pointman Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 I've wanted us to try and acquire him since there was the tiniest of glimmer of hope. I don't care if he's a pot head. I don't care if he's a dinosaur. Sign this beast. Would've been better if a stud like Streveler was tossing him the ball, but I guess we can have Flacco throw a 120 mph fastball 8 feet over his head. Nice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dunnie Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 12 minutes ago, pointman said: I've wanted us to try and acquire him since there was the tiniest of glimmer of hope. I don't care if he's a pot head. I don't care if he's a dinosaur. Sign this beast. Would've been better if a stud like Streveler was tossing him the ball, but I guess we can have Flacco throw a 120 mph fastball 8 feet over his head. Nice. The problem with Gordon isn't the weed. He had 7 starts last year and he never got more than 11 yards in a game. With Mahomes throwing the ball. The last time he had a hundred yard game was with Brady in New England in 2018. He is 31 years old and I don't expect a resurgence. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointman Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 17 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: The problem with Gordon isn't the weed. He had 7 starts last year and he never got more than 11 yards in a game. With Mahomes throwing the ball. The last time he had a hundred yard game was with Brady in New England in 2018. He is 31 years old and I don't expect a resurgence. I don't care! I want!! Line him up outside. He can be the big man that Mims will never be. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jet Nut Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 6 hours ago, More Cowbell said: Anyone know what he is being paid? Couple of loose joints? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
defensedoesntgetyoulaid Posted August 30, 2022 Share Posted August 30, 2022 4 hours ago, neckdemon said: pot is not performance enhancing Gordon would certainly be proof of that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zerovoltz Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Gordon was a good citizen in KC...but he isn't what he was as a football player. No longer able to separate and compound that with the guy just drops too many balls.....negating his value as a big red zone type target. Maybe some team shallow at WR and wanting to try him out as something of a bottom of depth chart guy, might give him a shot, but he's done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LockeJET Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 1 year 420 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight Englewood Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 9 hours ago, More Cowbell said: Anyone know what he is being paid? He was getting paid in ounces of sour diesel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titan24 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Who cares he’s getting old and a non story…..a tale of such wasted talent. Many on this board filled with intellectuals may be in the same boat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 13 hours ago, #27TheDominator said: Right, but none of this has much relationship to the reasons why the penalties end up being higher for things like drug use or credit card delinquency than the kind of things that seem so horrible - like Watson. One has a very simple bar of proof. A failed drug test. An unpaid dredit card statement. The other involves testimony from people who may or may not give a damn about the outcome. If you're talking about changing the laws maybe the little guy doesn't have much chance, though I would argue they have done pretty well on that score. I was talking about the NFLPA which has the ability to negotiate these kinds of penalties and kept it on the back burner. but if you are getting eny penalties at all (nfl or in the courts) then i'll assume you've been found to be guilty since not-guilty comes with zero penalties. so that wouldn't really explain the issue here Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 Video gaming addiction derails more careers these days then weed “addiction.” Not my cup of tea but moderation in all things and they can rarely hurt you… Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 2 hours ago, neckdemon said: but if you are getting eny penalties at all (nfl or in the courts) then i'll assume you've been found to be guilty since not-guilty comes with zero penalties. so that wouldn't really explain the issue here I guess I should not bother, but it isn't that simple. I am not trying to change your mind or say that it is right, but... Labor law is not really "the courts." The burden of proof is generally more likely than not or 51%. For instance, Watson was not even indicted, let alone convicted, but he can still quite easily punished by his "employer." There is a lot of wiggle room between 51% and most people's perception of "reasonable doubt." Most of that will fit in under the factors that call for mitigation of the penalty. If we just determine guilt/innocence and then go to penalty independent of the facts you can get some of the most unfair penalties, but that is a whole nother discussion. For an employer an employee being unable to follow a simple, even if unfair, rule might be more important than actual criminal misconduct. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TuscanyTile2 Posted August 31, 2022 Author Share Posted August 31, 2022 12 hours ago, Titan24 said: Who cares he’s getting old and a non story…..a tale of such wasted talent. Many on this board filled with intellectuals may be in the same boat. @T0mShane 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 21 hours ago, JetPotato said: MARIJUANA JOKES Get off your high horse, sir. Your username is JetPotato. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 21 hours ago, jgb said: another manifestation of the disease Joe W a couple weeks ago: "Our QB is 100 % out with an ACL tear and the season is over." You, me and a bunch of others: "Meh. If he is done, let's see how the rest of the roster looks." **** 2 weeks later **** Joe W: "YOU'RE ALL DISEASED" 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jetsfan80 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 19 hours ago, Green DNA said: Douglas should be stoned to death if he brings him in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peebag Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 13 hours ago, Titan24 said: Who cares he’s getting old and a non story…..a tale of such wasted talent. Many on this board filled with intellectuals may be in the same boat. This. By a landslide. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neckdemon Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 5 hours ago, #27TheDominator said: I guess I should not bother, but it isn't that simple. I am not trying to change your mind or say that it is right, but... Labor law is not really "the courts." The burden of proof is generally more likely than not or 51%. For instance, Watson was not even indicted, let alone convicted, but he can still quite easily punished by his "employer." There is a lot of wiggle room between 51% and most people's perception of "reasonable doubt." Most of that will fit in under the factors that call for mitigation of the penalty. If we just determine guilt/innocence and then go to penalty independent of the facts you can get some of the most unfair penalties, but that is a whole nother discussion. For an employer an employee being unable to follow a simple, even if unfair, rule might be more important than actual criminal misconduct. No matter what the burden of proof is....if you are being penalized it's been met right (if not then wtf are we even using any standard for)? More likely than not or beyond a reasonable doubt. Whatever the standard being used it's been met if you are being penalized. As of now we are already getting unfair penalties. The offense that you ate guilty of should matter. Smoking weed having a more harsh penalty than a sequel assault is ridiculous and no amount of trying to rationalize it is going to change that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maynard13 Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 I bet they caught him smoking the turf during practice. ??♂️ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyduhamelshouse Posted August 31, 2022 Share Posted August 31, 2022 we don't need any more WRs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight Englewood Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 On 8/30/2022 at 7:16 PM, Zerovoltz said: Gordon was a good citizen in KC...but he isn't what he was as a football player. No longer able to separate and compound that with the guy just drops too many balls.....negating his value as a big red zone type target. Maybe some team shallow at WR and wanting to try him out as something of a bottom of depth chart guy, might give him a shot, but he's done. Gordon has been a good citizen everywhere. His crime is he likes to drink and smoke weed- both victimless crimes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dwight Englewood Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 14 hours ago, jgb said: Video gaming addiction derails more careers these days then weed “addiction.” Not my cup of tea but moderation in all things and they can rarely hurt you… I don’t necessarily agree but I did know a guy with a 160 IQ who was in college for 10 years and could never hold a job who had that addiction Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jgb Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 5 hours ago, Dwight Englewood said: I don’t necessarily agree but I did know a guy with a 160 IQ who was in college for 10 years and could never hold a job who had that addiction I also know a guy who couldn't couldn't hold a job because he was addicted to watching "Goodfellas" 8 times a day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Harper Posted September 1, 2022 Share Posted September 1, 2022 I feel bad for the guy. At his peak he was pretty damn good. Really managed to foul things up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.