Pac Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, UnitedWhofans said: It's not an accomplishment. But it's not bottom of the barrell either. Stop treating it like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#27TheDominator Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, RESNewYork said: Is Mac really chasing anyone or just doing due diligence. Every day it's Mac is chasing this player or that player. I'm sure all fans have noticed that all the news we are getting from the media is at best guessing. My guess would be let's see what these guys are about, and if the price is right, we move forward or we have the info in our back pocket in case we need them later. C'mon man. Don't be like me! One was enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said: It's not an accomplishment. But it's not bottom of the barrell either. Stop treating it like that. They just plain sucked. Not end of the world doomsday bottom of the barrel sucked. They were just bad. Comparing them to the Kotite Jets (which some people have) is ridiculous and out of line Not doomsday? They released a slew of vets are in rebuilding mode. What more proof do you need? They are starting over with young guys and have blown it up at almost every level yet you say its not bottom of the barrel time? Come on. Optimism is on thing but blindness is quite another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Just now, JetFaninMI said: Not doomsday? They released a slew of vets are in rebuilding mode. What more proof do you need? They are starting over with young guys and have blown it up at almost every level yet you say its not bottom of the barrel time? Come on. Optimism is on thing but blindness is quite another. Who brought absolutely nothing in value last year. Fitz sucked, Revis Sucked, Marshall was bad, Mangold was hurt. If you subtract 0 from something, you get no difference. And due to the Parcells theorem, If we were 5-11 last year and we lost no one of significance, right now before schedules and any other factors, we are the same value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack48 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Daniel should be chasing ht eJets. But he probab;ly is npto rea;;y interested in actually playing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Blocker Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 To be clear I don't know what will happen. But my understanding is that the Jets will be meeting with Cutler. It may be that giving other Qb's a look is in part to let Cutler know he's not their only option. Of course it would be different if the Jets said they were not interested in Cutler. But they have not said that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Mike Maccagnan at Florham Park Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetFaninMI Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 2 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said: Who brought absolutely nothing in value last year. Fitz sucked, Revis Sucked, Marshall was bad, Mangold was hurt. If you subtract 0 from something, you get no difference. And due to the Parcells theorem, If we were 5-11 last year and we lost no one of significance, right now before schedules and any other factors, we are the same value. LOL. Parcells theorem? I'm not even going to bother with that one because it will start a whole $hitstorm of Parcells lovers and their loyalty to that man. Have you seen the Jets schedule? I have. They are gonna have a hard time this year my friend, and with the players on this roster so far your theorem is going to be worth jack $hit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Just now, JetFaninMI said: LOL. Parcells theorem? I'm not even going to bother with that one because it will start a whole $hitstorm of Parcells lovers and their loyalty to that man. Have you seen the Jets schedule? I have. They are gonna have a hard time this year my friend, and with the players on this roster so far your theorem is going to be worth jack $hit. That's why I said before schedules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RESNewYork Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 26 minutes ago, #27TheDominator said: C'mon man. Don't be like me! One was enough! My bad, didnt see it. But yes you speak the truth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sourceworx Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 47 minutes ago, AFJF said: Exactly. Cutler likely wins enough games to put you out of the running for a top QB in the draft. If Daniel is good, you have you're QB. If not, you draft one next year. Exactly. Daniel can come in and compete for the job with Hack and Petty. If any of them emerges as the clear-cut starter, then the Jets have a QB to build around. If none of them do, the Jets will have a very high draft pick next year. Of all the veteran options, Daniel makes the most sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Integrity28 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Joe W. Namath said: How many guys has he chased this offseason? No one wants this job. That's right, nobody wants to be a QB. None of these guys, who spend their whole lives trying to be "that guy", want to come to NY and be "that guy" in a scenario where the job is there for the taking and the bar couldn't be set lower for success. Nobody wants to take advantage of that situation at all. 55 minutes ago, Tinstar said: What you posted makes absolutely no sense . If no one wanted this job, then why are so many interviewing for the Job. People want the job, but the Jets don't plan on being held up by a bunch of second rate bandits . The Job of QB is available at our price, take it or mosey . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nyjbuddy Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Tinstar said: What you posted makes absolutely no sense . If no one wanted this job, then why are so many interviewing for the Job. People want the job, but the Jets don't plan on being held up by a bunch of second rate bandits . The Job of QB is available at our price, take it or mosey . That price is just a lot lower than what these QBs are expecting. They are probably asking for starter money but these guys are just backup type players with the possibility of starting in the right circumstances. Plus these free agents are thinking they are the long term solution to the Jets QB problem, while the Jets are probably just looking for a mentor-type QB that could possibly start a few games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Woody Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, bigalbarracuda said: I'd rather have Chase Daniel (on a short contract) than Jay Cutler. I'd rather have salmonella than Jay Cutler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munchmemory Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Q: Why this guy? A: SOJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Woody Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 56 minutes ago, UnitedWhofans said: It's not an accomplishment. But it's not bottom of the barrell either. Stop treating it like that. They just plain sucked. Not end of the world doomsday bottom of the barrel sucked. They were just bad. Comparing them to the Kotite Jets (which some people have) is ridiculous and out of line It's worse than last place. You suck, but then you get rewarded with no chance to become relevant for another year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munchmemory Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Lil Woody said: It's worse than last place. You suck, but then you get rewarded with no chance to become relevant for another year. Rep for username and avatar. LMAO! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slats Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, joewilly12 said: Joe jets I actually agree with this if we arent drafting a QB at 6 then lets go get Oweiller stop wasting time on all the bottom feeder QB's available in free agency. So Osweiler would be your example of a non-bottom feeder, then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, bigalbarracuda said: I'd rather have Chase Daniel (on a short contract) than Jay Cutler. I would rather have a short Jay Cutler than have the Jets Chase Daniel. (Not really, but I just wanted to try and reverse engineer that sentence lol). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChuckkieB Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 I would much rather have Daniel on the cheap than Osweiler, Cutler, or any of the other veterans who would come with a bigger price tag, but more importantly, would also be automatically anointed the starter. At least with Daniel in the fold, Petty and Hackenberg will be able to legitimately complete for the starting job, which is what I would like to see happen (unless the Jets draft a QB which I doubt), seeing that 2017 is going to be a rough year in terms of wins. At lest the Jets can spend the year finding out once and for all if Petty and/or Hackenberg are legit NFL QB's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pcola Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, joewilly12 said: Easily could have been 3-13 we beat the Browns and 49ers in OT Don't leave out the Taylor-less Bills game, week 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
long suffering jets fan Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, Joe Jets fan said: This is even better then what I said about osweiler. Sign him cheap and let him battle with the kids. Loser gets cut, winner starts and other is back up. He could be a player, but many here will say he sucks cause he has not played a lot. Agreed. Tyrod didn't play either till he joined the Bills, after that he did a admirable job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnitedWhofans Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Pcola said: Don't leave out the Taylor-less Bills game, week 17. But on the other hand, a made XP and a ST tackle and we would have 7 wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbeachboy Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 i wonder who will take the cheapest contract, probably chase daniel, he has no leverage or much experience, cutler will probably ask for alot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighPitch Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 30 minutes ago, slats said: So Osweiler would be your example of a non-bottom feeder, then? He's young and still an unknown. He beat the crap out of the sb champs on mnf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 32 minutes ago, slats said: So Osweiler would be your example of a non-bottom feeder, then? Compared to McCown and Daniel yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxman Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 32 minutes ago, jbeachboy said: i wonder who will take the cheapest contract, probably chase daniel, he has no leverage or much experience, cutler will probably ask for alot. I think Daniel as well, he has the most to gain from this. Nobody else is going to give him a chance to start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, slats said: So Osweiler would be your example of a non-bottom feeder, then? You guys sh-t on Osweiler yet he's better than Hack, Daniels and Petty combined Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 Mac loves terrible quarterbacks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 42 minutes ago, HighPitch said: He's young and still an unknown. He beat the crap out of the sb champs on mnf He didn't "beat the crap out of them" but he did win the game I'm not a big Osweiler guy but he is absolutely better than any Qb we had last season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Woody Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, thadude said: You guys sh-t on Osweiler yet he's better than Hack, Daniels and Petty combined What would you have us do? Sign Cutler, Romo and McCown and go for it all? And my "it all" I of course mean 7 wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joewilly12 Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 minute ago, Lil Woody said: What would you have us do? Sign Cutler, Romo and McCown and go for it all? And my "it all" I of course mean 7 wins. With McCown or Daniel I don't see 3 wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, Lil Woody said: What would you have us do? Sign Cutler, Romo and McCown and go for it all? And my "it all" I of course mean 7 wins. This offseason is a hot mess. Mac and Bowles are both gone next January hopefully Trump can give Woody a bunch of tasks as ambassador and he gets overwhelmed and sells the Jets and we move on from this dark period Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thadude Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 5 minutes ago, joewilly12 said: With McCown or Daniel I don't see 3 wins. I don't think McCown has won 3 games the past 2 seasons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tinstar Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 1 hour ago, nyjbuddy said: That price is just a lot lower than what these QBs are expecting. They are probably asking for starter money but these guys are just backup type players with the possibility of starting in the right circumstances. Plus these free agents are thinking they are the long term solution to the Jets QB problem, while the Jets are probably just looking for a mentor-type QB that could possibly start a few games. If I tell you I'm interested in you as a backup mentor who might have the opportunity to start in a pinch, why would you then tell me you want to be paid 7-8 mil per or more ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.