QB room of Darnold+Wilson is much better than Wilson + White. If Wilson wasn’t quite ready you had a very capable guy with upside of his own to hold the fort. 3) Could have had an open competition between two young QBs in camp. Iron sharpens iron. If Darnold beat out Wilson and held his job by playing well than it’s a good problem to have in the off-season. I understand it would have been an awkward spot for Sam to be in, but that’s part of the job description. Obviously it’s only 3 games, but we are watching Sam finally put it together for another team. Conversely Sam’s replacement is being thrown into the fire and is looking overwhelmed. Didn't JD say they did consider it? If so, I don't understand what your question is. Is it actually the level of consideration you're questioning? If so, what metric are you using to measure and analyze this? If you're measuring in F's given, how many F's did JD give and how many F's did you expect him to give? What was the minimum F's given you'd accept? 5 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JustInFudge Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Who is Tyler Durden? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wit Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 They did consider it salerhry. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Butterfield Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Could have had Rhule and Darnold a few years ago or Brady and Darnold this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UntouchableCrew Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Frankly, drafting Wilson and keeping Sam makes the least sense to me out of the four potential options. Trading Sam, trading down from #2 for a haul and rolling with a veteran journeyman (Tyrod Taylor, Jacoby Brissett) while we build the team up so that an eventual QB is walking into a good situation makes far more sense. 1 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warfish Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 This very idea was hashed out at length at the time, and I believe JD said they (the actual Org.) did consider it. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
usapaw Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Is it possible JD was wrong? Time will tell. This should be a fun topic all year for most and painful for others. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheNuuFaaolaExperience Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Wit said: They did consider it salerhry. What does solla-ry mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bungaman Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 10 minutes ago, usapaw said: Is it possible JD was wrong? Time will tell. This should be a fun topic all year for most and painful for others. It's getting less and less fun and more and more painful, as the parameters are well known, and the possibilities past, present and future have been beaten to death. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 hour ago, Warfish said: This very idea was hashed out at length at the time, and I believe JD said they (the actual Org.) did consider it. Strap in, its not the last time someone is going to come up with this line of thinking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetspenguin Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Again huh?Sent from the NY Jets Training Camp Suicide Watch desk. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doitny Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 1 hour ago, KO91 said: Really don’t understand why this wasn’t considered more by the Jets. They could have declined Sam’s option and let him play out his rookie contract. 1) The Jets invest a TON in Darnold. 3 seasons, the #6 overall pick, and 3 early 2nd round picks. Wasn’t the opportunity to evaluate his play in a new system with better WR options worth more to the Jets than what they got for him? It’s not like they received franchise altering compensation for Sam Darnold. 2) A QB room of Darnold+Wilson is much better than Wilson + White. If Wilson wasn’t quite ready you had a very capable guy with upside of his own to hold the fort. 3) Could have had an open competition between two young QBs in camp. Iron sharpens iron. If Darnold beat out Wilson and held his job by playing well than it’s a good problem to have in the off-season. I understand it would have been an awkward spot for Sam to be in, but that’s part of the job description. Obviously it’s only 3 games, but we are watching Sam finally put it together for another team. Conversely Sam’s replacement is being thrown into the fire and is looking overwhelmed. they did consider it. JD said it would be unfair to Wilson and they didnt want a QB controversy. which we would be in if this scenario played out. Jax got rid of Minshew, Cin got rid of Daulton when they drafted Burrow. some coaches dont want someone breathing down there rookies neck. and basically if Sam played well we blew the 2OA pick. even if you trade Wilson at the end of the season your not getting back anywhere near what it was worth on draft day 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevinc855 Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 They almost did it till Carolina offered that 2nd. Personally, I would of been ok with it. No pressure on the kid, he learns, and you give Sam one last shot. My suspicion is JD is going to use that 2nd with a future 2nd and a mid round to move up to snag a late 1st rounder. That would be 3 picks in the 1st round. JD's 2022 team needs to be drastically better and he knows it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet_Engine1 Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnnyLV Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 My god the overreaction to 1 bad game is incredibly epic. Let's use his one bad game as the ONLY measuring stick for him and declare Zach a bust now. I think many Jets fans just WANT to be miserable. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jets723 Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 2 minutes ago, johnnysd said: My god the overreaction to 1 bad game is incredibly epic. Let's use his one bad game as the ONLY measuring stick for him and declare Zach a bust now. I think many Jets fans just WANT to be miserable. I agree I think it’s ridiculous fans are calling Wilson a bust after one bad game and only 2 career games. As for Sam I feel he needed to get away from NY and we needed to restart the rookie clock. It’s a situation where I want both sides to excel eventually 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
undertow Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Having both of them on the team at the same time would have been impossible and a example of why is how people react when the coaching staff benches a mediocre 2nd round WR. The other option would have been to keep Sam and trade down for a haul...that would have kept multiple options open at QB for the future. JD put all the eggs in the Zach Wilson basket so let's hope that works out better then most of the other moves he's made. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Welp Posted September 24, 2021 Share Posted September 24, 2021 Lol this is quite comedic since Jets fans would be screaming for Wilson to start after the 2nd preseason game. Most fans already moved on from Darnold and seeing him keep Wilson on the sidelines would have been ugly for the organization. If anything they should have brought in a veteran QB to take the lumps while they groomed Zach. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.